Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

PELAYANAN PUBLIK BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DI KOTA PADANG Besse Fatmawanti; Naldi Gantika
UNES Law Review Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v2i2.109

Abstract

Research is important written in a journal is caused by several reasons: First , fulfillment of public services, especially for persons with disabilities, is an obligation and responsibility of the government in terms of fulfillment, both in the form of public services in the form of roads and sidewalks that are useful for the movement of persons with disabilities or for their mobility from one place to another, as well as supporting life supporters of disability. Article 2 of Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights states that the Republic of Indonesia recognizes and upholds human rights and basic human freedoms as rights which naturally inherit to and are inseparable from humans, which must be protected, respected and enforced for the sake of increasing human dignity . Then it is also regulated that the right to protect, respect and uphold human rights is the government and in full in Article 71 of Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights stated that "the Government is obliged and responsible to respect, protect, enforce and promote human rights regulated in this law, other laws and regulations, and international law on human rights received by the Republic of Indonesia. And it should not be forgotten also Article 72 which reads that the obligations and responsibilities of the government as referred to in Article 71 include effective implementation steps in the legal, political, economic, social, cultural, defense and security fields of the state and other fields. At least, there are 10 types of rights regulated in Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, a) the right to life, b) the right to family and continuing descent, c) the right to self-development, d) the right to justice, e) the right to personal freedom, f) the right to security, g) the right to welfare, h) the right to welfare, i) the right to participate in government, j) the right of women, k) the rights of the child.
PEMETAAN DAN ANALISA KONFLIK ANTARA MASYARAKAT DESA MENAMANG KIRI DAN PT SURYA HUTANI JAYA KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA KALIMANTAN TIMUR Naldi Gantika
UNES Law Review Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v2i4.134

Abstract

The urge for a peaceful and fair settlement of forestry conflicts also encourages business actors in the Indonesian forestry sector to develop conflict resolution mechanisms through dialogue and mediation processes through both mandatory (mandatory) and voluntary (voluntary) mechanisms. The commitment to apply the principle of FPIC (Free, Prior and Informed Consent) or free consent without coercion along its industrial supply chain (Supply Chain) has been declared by plantation companies under the banner of the APP (Asian Pulp and Paper) or Sinar Mas forestry (SMF) group and the APRIL group (Asia Pacific Resources International Limited). Not only that, the commitment to maintaining High Conservation Values ​​contained in the company's work area was also expressed by the two major groups of players in the plantation forest industry in Indonesia. This condition has created opportunities for improved access and relations between the conflicting parties. In East Kalimantan, Conflict Mapping and Analysis was carried out in Menamang Kiri Village, Muara Kaman District, Kutai Kertanegara Regency. In the spatial mapping analysis that was carried out, part of the village of Menamang Kiri was within the concession of PT Surya Hutani Jaya (PT SRH), a wood supplier to APP. Mapping and Conflict Analysis is focused on extracting information related to governance and land management by PT SRH and the people of Menamang Kiri Village, conflicts or potential conflicts that arise and the parties involved, the perceptions of each party related to differences in interests, and policy analysis.
Mekanisme Pembentukan Peraturan Nagari yang Baik (Studi di Nagari Gurun Panjang Kecamatan Bayang Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Sumatera Barat) Besse Patmawanti; Naldi Gantika
Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum Vol 12, No 2 (2020): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/legalitas.v12i2.208

Abstract

This research is descriptive analytic. The method uses in this research is the normative and juridical empiric method. This research is done in Nagari Gurun Panjang Disctrict of Bayang South Pesisir Regency West Sumatera. The techbique of collecting data is interview and document study. Then, the data analyzed qualitatively in descriptive analysis form. The results of research show that: (1) the nagari regulation formed by governance of nagari, consist of BAMUS nagari together walinagari. The existence of nagari regulation in the regulation admitted as one of legal law; (2) the governance of nagari Gurun Panjang has authority and manage his household itself, included in the forming of nagari regulation. The proposal of making nagari regulation can be from walinagari and then discussed between walinagari and BAMUS nagari. After approfing, the nagari regulation then brought by the head of BAMUS nagari to walinagari to be approved (and given to head of regency though head of district; (3) a nagari regulation constists of some parts arranged in a framework. The framework of a nagari regulation concits of six parts; title, introduction, content, closing, explanation (if needed), and attachment (if needed).  
PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI TERHADAP BARANG JAMINAN YANG TIDAK MEMILIKI AKTA FIDUSIA BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN NO. REG. 81/Pdt.G/2018.PN.Pdg Dora Tiara; Naldi Gantika
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 4 No 1 (2020): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (April 2020)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v4i1.140

Abstract

Financial institutions and banks provide financing for consumers, leasing, factoring. They generally use the procedure of the agreement which includes a fiduciary guarantee for fiduciary security objects. In practice, financial institutions provide movable goods requested by consumers. Consequently the debtor surrenders to the creditor in a fiduciary manner. Implementation of the executorial title by PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance is not through a court decision or fiduciary guarantee certificate, but only based on a power of attorney and agreement made by the collector . The sale of fiduciary collateral objects carried out by PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance does not go through public auctions but through separate sales; and Underhanded sales are not based on the agreement of both parties, the agreement is only based on PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance so that it harms the consumer. Actions taken by PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance does not provide legal certainty to both parties. The act of execution was carried out solely to safeguard assets regardless of legal certainty of the rights of consumers / debtors contained in fiduciary security objects in the form of car vehicles. Legal constraints of not registering the agreement are that execution cannot be carried out, based on Article 3 of the Minister of Finance Regulation No. 130 / PMK.010 / 2012 stating that finance companies are prohibited from withdrawing fiduciary objects in the form of motorized vehicles if the Fiduciary Registration Office has not issued a guarantee certificate fiduciary and hand it over to the finance company. With these provisions, PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance cannot execute if it does not register fiduciary collateral objects because without the registration of fiduciary collateral objects the fiduciary guarantee certificate cannot be issued.
PENGATURAN DAN DAMPAK TATA KELOLA TANAH ULAYAT MINANGKABAU DALAM RUANG HUKUM NEGERA PARADIGMA HUKUM KELUARGA Gantika, Naldi; Yulinda, Kiki
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Vol. 6 No. 2 Edisi 1 Januari 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v6i2.2105

Abstract

Abstrak: Peraturan-peraturan terkait perkawinan dan warisan juga seringkali menggerus hukum adat Minangkabau. Hukum adat Minangkabau memiliki aturan-aturan yang khas dalam hal perkawinan dan pembagian warisan yang berbeda dengan aturan-aturan modern yang diberlakukan oleh pemerintah. Hal ini menyebabkan terjadinya konflik antara hukum adat dan hukum positif dalam masyarakat Minangkabau. Meskipun demikian, upaya untuk melestarikan hukum adat Minangkabau tetap dilakukan oleh sebagian masyarakat. Mereka berusaha untuk tetap mempertahankan nilai-nilai dan aturan-aturan hukum adat Minangkabau agar tidak tergerus oleh peraturan-peraturan modern. Selain itu, beberapa langkah juga telah diambil untuk mengakomodasi hukum adat dalam sistem hukum nasional agar kedua sistem hukum dapat berdampingan secara harmonis. Dengan demikian, peraturan yang menggerus hukum adat Minangkabau merupakan isu yang kompleks dan memerlukan pendekatan yang bijaksana untuk menemukan titik temu antara hukum adat dan hukum positif. Pentingnya melestarikan warisan budaya dan kearifan lokal harus sejalan dengan upaya untuk membangun sistem hukum yang adil dan berkeadilan bagi seluruh masyarakat.Kata Kunci: Tanah UIayat, Minangkabau, Hukum Negara, Hukum Keluarga.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA WANPRESTASI JUAL BELI TANAH (Analisis Putusan Nomor 171/PDT/2022/PT PDG) Effendi, Devirianti; Gantika, Naldi
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 6, No 3 (2024): Vol. 6 No. 3 Edisi 3 April 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v6i3.2503

Abstract

Berdasarkan Pasal 1457 KUH Perdata menyebutkan bahwa jual beli adalah suatu perjanjian, dengan mana pihak yang satu mengikatkan dirinya untuk menyerahkan suatu kebendaan, dan pihak yang lain untuk membayar harga yang telah dijanjikan. Sesuai dengan kesepakatan yang dikehendaki dalam suatu perjanjian maka akan muncul hak dan kewajiban yang harus dipenuhi oleh pembeli maupun penjual. Akan tetapi dalam praktiknya kadang-kadang terjadi wanprestasi (ingkar janji) dimana salah satu pihak tidak mematuhi ataupun menjalankan apa yang menjadi kewajibannya. Salah satunya berupa kasus sengketa jual beli tanah yang diperiksa dan diadili pada tingkat banding oleh Pengadilan Tinggi Padang Nomor 171/PDT/2022/PT PDG. Sengketa terjadi antara Bakri Landra dan Arnaini sebagai penjual (Para Pembanding/Para Penggugat) dengan PT. PLN Persero unit Induk Pembangunan Sumatera Bagian Tengah sebagai pembeli (Terbanding/Tergugat) dan Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kota Padang (Turut Terbanding/Turut Tergugat) terkait pembayaran ganti rugi atas tanah yang akan diperuntukkan untuk pembangunan Gardu Induk 150  KV Bingkuang. Perumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini yaitu: Pertama, bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam penyelesaian perkara wanprestasi jual beli tanah Putusan Nomor 171/PDT/2022/PT PDG? Kedua, bagaimana akibat hukum dari putusan hakim terhadap penyelesaian perkara wanprestasi jual beli tanah Putusan Nomor 171/PDT/2022/PT PDG? Penelitian skripsi ini bersifat deskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini hanya menggunakan data sekunder yang bersumber dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan. Data yang diperoleh dari penelitian dianalisis secara kualitatif dan disajikan secara deskriptif kualitatif.Kata Kunci: Wanprestasi, Perjanjian.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP PUTUSAN PERKARA WANPRESTASI KONTRAK KERJA (Analisis Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.G/2022/PN Pdg) Effendi, Devirianti; Gantika, Naldi; Fitriyani, Cici
Ensiklopedia Education Review Vol 5, No 3 (2023): Volume 5 No 3 Desember 2023
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eer.v5i3.2049

Abstract

Pasal 1313 KUH Perdata, menyebutkan Perjanjian adalah hubungan hukum antara dua belah pihak atau lebih yang menimbulkan hak dan kewajiban. Pada Putusan Nomor : 41/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Pdg dalam melaksanakan kewajiban tersebut salah satu pihak tidak melaksanakan inti sebagaimana yang telah di sepakati di dalam perjanjian kontrak kerja yang telah di buat bersama, sehingga menimbulkan wanprestasi, dalam Putusan tersebut wanprestasi terjadi karena pihak tergugat tidak membayarkan sejumlah uang sebagai pembayaran atas pemenuhan prestasi yang telah dilakukan oleh Penggugat.Berdasarkan latar belakang diatas, maka permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini adalah : Pertama, Bagaimana pertimbangan Hakim dalam memutus Perkara Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Kontrak Kerja pada Putusan No.41/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Pdg.? Kedua, Apa saja akibat Hukum Putusan Perkara Wanprestasi Kontrak Kerja pada Putusan No.41/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Pdg.?Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan spesifikasi penelitian yang bersifat deskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan Yuridis normatif dengan melakukan penelitian hukum yang in concreto terhadap putusan Nomor : 41/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Pdg. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan/ studi dokumen. Data tersebut kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif dan disajikan dalam bentuk deskriptif kualitatif.Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat disimpulkan : Pertama, Pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan Nomor: 41/Pdt.g/2022/PN.Pdg  terhadap sengketa perjanjian kontrak kerja adalah  mencangkup pertimbangan yuridis, dan pertimbangan non yuridis, sehingga tepat sasaran dalam memberikan keringanan maupun pemberatan sesuai dengan apa yang dilakukan oleh tergugat di dalam suatu perkara, sehingga kesalahan yang diperbuat oleh tergugat dapat dipahami dengan baik oleh para tergugat tersebut. Kedua, Akibat hukum dari putusan nomor 41/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Pdg terhadap sengketa perjanjian kontrak kerja adalah Majelis menjatuhkan putusan tergugat I dan II untuk membayar ganti rugi materil dan denda keterlambatan pembayaran uang tagihan penggugat, sementara tergugat I di tugaskan untuk mengangarkan dana untuk Tergugat II dan tergugat III guna membayar sisa tagihan penggugat yang telah melaksanjkan pembagunan jalan. Serta menghukum para tergugat untuk sepenuhnya membayar ongkos biaya perkaraKata Kunci: Wanprestasi, Perjanjian, Kontrak Kerja
DISHARMONISASI PENGATURAN PENGELOLAAN PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI KEPENTINGAN PROYEK STRATEGIS NASIONAL Gantika, Naldi; Novianti, Novianti
Ensiklopedia Education Review Vol 5, No 3 (2023): Volume 5 No 3 Desember 2023
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eer.v5i3.2054

Abstract

Abstract: Civil law in Indonesia is basically based on Napoleonic Law and then based on Staatsblaad Number 23 of 1847 concerning Burgerlijk Wetboek for Indonesia (abbreviated as BW) or referred to as the Civil Code. BW is actually a legal regulation made by the Dutch East Indies government aimed at non-native citizen groups, namely Europeans and Chinese. However, based on article 2 of the transitional regulations of the 1945 Constitution, it is written "All State Bodies and Regulations that existed until the founding of the Republic of Indonesia on August 17 1945, as long as new ones have not been implemented according to the Constitution," are still in effect. And several provisions contained in the BW have currently been regulated separately or separately by various statutory regulations, for example relating to land, mortgage rights and fiduciaries.Keywords: Disharmonization, Management Arrangements, Land Acquisition. National Strategic.
PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI TERHADAP BARANG JAMINAN YANG TIDAK MEMILIKI AKTA FIDUSIA BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN NO. REG. 81/Pdt.G/2018.PN.Pdg Tiara, Dora; Gantika, Naldi
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 4 No 1 (2020): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (April 2020)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v4i1.140

Abstract

Financial institutions and banks provide financing for consumers, leasing, factoring. They generally use the procedure of the agreement which includes a fiduciary guarantee for fiduciary security objects. In practice, financial institutions provide movable goods requested by consumers. Consequently the debtor surrenders to the creditor in a fiduciary manner. Implementation of the executorial title by PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance is not through a court decision or fiduciary guarantee certificate, but only based on a power of attorney and agreement made by the collector . The sale of fiduciary collateral objects carried out by PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance does not go through public auctions but through separate sales; and Underhanded sales are not based on the agreement of both parties, the agreement is only based on PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance so that it harms the consumer. Actions taken by PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance does not provide legal certainty to both parties. The act of execution was carried out solely to safeguard assets regardless of legal certainty of the rights of consumers / debtors contained in fiduciary security objects in the form of car vehicles. Legal constraints of not registering the agreement are that execution cannot be carried out, based on Article 3 of the Minister of Finance Regulation No. 130 / PMK.010 / 2012 stating that finance companies are prohibited from withdrawing fiduciary objects in the form of motorized vehicles if the Fiduciary Registration Office has not issued a guarantee certificate fiduciary and hand it over to the finance company. With these provisions, PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance cannot execute if it does not register fiduciary collateral objects because without the registration of fiduciary collateral objects the fiduciary guarantee certificate cannot be issued.
Analysis of the Strength of Evidence of Witness a De-Charge Against the Judge's Decision Regarding the Release of the Defendant in a Tax Crime (Study of Decision Number 97/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Pdg) Musta, Arif Paria; Yulinda, Kiki; Gantika, Naldi
Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69989/y93z7b80

Abstract

This research examines the strategic significance of defense witnesses in impacting judicial rulings in cases of tax offenses, as illustrated in Decision Number 97/Pid Sus/2023/PN Pdg. A defense witness is a witness enlisted by the accused to undermine or challenge the allegations put forth by the prosecution to lessen or acquit the accused from legal liabilities. In this particular instance, the defense witness delivered pivotal testimony indicating that a third party had settled the tax in question unbeknownst to the defendant. Such testimony played a critical role in the judicial deliberations, convincing the judge to establish that the essential requirements of the charges were not fulfilled, resulting in the defendant's total clearance. This examination reveals that the testimonial influence of defense witnesses carries substantial weight in the adjudicatory process, particularly in intricate scenarios like tax offenses, where robust and credible evidence holds utmost importance. The ruling of the judge to clear the accused stemmed from the non-fulfillment of the requisites causing financial loss to the state, as stipulated in Article 191 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Hence, the findings of this research affirm the vital and strategic function of defense witnesses in shaping the ultimate resolution of a criminal lawsuit, especially within tax legislation necessitating thorough and impartial scrutiny of evidence.