Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

KAJIAN FEMINISME TERHADAP PEREMPUAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN Adlhiyati, Zakki; Kurniawan, Itok Dwi; Soehartono, Soehartono; Harjono, Harjono; Yulianti, Sri Wahyuningsih; Septiningsih, Ismawati
Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Prodi PPkn Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Terjadi perubahan atas eksistensi perempuan sebagai suatu subjek yang independen. Hal ini terlihat dari adanya perubahan relasi antara perempuan dengan laki-laki pada saat ini. Meskipun demikian, Undang-undang Perkawinan (UUP) ternyata belum memberikan perlindungan kepada perempuan atas kesetaraan gender. UUP masih membedakan hak serta kewajiban perempuan dengan laki-laki terkait persyaratan poligami UUP focus pada ketidakmampuan fisik perempuan sebagai alasan poligami. Ketentuan-ketentuan tersebut menempatkan perempuan pada posisi inferior. Feminisme menghendaki adanya pengakuan terhadap perempuan sebagai subjek yang mandiri dengan persamaan status, hak dan kewajiban dengan laki-laki. Oleh sebab itu perlu adanya perubahan pola pikir Negara dan pemberian pengakuan kepada perempuan sebagai suatu subjek yang independen, dari situ diharapkan negara dapat memberikan kesetaraan gender kepada perempuan.

Paradoks Kewajiban Bersaksi pada Ketentuan Hukum Acara Perdata Zakki Adlhiyati
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Juli – Desember 2018
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Analyzing witness obligation in giving testimony according to Indonesian civil procedural law is the objective of this writing. With the normative judicial method, concluded There is inconsistency in Indonesian civil procedural law in regulating the witness obligation. Punishment is provided for a witness when they neglected the hearing summons as regulated in Article 140 HIR/157 RBG, but in contrast article 143 HIR/170 RBG stated that no one may be forced to come before a court to testify in civil matters if the district court beyond their resides. Giving the same regulation with the current civil procedural law, the civil procedural law bill shows contradiction within its law and also with another law. Abandonment of court summons as a witness is a criminal offense with a sentence of six months in prison (Article 224 paragraph of the Criminal Code). The inconsistency and contradiction to some extent may bring negative impact to law enforcement and the law should be an amendment.

Paradoks Kewajiban Bersaksi pada Ketentuan Hukum Acara Perdata Zakki Adlhiyati
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Juli – Desember 2018
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v4i2.82

Analyzing witness obligation in giving testimony according to Indonesian civil procedural law is the objective of this writing. With the normative judicial method, concluded There is inconsistency in Indonesian civil procedural law in regulating the witness obligation. Punishment is provided for a witness when they neglected the hearing summons as regulated in Article 140 HIR/157 RBG, but in contrast article 143 HIR/170 RBG stated that no one may be forced to come before a court to testify in civil matters if the district court beyond their resides. Giving the same regulation with the current civil procedural law, the civil procedural law bill shows contradiction within its law and also with another law. Abandonment of court summons as a witness is a criminal offense with a sentence of six months in prison (Article 224 paragraph of the Criminal Code). The inconsistency and contradiction to some extent may bring negative impact to law enforcement and the law should be an amendment.

THE MODEL OF BIOPIRACY DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE FRAMEWORK OF PROTECTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE Zakki Adlhiyati; H Harjono; Sri Wahyuningsih Yulianti; Moch Najib Imanullah
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 16, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.1.444

Solving the problem of traditional knowledge biopiracy faced by Indonesia is the background of this article. Thereby the problem of this papers is to seek the best way to settle the dispute occurred in biopiracy case. Due to the economic value of traditional knowledge this national resources need to be protected. Due to this economic value, a lot of traditional knowledge stolen and patented by someone else, this biopiracy cases had been long faces by the developing countries i.e Indonesia with shisheido case and avian influenza (H5NI) case, India with turmeric case and basmati rice case. Judicial settlement of dispute, alternative dispute resolution, quasi-judicial is a way to solve the cases which can be chosen.Keywords: biopiracy, traditional knowledge, dispute

Melacak Keadilan dalam Regulasi Poligami: Kajian Filsafat Keadilan Aristoteles, Thomas Aquinas, dan John Rawls Zakki Adlhiyati; Achmad Achmad
Undang: Jurnal Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Justice is a principle that should be existed in every part of human life. It should be taken as a basic principle in human relation, such as in business, political, or private matter even in marriage relationship. How marriage relationship maintained in justice based, is justice still be existed when husband do polygamy, both are the issues that will be analysed in this article through philosophical studies. Marriege Law stated that husband and wife have the obligation to respect and stay faithfull to each others. Based on Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas and John Rawls theory, husband and wife positions are the same and in balance. These three philosophers stated that justice must be based on the equality (equality on position, equality on the right and obligation etc). Nevertheless, injustice founded in Marriage Law, first, the marriage law only give the chance to polygamy for husband, and second, polygamy prerequarement only focused on women physical uncompetency. There should be a revision to the marriage law to give equality rights between husband and wife. Abstrak Keadilan adalah sebuah nilai yang diharapkan selalu ada dalam kehidupan manusia, mulai dari politik, bisnis, sampai hubungan perkawinan. Dalam perkawinan, nilai keadilan harus menjadi salah satu dasar hubungan lahir batin ini. Bagaimana keadilan dalam poligami, apakah UU Perkawinan telah adil mengatur poligami, merupakan permasalahan yang akan dianalisis dalam artikel ini melalui kacamata filsafat. Undang-undang perkawinan menyebutkan bahwa suami dan istri mempunyai kewajiban untuk saling menghormati dan saling setia. Posisi suami dan istri jika dianalisis berdasarkan teori keadilan yang diutarakan oleh Aristoteles, Thomas Aquinas, dan John Rawls adalah sama dan seimbang. Ketiganya mendasarkan nilai keadilan sebagai sebuah bentuk persamaan hak dan kewajiban, persaman status, persaman kedudukan. Meskipun demikian ketidakadilan ditemukan dalam Undang-undang Perkawinan. Setidaknya ada dua hal terkait poligami yang menjadikan UU Perkawinan tidak adil. Pertama, UU hanya memberikan peluang poligami kepada suami, dan kedua, alasan poligami bermuatan gender karena hanya menitikberatkan ketidakmampuan atau cacat fisik istri. Agar adil maka seharusnya ada perubahan yang dilakukan terhadap Undang-undang Perkawinan, perlu ada kesetaraan antara suami dan istri.

DISPARITY ON CUMMULATION CASES OF TORT AND BREACH OF CONTRACT Zakki Adlhiyati; itok dwi kurniawan; muhammad rustamaji; Ismawati septiningsih
Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Vol 3 No 1: Juni 2022
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47492/jip.v3i1.1589

The discussion on the differentiation between breach of contract and tort has been prevail in a long time. In addition, there is judge’s disparity on the breach of contract and tort cumulation cases. Three cumulation dicisions were anallysed to understand the legal reasoning of the judges. Legal as well as conceptual approach used to reveal the strong relationship between breach of contract and tort in actual cases. Despite the different nature of the cases, the principle of tort existed on the breach of contract. However, the disparities of the awards occured on the actual cases. Firstly, judge consider that the cumulation is formally invalid hence the claim is unacceptable. Finally, on others cases the former reason is put aside and the judges acknowledge the strong relation between breach of contract and tort. Furthermore, systematical legal reasoning is used to grant the claims. With regard to the fairness, judge as the law enforcer need to give reasonable decision with their intellectuality.

KAJIAN FEMINISME TERHADAP PEREMPUAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN Zakki Adlhiyati; Itok Dwi Kurniawan; Soehartono Soehartono; Harjono Harjono; Sri Wahyuningsih Yulianti; Ismawati Septiningsih
Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Prodi PPkn Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Terjadi perubahan atas eksistensi perempuan sebagai suatu subjek yang independen. Hal ini terlihat dari adanya perubahan relasi antara perempuan dengan laki-laki pada saat ini. Meskipun demikian, Undang-undang Perkawinan (UUP) ternyata belum memberikan perlindungan kepada perempuan atas kesetaraan gender. UUP masih membedakan hak serta kewajiban perempuan dengan laki-laki terkait persyaratan poligami UUP focus pada ketidakmampuan fisik perempuan sebagai alasan poligami. Ketentuan-ketentuan tersebut menempatkan perempuan pada posisi inferior. Feminisme menghendaki adanya pengakuan terhadap perempuan sebagai subjek yang mandiri dengan persamaan status, hak dan kewajiban dengan laki-laki. Oleh sebab itu perlu adanya perubahan pola pikir Negara dan pemberian pengakuan kepada perempuan sebagai suatu subjek yang independen, dari situ diharapkan negara dapat memberikan kesetaraan gender kepada perempuan.

ASPEK KEPERDATAAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PADA PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DALAM ERA PERKEMBANGAN TEKNOLOGI DAN INFORMASI GUNA REFORMULASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM Arsyad Aldyan; Muhammad Rustamaji; Ismawati Septiningsih; Zakki Adlhiyati; Itok Dwi Kurniawan
Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol 11 No 2 (2022): JURNAL GLOBAL CITIZEN JURNAL ILMIAH KAJIAN PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN
Publisher : Prodi PPkn Universitas Slamet Riyadi

This article discusses the civilian aspect in defamation cases which is intended to reform law enforcement against defamation cases. This article uses normative research methods and uses a legislative approach. Defamation is indeed an act that violates the law and certainly harms the person whose reputation is tarnished, but with this loss, it is seen that it is possible to resolve this issue can be resolved through a civil law approach with aspects of illegal acts. This is because the application of criminal sanctions is the ultimate medium, and also of course the essence is to look at the resolution of the problem. Reformulation of law enforcement policy in defamation cases leading to civil settlement is of course intended so that the aggrieved person also receives compensation from the perpetrator, and also the perpetrator is obliged to pay compensation, so as not to release the perpetrator of defamation for the act committed, but not in the presence of criminal sanctions law enforcement.

PERBANDINGAN PENDAPAT HUKUM HAKIM ATAS SENGKETA HAK ATAS MEREK (Studi Putusan Nomor 332K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2021) Noer Ilmi Tari Wibowo; Zakki Adlhiyati
Verstek Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i1.71135

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dasar perbedaan atas pertimbangan hukum hakim Pengadilan Niaga dengan Mahkamah Agung. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan studi kasus. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder. Teknik yang dipakai dalam pengumpulan bahan hukum dalam penelitian ini adalah studi dokumen atau studi kepustakaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik analisis metode deskriptif analisis, yaitu dengan cara mendeskripsikan suatu masalah hukum secara rinci kemudian menganalisanya. Berdasarkan pembahasan ini diperoleh hasil bahwa dalam memutuskan perkara sengketa merek “STRONG” pada tingkat pertama maupun tingkat kasasi memiliki pertimbangan hukum hakim yang berbeda. Hakim Pengadilan Niaga mengabulkan gugatan Penggugat didasarkan pada alat bukti dan sistem first to file yang dianut di Indonesia sedangkan Hakim Mahkamah Agung dalam mengabulkan permohonan kasasi Tergugat didasarkan bahwa merek milik Tergugat juga sudah terdaftar sehingga Tergugat juga memiliki alas hak untuk menggunakan merek tersebut. Serta menurut Hakim Agung, house mark dari produk pasta gigi milik PT Unileber Indonesia ini ialah PEPSODENT STRONG 12 JAM sedangkan milik Penggugat ialah FORMULA STRONG sehingga sudah sangat jelas terlihat perbedaannya dan kata “STRONG” sendiri juga merupakan kata keterangan bukanlah kata temuan Penggugat.Kata Kunci: Pertimbangan Hakim; Sengketa; MerekThis study aims to determine the basis of differences in the legal considerations of judges of the Commercial Court and the Supreme Court. This research is a normative legal research with case studies. The type of data used is secondary data. The technique used in collecting legal materials in this research is document study or literature study. This study uses an analytical technique descriptive analysis method, namely by describing a legal issue in detail and then analyzing it. Based on this discussion, it was found that in deciding the "STRONG" brand dispute case at the first level and the cassation level the judges had different legal considerations. The Commercial Court Judge granted the Plaintiff's lawsuit based on evidence and the first to file system adopted in Indonesia while the Supreme Court Judge granted the Defendant's cassation request based on the fact that the Defendant's trademark had also been registered so that the Defendant also had the right to use the mark. And according to the Supreme Court Judge, the house mark of PT Unileber Indonesia's toothpaste product is PEPSODENT STRONG 12 JAM, while the Plaintiff's is STRONG FORMULA, so the difference is very clear and the word "STRONG" itself is also an adverb, not the words found by the Plaintiff.Keywords: Judge's Consideration; Dispute; Brand

LEGAL LIABILITY ON ADMINISTRATIVE TORT: RECENT REGULATION PERSPECTIVE Muhammad Farizka Sisma; Zakki Adlhiyati
Jurnal Cendekia Hukum Vol 8, No 2 (2023): JCH (JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM)
Publisher : STIH Putri Maharaja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33760/jch.v8i2.592

The development of judicial power brings some changes. One of them is the evolution of administrative law related to the object of administrative dispute, which embraces concrete action. Thus, the administrative tort was also affected by this change. This writing aims to understand the government's liability on the administrative tort and the regulation of onrechtmatige overheidsdaad before and after the enactment of Law Number 30/2014 on government administration. The normative juridical method reveals that the origin of authority plays a pivotal role in deciding the government's liability. Initially, the article of 1365 Civil Procedural Law was the legal based of an administrative tort, but in 2014 it was also stipulated in the Government Administration Law. In addition, The Law of Government administration broadens the limitation of administrative decisions and allows the administrative court to examine the administrative tort legally.

Title

Found 28 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 28 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 28 Documents
Search