Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI WARTAWAN YANG MENGALAMI KEKERASAN DALAM MELIPUT BERITA Andrianus Deny; Wahyu Prawesthi; Nur Handayati; M. Syahrul Borman
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Oktober 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan hak dan kewajiban wartawan dalam peliputan pemberitaan serta mengkaji bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Wartawan yang Mengalami Kekerasan Dalam Meliput Berita. Wartawan sebagai pelaku profesi jurnalistik memiliki peran strategis dalam menyampaikan informasi kepada publik, namun tidak jarang menghadapi berbagai bentuk kekerasan saat melakukan peliputan di lapangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 tentang Pers, Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia, dan instrumen internasional terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa wartawan memiliki hak untuk memperoleh dan menyebarkan informasi serta kewajiban untuk menjunjung tinggi kode etik jurnalistik. Namun dalam praktiknya, kekerasan terhadap wartawan masih sering terjadi tanpa adanya perlindungan hukum yang efektif. Oleh karena itu, perlu adanya penguatan mekanisme perlindungan hukum yang menjamin kebebasan pers sekaligus menjamin keselamatan wartawan sebagai bagian dari pemenuhan hak asasi manusia.
Justice and Justice: A Study of the Role of Judges in Answering Society's Need for a Fair Law Taqwanda Aulia Mahfud; M. Syahrul Borman
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2360

Abstract

Abstract: Law enforcement in Indonesia still faces serious challenges in realizing substantive justice for all levels of society. Inequality in the implementation of the law is often seen in the tendency of the justice system to be more repressive towards the lower classes, while structural crimes such as corruption are difficult to touch optimally. This study investigates the strategic position of judges in addressing society’s demand for equitable law, utilizing a normative juridical lens supported by the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. The findings suggest that judges are not merely executors of legal norms, but autonomous agents tasked with interpreting and embodying the living values of justice within society. As Friedman posits, the synergy among legal substance, structure, and culture is essential to ensure the law operates effectively within its sociocultural context. Judges are required to have integrity, professionalism, and social sensitivity in shaping decisions that reflect justice, not mere formal legality. Thus, a judicial paradigm reform is needed to ensure that the law becomes a tool for just and civilized social transformation.
Analisis Kesesuaian Masa Jabatan Pengurus RT dalam Peraturan Bupati Nomor 24 Tahun 2020 Anita Anita; M. Syahrul Borman; Nur handayati
Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Januari : Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/perspektif.v2i1.166

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the suitability of the term of office of the Neighborhood Association (RT) administrators with the provisions contained in Regent Regulation Number 24 of 2020 concerning the Organization and Work Procedures of Neighborhood Associations. The term of office of RT administrators is an important aspect in running the government at the village/sub-district level which affects the effectiveness of community services and the sustainability of development programs. Through a normative legal research approach, this study examines whether the provisions on the term of office of RT administrators stated in the regulation are in accordance with applicable legal principles, community needs, and practices in the field. The research methods used are document studies, interviews with RT administrators and related parties, and comparative analysis with similar policies in other areas. The results of the study indicate that there are several discrepancies between the provisions on the term of office stated in the Regent Regulation and the real conditions that occur in the field. Some RT administrators have difficulty in carrying out a term of office that is too short, while others feel that a term of office that is too long can hinder the regeneration of the administration. This study recommends that there be a revision to the Regent Regulation Number 24 of 2020, by considering the existing findings, and providing space for the community to participate more actively in the process of replacing RT administrators.