Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.884
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kosmik Hukum Journal of Social And Economics Research Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnalku Rechtsnormen Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Honeste Vivere
Paltiada Saragi
Universitas Kristen Indonesia
Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Normative Conflict Between Fiduciary Priority Rights and the Confiscation of Money Laundering Assets Paltiada Saragi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): September
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v4i1.6422

Abstract

This article examines whether a registered fiduciary security right survives seizure and confiscation of collateral connected to money laundering. It uses normative juridical research with statutory, conceptual, and limited case approaches, supported by grammatical, systematic, teleological, and comparative interpretation. The analysis distinguishes existing statutory rights from proposals for reform. Law Number 42 of 1999 establishes registration-based priority and droit de suite, but these provisions do not expressly determine a secured creditor’s payment priority against criminal confiscation. Law Number 8 of 2010 provides asset-control powers and specific objection mechanisms, rather than a comprehensive procedure for adjudicating fiduciary claims. The article’s principal contribution is a proposed proportionality-based harmonization test that combines verification of the criminal connection, validity and chronology of the security, objective good faith, valuation of the protected claim, and procedural safeguards. Unlike approaches limited to replacement collateral or continued personal liability, the test addresses the secured interest within asset-recovery proceedings. It recommends notice, an adversarial hearing, reasoned valuation, and allocation of sale proceeds where the applicable law permits protection of the creditor’s interest. These recommendations do not establish an existing automatic creditor-first payment rule. The analysis focuses on registered collateral alleged to constitute criminal proceeds or instrumentalities. Further legislative and procedural development is necessary to make the proposed model consistently enforceable.
Co-Authors Adi Suranta Ginting Adrianus Herman Henok Andrew Betlehn Ani Wijayati Annis A. Rahma Diary Demario Faryanti Tjandra FX Wisnu Ardianto Gilbert Marcelino Hasudungan Gultom Harsono Yaputra Hulman Panjaitan Ied Veda Sitepu Indrawan Yoswanda Saputra Inri Januar Koesmoeryantati Mompang Lycurgus Panggabean Nauvall Ramos Novalia Andriati Br Hombing Lbt Oktar Hasudungan Poltak Siringoringo Robbin Mathesta Robertus Mujiyono Sabbit Syifa Adhima Sebastianus Maryono Winston Lord Situngkir Yulius Amos Yuni Eliani