Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analysis of Legal Norms and Gender Equality in Relation to the Concept of Joint Custody for Minors Muhammad Fadhlan Aziz; Muhamad Yogi Mubarok; Ahmad Rizki Nurfahillah; Ilman Napiah; Deden Najmudin
MUWAZAH : jurnal kajian gender Vol 17 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/muwazah.v17i1.9200

Abstract

The application of custody rights in Indonesia generally uses sole custody. As stipulated in the Compilation of Islamic Law in Articles 105 and 156, priority for custody rights is automatically given to the mother. This is considered a problematic issue from a gender equality perspective, as child custody is not always monopolized by one gender but should consider aspects of quality, integrity, morality, and ability to fulfill the best interests of the child. At the same time, several court rulings in Indonesia have now established joint custody rather than sole custody. The purpose of this study is to re-examine the concept of joint custody of minor children as an effort and legitimization of the best interests of the child based on an analysis of legal norms and gender equality. This research is qualitative and uses a descriptive analytical method from library data sources. The results of this research can be concluded that joint custody is the granting of custody or care of the child to both parents alternately after divorce until both are required to take joint responsibility for their child. Although the granting of joint custody appears to deviate from existing provisions, it is not based on the provisions of the KHI but rather on the principle of the best interests of the child and the judge's legal interpretation. Furthermore, within the paradigm of gender equality, the role of men in contemporary society is equal to that of women, including in the care of minor children. This concept could serve as an alternative solution in resolving child custody disputes in Indonesia, simplifying the often complex and problematic process of determining custody rights.
Reconstructing Electoral Legal Politics in Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of the Ambivalence of the Open Proportional System and Electoral Thresholds Post Constitutional Court Decision No. 55/PUU-XXII/2024 Lisda Apriliani Sobirin; Muhamad Iqbal Ansori Firdaus; Ilman Napiah; Taufik Taufik; Fina Rosalina; Dian Hadiana
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i1.15454

Abstract

Indonesia's post reform electoral system was designed to strengthen popular representation but has paradoxically become an arena for elite interest contestation. This study critically analyzes the ambivalence of legal politics regarding the open proportional system and electoral thresholds, focusing on Constitutional Court Decision No. 55/PUU-XXII/2024. Employing doctrinal legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the analysis examines Law Number 7 of 2017 and the Court's jurisprudence. The findings reveal a structural paradox: the system normatively recognizes popular sovereignty but practically restricts political competition through high thresholds that benefit political cartels and incentivize high cost politics. Furthermore, the Constitutional Court’s open legal policy doctrine frequently metamorphoses into a shield for the legislative oligarchy, evading substantive constitutional correction. Ultimately, this article proposes a comprehensive reconstruction of electoral legal politics, shifting the paradigm from democratic containment to electoral justice. This reconstruction demands normative threshold reforms, structural political funding improvements, and the application of strict scrutiny by the Constitutional Court to safeguard citizens' rights against oligarchic capture, ensuring genuine constitutional democracy and equitable political participation.
Penyuluhan Kesadaran Hukum sebagai Pilar Implementasi Peraturan Perundang Undangan di Masyarakat Desa Lisda Apriliani Sobirin; Taufik Taufik; Muhamad Iqbal Ansori Firdaus; Ilman Napiah; Mardiman Mardiman
Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat METHABDI Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat METHABDI
Publisher : Universitas Methodist Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46880/methabdi.Vol6No1.pp6-12

Abstract

Low legal literacy in rural communities often hinders the effective implementation of legislation at the local level, potentially triggering disputes and reducing public compliance. This community service activity aims to enhance legal awareness among residents of Wantilan Village as a strategic pillar for regulatory enforcement. The method employed integrates Community-Based Research (CBR) and Participatory Action Research (PAR), encompassing interactive seminars, participatory discussions, and free legal consultation services. Program effectiveness was evaluated using pretest and posttest instruments administered to 85 participants. Results indicate a significant increase in legal awareness scores from an average of 42.5 to 78.3 (p < 0.01), with the highest improvement in knowledge of rights/obligations and compliance attitudes. A total of 24 consultation cases were successfully handled, primarily focusing on civil and village administration matters in a preventive manner. The findings confirm that a participatory educational approach effectively bridges the gap between formal legal norms and community practices. It is concluded that the program successfully strengthened the community’s legal awareness foundation. It is recommended that this model be developed into a sustainable village legal clinic integrated with village government programs and partner universities.