Irawan, Tb. Moh. Irma Ari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Validasi Asesmen Kompetensi Kepribadian Guru: Analisis Rasch Irawan, Tb. Moh. Irma Ari; Satrianta, Hengki; Tuaputimain, Hendrik; Asiedu, Alice; Ahman, Ahman
SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026): SAP
Publisher : Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/sap.v10i3.1773

Abstract

This study aims to validate personality competence assessment instruments for teachers with Rasch Model. This quantitative research involved 165 teachers with 72-items instrument measuring 13 dimensions of personality competence. Analysis using Winsteps 5.5.0 showed person reliability 0.83 and item reliability 0.99, indicating excellent measurement consistency. Dimensionality analysis results showed 66.1% variance explained by measurement with unexplained variance in first contrast 6.7%, meeting unidimensionality criteria. Response categories functioned optimally with ordered thresholds (-1.16, -0.46, 1.62). Of 72 items, 64 items (88.9%) showed good fit, while 8 items required revision. Findings showed “wise and prudent” dimension had highest difficulty level (3.42 logit), while “continuous professional development” lowest (-2.01 logit). This instrument provides practical contribution for teacher education institutions in evaluating teachers' personality competence objectively and evidence-based in digital era.
THE ETHICAL LANDSCAPE OF GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING SERVICES: PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS, IMPLEMENTATION, AND CHALLENGES IN THE DIGITAL ERA Irawan, Tb. Moh. Irma Ari; Solehuddin, M; Suryahadikusumah, Ahmad Rofi; Asiedu, Alice
Counsenesia Indonesian Journal Of Guidance and Counseling Vol 6 No 2 (2025): COUNSENESIA 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Universitas Tunas Pembangunan Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36728/cijgc.v6i2.5999

Abstract

Ethical codes form the foundation of counseling professionalism, protecting clients and maintaining professional integrity. The digital era presents complex ethical challenges regarding data confidentiality, counsellors’ digital competence, and professional boundaries in virtual spaces. This study comprehensively explores the philosophical foundations, structure, implementation, and challenges of ethical codes for guidance and counseling in national and international contexts, identifying regulatory gaps in the digital era. This research employed a narrative literature review approach examining publications from 2015-2025 sourced from Scopus, Google Scholar, ERIC, PubMed, PsycINFO, and national journal portals. Analysis was conducted through thematic content analysis, encompassing systematic information extraction, thematic categorization, comparative analysis of Indonesian and international ethical codes, narrative synthesis, and critical interpretation of theoretical and practical implications. Results of this research indicate that ethical codes are rooted in philosophical foundations (ontology, epistemology, axiology) with universal principles: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, fidelity, and veracity. International comparison reveals ACA and ASCA (US) emphasize client protection and digital technology; BACP (UK) focuses on values-based practice; PACFA and ACA Australia prioritize cultural diversity; while ABKIN Indonesia emphasizes socio-cultural norms and national educational goals. Digital era challenges include digital data confidentiality, counsellors’ digital competence gaps, professional boundaries on social media, digital informed consent, and cross-border counseling. International associations have updated their ethical codes to include specific digital counseling regulations, yet Indonesia lacks comprehensive chapters on cyber counseling. Indonesian ethical codes, ABKIN, need to revise its ethical codes by adding chapters on cyber counseling, strengthening enforcement mechanisms, and integrating digital ethics into counselor education curricula.
Subjective Well-Being Profile of University Students and Its Influencing Factors Zakiah, Luna Nuranis; Suherman, Maya Masyita; Irawan, Tb. Moh. Irma Ari; Marlina, Rina; Amirullah, Muhammad
International Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): International Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 3(1), 2026
Publisher : Academia Edu Cendekia Indonesia (AEDUCIA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64420/ijcp.v3i1.506

Abstract

Background: Subjective well-being is an important indicator of psychological health and life satisfaction among university students. Understanding students’ well-being is essential because academic demands, social adjustment, and developmental transitions during university life can significantly affect their psychological condition. Objective: This study aims to examine the profile of subjective well-being among university students and to identify the factors influencing it. Method: A quantitative survey design was employed, involving undergraduate students from several academic programs. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire that measured dimensions of subjective well-being, including life satisfaction, positive and negative affect, along with several potential influencing factors, such as academic stress, social support, and personal motivation. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the profile of students’ subjective well-being, while inferential analysis was applied to determine the factors associated with variations in well-being levels. Results: Students demonstrate varying levels of subjective well-being across different dimensions, with several factors showing significant relationships with overall well-being. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of academic and psychosocial environments in supporting students’ psychological health. Contribution: The study contributes to a better understanding of university students’ well-being. It provides educators and institutions with insights to develop strategies that enhance students’ psychological well-being and overall quality of life.