Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Evaluasi Kebijakan Pelayanan BPJSKesehatan di Ruang VIP Edelweiss Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah (RSUD) dr. M. M. Dunda Limboto Kabupaten Gorontalo Fatrawin Kai; Rifka S. Akibu; Widya Kurniati Mohi; Muh. Firyal Akbar
Jurnal Media Administrasi Vol 10 No 1 (2025): April: Jurnal Media Administrasi
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jma.v10i1.2870

Abstract

This study aims to determine and evaluate the BPJS Health Service Policy in the VIP Room of Edelweiss, Dr. M. M. Dunda Limboto Regional General Hospital, Gorontalo Regency. The research method used is qualitative descriptive. The results of the study indicate that several indicators of the effectiveness of the BPJS Health service policy in the VIP Room of Edelweiss, Dr. M. M. Dunda Limboto Regional General Hospital have not been running optimally. In terms of effectiveness, the administrative procedures are still considered unclear and not easy by patients and families, especially with the time limit for processing BPJS only 3 x 24 hours. The adequacy indicator is running quite well, but administrative information is only delivered verbally without written support, so patients or their families often have to ask again for the information needed. In terms of equality, although there are differences in facilities and comfort between the VIP room and the general care room, equality in processing BPJS administration is maintained. Responsiveness is considered good; administrative officers are considered fast and precise in providing solutions to obstacles faced by patients. However, in the accuracy indicator, some informants felt that the time given for administrative management was not yet in accordance with needs, especially for patient families who live far away or have other activities. This indicates the need for a re-evaluation of the time provisions and the delivery of more complete and written information.
The Scopus Radar Readiness Model for Mitigating Algorithmic Discontinuation Risks Eko Pramudya Laksana; Ikhwan Arief; Mochammad Tanzil Multazam; Busro Busro; Arif Zainudin; Akhmad Anwar Dani; Andista Candra Yusro; Dedi Rahman Nur; Utama Alan Deta; Much Fuad Saifuddin; Mohammad Fauziddin; Muhamad Ratodi; Asep Erlan Maulana; Muh. Firyal Akbar; Lucky Zamzami; Aldy Rialdy Atmadja; Eko Pramudya Laksana; Ikhwan Arief; Mochammad Tanzil Multazam; Busro Busro; Arif Zainudin; Akhmad Anwar Dani; Andista Candra Yusro; Dedi Rahman Nur; Utama Alan Deta; Much Fuad Saifuddin; Mohammad Fauziddin; Muhamad Ratodi; Asep Erlan Maulana; Muh. Firyal Akbar; Lucky Zamzami; Aldy Rialdy Atmadja
Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um065.v6.i3.2026.3

Abstract

The integrity of the global academic record is under unprecedented threat due to the industrialization of scientific misconduct, driven by paper mills, citation cartels, and identity theft, prompting major bibliographic databases to replace manual curation with algorithmic systems. This study examines the operational mechanics of the Scopus Radar tool, an unsupervised anomaly detection system designed to identify and eliminate articles exhibiting anomalous behavior. We reconstruct the bibliometric indicators that lead to discontinuation by triangulating data from the November 2025 Scopus Discontinued Titles list, public Elsevier policy papers, and independent bibliometric research. Our study of 62 cancelled journals shows that Publication Concerns (59.7%) and Outlier conduct (14.5%) are the top grounds for removal. There are definite tendencies when it comes to hyper-concentrated authorship, quick volume velocity spikes, and citation stacking that does not make sense. We also see a "contagion effect," where certain publications have far greater rates of quitting than others. Based on these findings, we propose the Scopus Radar Readiness Model (SRRM). The model is based on the Core Practices of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and has four stages of growth. This roadmap gives editorial boards the tools they need to go from reactive compliance to proactive integrity assurance. They can do this by using internal bibliometric audits to find and fix problems before they lead to external algorithmic enforcement. The results show that journals need to use Level 4 Optimized integrity practices to stay alive in a time when automated gatekeeping is common.