Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Assessing the welfare impact of Yogyakarta’s privilege fund on street vendors affected by the Sultan’s urban order policy Suswanta Suswanta; Anang Setiawan; Rossi Maunofa Widayat; Indragus Pangestu; Yujitia Ahdarrijal
Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jc.v23i2.89207

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the Special Fund (Danais) in improving community welfare through a case study of street vendor (PKL) relocation in the Malioboro Terrace area and the Abu Bakar Ali Special Parking Area (TKP), Yogyakarta. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), participatory observation, and policy document analysis, involving stakeholders including street vendors, parking attendants, and local government representatives. The findings reveal that the Danais-financed relocation policy has not delivered meaningful benefits to the affected communities. Key findings include declining revenues, limited participation in planning, and dissatisfaction with new locations and facilities. Although perceptions of social security improved, selling comfort and business sustainability remain significant concerns. These findings suggest that a technocratic approach insufficiently grounded in community needs and participation risks generating new forms of inequality. Accordingly, the deployment of Danais must be reoriented towards a more inclusive and equitable strategy focused on long-term socio-economic outcomes.
DIGITAL ELECTORAL RECAPITULATION SYSTEMS AND GOVERNANCE MODELS: COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE Timbul Dompak; Yujitia Ahdarrijal; Iranda Firiansyah
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i2.133538

Abstract

This study compares the management of election recapitulation information systems in Indonesia with those implemented in the Philippines, Brazil, Estonia, and Kyrgyzstan to examine differences in governance, system design, security mechanisms, digital infrastructure, transparency, and public trust. Although these countries have adopted various election technologies, ranging from optical scanning and Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) to Internet voting (i-voting) and optical tabulation, comprehensive comparative studies that position Indonesia within this international context remain limited. This study employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Data were collected from the Scopus database and supported by credible reports, while CiteSpace was used to map research trends and identify knowledge gaps. The findings reveal significant differences in the maturity of election recapitulation systems. Estonia and Brazil have achieved advanced digital election management through integrated digital governance, secure verification mechanisms, and high public trust. The Philippines applies a hybrid model combining paper ballots with automated vote counting, whereas Kyrgyzstan continues to rely largely on manual procedures. Indonesia's Sirekap represents an intermediate stage of digital transformation but continues to face challenges related to security, OCR accuracy, infrastructure readiness, and public trust. The theoretical contribution of this study is the development of a Comparative Governance Framework for Election Recapitulation Information Systems, demonstrating that system maturity is determined not only by technological adoption but also by the interaction among governance, security, digital infrastructure, transparency, and public trust. This framework provides a foundation for evaluating and improving election recapitulation systems in emerging digital democracies.
SMART TOURISM GOVERNANCE: A SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GOVERNMENT ROLES Iranda Firiansyah; Agung Wicaksono; Yujitia Ahdarrijal; Timbul Dompak
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i2.133551

Abstract

Smart tourism governance has become increasingly important as digital technologies reshape tourism management, public services, and destination development. However, existing studies have predominantly emphasized technological innovation, destination competitiveness, and tourist experiences, while the evolving administrative roles of government remain fragmented. This study aims to examine the intellectual development of smart tourism governance and map the evolving roles of government through a scientometric analysis. Data were retrieved from the Scopus database for the period 2015–2025 and analyzed using CiteSpace through co-citation, keyword co-occurrence, clustering, burst detection, and timeline visualization. A total of 132 publications were included in the final dataset. The findings identify five interconnected government roles: Regulator, Digital Infrastructure Provider, Network Coordinator, Data Steward, and Innovation Enabler. These roles operate through governance mechanisms involving policy integration, stakeholder collaboration, data governance, digital innovation, and institutional coordination. Based on these findings, the study proposes a Government-Centered Smart Tourism Governance Framework that conceptualizes government as a multidimensional governance actor rather than merely a regulator or stakeholder. The framework integrates insights from Collaborative Governance, Network Governance, Digital Governance, and Meta-Governance and demonstrates how government functions are connected to governance mechanisms and smart tourism outcomes. The study contributes to public administration by providing a conceptualization of how governmental authority and administrative functions are reorganized within technology-driven tourism governance.