Pratama Herry Herlambang
Universitas Negeri Semarang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Revitalizing Indonesia's Religious Courts System: The Modernization Impacts and Potentials of E-Court Dian Latifiani; Nur Arif Nugraha; Anis Widyawati; Akhmad Khalimy; Muhammad Iqbal Baiquni; Asmarani Ramli; Pratama Herry Herlambang
Jurnal Hukum Vol 40, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v40i1.32279

Abstract

The electronic court (E-Court) system implemented in this study utilizes online technology to facilitate the legal process. This system is based on the principles of fast, simple, and low-cost, and it is designed to address the challenges of traditional court procedures. The objective of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of E-Court implementation in the Kendal and Semarang Religious Courts in accordance with the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2019, No. 3 of 2022 and No. 7 of 2022 as well as the Directorate General of Religious Courts Agency No 5374/DJA/HM.01/X/2019, in achieving the principles of fast, simple, and low-cost. This study employs a juridical-empirical approach, using data gathered through interviews, observations, and literature review. The findings indicate that the online justice system, implemented with the aim of expediting the legal process, has been well received by the community, and has proven to be highly efficient in the Kendal and Semarang Religious Courts. Overall, this research highlights the importance of E-Court implementation in delivering fast, simple, and low-cost for the community, while acknowledging the need for continued efforts to enhance the system's accessibility and inclusivity.
The Executorial Role of the Administrative Court in Controlling Abuse and Restoring Trust Pratama Herry Herlambang; Suci Ramadhani; Felisha Chandra
Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): July-December, 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lsr.v5i2.30657

Abstract

This article examines the role of the Administrative Court (PTUN) in judicial control over abuse of power (abusus potestatis) by administrative officials and its contribution to restoring public trust. Guided by Montesquieu's separation of powers and A.V. Dicey's rule of law, PTUN acts as a mechanism to correct administrative excesses. However, abuse of power remains prevalent in Indonesia. The PTUN's execution mechanism, including dwangsom (coercive fines), is vital in enforcing rulings. Despite the legal framework under Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 PTUN faces challenges in enforcement due to resistance from officials and inadequate measures. This article explores how PTUN can improve its role by strengthening its execution mechanisms and institutional support. Using normative legal research, the study analyzes relevant laws and jurisprudence to evaluate the effectiveness of PTUN’s execution process and propose reforms to enhance its ability to protect citizens' rights and restore public trust.