Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

The Global Water Crisis: Water Diplomacy as an Effort to Avoid Conflict Between Countries Loso Judijanto; Nurul Fadhilah
Synergisia Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Synergisia - MAY
Publisher : Pt. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/txkjz298

Abstract

The global water crisis is increasingly worrisome, especially in regions that rely on transboundary water resources such as the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia. Competition for access to clean water has the potential to trigger conflict, but it can also be an opportunity to build cooperation between countries through water diplomacy. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of water diplomacy in the midst of a global water crisis and identify the factors that influence its success and failure. The research method used is qualitative with a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through literature studies from scientific journals, international organization reports, and policy documents, then analyzed using content analysis techniques and comparative analysis between regions. The results show that areas with strong cooperation mechanisms and international agreements, such as the Niger River basin, tend to be better able to manage potential conflicts. In contrast, tensions are rising in regions such as the Indus River (India–Pakistan) and the Nile River (Egypt–Ethiopia), where the uniliteral approach is still dominant. Water diplomacy has proven effective if it is supported by a clear legal framework, political commitment, and the mediating role of international organizations. Implicitly, countries need to strengthen water diplomacy policies as part of their security and sustainable development strategies, as well as encourage inclusive regional cooperation for transboundary water resources management.   
The Evolution Of Public Diplomacy: A New Strategy For  Enhancing State Image Loso Judijanto; Nurul Fadhilah
Synergisia Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Synergisia - MAY
Publisher : Pt. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/3w15rq72

Abstract

Public diplomacy has undergone a significant transformation in the digital era, becoming an important instrument in building the country's image on the international stage. This research aims to analyze the evolution of public diplomacy and identify new strategies that can be used by countries to improve their image. By leveraging social media and communication technologies, countries can reach international audiences more directly and build inclusive interactions. Approaches that emphasize positive messages, friendship, and two-way dialogue have proven to be more effective in shaping favorable public opinion. In addition, the challenges arising from the spread of disinformation and narrative competition require adaptation of public diplomacy strategies. The research is expected to provide deeper insights into effective public diplomacy practices, strengthen the role of soft powers, and recommend actions that countries can take to strengthen their international image in an ever-changing global context..
When the Law Is No Longer Sharp Upwards: A Critical Study of Elite Impunity in Corruption Crimes Nurul Fadhilah; Samsidar Samsidar; Zonita Zirhani Rumalean
Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): JOSI - MAY
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/pw8kan34

Abstract

The phenomenon of elite impunity in corruption cases in Indonesia shows that there is a sharp gap between ideal legal norms and the reality of law enforcement practices that are full of power intervention. Although legal instruments such as the Corruption Law and the 2023 Criminal Code have normatively regulated sanctions against corruption, their implementation often favors the interests of political and economic elites. The judicial process is often characterized by weak independence of legal institutions, judicial mafia practices, and multiple interpretations of legal articles that open up space for abuse of authority. This inequality not only violates the principle of equality before the law, but also results in the erosion of the legitimacy of legal institutions and a decline in public trust in the democratic system. This study uses a normative juridical approach with critical legal theory analysis to dismantle power relations in the Indonesian legal system. The results emphasized the need for structural reform through strengthening the independence of law enforcement agencies, progressive regulatory revisions, and the formation of a critical legal culture with integrity. Without comprehensive reform, the law will only be a tool for the perpetuation of power, not an instrument of justice. This study recommends a transformation of the legal paradigm in order to ensure substantive justice and prevent the systemic practice of impunity of the elite.
Public Whipping Punishment for Adultery Offenders in Aceh: A Study on the Application of Islamic Criminal Law and International Human Rights Nurul Fadhilah; Samsidar Samsidar
Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): JOSI - SEPTEMBER
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/380s8p35

Abstract

This study discusses the legal legitimacy of public whipping in Aceh as part of the legal specificity regulated through Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh. This specificity provides a constitutional basis for Aceh to implement Islamic law-based law through Qanun Jinayat, especially Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning the Jinayat Law which regulates the punishment for certain criminal acts, including adultery. Although normatively legitimate because it is underpinned by asymmetric decentralization mechanisms, the practice of public caning is controversial from a human rights perspective. Indonesia has ratified the ICCPR through Law Number 12 of 2005, so it is bound by the prohibition of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment. This condition creates a normative tension between Islamic sharia principles that emphasize social morality and international human rights principles that emphasize individual dignity. The research uses normative juridical methods with a legislative and conceptual approach, and analyzes the relationship between Islamic law, national law, and international law. The results of the study show the need for a more contextual reconstruction of punishment, emphasizing maqāṣid al-syarī'ah as a meeting point between religious values and human rights principles. Alternatives such as closed executions or rehabilitative punishment can be a solution so that the application of jinayat law remains relevant without causing serious contradictions. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of humanistic, transformative, and substantive justice regulatory innovation
The Draft Law on the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) and the Dynamics of Civil-Military Relations: Implications for Democracy and Civilian Supremacy in Indonesia Hamzah Jamaludin; Nurul Fadhilah
Journal of Politica Governo Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Politica Governo - April
Publisher : Pt. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/kpm93n57

Abstract

This research examines the dynamics of civil-military relations in post-Reform Indonesia, with a focus on the latest Draft Law (RUU) on TNI, which has the potential to threaten the principle of civilian supremacy and expand the role of the military in the civilian sphere. Through a qualitative approach and document study method, this research analyzes various provisions in the TNI Bill and compares them with similar regulations in countries that have undergone civil-military relations reform, such as Turkey, Chile and Thailand. The results show that although the bill aims to strengthen the TNI in the face of national threats, some provisions that expand the role of the military risk weakening civilian control and opening up opportunities for the militarization of politics. Therefore, this study recommends strengthening civilian oversight through independent institutions, updating military accountability mechanisms, and revising the TNI Bill to ensure the TNI remains focused on defense functions. The findings contribute to the discourse on civil-military relations in Indonesia and offer a new perspective on the importance of maintaining civilian supremacy in the democratization process.  
Weaponization of Interdependence: Economic Dependency as a Tool of Global Power Sumartono Sumartono; Nurul Fadhilah
Synergisia Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Synergisia- May
Publisher : Pt. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/92cv0r04

Abstract

This article examines the concept of weaponization of interdependence, a strategy whereby state actors exploit global economic interdependence networks as instruments of geopolitical pressure and power. The study analyzes how actors such as the United States, China, and Russia leverage dominance over financial networks, technology supply chains, and energy infrastructure to achieve their foreign policy objectives. Through a qualitative approach employing systematic analysis of recent scholarly literature, the study finds that economic interdependence is no longer neutral but has transformed into a strategic tool in great power competition. These findings carry significant implications for global governance architecture and the economic resilience of developing states
AI-Generated Content and the Crisis of Information Authenticity: A Modern Communication Science Perspective Nurul Fadhilah
Journal of Dialogos Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Dialogos - February
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/g054ex34

Abstract

The proliferation of AI-generated content (AIGC) has introduced a profound crisis of information authenticity across modern communication ecosystems. As large language models, generative image systems, and automated content pipelines become ubiquitous, the capacity of both individuals and institutions to distinguish authentic human-produced information from algorithmically synthesized content has been severely compromised. This systematic literature review examines the nature, scope, and communication science implications of the AIGC-driven authenticity crisis, drawing on 20 peer-reviewed studies published between 2021 and 2025. The review synthesizes evidence on how AIGC challenges fundamental epistemological assumptions embedded in communication theory, including source credibility, message authenticity, media trust, and information verification. Key findings reveal that human cognitive heuristics for detecting AI-generated language are systematically unreliable; that AIGC-enabled disinformation, deepfakes, and academic fabrication pose escalating societal risks; and that current detection and regulatory frameworks remain inadequate to the scale and velocity of AIGC proliferation. Drawing on communication science theory, this review proposes an Authentic Information Communication Framework (AICF) comprising four strategic dimensions: technological detection infrastructure, communicator transparency norms, audience critical digital literacy, and regulatory-ethical governance. Implications for communication scholars, media practitioners, policymakers, and educational institutions are discussed.
Digital Narcissism on Social Media: A Communication Science Perspective on Online Validation Culture Nurul Fadhilah
Journal of Dialogos Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Dialogos - February
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/nytz2q73

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of digital narcissism on social media platforms through the lens of communication science, with particular focus on the culture of online validation-seeking that has emerged in contemporary digital ecosystems. The increasing proliferation of social media has given rise to new behavioral patterns in which individuals engage in self-promotional activities driven by a desire for social approval, recognition, and affirmation from online audiences. Drawing on theoretical frameworks including Uses and Gratifications Theory, Social Comparison Theory, and Self-Presentation Theory, this paper analyzes how algorithmic mechanisms, platform affordances, and cultural factors collectively contribute to the amplification of narcissistic tendencies in digital environments. The study employs a systematic literature review methodology, synthesizing empirical findings from 20 peer-reviewed sources published between 2021 and 2023. Findings indicate that online validation culture manifests through selfie-posting, status broadcasting, and curated self-presentation, with significant variation across platforms. The study further reveals that excessive engagement in validation-seeking behaviors correlates with reduced psychological well-being, increased social comparison, and susceptibility to misinformation. The paper concludes with implications for communication practitioners, platform designers, and mental health advocates, urging the development of healthier digital engagement norms.