Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.909
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mimbar Keadilan Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Jurnal Kebijakan Pemerintahan Jurnal Independent Jurnal Penyuuhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JPPM) Islamic Studies Review SIYAR (Social Issues by Academic Researhers) Journal The Sunan Ampel Review of Political and Social Sciences Journal of Law and Legal Reform
Wibisono, Rizky Bangun
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Is ‘Priority’ Just? Rethinking Constitutional Fairness in Indonesia’s Mining Law Rohman, Abd.; Wibisono, Rizky Bangun
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v18i2.13150

Abstract

The governance of natural resources in Indonesia, especially the mining sector, remains a contested legal domain involving intersecting economic, political, and constitutional interests. Article 6 paragraph (1) letter j of Law No. 3/020 grants the central government the authority to designate WIUPK “on a priority basis,” raising constitutional questions about its alignment with Article 33 paragraph (3) of the UUD NRI 1945. Critics argue that the vague term “priority” invites discretionary abuse, perpetuates structural inequalities, and potentially legitimizes monopolistic practices in the name of development. This study aims to critically examine the constitutionality and practical implications of the said provision using a normative legal research approach. The method involves statutory analysis, jurisprudential review, and interpretative evaluation of relevant constitutional principles, including distributive justice and economic democracy. The findings suggest that while the provision may be justified as an affirmative policy instrument to promote equitable access to natural resources, its current formulation lacks clear legal criteria, thereby opening space for misuse. The Constitutional Court's Decision No. 77/PUU-XXII/2024 affirms that any prioritization must be grounded in transparent, accountable mechanisms and should reflect the principle of social justice. This decision also signals the importance of inclusive governance, public participation, and state responsibility in preventing legal inequality. Without substantial regulatory reform, the application of “priority” risks contradicting the very essence of constitutional fairness.
Co-Authors Ali Sahab Aribowo Aribowo Asfar, Mohammad Ayunina, Aldisa Qurrota Azis, Mokhamad Abdul Fikri, Sultoni Firdauz, Dimas Lazuardy Hasanah, Mauidhotul Mawardi, Rafi Aufa Mohamad, Nabila Ridwan Nurhaliza, Naswa Annyce Rohman, Abd. Roikan SITI AMINAH