Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.766
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Darussalam : Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab Al-Balad : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Al-Muqaronah:Jurnal Perbandingan Madzhab dan Hukum
Nuriskandar, Lalu Hendri
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PENGARUH PARTISIPASI PUBLIK DALAM PROSES PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DI ERA DIGITAL: STUDI KASUS PADA UU CIPTA KERJA Sukadi, Muhammad; Nuriskandar, Lalu Hendri
Al-Muqaronah: Jurnal Perbandingan Madzhab dan Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Al-Muqaronah : Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum
Publisher : STIS Darussalam Bermi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59259/am.v3i1.167

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of public participation in the process of forming laws in the digital era, with a case study on the Job Creation Law. In the digital era, technology has opened up new opportunities for the public to be more actively involved in the legislative process through various digital platforms. However, although access to the process of forming laws is increasingly easy, the quality and impact of public participation are often still questionable. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method to explore the extent to which public participation through digital media influences the process of forming the Job Creation Law. Data were collected through document analysis, in-depth interviews, and participant observation. The results of the study show that although digital technology has increased the amount of public participation, not all public input is adequately considered in the decision-making process. In addition, challenges such as digital exclusion and personal data protection are significant obstacles to increasing the effectiveness of participation. In conclusion, the digital era offers great opportunities to strengthen public participation in the process of forming laws, but improvements are needed in public engagement mechanisms, increased transparency, and privacy protection to ensure that such participation truly has an impact. Recommendations provided include the development of a more inclusive participation platform, increased transparency in the processing of public input, and stricter enforcement of privacy policies. Keywords: public participation, digital era, law formation, Job Creation Law, digital technology.
PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP KEWENANGAN PRESIDEN DALAM PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG Jumadi, Jumadi; Nuriskandar, Lalu Hendri
Al-Muqaronah: Jurnal Perbandingan Madzhab dan Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Al-Muqaronah : Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum
Publisher : STIS Darussalam Bermi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59259/am.v3i1.168

Abstract

This research aims to explore the influence of the Constitutional Court (MK) decision on the President's authority in the formation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws (Perppu). In the Indonesian constitutional system, Perppu is a legal instrument used by the President to deal with emergencies that require immediate handling, but this authority often gives rise to debate regarding the limits and conditions for its issuance. MK decisions have a crucial role in interpreting and establishing constitutional parameters for the use of this authority, so this research highlights how MK decisions influence the practice of forming Perppu by the President. This research uses normative juridical methods with a conceptual approach and analysis of relevant Constitutional Court decisions, including case studies of decisions that confirm emergency criteria and procedures for issuing Perppu. The findings of this research reveal that the Constitutional Court's decision has strengthened the principle of checks and balances between the executive and legislative branches, by setting stricter limits regarding the conditions that justify the issuance of a Perppu. Apart from that, the Constitutional Court's decision also emphasized the importance of openness and public participation in the Perppu formation process, as an effort to maintain legal accountability and legitimacy in the midst of an emergency situation. Furthermore, this research shows that the Constitutional Court's decision not only limits the President's authority, but also provides clearer guidance regarding the implementation of the Perppu so that it is in line with constitutional values ??and human rights. In the long term, the Constitutional Court's decisions have the potential to encourage reform in the legal regulatory system, by improving the quality of emergency legislation and strengthening protection of democratic principles. Therefore, this research concludes that the Constitutional Court's decision has a significant impact in ensuring that the President's authority in forming Perppu is used proportionally, appropriately, and in accordance with applicable constitutional provisions. Keywords: Constitutional Court Decision, Presidential Authority, Perppu, Constitution, Democracy, Accountability.
PERAN OMBUDSMAN DALAM MENJAGA GOOD GOVERNANCE DI INDONESIA: ANALISIS DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM TATA NEGARA ARMA NURLAILIY, NYI AYU; Nuriskandar, Lalu Hendri
Al-Muqaronah: Jurnal Perbandingan Madzhab dan Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Al-Muqaronah : Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum
Publisher : STIS Darussalam Bermi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59259/am.v3i1.169

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the role of the Ombudsman in maintaining good governance in Indonesia from the perspective of Constitutional Law. As an independent state institution, the Ombudsman has the main function of supervising public services carried out by government institutions and state-owned enterprises (BUMN), with the aim of ensuring that public administration runs in accordance with the principles of good governance, such as transparency, accountability and participation. public. This research explores the extent of the authority and effectiveness of the Ombudsman in carrying out its supervisory duties, as well as the challenges faced in ensuring the implementation of the recommendations issued. The approach used in this research is juridical-normative, with data analysis sourced from statutory regulations, decisions and relevant literature. The research results show that although the Ombudsman has contributed significantly in encouraging good governance practices, there are a number of obstacles, such as limited legal authority and resources, which affect the effectiveness of its supervision. In addition, the level of compliance of supervised institutions with the Ombudsman's recommendations still requires improvement. This research suggests strengthening the authority of the Ombudsman through revision of statutory regulations, increasing resources, and closer collaboration with other institutions, both at the national and international levels, to strengthen the role of the Ombudsman in maintaining good governance in Indonesia.  
PERBANDINGAN METODE PEMBUKTIAN SECARA QARINAH DI TERENGGANU (MALAYSIA) DAN ACEH (INDONESIA) Nuriskandar, Lalu Hendri
JURNAL DARUSSALAM: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Darussalam: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab
Publisher : STIS Darussalam Bermi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (415.631 KB) | DOI: 10.59259/jd.v1i2.10

Abstract

Pembuktian merupakan salah satu unsur penting dalam suatu proses hukum baik dalam hukum perdata maupun hukum Islam. Dalam perkara pidana, alat bukti yang jelas dan meyakinkan (tidak diragukan lagi) akan menjadi dasar pemidanaan suatu tindak pidana. Di sisi lain, bukti yang tidak jelas dan meyakinkan akan menjadi dasar pembebasan terdakwa dari dakwaan. Pembuktian harus diajukan di pengadilan sesuai dengan tata cara yang ditentukan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang ditetapkan oleh pemerintah suatu tempat atau daerah untuk menjamin keadilan dapat dicapai dengan cara yang sebaik-baiknya. Yurisprudensi Islam telah menetapkan aturan penilaian dan pembuktian sebagaimana dinyatakan dalam Al-Qur'an dan Hadits. Selain metode pembuktian yang disebutkan dalam Al-Qur'an dan Hadits seperti Ikrar (pengakuan) dan Syahadah (kesaksian), Qarinah juga diterima sebagai salah satu metode pembuktian dalam Islam. Qarinah memegang peranan penting sebagai metode atau alat pembuktian dalam suatu persidangan agar keadilan dapat ditegakkan. Penggunaan qarinah sangat diperlukan dalam pemidanaan suatu perkara jika tidak ada pengakuan atau keterangan saksi penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif,dengan metode kepustakaan, maka analisis isi dalam penelitian ini dilakukan secara induktif. Berdasarkan acuan putusan perkara di Pengadilan Syariah Terengganu dan Aceh, dapat disimpulkan bahwa kedua yurisdiksi tersebut menerima qarinah sebagai salah satu metode pembuktian di pengadilan. Dapat juga disimpulkan bahwa kedua yurisdiksi menerima qarnah kuat dan meyakinkan (qarinah al-qat'iyyah) yang dan qarinah yang perlu didukung oleh qarnah lain (qarnah ghayr al-qat'iyyah) untuk memungkinkannya mencapai tingkat kepercayaan. atau an al-gh?lib.
THE ADMISSIBILITY OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS koh beng, oh you; a/l Thiagarajan , Shanmugam; Nuriskandar, Lalu Hendri
JURNAL DARUSSALAM: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Darussalam: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab
Publisher : STIS Darussalam Bermi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (819.864 KB) | DOI: 10.59259/jd.v2i1.27

Abstract

Admissibility of criminal convictions as evidence in criminal proceedings has become a controversial decision of the Court of Appeal of United Kingdom in the case of Hollington v Hewthorn (1943). Since then several follow-up decisions has either adopted this decision and some jurisdictions have rejected it. This article assesses the effect of this decision in four jurisdictions, i.e UK, Australia, Canada and Malaysia. It is found that UK, Australia and Canada have since moved away from this judgement by amendment to their respective Evidence Acts. However, this is not so in the case of Malaysia. This paper recommends that Malaysia revisit section 43 of the Evidence Act 1950 with a view to amend this section to be on par with UK, Australia and Canada.   
Undocumented Migrant Worker’s Human Right: Should be Protected? International Law and Trafficking Law Perspective NURISKANDAR, LALU HENDRI
JURNAL DARUSSALAM: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Darussalam: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab
Publisher : STIS Darussalam Bermi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (638.797 KB) | DOI: 10.59259/jd.v2i1.28

Abstract

Undocumented Migrant Workers violate immigration rules and can be detrimental to the host country. On the other hand, their illegality is often exploited by employers who exploit them. The two problems examined in this study are how the protection that International Law provides them and what solutions can be offered to migrant countries to cope with undocumented migrant workers. This research is normative research, with qualitative analysis. The results of this study show that International Law protects the rights of undocumented migrant workers who have carried out their work without discrimination. In the face of undocumented migrants’ preventive measures are better taken by the state than enforcement. Keywords: migrant workers, illegal, non-discrimination
PENGGUNAAN TEKNOLOGI DALAM DETEKSI DAN PENCEGAHAN PERDAGANGAN ORANG: PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN Adnan, Idul; Hamdi, Muh. Rizal; Nuriskandar, Lalu Hendri
JURNAL DARUSSALAM: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Darussalam: Pemikiran Hukum Ketatanegaraan dan Perbandingan Mazhab
Publisher : STIS Darussalam Bermi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59259/jd.v4i1.151

Abstract

Human trafficking remains a grave violation of human rights, and its complex nature necessitates innovative approaches for effective detection and prevention. This study explores the role of technology in combating human trafficking, highlighting both the opportunities and challenges associated with its implementation. Advanced technologies such as machine learning algorithms, big data analytics, and blockchain are utilized to monitor suspicious activities, identify trafficking patterns, and ensure transparency in supply chains. Moreover, digital platforms and mobile applications provide crucial support for victims by enabling anonymous reporting and access to emergency assistance. Despite these advancements, significant challenges persist, including data privacy and security concerns. This research emphasizes the need for robust policies and collaborative efforts between public and private sectors to develop secure and effective technological solutions in the fight against human trafficking.
IMPLIKASI PENGHAPUSAN PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD PADA PEMILU SERENTAK TAHUN 2029 Hamdi, Muh. Rizal; Adnan, Idul; Nuriskandar, Lalu Hendri
JURNAL DARUSSALAM: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Darussalam: Pemikiran Hukum Ketatanegaraan dan Perbandingan Mazhab
Publisher : STIS Darussalam Bermi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59259/jd.v4i2.193

Abstract

This research aims to examine the implications of the Constitutional Court decision Number 116/PUU-XXI/2023, one of which contains the elimination of the 4% parliamentary threshold regulated in Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning Elections as one of the legal bases for implementation. election in 2029. The Constitutional Court (MK) considers that the parliamentary threshold provisions are not in line with the principles of popular sovereignty, electoral fairness, and violate the legal certainty guaranteed by the constitution. This research is library research which examines the Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XXI/2023. This research is descriptive analytical in nature, namely by describing the description of the object under study based on facts that appear as they are and then analyzing them to reveal the meanings behind these facts. The approach used in this research is a normative approach. In this research, it is explained that the existence of the Parliamentary Threshold is not effective enough as a mechanism to simplify the existence of political parties in the electoral system in Indonesia. It even tends to harm the constitutional rights of citizens who represent their constituents. The existence of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XXI/2023 provides a breath of fresh air to create justice in the implementation of the 2029 elections in Indonesia
Co-Authors a/l Thiagarajan , Shanmugam ARMA NURLAILIY, NYI AYU Elpipit Elpipit Fathony Karuniawan Hardiyatullah, Hardiyatullah Idul Adnan Jumadi Jumadi koh beng, oh you Muh. Rizal Hamdi Mustakim, Ahmad Muzawir, Muzawir Nurman Jayadi Sepyah, Sepyah Suarajana, Suarjana Suarjana Suarjana Sugitanata, Arif Sukadi, Muhammad