Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.512
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Arena Hukum JURNAL MAHKAMAH Jurnal Fatwa Hukum Jurnal Jatiswara KRTHA BHAYANGKARA AIWADTHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum TEKSTUR : Jurnal Teknologi Infrastruktur AL-SULTHANIYAH Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security
NIM. A1011141008, YULIANA
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tanjungpura
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Transportation

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Dynamics of Anti-Terrorism Regulation: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States: Dinamika Regulasi Anti-Terorisme: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Amerika Serikat Anang Hendri Prayogo; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Erdianto Effendi; Andi Hakim Lubis; Yuliana Yuliana
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): July-December, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i2.25125

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamics of anti-terrorism regulations in Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States by comparing the legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms in each country. legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms that apply in each country. The purpose of this research is to analyse how each country shapes its anti-terrorism law as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining a balance of as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining the balance between state security and human rights protection. The main issues discussed include differences in legal approach, scope of state authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent abuse of authority. abuse of authority. The method used is juridical method used is normative-comparative juridical by analysing statutory instruments, government policies, and institutional practices in the three countries. The results The results show that Indonesia emphasises procedural guarantees in its anti-terrorism law, Malaysia maintains a preventive detention model rooted in historical security doctrine. rooted in historical security doctrine, while the United States applies a layered a layered approach backed by extensive intelligence powers and judicial oversight. judicial oversight. In conclusion, although all three countries prioritise national security, their approaches reflect different security, their approaches reflect different legal traditions and political contexts. political context. Therefore, a balanced regulatory model should take into account effectiveness, constitutional accountability and protection of fundamental rights.
Co-Authors Akadol, Nina Septiana Jasri Anang Hendri Prayogo Andi Hakim Lubis Aswandi Aswandi, Aswandi Erdianto Effendi Gayatri, Nungky Dwi Ghani, Mohamad Zulkifli Abdul Herlina Husain, Natasya Auliya Ichsani, Immada Immada Ichsani Jasri Akadol, Nina Septiana Mega Fitri Hertini Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo Mukti, Plasma Versiana Natalia, Kristiani Octaviyana, Rickhy Artha Parabi, Ashraf Dhowian Ratna Herawati Saragih, Geofani Milthree Serera, Aulia Yuti Siti Aisyah Supriadi, Moh.