Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.658
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Veritas et Justitia LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Akta Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Ius Constituendum Nagari Law Review Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Jurnal Yuridis Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Jurnal GeoEkonomi JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Jurnal Nuansa Akademik: Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat Law Development Journal Ius Poenale Mimbar Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Susilo, Erwin
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Transforming Amicus Curiae Through an Experimental Jurisprudence Framework in Judicial Decision-Making Susilo, Erwin; Sujatmiko, Bagus; Arifin, Zaenal
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.12689

Abstract

This study examines the contemporary role of amicus curiae in strengthening judicial reasoning through the integration of the Experimental Jurisprudence (X-Jur) framework within the Indonesian legal system. The research addresses the absence of explicit regulations governing amicus curiae despite its increasing use in high-profile cases, creating inconsistencies in judicial treatment and undermining normative clarity. Using a normative legal method complemented by statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches, this study analyzes the doctrinal position of amicus curiae and evaluates its potential as an epistemic instrument that enriches judicial deliberations with empirical, psychological, and social perspectives. The findings demonstrate that amicus curiae provides valuable epistemic input that enhances judicial reflection; however, its current acceptance remains discretionary and fragmented due to the lack of procedural guidelines. The integration of X-Jur reveals a strong empirical connection between public perceptions of justice and judicial reasoning, offering a data-driven foundation for improving the legitimacy and social responsiveness of court decisions. The novelty of this research lies in conceptualizing amicus curiae as a methodological bridge between normative doctrine and empirical cognition, and in proposing a regulatory model—through a Supreme Court Regulation—that institutionalizes amicus curiae as a formal mechanism within Indonesia’s civil law tradition. This framework is essential for strengthening transparency, judicial reflectiveness, and the pursuit of substantive justice in modern adjudication.  
Access to Justice: An Effective Pretrial Model to Guarantee the Right to Defense for Suspects in Indonesia Susilo, Erwin; Din, Mohd; Suhaimi; Mansur, Teuku Muttaqin
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.14.2.2025.317-350

Abstract

This paper examines the ineffectiveness of the pretrial mechanism in Indonesia in guaranteeing the right of suspects to submit and request examination of exculpatory evidence during the investigation stage. Although the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) provides a legal basis for this right, no rules guarantee that investigators will conduct such examinations, as evidenced by several cases in which investigators ignored such requests. This study is normative legal research, employing a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. It compares the Brady Rule in the United States, which requires prosecutors to disclose evidence favorable to the defendant, and the Dutch model of the 'rechter-commissaris', which grants judges the authority to oversee investigative actions actively. The results of this study recommend expanding the authority of pretrial judges to order investigators to examine mitigating evidence based on requests from the suspect or their legal counsel. This reform is important to realize the principles of fair trial, favor defensionis, and equality of arms, as well as to strengthen constitutional protection of human rights and the values of Pancasila. Preliminary hearings, as conceptualized here, can address the injustices that remain unresolved despite decades since the enactment of the CPC in 1981.
Judicial Decisions and Legal Autopoiesis: Law as a Living System Susilo, Erwin
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v7i1.7882

Abstract

Law, as a living system, evolves through continuous communication, enabling it to adapt to social changes and technological advancements. This research examines the question of how law reproduces itself within the framework of judicial decision-making in Indonesia, to explain the theoretical and practical roles of judges in maintaining the vitality of the legal system. Using a normative-conceptual (doctrinal-philosophical) approach, this research combines Niklas Luhmann's autopoiesis theory, Hans Kelsen's pure law theory, Jürgen Habermas's communicative action theory, Ronald Dworkin's concept of law as integrity, and Pierre Bourdieu's theory of symbolic power to analyze how judicial decisions function as a mechanism for legal reproduction. The research results show that judges in Indonesia not only apply existing norms but also interpret and reconstruct them to align with social and technological developments. For example, this is evident in Supreme Court Decisions Number 1794 K/Pdt/2004 and Number 230/G/TF/2019/PTUN-JKT, which demonstrate how judges' legal considerations integrate normative coherence, communicative legitimacy, and social responsiveness. This research concludes that law in Indonesia functions as an autopoietic system—capable of independently reproducing itself, adapting, and sustaining itself through judicial communication, thus remaining relevant, legitimate, and responsive to the dynamics of contemporary society.
Healing Law, Not Hurting: Building a Therapeutic Jurisprudence-Based Criminal Justice System in Indonesia Susilo, Erwin; Mawla Ibnu Kamali , Karell
Ius Poenale Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/ip.v6i2.4408

Abstract

Therapeutic Jurisprudence (TJ) offers a humane and rehabilitation-oriented paradigm that moves beyond a purely punitive criminal justice model. This study examines the urgency of implementing TJ in Indonesia and proposes a conceptual criminal justice model to support its application. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, the study finds that TJ can enhance rehabilitation and reduce recidivism by incorporating defendants’ psychological and social conditions into judicial decision-making. The proposed model integrates Social Research Reports as a key basis for sentencing and strengthens the role of community probation officers in the rehabilitation process. Its implementation requires legal reform, particularly amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code to authorize judges to order Social Research Reports for adult defendants and to reinforce probation institutions. This study contributes to the development of a more inclusive, just, and rehabilitative criminal justice system in Indonesia.
Ratio Decidendi dan Obiter Dictum: Evolusi Konseptual Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Pidana Indonesia Susilo, Erwin; Negara, Dharma Setiawan
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 16, No 2 (2025): JNH VOL 16 NO 2 NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v16i2.5049

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas integrasi antara ratio decidendi dan obiter dictum dalam putusan perkara pidana di Indonesia sebagai cerminan perkembangan paradigma hukum yang tidak lagi terikat pada klasifikasi tradisional sistem common law. Melalui metode yuridis normatif, tulisan ini menyoroti bagaimana berlakunya Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, khususnya Pasal 53 ayat (2), mendorong pengadilan untuk mendahulukan nilai keadilan dibandingkan kepastian hukum, sehingga membuka ruang bagi obiter dictum untuk memperoleh relevansinya secara substantif. Dalam konteks ini, ratio decidendi dan obiter dictum dipahami bukan sebagai entitas yang terpisah secara ketat, melainkan saling melengkapi dalam membentuk struktur pertimbangan hukum yang integral. Artikel ini juga mengaitkan pergeseran tersebut dengan konsep positivisme hukum inklusif, yang mengakomodasi nilai-nilai moral dan kemanusiaan ke dalam sistem hukum positif. Dengan menelaah berbagai konsep, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penyatuan ratio decidendi dan obiter dictum adalah suatu keniscayaan secara yuridis dalam membangun putusan pidana yang adil dan kontekstual dalam sistem hukum Indonesia yang berlandaskan Pancasila.
Analisis Konsentrasi DPK di Bank Umum Indonesia Berdasarkan Tiering Saldo Hatta, M.; Susilo, Erwin
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Februari - April
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v5i1.6852

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis dinamika perkembangan dan tingkat konsentrasi Dana Pihak Ketiga (DPK) perbankan Indonesia berdasarkan klasifikasi tiering saldo selama periode 2013–2025. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi pola pertumbuhan DPK, perubahan struktur deposan, serta implikasi konsentrasi dana terhadap stabilitas sistem perbankan. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif-komparatif dan memanfaatkan data agregat publikasi Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS), analisis dibagi ke dalam tiga fase utama, yaitu periode pra-pandemi (2013–2019), periode pandemi dan dampaknya (2020–2023), serta periode pasca-pandemi (2024–2025). Tingkat konsentrasi dan ketimpangan distribusi DPK dianalisis menggunakan beberapa indikator komplementer, antara lain Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI), rasio konsentrasi antar tier saldo, Kurva Lorenz, dan Indeks Gini. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pertumbuhan DPK perbankan Indonesia bersifat asimetris dan cenderung semakin terkonsentrasi pada kelompok rekening bersaldo besar. Meskipun Tier 1 (rekening bersaldo kecil) secara konsisten mendominasi jumlah rekening, kontribusinya terhadap total nominal DPK terus mengalami penurunan relatif. Sebaliknya, kelompok tier saldo tinggi, khususnya Tier 5 hingga Tier 7, menunjukkan peningkatan kontribusi yang signifikan dan bersifat struktural dalam jangka menengah hingga panjang. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa peningkatan DPK lebih mencerminkan proses pendalaman simpanan (deposit deepening) dibandingkan perluasan basis deposan secara luas. Kondisi tersebut memiliki implikasi penting terhadap stabilitas likuiditas perbankan, sensitivitas terhadap perilaku deposan besar, serta efektivitas kebijakan inklusi keuangan. Oleh karena itu, hasil penelitian ini relevan sebagai dasar pertimbangan bagi regulator dan otoritas perbankan dalam merancang kebijakan pengelolaan risiko konsentrasi dana dan strategi pendalaman intermediasi keuangan yang berkelanjutan.
The Assessing Validity of Prima Facie Evidence in Handling the Exception of Jurisdiction in Civil Cases Negara, Dharma Setiawan; Susilo, Erwin; Darmawan, Didit; Hardyansah, Rommy; Lufsiana, Lufsiana
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i1.48280

Abstract

The plea of lack of jurisdiction in civil cases is a procedural objection by the defendant challenging the court's authority to adjudicate. Theoretically, it does not involve substantive proof, as it precedes the case's merits. However, judicial practice often includes preliminary evidence, prompting scrutiny of its validity. This study examines the legal foundations of jurisdiction exceptions in Indonesian civil procedure and assesses the admissibility of preliminary evidence. Employing a normative juridical approach with legislative, case, and conceptual analysis, it reviews regulations like the Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR), Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (RBg), and Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power. Case studies of Interlocutory Decision No. 19/Pdt.Sus-Parpol/2018/PN Cbn and Decision No. 56/Pdt.G/2018/PN Cbn reveal judges accepting preliminary evidence in jurisdiction pleas. Findings indicate that, despite absent explicit rules, this practice aligns with principles of fast, simple, and low-cost justice under Article 2(4) of Law No. 48/2009. To prevent procedural delays, future regulations should restrict evidence to documents, per Positief Wettelijke Bewijstheorie. This research clarifies the legal framework for preliminary evidence in jurisdiction exceptions, enhancing civil justice efficiency in Indonesia.
Restorative Justice: Antithesis or New Face of The Punishment Model? Susilo, Erwin; Sujatmiko, Bagus; Mawla Ibnu Kamali , Karell
Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Islamic Criminal Law Department, Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/legitimasi.v14i2.31892

Abstract

Restorative Justice is increasingly adopted to overcome the limitations of retributive punishment, which emphasizes inflicting suffering on offenders. However, a fundamental theoretical debate remains regarding the ontological status of Restorative Justice: whether it is merely a non-penal mechanism outside the concept of punishment or a transformative form of punishment within the modern penal framework. This research examines this debate by determining the proper positioning of Restorative Justice in modern sentencing policy. The purpose of this study is to reconstruct the penal paradigm by integrating restorative, utilitarian, and moral-communitarian values into a more humane and inclusive system of punishment. Using normative legal research with a conceptual approach, this study analyzes theories, legislation, and judicial practices related to Restorative Justice in Indonesia. The findings suggest that Restorative Justice still retains punitive elements, as offenders are required to acknowledge wrongdoing and repair the harm. Consequently, Restorative Justice ought not to be classified as an exclusively non-penal mechanism but rather as an evolution of punishment that prioritizes reconciliation, moral accountability, and social restoration. This study concludes that Restorative Justice represents the new face of punishment, where the ultimate aim is no longer solely retribution but the restoration of social balance and substantive justice for victims, offenders, and society.
Co-Authors Agung Gunawan Ainal Mardhiah Asih, Wigati Taberi Didit Darmawan Din, Mohd. Kemala Sari, Gita Lilik Handayani Lufsiana, Lufsiana M. Hatta M. Rafi Mawla Ibnu Kamali , Karell Mohd Din, Mohd Nainggolan, Hermin Negara, Dharma Setiawan Rommy Hardyansah Saputra, Dasriyan Sembiring, Eddy Daulatta Setiawan Negara, Dharma Suhaimi Suhaimi Suhaimi Sujatmiko, Bagus Teuku Muttaqin Mansur Zaenal Arifin