Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.89
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pembaharuan Hukum Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Verstek Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Rechtsvinding
Arsyad Aldyan
Faculty Of Law, Sebelas Maret University
Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 20 Documents
Search

 1   2 
ASPEK KEPERDATAAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PADA PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DALAM ERA PERKEMBANGAN TEKNOLOGI DAN INFORMASI GUNA REFORMULASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM Arsyad Aldyan; Muhammad Rustamaji; Ismawati Septiningsih; Zakki Adlhiyati; Itok Dwi Kurniawan
Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol 11 No 2 (2022): JURNAL GLOBAL CITIZEN JURNAL ILMIAH KAJIAN PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN
Publisher : Prodi PPkn Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (126.567 KB) | DOI: 10.33061/jgz.v11i2.6743

Abstract

This article discusses the civilian aspect in defamation cases which is intended to reform law enforcement against defamation cases. This article uses normative research methods and uses a legislative approach. Defamation is indeed an act that violates the law and certainly harms the person whose reputation is tarnished, but with this loss, it is seen that it is possible to resolve this issue can be resolved through a civil law approach with aspects of illegal acts. This is because the application of criminal sanctions is the ultimate medium, and also of course the essence is to look at the resolution of the problem. Reformulation of law enforcement policy in defamation cases leading to civil settlement is of course intended so that the aggrieved person also receives compensation from the perpetrator, and also the perpetrator is obliged to pay compensation, so as not to release the perpetrator of defamation for the act committed, but not in the presence of criminal sanctions law enforcement.
PEMBUKTIAN VISUM ET REPERTUM PADA TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN Indah Wulandari; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 11, No 2 (2023): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71602

Abstract

This article analyzes theproofof Visum et Repertum onthe criminal act of persecution resulting in death. The purpose of this article is to find out Visum et Repertum from the perspective of evidentiary law onthe criminal act of persecution resulting in deathin the context ofacase study ofDecisionNumber 80/Pid.B/2022/PN Krg. This research is normative or doctrinal legal research that is prescriptive and applied. This research uses a case approach with the types of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials using document studies or literature studies. This research uses legal material analysis techniques with a deduction syllogism method. Based on this study, the results were obtained that Visum et Repertum has met the perspective of evidentiarylaw, especially in the criminal act of persecutionresultingin death in the context of a case study of Decision Number 80/Pid.B/2022/PN Krg. From the perspective of evidentiary law, Visum et Repertum is included in the category of evidence and can have the power of proof as documentary evidence, expert testimony, and directive evidence.Keywords: Death; Persecution; Proof; Visum et Repertum
Implementation Sharia Principles and Development of National Law In Sharia Share Trading In Indonesian Capital Market Arsyad Aldyan
Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25273/ay.v2i2.13153

Abstract

In the capital market sector in Indonesia, especially with regard to stock trading in the capital market, sharia principles have begun to be applied properly. This is indicated by the existence of facilities (Sharia Online Trading System (SOTS) as well as brokers or securities companies that facilitate trading of shares in sharia, in addition to that added by the number of issuers listing sharia shares. Besides that, it is also supported more by the regulations issued by the national sharia board of the Indonesian Ulema Council and Otoritas Jasa Keuangan related to share trading in sharia. Finance as the institution tasked with overseeing the capital market. The National Sharia Council of MUI, issued regulations regarding sharia shares, among others, the Fatwa of the National Sharia Council No: 40/DSN-MUI/X/2003 concerning the Capital Market and General Guidelines for the Implementation of Sharia Principles in the Capital Market Sector; Fatwa of the National Sharia Council No: 80/DSN-MUI/III/2011 concerning the Implementation of Sharia Principles in the Mechanism of Trading in Equity Securities in the Regular Market of the Stock Exchange; while regarding sharia shares, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan issued the following regulations. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Regulation No. 17/POJK.04/2015 concerning Issuance and Requirements for Sharia Securities in the Form of Shares by Sharia Issuers or Sharia Public Companies; Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Regulation No. 53 /POJK.04/2015 concerning Contracts Used in Issuing Sharia Securities in the Capital Market; Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Regulation No. 15/POJK.04/2015 Regarding the Implementation of Sharia Principles in the Capital Market
Legal Protection of the Status and Rights of Biological Children (Case Study of Determination Number 114/Pdt.P/2025/Pa.Bi) Salsabila Khairunnisa; Burhanudin Harahap; Arsyad Aldyan
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1245

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal protection of the status and rights of biological children according to Islamic law and the Child Protection Law, especially in assessing the suitability of the judge's legal considerations in Determination Number 114/Pdt.P/2025/PA. Bi to the principles of child justice and the fulfillment of civil rights without burdening children due to parental errors. The method used is normative juridical by examining Islamic legal norms through sharia maqasid and national laws and regulations, through literature studies on primary legal materials in the form of court decisions and secondary, analyzed qualitatively with normative interpretation. The results of the study show that Islamic law places biological children as a divine mandate that is protected by nasab for the sake of hifz al-nasl, even though the legal status is limited to sharia marriage so that the right of inheritance of faraidh does not fully apply to children of serial polygamy as in the case of Determination 114/Pdt.P/2025/PA. However, the rights to alimony, education, and affection must still be fulfilled by the father reasonably to be independent; The Child Protection Law guarantees the right to identity, health, and participation without discrimination through a complete birth certificate after biological attestation via DNA test, although judges' considerations often limit legal status due to administrative violations of parental marriage, so that children only receive partial rights such as alimony through a district court lawsuit without full guardianship or inheritance priority, which has the potential to cause social stigmatization and difficulty accessing public services such as scholarships or BPJS in areas such as Kediri; This gap creates a subjective injustice because the child is innocent, as the Constitutional Court's Decision expands biological civil relations in the best interests of the child, but the implementation of religious courts is still formalistic so that optimal protection requires harmonization through progressive fatwas and restorative mediation to ensure family reintegration and long-term psychological stability of children.
Penguatan Penegakan Hukum Bisnis di Indonesia: Analisis Kritis Kapasitas Kelembagaan dan Konsistensi Regulasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Arsyad Aldyan; Kartika Asmanda Putri; Rizal Akbar Aldyan
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 03 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i03.1575

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis secara kritis efektivitas penegakan hukum bisnis di Indonesia dengan menitikberatkan pada kapasitas kelembagaan dan konsistensi regulasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa. Berdasarkan pendekatan normatif-sosiolegal, studi ini mengidentifikasi bahwa kelemahan institusional, tumpang tindih yurisdiksi, serta ambiguitas prosedural secara signifikan menghambat kepastian hukum dan mereduksi kepercayaan investor. Melalui pemetaan regulasi, analisis indikator kelembagaan, serta studi kasus pasca-implementasi Omnibus Law, ditemukan bahwa inkonsistensi antar rezim hukum (perdata, komersial, investasi) memperburuk fragmentasi kebijakan dan memperbesar risiko forum shopping. Studi ini merekomendasikan pembentukan kamar pengadilan niaga yang terintegrasi dengan mekanisme ADR, kodifikasi terpadu atas prosedur penyelesaian sengketa, dan penguatan kapasitas hakim serta arbiter melalui pelatihan dan teknologi. Temuan ini menjadi dasar untuk reformasi hukum komersial yang lebih adaptif, prediktabel, dan selaras dengan praktik internasional dalam menjamin iklim investasi yang kondusif.
TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA ABORSI ILEGAL (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 118/PID.SUS/2023/PN SKH) Dhesthi Kembang Masa; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 12, No 4 (2024): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i4.85239

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pemidanaan perkara aborsi ilegal. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara aborsi ilegal dalam Putusan Nomor: 118/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Skh telah memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 183 KUHAP. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian ini bersifat perskriptif dan terapan. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum dengan studi kepustakaan. Bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara aborsi ilegal dalam Putusan Nomor 118/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Skh telah memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 183 KUHAP. Pada tahap pembuktian di perkara ini, disajikan lebih dari dua alat bukti yang sah, di antaranya keterangan saksi-saksi, keterangan para terdakwa, dan alat bukti surat. Sementara itu, untuk menanggulangi banyaknya perkara aborsi di Indonesia diperlukan upaya kuratif dan preventif.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS BEBAS KASUS TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA Arrabi Oktavian Sabari Adhyaksa; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 13, No 2 (2025): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i2.88976

Abstract

Penelitian dalam penulisan hukum ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kesesuaian teori pembuktian pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Fakfak Nomor: 2/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Ffk yang memutuskan bebas terdakwa, serta untuk menilai kesesuaian pertimbangan hakim dalam kasus Tindak Pidana Narkotika pada putusan tersebut dengan ketentuan Pasal 183 KUHAP. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif yang menggunakan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Pendekatan ini dilakukan dengan menelaah kasus kasus terkait isu hukum yang sudah mendapatkan putusan berkekuatan hukum tetap. Data dikumpulkan dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder melalui studi kepustakaan (library research). Bahan hukum yang diperoleh kemudian diolah menggunakan metode silogisme dengan pola pikir deduktif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa teori pembuktian yang diterapkan dalam putusan kasus Tindak Pidana Narkotika tersebut sudah sesuai, dan pertimbangan hakim dalam memutuskan bebas terdakwa juga sudah tepat karena tidak terpenuhinya ketentuan Pasal 183 KUHAP.
KAJIAN PENGGUNAAN PERLUASAN MAKNA KETERANGAN SAKSI PADA PERKARA PENGUASAAN NARKOTIKA DENGAN TERSANGKA MRP BIN P Tri Wahyu Wijanoko; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 9, No 4 (2021): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72431

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the use of Constitutional Court Decision Number 65/PUU-VIII/2010 as a legal basis for expanding the meaning of witness testimony in order to convict MRP Bin P, and to understand the reasons why expanding the meaning of witness testimony is necessary in this case. The research method used is doctrinal or normative legal research with a case study approach, and primary and secondary legal sources are collected through literature review techniques. The results of the study show that the lack of evidence in this case makes it difficult for investigators to prove the perpetrator's actions, and expanding the meaning of witness testimony is necessary to overcome this problem. Constitutional Court Decision Number 64/PUU-VIII/2010 provides an opportunity for arresting witnesses to prove the perpetrator's actions of possessing narcotics.Keywords: Narcotics; expansion of meaning; witness statement.
PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG MENGABULKAN KASASI PERKARA PENIPUAN DAN PENCUCIAN UANG DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 330K/PID.SUS/2023. Faya Asyiffa; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 14, No 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i2.98886

Abstract

Penelitian ini mempunyai tujuan untuk menganalisis tentang kesesuaian pertimbangan hakim Mahkamah Agung dalam mengabulkan kasasi Penuntut Umum perkara Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Pencucian Uang dalam Putusan Nomor 330 K/Pid.Sus/2023 dengan ketentuan Pasal 253 Ayat (1) KUHAP. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Sumber bahan hukum dalam penelitian yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis menggunakan metode silogisme. Hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa pertimbangan hakim Mahkamah Agung dalam mengabulkan kasasi Penuntut Umum telah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 253 Ayat (1) KUHAP. Dalam pertimbangannya, Mahkamah Agung membatalkan putusan sebelumnya yaitu Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.B/2021/PN Sgn dan Mahkamah Agung menyatakan bahwa Judex Factie telah salah dalam menerapkan hukum 
TINJAUAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PIDANA PENGAWASAN PADA PERKARA PERSETUBUHAN ANAK Aprilia Dwi Arika; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 12, No 2 (2024): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i2.82243

Abstract

Artikel ini mengidentifikasi hukum acara pidana terkait dengan tinjauan pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pidana pengawasan terhadap Anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum pada perkara persetubuhan anak. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pidana pengawasan pada perkara persetubuhan anak dalam Putusan Nomor 11/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/Pn Wng. Jenis penelitian hukum ini yaitu penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dengan pendekatan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kasus. Jenis bahan hukum yang digunakan yaitu bahan hukum primer dan sekunder dengan teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum tersebut melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana pengawasan pada Putusan Nomor 11/Pid.Sus Anak/2022/Pn.Wng didasarkan dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, karena hakim menjatuhkan sanksi kepada Anak dengan mengutamakan prinsip peradilan pidana anak. Bahwasannya, Anak masih mempunyai masa depan yang panjang sehingga Anak dapat memperbaiki kehidupannya di masa mendatang. Dengan demikian, Anak yang melakukan tindak pidana tersebut mendapatkan sanksi khusus sesuai dengan ketentuan yang tercantum di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Co-Authors afina akmalia Aprilia Dwi Arika Arrabi Oktavian Sabari Adhyaksa Aulia Hermastuti Turastananing Sari Aulia Nur Ainun Bambang Santoso Bambang Santoso Bretna Shiwe Benaya Uneputty Burhanudin Harahap Dhesthi Kembang Masa Ester Natalia Sianipar Faya Asyiffa Indah Wulandari Ismawati Septiningsih Ismawati Septiningsih Itok Dwi Kurniawan Itok Dwi Kurniawan Jose Gama Santos Kartika Asmanda Putri Kukuh Tejomurti Muhammad Ajmal Qolfathriyuus Muhammad Rustamaji Muhammad Rustamaji Rachma Indriyani Reinaldy Bagus Andika Rizal Akbar Aldyan Salafiyyah Diwayanti Salsabila Khairunnisa Soehartono . Tri Wahyu Wijanoko Zakki Adlhiyati