Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Women's Career Islamic Family Law Perspectives Husna Srifyan, Jihan; Anzar Aquil; Muntaha Artalim Zaim; Alqahoom, Abdualhmeed
Demak Universal Journal of Islam and Sharia Vol. 1 No. 02 (2023): Main Theme: The Dynamics of Sharia in Family, Economy, and Islamic Law
Publisher : Walidem Institute and Publishing (WIP)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61455/deujis.v1i02.59

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyze the review of Islamic law on the profession and the administration of the wife's salary in Kalipucang Kulon Village, Welahan District, Jepara Regency in supporting family income as a factory worker. This research is a type of field research with a qualitative approach, namely research that has the characteristics that the data is expressed in a natural state or as it is (natural setting), by not changing the shape of symbols or numbers and is descriptive based on the question of how. And the data processing technique is to use qualitative descriptive techniques. Research families that in everyday life have needs that must be met, both primary, secondary and tertiary needs. There are times when a husband does not have enough ability to meet these needs. Therefore, in this time and conditions are different, women have had the same opportunities as men to excel in various areas of life, even economically no longer dependent on men.
Motivation of students with learning disorders in memorizing alfiyah ibn malik at imadutthulabah islamic boarding school Anzar Aquil; Aliwan; Ahmad Mustafidin; Santi Ratnawati; Kunfuaidah Latifah; Maskur
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 4 No. 2 Mei 2025: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jipsi.v4i2.434

Abstract

This research examines the motivation of students with learning disorders in memorizing the Alfiyah Ibnu Malik book verses at Pondok Pesantren Imadutthulabah. The study aims to understand both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, as well as the supporting and inhibiting factors faced by these students. Using a phenomenological approach and descriptive qualitative method, this research collected data through interviews with the head of the boarding school, the Alfiyah book verse listeners, Nahwu Shorof subject teachers, and students with learning disorders. Data analysis was conducted through data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions, with data validity checks using source triangulation and method triangulation. Intrinsic motivation, such as personal satisfaction, a sense of achievement, personal development, and responsibility, plays a crucial role in supporting students. This motivation comes from an internal drive to understand and master knowledge, encouraging students to keep trying even though it requires more effort and time. Extrinsic motivation is also important, including external support like praise, expectations from others, and rewards, which encourage students to be more enthusiastic and persistent in their learning. The inhibiting factors faced include genetic, neurobiological, and environmental factors. This study reveals that despite the challenges, students with learning disorders demonstrate resilience and adaptability through various coping strategies. The findings highlight the need for tailored educational interventions and continuous support systems to maximize the students’ potential in Islamic boarding school environments.
Punishment and reward in islamic education: Implementation at ma hidayatus subban Anzar Aquil; Hermawati, Triana; Ahmad Mustafidin; Santi Ratnawati; Kunfuaidah Latifah; Maskur
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 4 No. 1 Februari 2025: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jipsi.v4i1.437

Abstract

This research is motivated by a discrepancy between the ideal principles of Islam and field practices, where rewards and punishments are often applied mechanistically, ineducatively, and without considering students' psychological contexts. Using a descriptive qualitative approach and a case study method, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation. The findings show that the implementation of reward and punishment at MA Hidayatus Subban is carried out regularly and relatively systematically. Rewards are given in both material and symbolic-spiritual forms, such as praise, certificates, and prayers, which have proven effective in enhancing motivation and fostering positive student behavior. Punishments, on the other hand, are applied in an educative manner, including advice, reflective assignments, and familial approaches aimed at developing moral awareness. However, the study also found inconsistencies among teachers in applying reward and punishment, leading to perceptions of injustice among students. The study concludes that the effectiveness of reward and punishment in Islamic education is greatly influenced by teachers’ understanding of spiritual values, sensitivity to students’ psychological conditions, and strong institutional support from the school principal and parental involvement. Rewards and punishments should not be treated merely as technical instruments of classroom management but must be grounded in an educational awareness rooted in Islamic values such as justice, compassion, responsibility, and self-awareness. When applied fairly, proportionally, and contextually—in alignment with the goals of Islamic education within the framework of maqashid al-shariah—educational institutions are expected to shape students who are not only behaviorally compliant but also possess strong moral and spiritual consciousness. Proper implementation of these methods impacts not only student discipline but also serves as a fundamental
Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Academic Literacy among University Students in Indonesia: A Case Study A Fadel Muhammad; Nur Astiana Hidayat Ardi; Nitswat, Nurhaliza; Sri Hardianti Nur; Razak, Annisa Zhalila; Fatjri Nur Tajuddin; Anzar Aquil; Moch. Nur Syahrus Syahbana
Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan
Publisher : Scidac Plus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51214/bip.v5i1.1393

Abstract

The rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in higher education has transformed learning practices, prompting concerns about their influence on students’ critical thinking, originality, and independent engagement with academic materials. This study explores the perceived impact of AI on academic literacy among Indonesian university students, with particular attention to critical thinking, originality, and independent learning. Employing a qualitative approach, the study captures students' experiences and perspectives, revealing that while AI tools such as ChatGPT and Grammarly are perceived to enhance learning efficiency, they may also diminish deeper engagement with academic content and critical thinking processes. Many participants reported a tendency to rely on AI-generated summaries, which they associated with reduced independent analysis and creativity. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that when AI tools are integrated with thoughtful pedagogical strategies, they can support the development of academic literacy within ethical boundaries. The study underscores the importance of implementing AI literacy programs and ethical guidelines to foster responsible and reflective use of AI in academic contexts.
The shariah ruling on the permissibility of seafood in hanafi and shafi'i jurisprudence: A comparative study in the light of the qur'an and hadith Anzar Aquil; Noor Malihah; Eny Rahmawati; Husna Nashihin; Nurhuda Alfina Layalin; Ahmad Ahadi
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 4 No. 3 Juli 2025: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v4i3.467

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the permissibility of seafood within the Hanafi and Shafi'i schools of Islamic jurisprudence. Although both schools derive their rulings from the Qur'an and Hadith, they offer divergent interpretations regarding various marine life. Whereas the Shafi'i madhab generally permits all types of seafood based on the broad textual evidence, the Hanafi school restricts permissible sea creatures chiefly to fish, relying on a more cautious and often literalist textual interpretation. By examining Qur'anic verses, Hadith evidence, the methodological underpinnings of classical jurisprudence, and the perspectives of various scholars, this study elucidates the historical and contextual basis for these legal differences. Furthermore, contemporary case studies are included to explore how these rulings affect dietary practices in Muslim communities today, thereby demonstrating the legal pluralism inherent in the Islamic juridical tradition.