Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.89
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pembaharuan Hukum Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Verstek Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Rechtsvinding
Arsyad Aldyan
Faculty Of Law, Sebelas Maret University
Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 20 Documents
Search

 1   2 
KEDUDUKAN VISUM ET REPERTUM DALAM PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM TERHADAP PERKARA PENGANIAYAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN Aulia Nur Ainun; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 11, No 2 (2023): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71509

Abstract

The purpose of this legal research is to determine the position of visum et repertum in the judge's legal considerations of persecution that caused death with the case study of Decision number 410/Pid.B/2020/PN.CKR. This legal research is included in the type of normative legal research which is prescriptive with a case approach and statutory approach. The data collection technique used by the authors in this legal research is a library research. The results of the reseacrh showed that the letter evidence is in the form of visum et repertum in the case with decision Nnmber 410/Pid.B/2020/PN CKR has an important role in assisting the Panel of Judges in their considerations for imposing a sentence on the crime ofpersecution that causing someone’s death which based on Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, visum et repertum is required in strengthening other evidences that have existed. The position of the visum et repertum in the perspective of evidentiary law as a judge's legal considerations, it is an authentic deed that becomes valid evidence in accordance with the provisions of evidence set forth in Article 187 jo. Article 184 paragraph (1) letter c which plays a role in creating a material truth.Keywords: Visum et Repertum; Judge’s Legal Consideration; Persecution that Caused Death
ANALISIS PENGGUNAAN DAKWAAN ALTERNATIF SUBSIDAIR OLEH PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PERKARA PERLINDUNGAN ANAK afina akmalia; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73335

Abstract

This study aims to determine the suitability of the use of alternative subsidiary forms of indictment by public prosecutors in proving child protection cases with the provisions of the KUHAP based on decision Number 13/Pid.Sus.Anak/2020/PN.Kln. This research is included in normative legal research with a case study. Techniques for collecting primary and secondary legal materials are obtained from document studies or literature. Based on this research, it was found that the use of an alternative subsidiary form of indictment by the public prosecutor in proving child protection cases in Decision Number 13/Pid.Sus.Anak/2020/PN.Kln is by the KUHAP. The Public Prosecutor in preparing the indictment has complied with the provisions stipulated in the Attorney General’s Circular Letter Number SE004/J.A/11/1993 concerning Making Indictments. The preparation of this subsidiary alternative indictment has met the formal and material requirements for an indictment as regulated in the provisions of Article 143 Paragraph (2) of the KUHAP. The Public Prosecutor used an alternative subsidiary form of indictment because the Public Prosecutor was unsure which article was most appropriate to apply to the actions he was charged with against the defendant.Keywords: Indictment, Alternative Subsidiary, Public Prosecutor, Child Protection
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENGABULKAN KASASI SENGKETA MEREK PADA PERKARA NOMOR 332 K/Pdt.Sus- HKI/2021 Bretna Shiwe Benaya Uneputty; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.104198

Abstract

This article examines the analysis of the Supreme Court Judge's consideration in granting the cassation of PT Unilever Indonesia, Tbk against Hardwood Private Limited in the “STRONG” toothpaste brand dispute. This article shows that at the first level, the Central Jakarta Commercial Court granted Hardwood Private Limited's lawsuit with the consideration that the “Strong” trademark had been registered first, so it was entitled to legal protection based on the “first to file” principle. However, at the cassation level, the Supreme Court overturned the decision on the grounds that the word “STRONG” in the Defendant's “PEPSODENT STRONG 12 JAM” mark was not substantially similar to the Plaintiff's mark. The Supreme Court judges argued that the word “STRONG” is a common adverb and is not a dominant element in the mark. There is an inconsistency in the application of the “first to file” principle in the settlement of trademark disputes in the Cassation Decision. This case shows that even though a trademark has been registered first, it does not automatically get legal protection if it cannot be proven that there is a similarity in essence with the disputed trademark.
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PADA PERKARA MEMPERTONTONKAN KETELANJANGAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 264/PID.B/2021/PN SGT) Reinaldy Bagus Andika; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i1.79518

Abstract

Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan dan mengkaji permasalahan mengenai hakim yang memutuskan putusan pidana berupa penjara selama 2 tahun terhadap pelaku pelecehan seksual dalam hal ini, pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana apakah sudah sesuai dengan Pasal 183 KUHAP jo Pasal 36 Undang Undang no. 44 tahun 2008 tentang Pornografi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitianhukum normatif bersifat perspektif dan terapan. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, dengan cara studi pustaka, teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode deduktif yang berpangkal pada premis mayor dan premis minor. Dari hasil penelitian dan pembahasan yang telah dilakukan Penulis, Penulis menemukan bahwa pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap Terdakwa telah sesuai dengan Pasal 183 jo Pasal 36 Undang Undang no. 44 tahun 2008 studi putusan nomor: 264/PID.B/2021/Pn Sgt dengan memperhatikan alat-alat bukti yang sah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP dengan setidaknya berdasarkan minimal adanya 2 (dua) alat bukti, sehingga Terdakwa terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan menurut hukum melakukan tindak pidana.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN KARTU TANDA PENGENAL ADVOKAT TIDAK VALID SEBAGAI PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK Aulia Hermastuti Turastananing Sari; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.100476

Abstract

This article examines the use of an invalid Advocate Identification Card (KTPA) as a violation of the code of ethics, and explores its long-term effects on the credibility of the legal profession. The use of invalid KTPA in the judicial process can harm justice and threaten the integrity of the legal system. This practice not only reflects weaknesses in the lawyer's identity verification process, but also has the potential to result in unfair court decisions due to the presence of unauthorized parties. The purpose of this article is to find out the legal sanctions that can be given to advocates who have violated the code of ethics due to the use of an invalid KTPA. This article was researched using empirical legal research methods. The research results prove that the use of an invalid KTPA in the judicial process is considered a violation of the code of ethics. Therefore, it is important for the legal system to enforce sanctions for violations of this kind in order to maintain the integrity and credibility of the advocacy profession and the justice system as a whole. The sanctions that will befall the advocate range from ordinary warnings, strong warnings, temporary dismissal, to expulsion from membership in professional organizations. 
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP KETERANGAN SAKSI YANG PENUNTUTANNYA DILAKUKAN TERPISAH (SPLITSING) DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA Ester Natalia Sianipar; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 12, No 3 (2024): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i3.84368

Abstract

Abstrak: Artikel ini mendeskripsikan dan mengkaji permasalahan mengenai pertimbangan hakim terhadap keterangan saksi yang penuntutannya dilakukan secara terpisah dalam Putusan Nomor 338/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. Yyk. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Jenis bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, dan bahan hukum sekunder dengan teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yakni studi dokumen (kepustakaan). Hasil penelitian dan pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa keterangan saksi yang penuntutannya dilakukan secara terpisah dipertimbangkan oleh hakim karena telah memberikan keyakinan bagi hakim dalam memutus pelaku bersalah karena melakukan tindak pidana narkotika.Kata Kunci: Pertimbangan Hakim, Saksi, Narkotika Abstract: This article describes and examines the issue of the judge's consideration of the testimony of witnesses whose prosecution is carried out separately in decision number 338/Pid.Sus/ 2021 / Fr. Yyk. This study is a normative legal research that uses a case approach (case approach). The types of legal materials used consist of primary legal materials, and secondary legal materials with data collection techniques used in this study, namely the study of documents (literature). The results of the study and discussion showed that the testimony of witnesses whose prosecution was carried out separately was considered by the judge because it had given confidence to the judge in deciding the perpetrator guilty of committing narcoticscrimes.Keywords: Judge’s Consideration; Sanctions; Narcotics
ANALISIS KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN VISUM ET REPERTUM SEBAGAI BUKTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMERKOSAAN Salafiyyah Diwayanti; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.74874

Abstract

This study aims to explain how the strenght of evidence (bewijskracht) for Visum et Repertum as evidence in the crime of rape in Decision Number 42/Pid.B/2021/PN.Kds. The research method used is a normative legal research method with a prescriptive nature of research and uses a case approach. This research shows that Visum et Repertum is important as evidence in the crime of rape because it plays a role in the process of proving a criminal case which can provide a clear picture of crime. Strenght of Evidence (bewijskracht) for Visum et Repertum in Decision Number 42/Pid.B/2021/PN.Kds is independent for the judge. The evidence presented in this case in the form of witness testimony, defendant’s statement, Visum et Repertum letter are related to one another. The strenght of the evidence is the same, no one exceeds the other. The strenght of the proof is free and not binding, depending on the judges’s assesment Keywords: Strenght of Evidence, Visum et Repertum
The Establishing Paradigm of Dominus Litis Principle in Indonesian Administrative Justice Soehartono Soehartono; Kukuh Tejomurti; Arsyad Aldyan; Rachma Indriyani
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 5 Issue 1, January 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss1.877.pp42-55

Abstract

This study aimed to analyse a shifting paradigm of Dominus Litis (judge activeness) in the Indonesian state administrative justice. This principle emphasises that judges expand the paradigm that judges are not limited to being used in processes regulated in law. However, judges need to actively develop the paradigm to make legal discoveries oriented towards substantive justice and expand the paradigm from merely resolving disputes positivistically to resolving conflicts with paradigms. Legal realism and sociological jurisprudence to create substantive justice. This paper uses the normative research method, with a statutory approach and case approach by analysing two decisions of state administrative court judges. The result showed that Dominus Litis in the dispute's accomplishment is not limited to the implementation of juridical-legal positivism factors, but on how judges use their mindset to provide ideal decisions and conduct legal reasoning use socio-legal and socio-cultural paradigms. The development of demands for justice has also experienced a paradigm shift of justice. It requires the principle of an active judge who always follows developments in public policy, such as the principle of sustainable development related to environmental and natural resource issues, and finding the legal material truth.
The Doctrine of Unequivocal Waiver: Evaluating The International Legitimacy of In Absentia Corruption Trials Amid Indonesia’s E-Summons Verification Vacuum Under Law No. 20 of 2025 Muhammad Ajmal Qolfathriyuus; Bambang Santoso; Arsyad Aldyan
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3777

Abstract

Indonesia's in absentia trial mechanism for corruption cases faces a chronic legitimacy crisis, in which domestic convictions frequently prove non-executable in foreign jurisdictions. The research gap addressed here is the absence of scholarship linking the technical verification vacuum in electronic summons (e-summons) to the doctrinal requirements of Unequivocal Waiver under international human rights law. This study aims to evaluate why the normative vacuum in Article 150 paragraph (2) of Law No. 20 of 2025 on Criminal Procedure undermines the legitimacy of in absentia corruption trials under Article 38 of the Anti-Corruption Law, and to formulate a strategy for optimizing the Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) instrument. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches, the study tests Indonesian regulation against the Unequivocal Waiver doctrine and the Sejdovic v. Italy jurisprudence. The results show that treating a mere “sent” status as valid legal notice, combined with the prohibition on legal representation for absent defendants under Supreme Court Circular No. 6 of 1988, systematically defeats the actual-knowledge standard required internationally. This novelty proposes a Verified Digital Waiver protocol grounded in digital audit trails and biometric authentication to restore executorial legitimacy and support cross-border asset recovery
SOCIO-LEGAL CHALLENGES OF INDIGENOUS LAND IN WEST KALIMANTAN: CUSTOMARY PRACTICES AND NATIONAL LAW Itok Dwi Kurniawan; Arsyad Aldyan; Ismawati Septiningsih; Muhammad Rustamaji; Bambang Santoso; Jose Gama Santos
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 11, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v11i3.33860

Abstract

Customary law in the national legal system is undoubtedly fundamental to maintaining existence because customary law can also be applied to resolve conflicts in society. This research uses socio-legal methods, and the data obtained is based on data in the field through an interview process with several related parties. In contrast, for legal problems in this society, only some things can be resolved through a customary law approach. For example, in the Dayak indigenous community, several legal problems cannot be resolved according to custom, especially regarding unregistered land rights. These problems certainly cannot be solely resolved using a customary law approach. This certainly shows that customary law cannot necessarily accommodate the interests of Indigenous peoples because this is also closely related to legal certainty. Because they relate to legal certainty, they must be resolved through a positive legal approach, such as submitting a request to the court or an application to the relevant agency. This certainly happens because the legal awareness of regional communities in Indonesia is currently not very good; this leads to legal issues within indigenous communities that cannot be resolved through customary law.
Co-Authors afina akmalia Aprilia Dwi Arika Arrabi Oktavian Sabari Adhyaksa Aulia Hermastuti Turastananing Sari Aulia Nur Ainun Bambang Santoso Bambang Santoso Bretna Shiwe Benaya Uneputty Burhanudin Harahap Dhesthi Kembang Masa Ester Natalia Sianipar Faya Asyiffa Indah Wulandari Ismawati Septiningsih Ismawati Septiningsih Itok Dwi Kurniawan Itok Dwi Kurniawan Jose Gama Santos Kartika Asmanda Putri Kukuh Tejomurti Muhammad Ajmal Qolfathriyuus Muhammad Rustamaji Muhammad Rustamaji Rachma Indriyani Reinaldy Bagus Andika Rizal Akbar Aldyan Salafiyyah Diwayanti Salsabila Khairunnisa Soehartono . Tri Wahyu Wijanoko Zakki Adlhiyati