cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Raymond Michael Menot
Contact Email
michael@ui.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
journal.ai@gmail.com
Editorial Address
"Departemen Antropologi, FISIP, Gedung B, Lt.1, FISIP Universitas Indonesia Depok 16424"
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurna lAntropologi Indonesia
Published by Universitas Indonesia
ISSN : 1693167X     EISSN : 16936086     DOI : 10.7454
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
ANTROPOLOGI INDONESIA was published to develop and enrich scientific discussion for scholars who put interest on socio-cultural issues in Indonesia. These journals apply peer-reviewed process in selecting high quality article. Editors welcome theoretical or research based article submission. Author’s argument doesn’t need to be in line with editors. The criteria of the submitted article covers the following types of article: first, the article presents the results of an ethnographic/qualitative research in certain topic and is related with ethnic/social groups in Indonesia; second, the article is an elaborated discussion of applied and collaborative research with strong engagement between the author and the collaborator’s subject in implementing intervention program or any other development initiative that put emphasizes on social, political, and cultural issues; third, a theoretical writing that elaborates social and cultural theory linked with the theoretical discourse of anthropology, especially in Indonesia anthropology; last, the article is a critical review of anthropological reference and other ethnography books that must be published at least in the last 3 years.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 579 Documents
 29   30   31   32   33 
Struktural-Fungsionalisme Amri Marzali
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article deals with the concepts of function and social structure, developed by two leading figures in British Social Anthropology, Radcliffe -Brown and Malinowski, before the Second World War. In this article, the author distinguishes Malinowski's concept of function from Radcliffe -Brown's, delineates Radcliffe-Brown's concept of social-structure and Evans-Pritchard's review of this concept. This article particularly intends to help the Indonesia students to study anthropological theory in their own language. Key words: organic analogy; social structure; institution; ideographic method.
Konflik Sosial dan Alternatif Pemecahannya Parsudi Suparlan
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In this article the author looks into social conflict and alternative solutions to the problem. He begins by discussing the merits of a conflict model in viewing society, as expounded by Dahrendorf, Bailey and others. The author argues that, in contrast, the New Order Regime of Indonesia followed a model of equilibrium, characteristic of most pseudo-democratic or authoritarian states. With an emphasis on gotong royong. uniformity, balance and harmony, any move toward individuality or anti-stability was seen as having no function in the maintenance of the system. Holding to this latter model, any view deviating from official policy was removed. Different views could only be expressed by those with power, who were in fact those in power. By setting the rules of the game, their own views were never seen as a form of deviation. This led to the emergence of conflict between various groups, whereby some were stripped of their identities, dignity and/or material resources in the interest of the state or more powerful groups. Conflicts between ethnic groups present a special problem, because any attack on the group is seen as an attack on the individual, and vice versa. The author suggests that with a conflict model, differences are a given, and conflicts give rise to competition where there exist rules for competition that are fair and well-enforced. These rules must be enforced by an impartial police. However, the incorporation of the police into the Indonesian military for the past 32 years has placed emphasis on the use of military tactics for resolving conflict. In fact, one solution to the problem of conflict is the presence of one institution or organization that can be trusted and depended upon by all parties involved; and this should be the police.Key words: conflict potentiality; ethnic plurality; culture dominant.
Some Notes on Clifford Geertz’s Interpretive Anthropology Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Salah satu persoalan dalam filsafat ilmu sosial adalah bagaimana menjelaskan (explain) tindakan-tindakan manusia yang beranekaragam secara ilmiah. Apakah kita dapat menerapkan metode-metode ilmu alam atau ada cara lain yang lebih tepat untuk menjelaskannya? Para ilmuwan sosial masih terus berupaya menemukan the best way untuk menjelaskan gejala-gejala sosial meskipun mereka tetap belum puas. Thomas Kuhn berpendapat bahwa ilmu sosial-tidak seperti ilmu alam-masih terlibat dalam diskusi metodologi yang tidak habis-habisnya karena belum mampu mencapai suatu kesepakatan mengenai paradigma-paradigma umum untuk membatasi masalah-masalah dan prosedur penelitian. Artikel ini berusaha mendiskusikan pandangan interpretive dari Clifford Geertz dalam mengkaji kebudayaan dan masyarakat serta kedudukannya dalam konstelasi metodologi ilmu sosial. Ada dua alasan mengapa perlu mendiskusikan masalah ini: (1) pandangan interpretive terhadap gejala-gejala sosial merupakan perkembangan penting dalam ilmu sosial selama dua dasawarsa; (2) C. Geertz yang banyak dipengaruhi teori sistem Talcott Parsons telah mengembangkan gagasan yang kaya dan luar biasa tentang bagaimana melihat dan menganalisis kebudayaan dan masyarakat. Perhatiannya tidak hanya pada masalah antropologi tetapi juga pada ilmu sosial umumnya. Kata kunci: intrepretivisme; "thick description"; anti ekonomisme; anti reduksionisme.
Metode Pemahaman bagi Penelitian Antropologi Ninuk Kleden-Probonegoro
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Amidst the many changes in the approaches taken by anthropologists today, the author reexamines the works produced in the more humanistic tradition of anthropology. She begins with the question of whether anthropological research can be conducted with an idiographic approach. Through a discussion of Verstehen, experience and hermeneutics, and drawing from her own experiences in the field, the author argues that the methods characteristic of amore humanistic anthropology can be applied to anthropological research and remain scientifically sound. Key words: hermeneutic; experience; "thick description".
Pendekatan Prosesual: Menjawab Tantangan dalam Mengkaji Dinamika Budaya Yunita T. Winarto
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Non-processual approaches in anthropology have been heavily criticized for not providing an adequate framework for explaining the emergence of socio-cultural phenomena, and the processes and mechanisms of change. Socio-cultural life is undeniably dynamic and everchanging. In facing this matter many anthropologists have turned to a processual approach in studying the dynamics of culture in the last two decades. In this article the author shows how the a processual approach is applied to the study of cultural dynamics. The author begins by discussing the unit of analysis and focus of study in a processual approach. Following that, she discusses the implication of this upon the methods and strategies for uncovering, describing and explaining change. The author also shows how this approach can uncover the heterogeneous nature of a socio-cultural phenomenon and the extent to which that heterogeneity allows change to occur. Her arguments are based upon empirical cases of knowledge transmission and formation among farmers in several locations on the north coast of West Java and Central Lampung. Key words: change and continuity; variation and conformity; research strategy.
Dari Bounded System ke Borderless Society: Krisis Metode Antropologi dalam Memahami Masyarakat Masa Kini Irwan Abdullah
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Society and culture can no longer be viewed as they have been in the past. Fundamental changes in group and cultural dynamics provide a new context with implications on how anthropological research must be done. A major change is the shift from the view of societies and cultures as bounded systems to the deterritorialization of culture. The author identifies three stages of change bearing upon agrarian cultures, i.e., market entry, market integration and market expansion. There is a new social reality wherein increasingly intensive mobility is enabled by transportation and communication, thus allowing movement across geographic and cultural boundaries. The author notes that the implications of this are manifold, i.e., a shift in the context for the production of meaning; the problem of the locus of culture; conventional methods of data collection that do not inform the anthropologist on how to handle data available from electronic media; the problem of representation and representativeness; and the matter of determining the unit of analysis in research. Key words: culture change; cultural deterritorialization; research methods.
Antropologi dan Civil Society: Pendekatan Teori Kebudayaan Bachtiar Alam
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article seeks to demonstrate the relevance of modern anthropological perspectives to the development of civil society in Indonesia. The concept of civil society has figured prominently in the political discourses taking place in Indonesia today. It has been largely interpreted as an intermediate sphere between the state and local communities, where the discourses on individual freedom as well as cultural and religious diversity can be effectively articulated without being co-opted by the state power, or being bogged down in communal conflicts. This paper argues that modern anthropological perspectives, centering on the idea of the development of polyphonic discourses on cultural identities, can offer a powerful conceptual tool to deconstruct the cultural essentialism perpetuated by the state power and social groups, thereby making a significant contribution to the development of civil society in Indonesia. Key words: civil society; practice; discourse; culture theory.
Keluarga dan Rumah Tangga: Satuan Penelitian dalam Perubahan Masyarakat Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 3 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Family and household are two concepts that have been blended into a single notion in most of the texts on kinship and social organization in the past, because, in many instances, they have interchangeably functions in many developed societies in which nuclear family type is the main reference. But, this situation is much different if we approach our developing societies-with special emphasis, urban-in terms of vastly and hardly social and economic changes. This article proposes to distinguish family and household concepts for analytical purposes. Household in its flexible form provides more promising space for dynamic anthropological research, especially in our society than the classical family concept. Selecting household as a common focus for anthropological research and analysis has both practical and theoretical justifications. Key words: family; household; social change.
Pergeseran Orientasi Nilai Kultural dan Keagamaan di Indonesia (Sebuah Esai dalam Rangka Mengenang Almarhum Prof. Koentjaraningrat) Amri Marzali
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 3 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the late Prof. Koentjaraningrat. It attempts to trace the history and the source of a concept and method used by Koentjaraningrat in a research and many of his speeches in the period of 1960-70s. The concept is called 'orientasi nilai-budaya'. The author finds that the concept was borrowed from the concept 'value orientation' used by Florence Kluckhohn and Fred Strodbeck, which was printed in their book, Variations in Value Orientation (1961). The concept 'value orientation' was originally stems from the concept 'value', which was once developed by Clyde Kluckhohn, the husband of Florence Kluckhohn, at Harvard University USA. This explanation, according to the author, is important for the student of anthropology in Indonesia. In the final of the article, the author attempts to apply the concept to the socio-cultural changes in contemporary Indonesia, particularly among the members of Islamic community. Key words: value orientation; value; socio-cultural changes.
Kajian Antropologi tentang Globalisasi: Catatan tentang Studi-studi Keterkaitan Dunia Celia Lowe
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 3 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

"Lewat globalisasi, keterkaitan antara manusia dan tempat meningkat, dan manusia yang sebelumnya tidak pernah saling jumpa sekarang berkesempatan untuk menjalin kontak. Meskipun kita dapat melihat globalisasi terjadidi mana-mana, proses globalisasi sebenarnya tidak terdistribusi secara merata. Sebagian orang, hampir tidak pernah pindah dari satu tempat ke tempat lain yang berbeda dari tempat mereka lahir dan mati, dan banyak lagi yang tidak berpartisipasi secara aktif dalam seluruh pola konsumsi, birokrasi, atau informasi yang merupakan karakteristik dari globalisasi. Namun, setiap orang pada tingkatan tertentu terlibat dalam suatu bentuk sirkulasi yang baru. Globalisasi telah merubah dunia dimana kitasemua hidup."

Page 31 of 58 | Total Record : 579

 29   30   31   32   33 

Filter by Year

1969 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 42, No 2 (2021): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 42, No 1 (2021): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 41, No 2 (2020): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 41, No 1 (2020): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 40, No 2 (2019): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 40, No 1 (2019): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 39, No 2 (2018): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 39, No 1 (2018): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 38, No 2 (2017): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 38, No 1 (2017): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 37, No 2 (2016): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 37, No 1 (2016): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 36, No 2 (2015): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 36, No 1 (2015): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 35, No 1 (2014): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 34, No 2 (2013): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 34, No 1 (2013): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 33, No 3 (2012): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 33, No 2 (2012): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 33, No 1 (2012): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 32, No 3 (2011): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 32, No 2 (2011): Antropologi Indonesia Vol 32, No 1 (2011): Antropologi Indonesia ##issue.vol## 31, ##issue.no## 3 (2010): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia Vol 31, No 3 (2010): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 1 (2009): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 3 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 1 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia Vol 29, No 3 (2005): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia Vol 29, No 2 (2005): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia Vol 29, No 1 (2005): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 75 (2004): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 74 (2004): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia (english edition) No 74 (2004): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 73 (2004): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 72 (2003): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 71 (2003): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 70 (2003): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 69 (2002): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 68 (2002): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 67 (2002): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 66 (2001): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 65 (2001): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 64 (2001): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 63 (2000): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 62 (2000): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 61 (2000): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 60 (1999): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 59 (1999): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 58 (1999): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 57 (1998): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 56 (1998): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 55 (1998): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 54 (1997): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 53 (1997): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 52 (1997): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 51 (1995): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 50 (1992): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 49 (1991): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 48 (1991): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 47 (1989): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia No 44 (1986): Berita Antropologi No 43 (1986): Berita Antropologi No 42 (1986): Berita Antropologi No 41 (1986): Berita Antropologi No 40 (1985): Berita Antropologi No 39 (1980): Berita Antropologi No 38 (1980): Berita Antropologi No 37 (1980): Berita Antropologi No 36 (1980): Berita Antropologi No 35 (1978): Berita Antropologi No 34 (1978): Berita Antropologi No 32-33 (1977): Berita Antropologi No 31 (1977): Berita Antropologi No 30 (1977): Berita Antropologi Terbitan Khusus No 21 (1975): Berita Antropologi No 20 (1975): Berita Antropologi No 19 (1975): Berita Antropologi No 23 (1974): Berita Antropologi Terbitan Khusus No 18 (1974): Berita Antropologi No 17 (1974): Berita Antropologi No 15 (1974): Berita Antropologi No 14 (1974): Berita Antropologi Terbitan Khusus No 3 (1973): Berita Antropologi Terbitan Khusus No 11 (1972): Berita Antropologi No 9 (1972): Berita Antropologi No 8 (1972): Berita Antropologi No 7 (1972): Berita Antropologi No 6 (1972): Berita Antropologi No 2 (1972): Berita Antropologi Terbitan Khusus No 1 (1972): Berita Antropologi Terbitan Khusus No 5 (1971): Berita Antropologi No 4 (1971): Berita Antropologi No 3 (1969): Berita Antropologi No 2 (1969): Berita Antropologi No 1 (1969): Berita Antropologi More Issue