Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Sosialisasi Pembuktian Cyber Crime dalam KUHAP dan UU ITE Sunariyo, Sunariyo; Elviandri, Elviandri; Rahayuningsih, Uut; Prasetyo, Bayu
Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Alesha Media Digital

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59025/s6yw8h91

Abstract

Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini merupakan implementasi Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman masyarakat dan mahasiswa mengenai sistem pembuktian tindak pidana siber di Indonesia. Permasalahan utama mitra adalah rendahnya pemahaman terkait validitas alat bukti elektronik dan disharmoni antara Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) dengan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE), yang berakibat pada lemahnya tindak lanjut hukum terhadap laporan kejahatan siber. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, kegiatan sosialisasi dilaksanakan di Kelurahan Sidodadi, Samarinda, diikuti oleh 30 orang mahasiswa dan 20 orang dari mayarakat umum dengan metode ceramah normatif-yuridis, diskusi interaktif, dan studi kasus. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan bahwa peserta memperoleh peningkatan pemahaman tentang validitas alat bukti digital dari sisi formil dan materiil, serta pentingnya dokumentasi forensik dalam proses penyidikan. Diskusi juga menyoroti perlunya harmonisasi regulasi dan pendampingan hukum bagi korban kejahatan siber agar proses pelaporan tidak terhambat karena kekurangan alat bukti. Kesimpulannya, kegiatan ini berkontribusi dalam memperkuat kesadaran hukum, meningkatkan kapasitas masyarakat dalam menghadapi cybercrime, dan mendorong reformasi hukum acara pidana yang responsif terhadap perkembangan teknologi informasi.
An Independent and Dignified Criminal Justice System: The Path Toward Substantive Justice Rahayuningsih, Uut; Sunariyo, Sunariyo; Hamid, Muhammad Qodri; Fajar, Ira Fadia
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2307

Abstract

The enforcement of criminal law in Indonesia plays a vital role in realizing a state based on law, as mandated by the 1945 Constitution. However, the criminal justice system, which should operate independently and with authority, still faces various serious challenges—ranging from political power intervention, unequal access to justice, to the weak integrity of law enforcement officials. This study aims to analyze the structure and dynamics of Indonesia’s criminal justice system within the framework of national legal politics, using a socio-legal approach that combines normative analysis and empirical field data. The main focus is directed at the integration of three aspects of the legal system: substance (legislation), structure (law enforcement institutions), and legal culture (awareness and behavior of both society and legal officials).The findings reveal that synchronization among the sub-systems of the criminal justice system—namely the police, prosecution, courts, and correctional institutions—is still suboptimal. This is exacerbated by low public trust in law enforcement, the criminalization of vulnerable groups, and the dominance of a formalistic approach that neglects substantive justice. In this context, progressive legal theory becomes highly relevant as a foundation for reforming the criminal justice system toward one that is more humane, just, and people-centered. Improving the quality of human resources in law enforcement is needed through legal education that is not only oriented toward legal certainty but also instills the values of justice and social utility. Therefore, an independent and dignified criminal justice system can only be realized if all legal elements work in an integrated manner and place substantive justice as the main orientation in every law enforcement process.
Budget Abuse as a Form of Corruption Kawuryan, Angelica Ari Pramesti; Alhadi, Muhammad Nurcholis; Rahayuningsih, Uut
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 5 Issue 7, September 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v5i7.3298

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines the form of criminal liability of public officials involved in corruption crimes, particularly in the misuse of state budgets. The case analyzed is Decision Number 15/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN.MNK involving Ahmad Afit Rumagesan, Chairman of the Fakfak District Parliament for the 2009–2014 period.Purposes of the Research: This study underscores the importance of strengthening oversight in public financial management to prevent future budget misuse.Methods of the Research: This research applies a normative juridical method with a case study approach.Findings of the Research: The findings indicate that the defendant was proven to have misused the treasurer's cash funds for personal purposes without a legitimate legal basis, resulting in a state loss of IDR 432,425,000. In passing the verdict, the judge considered the state's financial loss, the defendant's role, and the absence of good faith to return the funds.