Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.323
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review Media Iuris MAGISTRA Law Review Jurnal Abdimas Kartika Wijayakusuma
Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : awang long law review

 1 
SEMA BINDING STRENGTH NO. 2/2023 REGARDING THE JUDGE'S DETERMINATION IN APPLICATIONS FOR REGISTRATION OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGES Leonide, Cliff Ivan; Khoidin, M.; Zulaika, Emi; Poesoko, Herowati; Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1166

Abstract

The state guarantees freedom of religion, as well as forming a marriage. Registration of marriages, especially mixed marriages, is regulated in Article 57 of Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage. This mixed marriage is also related to interfaith marriage which is also a right for Indonesian citizens. The Supreme Court in this case made SEMA No. 2/2023 dated 17 July 2023 concerning Appointments for Judges in Adjudicating Cases on Applications for Registration of Marriages Between People of Different Religions and Beliefs, at point No. 2 explains that "The court did not grant the request for registration of marriages between people of different religions and beliefs." If this SEMA is analyzed it is in conflict with Article 35 letter (a) of Law no. 23 of 2006 in conjunction with Article 50 of Minister of Home Affairs Regulation no. 108/2019. Therefore, the author analyzes the binding strength of SEMA No. 2/2023 dated 17 July 2023 regarding the failure to grant the request for registration of interfaith marriages. Meanwhile, Minister of Home Affairs Regulation no. 108/2019 states that interfaith marriages must be proven, which automatically results in an application being made to the court. This is also related to Article 35 letter (a) of Law no. 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration which regulates marriages determined by courts for people of different religions. Therefore, the author analyzes the above problem with the problem, namely the binding force of SEMA No. 2/2023 regarding the judge's decision in the application for registration of interfaith marriages. The method used is normative juridical research, with an analysis of the theory of authority and legal certainty. The approaches used are the conceptual approach, statutory approach and case approach. The conclusion to be reached in this writing has future perspective value and is in accordance with its axiology, namely the aim of law is justice.
PERMANENT LEGAL STRENGTH (INKRACHT VAN GEWEIJSDE) PKPU PEACE IN BANKRUPTCY LAW Poesoko, Felly Felmmy Dwi Renaningtyas; Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina; Tektona, Rahmadi Indra; Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih; Astutik, Sri
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1167

Abstract

The decision to ratify PKPU peace (homologation) based on its regulations has permanent legal force (inkracht van geweijsde). The nature of permanent legal force is related to whether it can be executed or implemented immediately, so that this decision requires legal certainty by stating that the decision must have permanent legal force. Bankruptcy law regulates differently regarding the permanent legal force in PKPU decisions, the difference being that the permanent legal force does not apply to the entire substance of the case but only to the peace agreement agreement, which can be called limited permanent legal force. Regarding this specificity, the researcher wants to analyze it under the title "permanent legal force (inkracht van geweijsde) of PKPU peace in bankruptcy law". This research uses normative juridical research methods, with the analysis of peace theory, legal system theory and theory of legal objectives with a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach and which is expected to have prescriptive value in the future in accordance with its axiology, namely the aim of law is justice
PRACTICAL LAW DEVELOPMENT THE INSTITUTION OF POSTPONEMENT OF DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS TO ACHIEVE THE VALUE OF JUSTICE Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih; Poesoko, Herowati; Raharja, Sunarya; Puryani, Puji; Andani, Devi
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1234

Abstract

Practical law development is described as implementing the duties or ideals of the law in practice. Law is an arrangement the state provides to the community as a guarantee of security for justice seekers (justiabelen). In practice, cases examined in the application of the law by linking the regulatory norms with the legal facts, then the result of the judge's analysis is the ratio decidendi as the basis for making the ruling, as well as the decision in the PKPU realm in bankruptcy law which is lex specialist on the work of PKPU institutions. The success of the PKPU institution's work with a court decision that has permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde) (vide Article 287 of the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law). The PKPU peace institution in every case settlement is needed to be strongly encouraged so that the success rate is high. This is because this institution at an early stage is desired to be a tool in stopping the bankruptcy decision for the debtor, so that the debtor can continue his business and can pay his debts to creditors, therefore it is expected to provide justice for the parties who are litigating. The purpose of law is to achieve the value of justice, with the value of legal certainty and the value of the benefits of the PKPU institution, which is part of the value of justice as a legal goal. The author in this article analyzes "how the practical legal implementation of the PKPU peace institution achieves the value of justice". The writing of this article uses the normative juridical method, which makes the norm as the legal concept, and uses the analysis knife of the theory of legal objectives taken from 3 (three) general teachings of Gustav Radbruch, namely certainty, benefits and the end is justice, in addition to dissecting it, also using Kees Schuit's theory, namely idiil elements, operational elements and actuil elements. The approach used is conceptual approach, statutory approach, and case approach. The conclusion to be reached has prescriptive value as an apology for the world of legal science, especially the science of bankruptcy law and the institution of Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU).
SEMA BINDING STRENGTH NO. 2/2023 REGARDING THE JUDGE'S DETERMINATION IN APPLICATIONS FOR REGISTRATION OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGES Leonide, Cliff Ivan; Khoidin, M.; Zulaika, Emi; Poesoko, Herowati; Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1166

Abstract

The state guarantees freedom of religion, as well as forming a marriage. Registration of marriages, especially mixed marriages, is regulated in Article 57 of Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage. This mixed marriage is also related to interfaith marriage which is also a right for Indonesian citizens. The Supreme Court in this case made SEMA No. 2/2023 dated 17 July 2023 concerning Appointments for Judges in Adjudicating Cases on Applications for Registration of Marriages Between People of Different Religions and Beliefs, at point No. 2 explains that "The court did not grant the request for registration of marriages between people of different religions and beliefs." If this SEMA is analyzed it is in conflict with Article 35 letter (a) of Law no. 23 of 2006 in conjunction with Article 50 of Minister of Home Affairs Regulation no. 108/2019. Therefore, the author analyzes the binding strength of SEMA No. 2/2023 dated 17 July 2023 regarding the failure to grant the request for registration of interfaith marriages. Meanwhile, Minister of Home Affairs Regulation no. 108/2019 states that interfaith marriages must be proven, which automatically results in an application being made to the court. This is also related to Article 35 letter (a) of Law no. 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration which regulates marriages determined by courts for people of different religions. Therefore, the author analyzes the above problem with the problem, namely the binding force of SEMA No. 2/2023 regarding the judge's decision in the application for registration of interfaith marriages. The method used is normative juridical research, with an analysis of the theory of authority and legal certainty. The approaches used are the conceptual approach, statutory approach and case approach. The conclusion to be reached in this writing has future perspective value and is in accordance with its axiology, namely the aim of law is justice.
PERMANENT LEGAL STRENGTH (INKRACHT VAN GEWEIJSDE) PKPU PEACE IN BANKRUPTCY LAW Poesoko, Felly Felmmy Dwi Renaningtyas; Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina; Tektona, Rahmadi Indra; Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih; Astutik, Sri
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1167

Abstract

The decision to ratify PKPU peace (homologation) based on its regulations has permanent legal force (inkracht van geweijsde). The nature of permanent legal force is related to whether it can be executed or implemented immediately, so that this decision requires legal certainty by stating that the decision must have permanent legal force. Bankruptcy law regulates differently regarding the permanent legal force in PKPU decisions, the difference being that the permanent legal force does not apply to the entire substance of the case but only to the peace agreement agreement, which can be called limited permanent legal force. Regarding this specificity, the researcher wants to analyze it under the title "permanent legal force (inkracht van geweijsde) of PKPU peace in bankruptcy law". This research uses normative juridical research methods, with the analysis of peace theory, legal system theory and theory of legal objectives with a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach and which is expected to have prescriptive value in the future in accordance with its axiology, namely the aim of law is justice
PRACTICAL LAW DEVELOPMENT THE INSTITUTION OF POSTPONEMENT OF DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS TO ACHIEVE THE VALUE OF JUSTICE Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih; Poesoko, Herowati; Raharja, Sunarya; Puryani, Puji; Andani, Devi
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1234

Abstract

Practical law development is described as implementing the duties or ideals of the law in practice. Law is an arrangement the state provides to the community as a guarantee of security for justice seekers (justiabelen). In practice, cases examined in the application of the law by linking the regulatory norms with the legal facts, then the result of the judge's analysis is the ratio decidendi as the basis for making the ruling, as well as the decision in the PKPU realm in bankruptcy law which is lex specialist on the work of PKPU institutions. The success of the PKPU institution's work with a court decision that has permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde) (vide Article 287 of the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law). The PKPU peace institution in every case settlement is needed to be strongly encouraged so that the success rate is high. This is because this institution at an early stage is desired to be a tool in stopping the bankruptcy decision for the debtor, so that the debtor can continue his business and can pay his debts to creditors, therefore it is expected to provide justice for the parties who are litigating. The purpose of law is to achieve the value of justice, with the value of legal certainty and the value of the benefits of the PKPU institution, which is part of the value of justice as a legal goal. The author in this article analyzes "how the practical legal implementation of the PKPU peace institution achieves the value of justice". The writing of this article uses the normative juridical method, which makes the norm as the legal concept, and uses the analysis knife of the theory of legal objectives taken from 3 (three) general teachings of Gustav Radbruch, namely certainty, benefits and the end is justice, in addition to dissecting it, also using Kees Schuit's theory, namely idiil elements, operational elements and actuil elements. The approach used is conceptual approach, statutory approach, and case approach. The conclusion to be reached has prescriptive value as an apology for the world of legal science, especially the science of bankruptcy law and the institution of Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU).
Co-Authors Ariyani, Nita Devi Andani Dyah Ochtorina Susanti Emi Zulaika Herowati Poesoko, Herowati Leonide, Cliff Ivan M. Hadi Shubhan M. Khoidin, M. Poesoko, Felly Felmmy Dwi Renaningtyas Puryani, Puji R. Murjiyanto, R. Rahmadi Indra Tektona SRI ASTUTIK Sudiyana Sudiyana, Sudiyana Sunarya Raharja Utami, Wahyu Dwi Zahir, Mohd Zamre Mohd