cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
pasca@usm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Pasca Sarjana Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang (USM) Jl Soekarno Hatta Tlogosari Semarang
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ius Constituendum
Published by Universitas Semarang
ISSN : 25412345     EISSN : 25808842     DOI : 10.26623
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Journal Ius Constituendum a scientific journal that includes research, court decisions and assessment/comprehensive legal discourse both by researchers and society in general to emphasize the results in an effort to formulate new rules of the new in the field of the legal studies in accordance with the character of ius constituendum. Journal Ius Constituendum periodic journal published twice a year in April and October, has been indexed SINTA 3 (Accredited by the Directorate General of Research And Development of the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia Number 36/E/ KPT/2019). Registered as a member of Crossref system with Digital Object Identifier (DOI) prefix 10.26623. All articles will have DOI number.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): FEBRUARY" : 7 Documents clear
Derden verzet as a Legal Protection Effort for Third Parties In Realising Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Siti Zulaichah; Yayuk Whindari; Sheila Kusuma Wardani Amnesti; Nurul Istiqomah
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i1.12669

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of derden verzet as a legal protection mechanism for third parties in civil execution disputes in Indonesia and to assess its relevance to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 16 on peace, justice, and strong institutions. Employing normative legal research with a case approach, this article examines Decision No. 372/Pdt/2020/PT.Bdg and relevant procedural norms under the HIR/RBg framework, supported by doctrinal and human-rights-based justice literature. The findings show that derden verzet is conceptually designed to safeguard third-party property rights affected by final court judgments; however, its implementation remains constrained by procedural formalism, a heavy burden of proof, limited public awareness, and inadequate procedural safeguards in summons and evidentiary examination. In the analyzed case, the third party’s attempt to reclaim property rights was impeded despite indications that the transfer of rights occurred in the absence of good faith, demonstrating a gap between procedural compliance and substantive justice. This condition undermines legal certainty and weakens access to justice, contradicting the institutional objectives promoted by SDG Goal 16. The novelty of this study lies in repositioning derden verzet not merely as an extraordinary procedural remedy but as a substantive rights-protection instrument within a human-rights-oriented civil justice reform agenda, while identifying key normative deficiencies such as unclear standing requirements and undefined criteria of “harmed interests.” Accordingly, the study recommends clearer judicial guidelines and standardized procedural rules to strengthen third-party standing assessment, improve structured evidentiary review, and reduce excessive formalism to ensure more effective protection and a more accountable civil justice system.
Right to Be Forgotten for Child Victims of Electronic Sexual Violence Rahmatiah Irwan; Aulya Nisa'; Anggun Retno Wardani; Agrita Permata Sari; Azzura Fathanul Umara; Rivana Tesalonika Taroreh
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i1.12784

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of the Right to Be Forgotten (RTBF) as a legal protection instrument for children victims of electronic-based sexual violence (KSBE). The phenomenon of KSBE in Indonesia shows a significant increase, with women and children as the main victims. Sexually charged content stored in digital spaces triggers prolonged re-victimization because it is difficult to remove. Although RTBF has been recognized normatively through the TPKS Law, ITE Law, Child Protection Law, and Personal Data Protection Law, its implementation is still partial and not yet effective. The main obstacles include the absence of clear technical rules, formalistic and slow legal procedures, technical limitations in cross-jurisdictional elimination, and multiple interpretations of norms. This condition causes the children of KSBE victims to experience structural victimization, where the failure of the state to provide a mechanism for removing content adds to the psychological and social burden of the victims. A juridical-normative approach with radical victimization analysis shows that RTBF has not been positioned as a victim's substantive right, so protection has not been fully in favor of the principle of the best interests of the child. This research emphasizes the need for operational legal reforms: a rapid administrative mechanism for content removal, strict sanctions for non-compliant digital platforms, and multi-sector coordination between law enforcement agencies, Kominfo, and child protection agencies. The main findings of the study are the placement of RTBF as a substantive instrument to protect children victims of KSBE in the digital era, strengthening the principle of the best interests for children, while affirming the role of the state in stopping the cycle of digital victimization. The novelty of the research lies in the integration of radical legal, digital, and victimology analysis to formulate concrete technical and procedural recommendations for child protection in the digital space. Keywords: children; electronic-based sexual violence; legal protection; right to be forgotten; victimologyn
Legal Protection of Health Workers in Emergency Medical Procedures: An Analysis of Legal Certainty in Indonesia and Thailand Rosnida Rosnida; Akbar, Muhamad Aksan; Muhammad As Ari. AM; Irabiah Irabiah; Yeni Haerani; Patma Sari
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i1.12818

Abstract

This study examines the legal certainty afforded to healthcare workers in performing emergency medical procedures in Indonesia and compares it with the legal protection framework implemented in Thailand. The urgency of this research arises from the increasing criminalization and malpractice claims faced by healthcare workers acting in good faith under high-risk and time-sensitive emergency conditions. Using a normative juridical method that incorporates statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health in conjunction with Thailand’s Emergency Medical Act and the application of the Good Samaritan principle. The findings reveal that although Indonesian law normatively recognizes legal protection for healthcare workers, its implementation remains weak due to the absence of technical guidelines, inconsistent law enforcement practices, and the limited role of professional medical institutions in the early stages of legal proceedings. In contrast, Thailand provides more effective legal certainty through explicit statutory immunity, integrated institutional support, and a restorative legal approach toward emergency medical practice. The novelty of this study lies in its comparative analysis, demonstrating that Thailand’s qualified immunity model may serve as a normative and institutional reference for strengthening legal protection for healthcare workers in Indonesia, particularly in emergency medical contexts. This study contributes to the development of health law by offering policy-oriented recommendations to enhance legal certainty, professional security, and patient safety.
Judicial Application of Actus Reus and Mens Rea In Village Fund Corruption Cases Aprilia Khoirun Nisa; Ali Maskur
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i1.12996

Abstract

Reus and Mens Rea In Village Fund Corruption Cases   Aprilia Khoirun Nisa, Ali Maskur  Faculty of Sharia and Law, Walisongo State Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia apriliakhoirunnisa22@gmail.com   Abstract   This study examines the judicial application of actus reus and mens rea in village fund corruption cases, with a specific focus on Decision Number 2/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Smg involving a village head in Blora Regency. The persistence of corruption at the village governance level highlights the need for doctrinal consistency between judicial reasoning and classical principles of criminal liability. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, this research analyzes how the court established the outward unlawful conduct (actus reus) through proven abuse of authority, manipulation of village financial administration, and resulting state financial losses, as well as how it inferred the inward culpable intent (mens rea) from deliberate and systematic misuse of public funds. The findings demonstrate that the judge’s reasoning substantially aligns with Moeljatno’s theory, which emphasizes the unity between unlawful acts and moral blameworthiness as the foundation of criminal responsibility. The judgment also reflects formal compliance with Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2020 on corruption sentencing guidelines, although its emphasis on nominal financial loss raises normative tension with the primacy of moral culpability in classical criminal law. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated doctrinal assessment that simultaneously evaluates actus reus, mens rea, causality, and sentencing considerations, thereby reaffirming the continued relevance of classical criminal law theory in contemporary corruption adjudication involving village funds.
Comparing the Transfer of Prisoners Between Japan and the Netherlands Mg. Nela Violina Indah Pratiwi; Emmilia Rusdiana
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i1.13000

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan sistem pemindahan narapidana antarnegara di Jepang dan Belanda untuk mengidentifikasi model hukum yang dapat diadaptasi oleh Indonesia. Latar belakang penelitian ini muncul dari meningkatnya jumlah warga negara asing yang dihukum di Indonesia, serta warga negara Indonesia yang menjalani hukuman di luar negeri. Sementara itu, Indonesia belum memiliki peraturan khusus mengenai pemindahan narapidana antarnegara. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada perlunya landasan hukum yang menjamin hak asasi manusia, kepastian hukum, dan efektivitas reintegrasi sosial bagi narapidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Jepang mengatur pemindahan narapidana berdasarkan Konvensi Dewan Eropa tentang Pemindahan Narapidana (1983) melalui Undang-Undang No. 66 Tahun 2002, yang menekankan persetujuan sukarela, prinsip-prinsip kemanusiaan, dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Sementara itu, Belanda menerapkan Wet wederzijdse erkenning en tenuitvoerlegging vrijheidsbenemende en voorwaardelijke sancties (WETS), yang diadopsi dari Keputusan Kerangka Kerja Dewan 2008/909/JHA, yang mencakup sistem pengawasan ketat dan mekanisme sertifikat di antara negara-negara anggota Uni Eropa. Jepang unggul dalam melindungi hak-hak individu, sementara Belanda lebih efisien dalam mengoordinasikan urusan administratif antarnegara. Hasil perbandingan ini memberikan landasan konseptual bagi Indonesia untuk merancang peraturan pemindahan narapidana yang menyeimbangkan prinsip legalitas, kemanusiaan, dan kepastian hukum. Kata Kunci: Hukum; Keadilan; Reintegrasi Sosial; Pemindahan Narapidana; Hak Asasi Manusia
Blockchain-Based Therapeutic Agreement Model For Patient Legal Protection in Telemedicine Ratih, Ratih Pratiwi Syurkawi; Dodi, Dodi Jaya Wardana; Ifahda, Ifahda Pratama Hapsari; Deni, Deni Setiyawan; Eka, Eka Nurjanah
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i1.13047

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and formulate an optimized legal protection model for patients in telemedicine services in Indonesia by developing a blockchain-based therapeutic agreement framework that strengthens legal certainty, informed consent, and personal data security. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this research examines Indonesia’s Health Law, the Personal Data Protection (PDP) Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT) Law, and sectoral telemedicine regulations, supported by relevant scholarly literature. The findings demonstrate that Indonesia’s telemedicine governance remains constrained by regulatory gaps and normative disharmony, particularly in direct-to-patient services, due to the absence of standardized electronic informed consent (e-consent) procedures, weak digital identity verification, and unclear demarcation of liability between physicians as medical professionals and platforms as electronic system providers. These weaknesses expose patients to heightened risks of malpractice disputes, evidentiary challenges in electronic medical records, and personal data breaches. To address these issues, this study proposes a blockchain-enabled therapeutic agreement model integrated with smart contract mechanisms to ensure immutable consent records, transparent audit trails, enforceable allocation of rights and obligations, and privacy-by-design compliance with the PDP Law. The novelty of this study lies in integrating health law principles with blockchain-based contractual architecture as a concrete regulatory and operational blueprint for patient protection within Indonesia’s digital health ecosystem. This model provides policy implications for establishing standardized digital contract templates, risk-based supervision, and interoperable verification systems to enhance trust, accountability, and equitable access to telemedicine, including in frontier, outermost, and remote (3T) regions.
War Crimes Within The Framework of International Humanitarian Law And The Rome Statute: An Analytical Study of Israel-Palestine Conflict Iskandar Iskandar; Irsan, Muhammad Irsan; Didin Nurul Rosidin; Uu Nurul Huda; Ryan Fachryan Lesmana Putra
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i1.13106

Abstract

This study aims to examine how war crimes are conceptualised and enforced within the framework of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and the Rome Statute by analysing the Israel–Palestine conflict as a prolonged and politically contested armed conflict in which serious violations against civilians persist with limited accountability. Using a normative legal research design, this article applies a statutory and case-based approach through doctrinal analysis of the Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocols, and the Rome Statute, supported by qualitative examination of ICC-related documents, United Nations reports, and verified secondary data to assess the implementation of core IHL principles, particularly distinction and proportionality. The findings demonstrate that recurrent violations committed by both parties are not primarily caused by normative gaps in international law, but rather by structural enforcement barriers, including the ICC’s jurisdictional and admissibility constraints, restricted access to evidence, lack of state cooperation, political interference, and selective enforcement through international institutions, especially the UN Security Council. These obstacles contribute to an enduring enforcement deficit that weakens civilian protection and perpetuates impunity in asymmetric and protracted conflicts. The novelty of this study lies in systematically linking fundamental IHL principles—distinction, proportionality, and the prohibition of excessive force—to their qualification as war crimes under Article 8 of the Rome Statute, while critically demonstrating how political realities and institutional dependence on state cooperation undermine the effectiveness of international criminal accountability mechanisms. This research highlights the urgent need to strengthen coordination among international institutions, enhance investigative access and evidentiary reliability, and promote more consistent and impartial enforcement strategies to ensure that IHL and international criminal law operate as effective deterrents and justice-delivering instruments in contemporary armed conflicts.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): FEBRUARY Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): OCTOBER Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JUNE Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): FEBRUARY Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024): OCTOBER Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JUNE Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): FEBRUARY Vol 8, No 3 (2023): OCTOBER Vol 8, No 2 (2023): JUNE Vol 8, No 1 (2023): FEBRUARY Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): OCTOBER Vol 7, No 1 (2022): APRIL Vol 6, No 2 (2021): OKTOBER Vol 6, No 1 (2021): APRIL Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): OCTOBER Vol 5, No 1 (2020): APRIL Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): OCTOBER Vol 4, No 1 (2019): April Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): OCTOBER Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): April Vol 3, No 1 (2018): April Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): OCTOBER Vol 2, No 1 (2017): April Vol 1, No 2 (2016): Oktober More Issue