Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analisis Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Bidang Konstruksi dalam Pembangunan Gedung NTT Fair: (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 42/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN.Kpg) Filmon Lopo; Karolus Kopong Medan; Rudepel Petrus Leo
JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jass.v7i1.2210

Abstract

Procurement of Government Goods / Services is a government spending mechanism that plays an important role in the utilization of state budget. Construction services are sectors that play an important role in Indonesia's development. Through this sector, the physical progress of development can be seen directly. In practice in general the implementation of procurement of goods / services Government construction often occurs problems, among other things, violations of both the Procurement Procurement procedure and the infringement that are detrimental to the State or the criminal act of corruption perpetrated by the organization of procurement of goods / services Construction. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal arrangements for the procurement of goods / services of construction after Perpres No. 4 Tahun 2015 and To know how the implementation of the application of criminal law of corruption in the field of goods / construction services on the decision No. 42/Pid.sus-TPK/2019/PN.KPG. This research is a normative research using primary data and secondary data. The data were collected through interview method and literature study which then analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. Based on the results of research has been done, the authors concluded that (1) has been arranged various legal instruments related to the implementation of procurement of goods / government construction services starting from the Act up to the Presidential Decree as a technical arrangement; and (2) the application of criminal law of corruption to the decision No. 42Pid.sus TPK/2019/PN.KPG has been in accordance with the provisions the provisions of the Act constitution. 20 year 2001 jo constutition No 31 Tahun 1999 about Eradiction Criminal Act of Corruption.
Faktor Penyebab dan Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Daerah Nusa Tenggara Timur Nadya Novia Lado; Karolus Kopong Medan; Rudepel Petrus Leo
JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jass.v7i1.2211

Abstract

This study discusses in depth the factors that cause and efforts to overcome the crime of trafficking in persons (TPPO) in the jurisdiction of the East Nusa Tenggara Police (NTT), which is known to have the highest number of trafficking cases in Indonesia. Using a juridical-empirical approach through interviews with nine resource persons consisting of law enforcement officials, women and child protection institutions, and the community, this study shows that although the substance of the law is quite adequate, its implementation is still weak and has not been able to cause a deterrent effect for perpetrators. Limited human resources, supporting facilities, and weak coordination between institutions are the main obstacles in the law enforcement process. Countermeasures are carried out through three main aspects, namely preemptive (counseling, socialization, and community economic empowerment), preventive (port supervision, formation of a monitoring team for illegal job vacancies, and cross-sector cooperation), and repressive (investigation, arrest, and legal process against perpetrators). This research also emphasizes the importance of increasing the capacity of the apparatus, synergy between agencies, and public education as sustainable steps in reducing the number of trafficking and protecting victims as a whole.
Sebab Atau Alasan Hakim Tidak Menjatuhkan Hukuman Maksimal Serta Hambatan yang Dihadapi dalam Penanganan Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana di Jalur 40 Kupang Kota Melani Yosefine Akunut; Rudepel Petrus Leo; Deddy R
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): November : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v1i4.711

Abstract

Premeditated murder is the crime of taking the life of another human being, or killing after planning the time or method, with the aim of ensuring the success of the killing or to avoid capture. Premeditated murder in general law is the most serious type of murder, and the perpetrator may be sentenced to death or life imprisonment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the causes or reasons why the judge did not impose the maximum sentence and the obstacles faced in handling cases of premeditated murder in the Kupang City line This research is an empirical legal research, conducted at the Kupang District Court, Data collection techniques use observation techniques, interviews, and literature/document studies. The results of data management were analyzed descriptively qualitatively using the inductive method. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be seen: (1) The reason or reason the judge did not give the maximum sentence to the perpetrators of murder on Line 40 Kupang City there are two reasons, namely, the Judge considers the aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the perpetrators. (2) The obstacles faced in handling premeditated murder cases are external and internal factors.
Tinjauan Kriminologis Terhadap Kejahatan Penipuan Dalam Proses Seleksi TNI-AD Dengan Modus Kenalan Panitia Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Kupang : Studi Kasus dalam Putusan Nomor: 131/Pid.B/2022/PN Kpg David, David Timothy Ryopitz Ndaong; Rudepel Petrus Leo; Orpa Ganefo Manuain
ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 6: Mei 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jim.v5i6.17008

Abstract

This study aims to determine the factors that cause fraud in the Indonesian Army (TNI-AD) selection process, using the acquaint committee modus operandi, and to address these issues based on Decision Number 131/Pid.B/2022/PN Kpg from a criminological perspective. This study uses an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach, through literature review, analysis of court decisions, and interviews with relevant parties. The research results show that the fraud crime is influenced by two main factors: internal and external factors. Internal factors include the perpetrator's economic condition, which encourages deviant behavior. Meanwhile, external factors include the victim's needs, the social relationship between the perpetrator and the victim, and the opportunity exploited by the perpetrator. Furthermore, based on analysis using the fraud triangle theory, it was found that the elements of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization collectively drive the perpetrator to commit fraud. Efforts to combat fraud are carried out through two approaches: preventive and repressive. Preventive efforts involve legal education, raising public awareness, and monitoring practices that have the potential to lead to crime. Repressive efforts involve enforcing the law against perpetrators in accordance with applicable regulations to provide a deterrent effect and maintain public order. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the fraud in this case was not only caused by the perpetrator's intentions, but also influenced by economic conditions, social relationships, and available opportunities. Therefore, synergy between law enforcement and the community is needed in efforts to prevent and address fraud
Tinjauan Kriminologis Terhadap Kasus Pencurian Yang Dilakukan Oleh Residivis Di Kota Kupang Aurelio, Aurelio Junior Wolo; Rudepel Petrus Leo; Rosalind Angel Fanggi
ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 6: Mei 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jim.v5i6.17097

Abstract

This study is motivated by the increasing number of theft cases committed by recidivists in Kupang City, indicating that law enforcement and correctional efforts have not been fully effective in preventing the recurrence of criminal acts. Recidivism in theft cases is an important issue as it is related to both individual and social environmental factors influencing the offenders’ behavior. Therefore, this study aims to identify the factors causing theft by recidivists and to analyze the effectiveness of the law and sanctions applied in preventing such crimes in Kupang City. This research employs an empirical legal research method with a qualitative approach. Data were collected through direct interviews with recidivist offenders, correctional officers, and police officers, and supported by literature study. The collected data were analyzed using a descriptive qualitative method to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the research problems. The results show that the factors causing theft by recidivists consist of internal and external factors. Internal factors include psychological conditions such as mental pressure, frustration, low self-control, and established criminal habits. Meanwhile, external factors include unfavorable social environments, peer influence, economic pressure, and lack of family support. In addition, the effectiveness of the law and sanctions is considered not yet optimal, due to weaknesses in inmate rehabilitation, limited coordination among law enforcement institutions, and social stigma against former prisoners that hinders social reintegration. The conclusion of this study is that theft committed by recidivists in Kupang City is influenced by a combination of internal and external factors, as well as the ineffectiveness of law enforcement and sanctions in preventing repeated crimes. Therefore, more comprehensive efforts are needed, including improving the quality of rehabilitation in correctional institutions, strengthening inter-agency coordination, and increasing social support from the community to prevent recidivism