Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Dampak Perilaku Masyarakat Terhadap Penetapan Kawasan Industri Terpadu Batang di Batang Sami’an, Sami’an; Al Farisi, Salman; Milzam, Muhammad; Addi Syirfan, Muhammad; Bagastio, Andrew
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i4.13488

Perubahan akibat pembangunan yang berlangsung dengan pesat, selain mendatangkan kemakmuran bagi masyarakat juga memberi pengaruh terhadap lingkungan sosial, ekonomi setempat. Untuk itu setiap pembangunan industri harus memperhitungkan dampak yang mungkin ditimbulkan. Dampak ini meliputi dampak yang bersifat positif dan negatif. Keberadaan kawasan industri juga dapat memicu terjadinya mobilitas penduduk pendatang ke daerah sekitar kawasan industri. Keberadaan penduduk pendatang akan berpengaruh terhadap pergeseran perilaku sosial dalam tingkat solidaritas antara penduduk lokal dan penduduk pendatang yang membawa tata nilai dan perilakunya dengan masyarakat setempat. Akibatnya melemah dan melunturnya solidaritas dalam hal bergotong royong diakibatkan dari kesibukan dan banyaknya masyarakat yang menghabiskan waktu di tempat kerja. Kesibukan itulah yang membuat masyarakat menjadi kurang perhatian terhadap lingkungan sekitarnya yang menyebabkan melunturnya solidaritas dalam hal bergotong royong. Dampak pembangunan kawasan industri diharapkan mampu menciptakan keanekaragaman kehidupan ekonomi dan menciptakan lapangan kerja baru. penetapan kawasan industri akan menciptakan peluang kerja baik dari sektor industri itu sendiri maupun di sektor lain seperti sektor jasa dan perdagangan, sehingga mendorong peningkatan pendapatan masyarakat yang akan berimplikasi terhadap peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat ke arah yang lebih baik dan merata. Dampak lain dari kehadiran kawasan industri ini pun berdampak bagi kehidupan masyarakat pedesaan, pada pola perilaku masyarakat, yang lambat laun mulai pudar tergerus oleh zaman.

The Efectiveness of Arbitration Mechanisms in The Resolution Of Construction Disputes In Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration And Alternative Dispute Resolution Pakpahan, Alfredo; Saragih, Hidbar Roberta; Wisatrioda, Bayu; Laia, Kharisman; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Sami’an, Sami’an
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2619

Disputes in construction projects often arise from divergent interpretations of contracts, delays in execution, and the complex dynamics of scope changes. Within this context, arbitration has long been regarded as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that promises efficiency, fairness, and confidentiality outside the court system. However, more than two decades after the enactment of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, its effectiveness in the construction sector remains subject to debate and scrutiny. This study critically examines the effectiveness of arbitration in resolving construction disputes under the legal framework established by Law No. 30 of 1999. Using a normative juridical approach, it reviews statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and field practices, complemented by interviews with legal practitioners and construction arbitrators. The findings reveal that while arbitration offers advantages in terms of confidentiality, procedural flexibility, and finality of decisions, its practical effectiveness is often constrained by high procedural costs, limited contractual understanding among parties, and challenges in enforcing arbitral awards through the courts. Furthermore, the substance of Law No. 30 of 1999 appears insufficiently adaptive to the technical and multidimensional nature of modern construction disputes. This research therefore recommends revising and modernizing the law particularly by strengthening the enforceability of arbitral awards, standardizing arbitration institutions, and enhancing the competence of human resources in construction law. Ultimately, arbitration should evolve as a mechanism not only for efficient dispute resolution but also for upholding justice, legal certainty, and professional integrity in Indonesia’s construction sector.

Analysis of Management of Legal Consequences of Service Provider Default on Project Delays: A Legal Study and Relational Approach to Dispute Prevention Setijanto, Augustinus; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Sami’an, Sami’an
IJEBD (International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development) Vol 8 No 6 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : LPPM of NAROTAMA UNIVERSITY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29138/ijebd.v8i6.3470

Delays in construction work execution represent one of the most common forms of default that trigger disputes between employers and contractors. Within Indonesia’s civil law framework, such default entails legal consequences including delay penalties, compensation, contract termination, and enforcement of performance bonds. This study examines these legal implications under the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), Law No. 2 of 2017 on Construction Services, and several Supreme Court decisions with permanent legal force namely Decisions No. 294 PK/Pdt/2014, No. 3053 K/Pdt/2011, and No. 60 K/Pdt/2020. The research adopts a normative juridical approach supported by secondary data from literature review and judicial case analysis. It also proposes a dispute-prevention hypothesis founded on effective communication through guanxi, dynamic relationship, and personal approach, aimed at reinforcing loyalty and preventing conflict. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s positive legal system remains sanction-oriented and emphasizes legal certainty, whereas sustainable dispute prevention requires a paradigm grounded in relational trust. Integrating relational approaches into construction contract practice may establish equilibrium between legal certainty and substantive justice.

The Efectiveness of Arbitration Mechanisms in The Resolution Of Construction Disputes In Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration And Alternative Dispute Resolution Pakpahan, Alfredo; Saragih, Hidbar Roberta; Wisatrioda, Bayu; Laia, Kharisman; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Sami’an, Sami’an
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2619

Disputes in construction projects often arise from divergent interpretations of contracts, delays in execution, and the complex dynamics of scope changes. Within this context, arbitration has long been regarded as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that promises efficiency, fairness, and confidentiality outside the court system. However, more than two decades after the enactment of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, its effectiveness in the construction sector remains subject to debate and scrutiny. This study critically examines the effectiveness of arbitration in resolving construction disputes under the legal framework established by Law No. 30 of 1999. Using a normative juridical approach, it reviews statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and field practices, complemented by interviews with legal practitioners and construction arbitrators. The findings reveal that while arbitration offers advantages in terms of confidentiality, procedural flexibility, and finality of decisions, its practical effectiveness is often constrained by high procedural costs, limited contractual understanding among parties, and challenges in enforcing arbitral awards through the courts. Furthermore, the substance of Law No. 30 of 1999 appears insufficiently adaptive to the technical and multidimensional nature of modern construction disputes. This research therefore recommends revising and modernizing the law particularly by strengthening the enforceability of arbitral awards, standardizing arbitration institutions, and enhancing the competence of human resources in construction law. Ultimately, arbitration should evolve as a mechanism not only for efficient dispute resolution but also for upholding justice, legal certainty, and professional integrity in Indonesia’s construction sector.

Penerapan Asas Itikad Baik dalam Menjamin Profesionalitas Konsultan Desain pada Kontrak Konstruksi Design & Build di Indonesia Pakpahan, Petra Firman; Sami’an, Sami’an; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Aditya, Agung
Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jii.v5i1.7441

The Design & Build (DB) procurement model reshapes the legal structure of construction contracts by consolidating the responsibility for both design and construction under a single entity, the DB contractor. Within this structure, design consultants operate under the contractor’s authority and have no direct contractual relationship with the owner, creating potential conflicts of interest that may compromise professional independence. This normative legal research examines how the principle of good faith and the statutory principle of professionalism can be employed to interpret and regulate the obligations of DB contractors and their design consultants, particularly in ensuring the integrity and reliability of design outcomes. Using a statute-based and conceptual approach, this study analyses the Indonesian Civil Code, Law No. 2 of 2017 on Construction Services, and doctrinal writings on contract law and construction law, alongside academic literature on DB performance. The findings reveal that good faith functions as an interpretive, supplementary, and corrective principle in contractual relationships, and can therefore serve as a normative foundation to prevent undue interference by contractors in design decisions. Furthermore, the principle of professionalism requires design consultants to uphold technical standards and ethical responsibilities, even when positioned hierarchically under the contractor. The study concludes that the integration of good faith and professionalism offers an effective normative mechanism to strengthen accountability in DB projects, protect the owner’s interests, and fill the contractual gap arising from the absence of privity between the owner and the design consultant.

Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Konstruksi Internasional Melalui Arbitrase ICSID Sudarsono, Sudarsono; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Sami’an, Sami’an; Kunantiyorini, Anik
Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jii.v5i1.7442

This study aims to examine the settlement of investment disputes between the government and foreign investors through the ICSID institution and the mechanism for implementing its decisions in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with a regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. ICSID (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes) is based on an international agreement that establishes an autonomous and independent system for the settlement of foreign investment disputes. The ICSID's performance does not serve as a mediator that reconciles the parties; rather, it provides an institutional and procedural framework for independent conciliation commissions and arbitration tribunals set up specifically for each dispute case. In this case, ICSID only provides dispute resolution facilities based on two sets of procedural rules, namely the provisions of the ICSID Convention along with the ICSID Regulations/Rules, as well as the ICSID Additional Facilities Rules. Furthermore, the implementation of ICSID institutional decisions in Indonesia refers to Law No. 30 of 1999 which stipulates that the authority to recognize and implement international arbitral awards lies with the Central Jakarta District Court, with a procedure that must be preceded by an application from the party concerned.

Perbandingan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Antara Kontrak Pemerintah dan Kontrak Swasta Suryani, Sandra; Sami’an, Sami’an; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono
Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jii.v5i1.7459

The principle of freedom of contract is a fundamental principle in contract law which gives parties the authority to determine whether they will make an agreement, with whom the agreement is made, as well as the content and form of the agreement. This principle is rooted in the idea of ??autonomy of will which places contracts as the result of free agreement between the parties. However, in practice, the principle of freedom of contract is not applied uniformly to all types of contracts. Differences in the character of the parties, the purpose of the contract, and the interests protected by law cause variations in restrictions on freedom of contract, especially between government contracts and private contracts. Government contracts, even though they are in the form of agreements, cannot be separated from the state's function as organizer of public interests, so that freedom of contract in them experiences stricter restrictions. On the other hand, private contracts provide a wider space for freedom, although in practice they still face limitations due to the unequal bargaining positions of the parties. This research aims to analyze the concept of the principle of freedom of contract and compare its application in government contracts and private contracts in order to assess the relevance and legitimacy of this principle in modern contractual practice.

Kewenangan Konstitusional Pemerintah dalam Pelaksanaan Proyek Strategis Nasional Hadamean, Join; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Sami’an, Sami’an; Noor, Ganis Vitayanty
Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/japendi.v6i12.9065

PSN merupakan instrumen percepatan pembangunan yang diatur melalui berbagai regulasi, termasuk UUD 1945, UU Pemerintahan Daerah, serta Peraturan Presiden tentang PSN. Namun, perlu ditinjau sejauh mana kewenangan konstitusional pemerintah dapat digunakan tanpa melampaui prinsip checks and balances. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kewenangan konstitusional Pemerintah dalam pelaksanaan Proyek Strategis Nasional (PSN) dengan meninjau dasar hukum, cakupan kewenangan eksekutif, serta implikasinya terhadap tata kelola pembangunan nasional. Penelitian menggunakan metode studi kepustakaan melalui analisis konstitusi, peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, serta literatur akademik terkait kewenangan eksekutif dan hukum administrasi. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah memiliki legitimasi konstitusional untuk menjalankan PSN berdasarkan fungsi eksekutif dan mandat pembangunan nasional. Namun, kewenangan tersebut dibatasi oleh prinsip otonomi daerah, akuntabilitas publik, dan pengawasan yudisial. Pelaksanaan PSN efektif ketika didukung koordinasi lintas lembaga dan penegakan prinsip good governance. Namun, potensi konflik kewenangan, sentralisasi keputusan, dan kurangnya partisipasi publik dapat menimbulkan persoalan implementatif. Studi ini menegaskan pentingnya harmonisasi kewenangan pusat-daerah, transparansi prosedural, serta penguatan mekanisme pengawasan agar pelaksanaan PSN tetap sejalan dengan prinsip negara hukum.

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Subkontrak dalam Proyek Konstruksi di Indonesia: Analisis Kritis Terhadap Accountability Gap dan Rekomendasi Penataan Ulang Tanggung Jawab Kontraktor Utama Syafi'udin, Achmad; Sami’an, Sami’an; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Noor, Ganis Vitayanty
Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/japendi.v6i12.9232

Penelitian ini mengkaji secara mendalam celah perlindungan hukum (accountability gap) yang dialami pekerja subkontrak dalam proyek konstruksi di Indonesia, khususnya akibat lemahnya pertanggungjawaban kontraktor utama terhadap pemenuhan hak-hak normatif pekerja. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, penelitian ini menganalisis ketidakselarasan pengaturan antara Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Jasa Konstruksi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan, yang dalam praktiknya membuka ruang bagi kontraktor utama untuk melepaskan tanggung jawab hukum atas upah, keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (K3), serta jaminan sosial pekerja subkontrak. Kondisi ini menjadi semakin krusial mengingat sektor konstruksi tercatat menyumbang sekitar 32% dari total kecelakaan kerja nasional, dengan ribuan kasus terjadi setiap tahun dan sebagian besar melibatkan pekerja dengan status hubungan kerja tidak langsung. Studi kasus kegagalan PT Istaka Karya (Persero) menunjukkan dampak sistemik dari accountability gap tersebut, berupa tunggakan upah yang berkepanjangan, kerugian finansial massal bagi subkontraktor, serta penderitaan berantai yang dialami pekerja dan keluarganya. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kerangka hukum yang ada masih bersifat formalistik dan belum responsif terhadap karakter hubungan kerja triangular dalam industri konstruksi. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan prinsip tanggung jawab solidaritas (solidary liability) kontraktor utama melalui amandemen Undang-Undang Jasa Konstruksi, integrasi basis data ketenagakerjaan lintas sektor, serta pembentukan mekanisme retensi khusus untuk perlindungan pekerja, guna mendorong pergeseran paradigma dari perlindungan administratif menuju perlindungan substantif yang berkeadilan.

Kewenangan Pejabat Pemerintah dalam Pemutusan Kontrak Proyek Konstruksi Infrastruktur: Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penyedia Vaza, Herry; Sami’an, Sami’an
Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/japendi.v6i12.9235

Penelitian ini menganalisis kerangka hukum dan implikasi pemutusan kontrak oleh Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen (PPK) dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah, khususnya pada sektor jasa konstruksi. Kewenangan PPK dalam pemutusan kontrak tidak bersifat absolut dan harus didasarkan pada ketentuan hukum yang berlaku, termasuk pembuktian wanprestasi dan pemberian kesempatan perbaikan kepada penyedia jasa. Tindakan pemutusan kontrak secara sepihak berpotensi menimbulkan sengketa perdata maupun Tata Usaha Negara, yang dapat merugikan baik negara maupun penyedia jasa. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif yang dilengkapi dengan analisis deskriptif-kualitatif regulasi, doktrin hukum, dan putusan pengadilan relevan, penelitian ini juga mengadopsi pendekatan empiris terbatas melalui rekonstruksi kasus fiktif untuk menguji penerapan norma hukum dalam praktik. Tujuan utama penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi dasar hukum kewenangan PPK, menafsirkan kewenangan diskresioner, serta mengeksplorasi penerapan prinsip-prinsip hukum perdata dalam penyelesaian sengketa pemutusan kontrak. Lebih lanjut, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan merumuskan konsep perlindungan hukum yang komprehensif bagi penyedia jasa atas pemutusan kontrak secara sepihak, mengingat potensi kerugian finansial dan reputasi yang mungkin timbul. Kajian ini juga menyoroti pertanggungjawaban hukum pejabat pemerintah dalam penyimpangan pengadaan barang/jasa dan berupaya mencapai keseimbangan antara diskresi pejabat dengan hak-hak penyedia jasa guna menjamin kepastian hukum dan keadilan.

Title

Found 29 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 29 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 29 Documents
Search