Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.397
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Logika : Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan Sociological Jurisprudence Journal KERTHA WICAKSANA Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Res Nullius Law Journal Jurnal Media Ekonomi Jurnal AkunStie (JAS) Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) Law Development Journal BISMA Cendekia Hutanasyah : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Law Journal Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah PESHUM Sinergi : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin
Samosir, Agustinus
Program Studi Hukum, Fakultas Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Sosial Humaniora, Universitas Bina Insan, Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pemidanaan Pengedar Narkotika Dalam Perspektif Teori Pemidanaan Di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas 1a Kota Lubuklinggau (Studi Kasus Putusan 474/Pid.Sus/2025/Pnllg) M. Alvin Gumay; Agustinus Samosir; Devi Anggreni Sy; Wawan Fransisco
Sinergi : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Sinergi: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin
Publisher : PT. AHLAL PUBLISHER NUSANTARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal analysis of the sentencing of narcotics dealers from the perspective of criminal theory at the Class 1A District Court of Lubuklinggau City (Case Study of Decision Number: 474/Pid.Sus/2025/Pnllg). This type of research is normative-empirical. Normative-empirical (applied) legal research is research that examines the implementation or implementation of positive legal provisions (legislation) and written documents in action (factual) on each particular legal event that occurs in society. Data collection techniques include; collecting secondary data (library and written documents) through library studies and document studies and collecting primary data (data on the research object) through interviews with respondents and informants and resource persons. The conclusion in this study is that the Panel of Judges has applied legal provisions appropriately and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The sentencing imposed is based on valid evidence according to Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as well as the fulfillment of the elements of the crime as regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The judge in deciding the case has considered the legal and non-legal aspects in a balanced manner, including the Public Prosecutor’s indictment, witness and defendant statements, evidence, and the defendant’s social and psychological conditions. Thus, from a normative and theoretical legal perspective, the sentencing in Decision Number 474/Pid.Sus/2025/PN LLG has fulfilled the principles of justice, legal certainty, and expediency, and is in line with the objectives of sentencing in Indonesian criminal law. Keywords: Criminalization, Dealers, Narcotics   Abstrak Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pemidanaan Pengedar Narkotika Dalam Perspektif Teori Pemidanaan Di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas 1a Kota Lubuklinggau (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 474/Pid.Sus/2025/Pnllg). Jenis penelitian ini normatifi-empiris. Penelitian hukum normative-empiris (terapan), merupakan penelitian yang mengkaji pelaksanaan atau implementasi ketentuan hukum positif (Perundang- undangan) dan dokumen tertulis secara in action (viiienyusu) pada suatu setiap peristiwa hukum tertentu yang terjadi. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi; pengumpulan data sekunder (kepustakaan dan dokumen tertulis) melalui studi viiienyusu dan studi dokumen dan pengumpulan data primer (data pada obyek penelitian dilakukan) melalui wawancara dengan responden dan informan serta narasumber. Simpulan dalam penelitian ini bahwa Majelis hakim telah menerapkan ketentuan hukum secara tepat dan sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Pemidanaan yang dijatuhkan didasarkan pada pembuktian yang sah menurut Pasal 184 KUHAP, serta pemenuhan unsur-unsur tindak pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Hakim dalam memutus perkara telah mempertimbangkan aspek yuridis dan non yuridis secara seimbang, meliputi dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum, keterangan saksi dan terdakwa, barang bukti, serta kondisi viiienyus dan psikologis terdakwa. Dengan demikian, secara yuridis viiienyusunviii dan teoritis, pemidanaan dalam Putusan Nomor 474/Pid.Sus/2025/PN LLG telah memenuhi prinsip keadilan, kepastian hukum, dan kemanfaatan, serta sejalan dengan tujuan pemidanaan dalam hukum pidana Indonesia.   Kata kunci: Pemidanaan, Pengedar , Narkotika  
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pemidanaan Pengedar Narkotika Dalam Perspektif Teori Pemidanaan Di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas 1a Kota Lubuklinggau (Studi Kasus Putusan 474/Pid.Sus/2025/Pnllg) M. Alvin Gumay; Agustinus Samosir; Devi Anggreni Sy; Wawan Fransisco
Sinergi : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Sinergi: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin
Publisher : PT. AHLAL PUBLISHER NUSANTARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal analysis of the sentencing of narcotics dealers from the perspective of criminal theory at the Class 1A District Court of Lubuklinggau City (Case Study of Decision Number: 474/Pid.Sus/2025/Pnllg). This type of research is normative-empirical. Normative-empirical (applied) legal research is research that examines the implementation or implementation of positive legal provisions (legislation) and written documents in action (factual) on each particular legal event that occurs in society. Data collection techniques include; collecting secondary data (library and written documents) through library studies and document studies and collecting primary data (data on the research object) through interviews with respondents and informants and resource persons. The conclusion in this study is that the Panel of Judges has applied legal provisions appropriately and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The sentencing imposed is based on valid evidence according to Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as well as the fulfillment of the elements of the crime as regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The judge in deciding the case has considered the legal and non-legal aspects in a balanced manner, including the Public Prosecutor’s indictment, witness and defendant statements, evidence, and the defendant’s social and psychological conditions. Thus, from a normative and theoretical legal perspective, the sentencing in Decision Number 474/Pid.Sus/2025/PN LLG has fulfilled the principles of justice, legal certainty, and expediency, and is in line with the objectives of sentencing in Indonesian criminal law. Keywords: Criminalization, Dealers, Narcotics   Abstrak Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pemidanaan Pengedar Narkotika Dalam Perspektif Teori Pemidanaan Di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas 1a Kota Lubuklinggau (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 474/Pid.Sus/2025/Pnllg). Jenis penelitian ini normatifi-empiris. Penelitian hukum normative-empiris (terapan), merupakan penelitian yang mengkaji pelaksanaan atau implementasi ketentuan hukum positif (Perundang- undangan) dan dokumen tertulis secara in action (viiienyusu) pada suatu setiap peristiwa hukum tertentu yang terjadi. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi; pengumpulan data sekunder (kepustakaan dan dokumen tertulis) melalui studi viiienyusu dan studi dokumen dan pengumpulan data primer (data pada obyek penelitian dilakukan) melalui wawancara dengan responden dan informan serta narasumber. Simpulan dalam penelitian ini bahwa Majelis hakim telah menerapkan ketentuan hukum secara tepat dan sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Pemidanaan yang dijatuhkan didasarkan pada pembuktian yang sah menurut Pasal 184 KUHAP, serta pemenuhan unsur-unsur tindak pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Hakim dalam memutus perkara telah mempertimbangkan aspek yuridis dan non yuridis secara seimbang, meliputi dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum, keterangan saksi dan terdakwa, barang bukti, serta kondisi viiienyus dan psikologis terdakwa. Dengan demikian, secara yuridis viiienyusunviii dan teoritis, pemidanaan dalam Putusan Nomor 474/Pid.Sus/2025/PN LLG telah memenuhi prinsip keadilan, kepastian hukum, dan kemanfaatan, serta sejalan dengan tujuan pemidanaan dalam hukum pidana Indonesia.   Kata kunci: Pemidanaan, Pengedar , Narkotika  
Hybrid Civil Servant Discipline under Government Regulation Number 94 of 2021: Legal Enforcement, TPP Incentives, and Familial Corrective Practices in Lubuklinggau City Agustinus Samosir
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.3.1055-1066

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of Government Regulation Number 94 of 2021 concerning Civil Servant Discipline, focusing on administrative enforcement, performance incentives (TPP), and corrective approaches in Lubuklinggau City.
Kajian Yuridis Kekuatan Alat Bukti Visum Et Repertum dalam Membuktikan Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 240/Pid.Sus/2025/Pn.Llg) Patricia Ageng Pangesti; Agustinus Samosir; Fitriyani; Devi Anggreni Sy
Sinergi : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 9 (2026): Sinergi: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin
Publisher : PT. AHLAL PUBLISHER NUSANTARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66914/gfjg7k97

Abstract

Sexual crime against children is a profoundly serious form of human rights violation thus demanding a highly precise legal evidentiary process in court particularly through the utilization of forensic medical instruments. This study aims to juridically examine the position and evidentiary strength of Visum Et Repertum in proving the criminal act of sexual intercourse against children while simultaneously analyzing the foundation of the judges considerations in Decision Number 240 Pid Sus 2025 PN LLG. This study applies a normative empirical legal research type through a statutory approach a case approach and a conceptual approach where data collection is executed through literature review decision documentation and in depth interviews at the Lubuklinggau District Court. The research results reveal that juridically Visum Et Repertum holds a valid position as documentary evidence based on the Criminal Procedure Code however this forensic instrument does not possess absolute and independently binding evidentiary strength. This medical document must be combined with other valid evidence to weave the complete conviction of the panel of judges. Furthermore the judges considerations in imposing criminal sanctions are proven not merely to use the visum to prove the formal guilt of the perpetrator but also to make it a benchmark for the physical suffering and psychological trauma of the victim. This approach affirms that the application of evidence in court has integrated the values of victimology and child protection to realize restorative justice that favors the best interests of the child Keywords: Visum Et Repertum, Evidence, Child Sexual Intercourse.   Abstrak Kejahatan seksual terhadap anak merupakan bentuk pelanggaran hak asasi yang teramat serius sehingga menuntut proses pembuktian hukum yang sangat presisi di pengadilan khususnya melalui pemanfaatan instrumen medis forensik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara yuridis kedudukan serta kekuatan alat bukti Visum Et Repertum dalam membuktikan tindak pidana persetubuhan terhadap anak sekaligus menganalisis landasan pertimbangan hakim pada Putusan Nomor 240 Pid Sus 2025 PN LLG. Kajian ini menerapkan jenis penelitian hukum normatif empiris melalui pendekatan perundang undangan pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan konseptual di mana pengumpulan data dieksekusi melalui penelusuran kepustakaan dokumentasi putusan serta wawancara mendalam di Pengadilan Negeri Lubuklinggau. Hasil penelitian menyingkap bahwa secara yuridis Visum Et Repertum berkedudukan sah sebagai alat bukti surat berdasarkan Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Acara Pidana namun instrumen forensik tersebut tidak memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang mutlak dan mengikat secara mandiri. Dokumen medis ini wajib dipadukan dengan alat bukti sah lainnya guna merajut keyakinan majelis hakim secara utuh. Lebih lanjut pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi pidana terbukti tidak semata mata menggunakan visum untuk membuktikan kesalahan formal pelaku melainkan turut menjadikannya sebagai tolak ukur penderitaan fisik dan trauma psikologis korban. Pendekatan ini menegaskan bahwa penerapan pembuktian di peradilan telah mengintegrasikan nilai nilai viktimologi dan pelindungan anak demi mewujudkan keadilan restoratif yang berpihak pada kepentingan terbaik sang anak. Kata kunci: Visum Et Repertum, Alat Bukti, Persetubuhan Anak.
Kajian Yuridis Kekuatan Alat Bukti Visum Et Repertum dalam Membuktikan Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 240/Pid.Sus/2025/Pn.Llg) Patricia Ageng Pangesti; Agustinus Samosir; Fitriyani; Devi Anggreni Sy
Sinergi : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 9 (2026): Sinergi: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin
Publisher : PT. AHLAL PUBLISHER NUSANTARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66914/gfjg7k97

Abstract

Sexual crime against children is a profoundly serious form of human rights violation thus demanding a highly precise legal evidentiary process in court particularly through the utilization of forensic medical instruments. This study aims to juridically examine the position and evidentiary strength of Visum Et Repertum in proving the criminal act of sexual intercourse against children while simultaneously analyzing the foundation of the judges considerations in Decision Number 240 Pid Sus 2025 PN LLG. This study applies a normative empirical legal research type through a statutory approach a case approach and a conceptual approach where data collection is executed through literature review decision documentation and in depth interviews at the Lubuklinggau District Court. The research results reveal that juridically Visum Et Repertum holds a valid position as documentary evidence based on the Criminal Procedure Code however this forensic instrument does not possess absolute and independently binding evidentiary strength. This medical document must be combined with other valid evidence to weave the complete conviction of the panel of judges. Furthermore the judges considerations in imposing criminal sanctions are proven not merely to use the visum to prove the formal guilt of the perpetrator but also to make it a benchmark for the physical suffering and psychological trauma of the victim. This approach affirms that the application of evidence in court has integrated the values of victimology and child protection to realize restorative justice that favors the best interests of the child Keywords: Visum Et Repertum, Evidence, Child Sexual Intercourse.   Abstrak Kejahatan seksual terhadap anak merupakan bentuk pelanggaran hak asasi yang teramat serius sehingga menuntut proses pembuktian hukum yang sangat presisi di pengadilan khususnya melalui pemanfaatan instrumen medis forensik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara yuridis kedudukan serta kekuatan alat bukti Visum Et Repertum dalam membuktikan tindak pidana persetubuhan terhadap anak sekaligus menganalisis landasan pertimbangan hakim pada Putusan Nomor 240 Pid Sus 2025 PN LLG. Kajian ini menerapkan jenis penelitian hukum normatif empiris melalui pendekatan perundang undangan pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan konseptual di mana pengumpulan data dieksekusi melalui penelusuran kepustakaan dokumentasi putusan serta wawancara mendalam di Pengadilan Negeri Lubuklinggau. Hasil penelitian menyingkap bahwa secara yuridis Visum Et Repertum berkedudukan sah sebagai alat bukti surat berdasarkan Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Acara Pidana namun instrumen forensik tersebut tidak memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang mutlak dan mengikat secara mandiri. Dokumen medis ini wajib dipadukan dengan alat bukti sah lainnya guna merajut keyakinan majelis hakim secara utuh. Lebih lanjut pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi pidana terbukti tidak semata mata menggunakan visum untuk membuktikan kesalahan formal pelaku melainkan turut menjadikannya sebagai tolak ukur penderitaan fisik dan trauma psikologis korban. Pendekatan ini menegaskan bahwa penerapan pembuktian di peradilan telah mengintegrasikan nilai nilai viktimologi dan pelindungan anak demi mewujudkan keadilan restoratif yang berpihak pada kepentingan terbaik sang anak. Kata kunci: Visum Et Repertum, Alat Bukti, Persetubuhan Anak.
Co-Authors Abdul Jabar Rahim Ahmad Fuadi Ardayana Ardayana Ardi Muthahir Devi Anggreni Sy Devi Anggreni Sy Dewi, A.A Sagung Laksmi Efiyanti, Yuli Eri Triharyati Fitria Fitria Fitriyani Fitriyani Fitriyani Fitriyani Fitriyani Fitriyani Fitriyani Fransisco, Wawan Irnawati Irnawati Jelita Aprilyanti Jimmy Celvin Kristiani, Rheza Dwi Kuswoyo, Bahet Edi Masayu Putri Sundari Naura, Putri Novan Paleni, Herman Prasasti, Eva Putri, Pretty Gunadi Rheza Dwi Kristiani Tri Windi Uli Arta Wilson Gandhi Wilson Ghandi