Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.207
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM Jurnal Theologia Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama untuk Pemberdayaan Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam IJTIHAD Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Al-Ahkam Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender Raheema Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Al-MARSHAD: Jurnal Astronomi Islam dan Ilmu-Ilmu Berkaitan Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Undang: Jurnal Hukum Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Batoboh : Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat JURNAL PENELITIAN Dialogia: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Jurnal Bimas Islam Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Penamas Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi) Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Jurnal Penelitian Jurnal Hukum Islam
Wildani Hefni
Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL PENELITIAN

 1 
Ideological Political Contestation in the Discourse of Hisab Rukyat in Indonesia Hefni, Wildani
Jurnal Penelitian Volume 16 Nomor 1 2019
Publisher : IAIN Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (300.585 KB) | DOI: 10.28918/jupe.v16i1.1826

Abstract

This article discusses the ideological contestation of the two mass organizations, Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), that are the spearhead of the two paradigms in determining the beginning of the month of qamariah. Hisab is initiated by Muhammadiyah and rukyat is pioneered by Nahdlatul Ulama (NU). These two paradigms are the cause of the emergence of tension conflict due to the non-uniformity of the method of determining the beginning of the qamariah month in Indonesia. By using a power relations approach and reading of religious commodification, this article concludes that fragmentation of religious authority has given rise to a real phenomenon in the midst of society in the form of ideological political contestation played by two large mass organizations in Indonesia in determining the beginning of the qamariah month, NU and Muhammadiyah. The conception of power relations with the government is a problem that is often used as a basis for maintaining ideology and belief in a paradigm that has long been built. Moreover, religious issues drawn in ideological interests have led to a layer of group fanaticism which often makes religion a commodification of pragmatic interests.
Ideological Political Contestation in the Discourse of Hisab Rukyat in Indonesia Wildani Hefni
Jurnal Penelitian Volume 16 Nomor 1 2019
Publisher : IAIN Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jupe.v16i1.1826

Abstract

This article discusses the ideological contestation of the two mass organizations, Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), that are the spearhead of the two paradigms in determining the beginning of the month of qamariah. Hisab is initiated by Muhammadiyah and rukyat is pioneered by Nahdlatul Ulama (NU). These two paradigms are the cause of the emergence of tension conflict due to the non-uniformity of the method of determining the beginning of the qamariah month in Indonesia. By using a power relations approach and reading of religious commodification, this article concludes that fragmentation of religious authority has given rise to a real phenomenon in the midst of society in the form of ideological political contestation played by two large mass organizations in Indonesia in determining the beginning of the qamariah month, NU and Muhammadiyah. The conception of power relations with the government is a problem that is often used as a basis for maintaining ideology and belief in a paradigm that has long been built. Moreover, religious issues drawn in ideological interests have led to a layer of group fanaticism which often makes religion a commodification of pragmatic interests.
Facing Religious Contemporary Challenges: Redefining the Partnership of Islamic Higher Education and Islamic Religious Instructors in Mainstreaming Religious Moderation Wildani Hefni; Rizqa Ahmadi
Jurnal Penelitian Volume 19 Nomor 2 2022
Publisher : IAIN Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jupe.v19i2.6161

Abstract

This article examines the partnership of Islamic higher education with Islamic religious instructors in mainstreaming religious moderation values. This partnership is conducted to face some challenges in contemporary religious understanding. Religious moderation values, such as tolerance, justice, balance, and humanism, become individual and institutional needs. The type of this research is qualitative research using library-based analysis, which obtains the information from news documents and existing partnership documents. The object of this study is the State Islamic University (UIN) Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember and Islamic Religious Instructors in the Jember regency. This study concludes that the partnership between two institutions supports the mainstreaming of religious moderation values in several forms, including early mapping of religious conflicts, formulating strategies for resolving religious phenomena, and using digital media. These two institutions agreed on several points outlined in their “declaration.” The functions of religious instructors include educative, consultative, informative, and motivational, and Islamic higher education's role is to become a bridge to assist and provide religious education to the community based on religious moderation values, such as tolerance, fairness, and egalitarianism.
Co-Authors Ayis Mukholik Ayis Mukholik, Ayis Billah, A. Mu'tasim Chamdan, Umar Hafifi, Mahbubatul Imam Mustofa Imam Mustofa IMAM MUSTOFA Ishaq Ishaq Lilik Rofiqoh Maliki, Ibnu Akbar Maslathif Dwi Purnomo Miftahul Ulum Mufliha Wijayati Muhamad Khusnul Muna Muhammad Iqbal Juliansyahzen Muhammad Muntahibun Nafis Mutrofin Mutrofin Purnomo, Maslathif Dwi Qurrotul Uyun Rizqa Ahmadi Rizqa Ahmadi Rizqa Ahmadi Rizqa Ahmadi Rizqa Ahmadi Rizqa Ahmadi Rizqa Ahmadi Rizqa Ahmadi, Rizqa Sa`adah, Sri Lumatus Subairi, Ach.