Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analisis Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Bidang Konstruksi dalam Pembangunan Gedung NTT Fair: (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 42/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN.Kpg) Filmon Lopo; Karolus Kopong Medan; Rudepel Petrus Leo
JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jass.v7i1.2210

Abstract

Procurement of Government Goods / Services is a government spending mechanism that plays an important role in the utilization of state budget. Construction services are sectors that play an important role in Indonesia's development. Through this sector, the physical progress of development can be seen directly. In practice in general the implementation of procurement of goods / services Government construction often occurs problems, among other things, violations of both the Procurement Procurement procedure and the infringement that are detrimental to the State or the criminal act of corruption perpetrated by the organization of procurement of goods / services Construction. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal arrangements for the procurement of goods / services of construction after Perpres No. 4 Tahun 2015 and To know how the implementation of the application of criminal law of corruption in the field of goods / construction services on the decision No. 42/Pid.sus-TPK/2019/PN.KPG. This research is a normative research using primary data and secondary data. The data were collected through interview method and literature study which then analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. Based on the results of research has been done, the authors concluded that (1) has been arranged various legal instruments related to the implementation of procurement of goods / government construction services starting from the Act up to the Presidential Decree as a technical arrangement; and (2) the application of criminal law of corruption to the decision No. 42Pid.sus TPK/2019/PN.KPG has been in accordance with the provisions the provisions of the Act constitution. 20 year 2001 jo constutition No 31 Tahun 1999 about Eradiction Criminal Act of Corruption.
Faktor Penyebab dan Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Daerah Nusa Tenggara Timur Nadya Novia Lado; Karolus Kopong Medan; Rudepel Petrus Leo
JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jass.v7i1.2211

Abstract

This study discusses in depth the factors that cause and efforts to overcome the crime of trafficking in persons (TPPO) in the jurisdiction of the East Nusa Tenggara Police (NTT), which is known to have the highest number of trafficking cases in Indonesia. Using a juridical-empirical approach through interviews with nine resource persons consisting of law enforcement officials, women and child protection institutions, and the community, this study shows that although the substance of the law is quite adequate, its implementation is still weak and has not been able to cause a deterrent effect for perpetrators. Limited human resources, supporting facilities, and weak coordination between institutions are the main obstacles in the law enforcement process. Countermeasures are carried out through three main aspects, namely preemptive (counseling, socialization, and community economic empowerment), preventive (port supervision, formation of a monitoring team for illegal job vacancies, and cross-sector cooperation), and repressive (investigation, arrest, and legal process against perpetrators). This research also emphasizes the importance of increasing the capacity of the apparatus, synergy between agencies, and public education as sustainable steps in reducing the number of trafficking and protecting victims as a whole.
Sebab Atau Alasan Hakim Tidak Menjatuhkan Hukuman Maksimal Serta Hambatan yang Dihadapi dalam Penanganan Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana di Jalur 40 Kupang Kota Melani Yosefine Akunut; Rudepel Petrus Leo; Deddy R
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): November : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v1i4.711

Abstract

Premeditated murder is the crime of taking the life of another human being, or killing after planning the time or method, with the aim of ensuring the success of the killing or to avoid capture. Premeditated murder in general law is the most serious type of murder, and the perpetrator may be sentenced to death or life imprisonment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the causes or reasons why the judge did not impose the maximum sentence and the obstacles faced in handling cases of premeditated murder in the Kupang City line This research is an empirical legal research, conducted at the Kupang District Court, Data collection techniques use observation techniques, interviews, and literature/document studies. The results of data management were analyzed descriptively qualitatively using the inductive method. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be seen: (1) The reason or reason the judge did not give the maximum sentence to the perpetrators of murder on Line 40 Kupang City there are two reasons, namely, the Judge considers the aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the perpetrators. (2) The obstacles faced in handling premeditated murder cases are external and internal factors.