Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.67
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Berajah Journal
Siti Humulhaer
Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf Tangerang
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PEMBARUAN HUKUM PIDANA KORUPSI PASCA REVISI UU NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2025 ANALISIS YURIDIS ATAS PERLINDUNGAN PEJABAT BUMN DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM Opik Sepriadi; Siti Humulhaer; Salman Al Ghifari; Unggul Budi
Berajah Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Berajah Journal
Publisher : CV. Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/bj.v6i1.228

Abstract

The amendment to Law No. 1 of 2025 amending Law No. 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Offences (the Anti-Corruption Law) introduces new dynamics into Indonesia’s criminal law system regarding corruption, particularly in relation to the management of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). This study aims to conduct a legal analysis of the updates to corruption criminal law following the amendment of Law No. 1 of 2025, focusing on the protection of SOE officials and its implications for the effectiveness of law enforcement. Using a normative legal research method with a legislative and conceptual analysis approach, this study found that the revision of Law No. 1 of 2025 introduced a distinction between legitimate business risks and corrupt acts through the strengthening of the business judgment rule and the removal of the status of public officials for SOE officials (Article 9G). Although this amendment provides legal certainty and protection against the criminalisation of business policies that are not malicious in nature, there is a risk of moral hazard and a weakening of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). This study recommends the need for regulatory harmonisation among law enforcement agencies, the strengthening of internal oversight systems within SOEs, and a re-evaluation of Article 9G to maintain a balance between legal protection and the eradication of corruption.
REKONSTRUKSI PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN RESTORATIF PASCA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL DAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 Dadang Rachmat; Siti Humulhaer; Dede Agus Sodikin; Djamal Efendi; Ervawati
Berajah Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Berajah Journal
Publisher : CV. Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/bj.v6i1.231

Abstract

This study analyses the paradigm shift in the enforcement of criminal law relating to acts of violence in Indonesia following the enactment of Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Offences (UU TPKS) and the Criminal Code No. 1 of 2023 (New Criminal Code). Employing a normative legal research method with a conceptual and legislative approach, this study traces the evolution from a retributive paradigm towards restorative justice in the handling of criminal cases involving violence. The findings indicate that the integration of restorative justice into the Indonesian criminal justice system presents substantive challenges regarding the balance between victim protection and offender rehabilitation. The UU TPKS provides an explicit legal basis for the application of restorative justice through Article 23, which regulates the discontinuation of prosecution based on restorative justice, whilst the New KUHP strengthens victim protection through more comprehensive provisions on physical violence. However, practical implementation faces structural barriers in the form of limited capacity among law enforcement officials, resistance from patriarchal culture, and the absence of standard operating procedures. This study recommends policy reform through the development of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for restorative justice, the strengthening of independent mediation institutions, and the harmonisation of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) with the TPKS Law to realise a criminal justice system oriented towards recovery and reconciliation.
Co-Authors Aditya Putra Setyawan Agus Alqodri Agus Eko Setyawan Ahiruddin Ahmad Fahrul Rozi Ahmad Nurafendi Akhmad Faishal Al Bukhori Andriyani Susilawati Anharyanto Ani Wahyuni Ashuri Asri Cahyadi Bachtiar Kemal Harahap Dadang Rachmat Dany Wahyu Dede Agus Sodikin Dian Retno Widayati Djamal Efendi Dwi Mani Suci Purwanto Eduardo Retno Ervawati Faizul Idris Firmansyah Mahmud Gatot Subroto Gunarto Wardono Juhana Nuryana M Zaenudin Ibrahim Mahmuddin Mochamad Fachri Muzhaffar Muhammad Fajar Alfahimi Muslimin Nida Lailatu Syabani Nursalim Oke Wiredarme Oky Rona Wijaya Opik Sepriadi Rahmat Giling Rahmat Wijaya Raliyanto Budi Wikarno Regina Yura Fitriah Sari Rifqi Syifa’ul Qolbi Ronald Pasrah Ronny Erlando Salman Al Ghifari Teddy T Pingak Unggul Budi Wisnu Cahyo Apriliyadi