Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Cacat Formil Penetapan Tersangka oleh KPK: Analisis Yuridis atas Pelanggaran Due Process of Law dalam Perkara Gus Yaqut Wiratmadinata; Hanri Aldino; Radhali
Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Vol 21 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Samudra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33059/jhsk.v21i1.14318

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legality of suspect designation by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) from the perspective of criminal procedural law, with a focus on procedural (formal) aspects and their juridical implications. The main issue lies in the alleged procedural defects in the suspect designation, which potentially violate the principle of due process of law. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using a deductive-inductive method. The findings reveal that the suspect designation in the case at hand contains several fundamental procedural defects, including premature designation without sufficient evidence, abuse of authority (ultra vires), administrative procedural violations, inconsistency of legal basis, and the use of documents that do not qualify as lawful evidence under the Criminal Procedure Code. These defects cumulatively render the designation legally invalid. The juridical implication is that the suspect designation becomes null and void, thereby invalidating all subsequent legal processes derived from it. This study underscores the importance of strict adherence to legal procedures as a mechanism to safeguard human rights and prevent abuse of power in law enforcement
Implications of Business Certainty for Plantation Companies on Land Release PolicieshImplications of Business Certainty for Plantation Companies on Land Release Policiesh M. Iqbal Asnawi; Radhali; Verianto Dwikaprio Pane; Agung Ibrahim Hasibuan
Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law Vol. 5 No. 01 (2026): Vol. 05 No. 01 (2026) February Edition 2026
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzes the policy on the partial release of plantation land through the plasma partnership scheme and the Agrarian Reform Object Land (TORA) program from the perspective of legal certainty and the protection of business actors’ rights. The issue arises when the obligation to release land is imposed without a clear compensation mechanism, while companies have lawfully obtained Cultivation Rights (HGU) and invested long-term capital based on the granted land area and duration. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that land release through plasma schemes and TORA does not explicitly regulate fair compensation, thereby potentially creating legal uncertainty and disrupting the investment climate. Normatively, any reduction or acquisition of land rights for public purposes should be carried out through land procurement or revocation mechanisms that require just and adequate compensation. The study concludes that it is necessary to reformulate land release policies based on proportionality and constitutional balance principles to ensure that agrarian reform remains aligned with Pancasila values while safeguarding justice and sustainable investment in the plantation sector.