cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
 160   161   162   163   164 
The Role and Responsibilities of Notaries as Members of the Notary Supervisory Council According to Law No. 30/2004 Soetopo, Hadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2029

Abstract

This study examines the role and duties of notaries serving as members of the Notary Supervisory Council (MPN) in accordance with Law No. 30/2004 on the Notary Position (UUJN). The goal of this study is to understand the role of notaries in the MPN framework and determine the duties and difficulties they face in upholding professionalism and honesty. This study employs a normative analysis methodology with a qualitative approach to investigate the execution of MPN responsibilities at various levels. We achieve this through a comprehensive evaluation of existing literature and the examination of case studies. The comprehensive analysis centres on the interaction between notaries and MPN, as well as their respective responsibilities in maintaining the code of ethics and resolving conflicts. The findings suggest that notaries have a pivotal role in the MPN framework, which comprises three tiers: MPD, MPW, and MPP. Notaries at every level have the responsibility of overseeing, promoting, and enforcing the code of ethics, as well as settling conflicts through mediation. According to the report, the functions and obligations of notaries in MPN are critical for upholding the profession's integrity and professionalism. MPN employs a hierarchical system of supervision to carry out its duties effectively and efficiently, ensuring that all notaries in Indonesia comply with legislation and maintain public confidence in the profession.
Penerapan Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 Terhadap Perlindungan Jaminan Sosial Pekerja Migran Indonesia Bernadetha Chelvi Yuliastuti; Heru Susetyo
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2031

Abstract

Komitmen Pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan terhadap Pekerja Migran Indonesia (PMI) salah satunya melalui program jaminan sosial. Program Jaminan Sosial mulai diterapkan di Indonesia sejak tahun 2004 dengan berlakunya UU No 40 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional. Pada tahun 2018, diterbitkan peraturan yang khusus mengatur jaminan sosial untuk para pekerja migran Indonesia yaitu Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan No 18 Tahun 2018 tentang Jaminan Sosial Pekerja Migran Indonesia. Dalam pelaksanaannya, Permenaker tersebut belum menjawab kesenjangan antara kebutuhan dan layanan yang PMI dapatkan. Permasalahan terbesar adalah mengenai tata kelola dalam implementasi jaminan sosial pekerja migran Indonesia. Pada Februari 2023 terbitlah Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 sebagai pengganti atas Permenaker Nomor 18 Tahun 2018 tentang Jaminan Sosial Pekerja Migran Indonesia. Permenaker No 4 Tahun 2023 ini diyakini lebih komprehensif dalam memberikan perlindungan kepada Pekerja Migran Indonesia mulai dari sebelum, selama, hingga setelah bekerja. Jurnal ini akan memaparkan penerapan Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 terhadap perlindungan jaminan sosial Pekerja Migran Indonesia.
Peran Bukti dan Keahlian Dalam Membuktikan Tindak Pidana Yang Berkaitan Dengan Fetishisme Disorder Evangeline Amanta Chrisya; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2032

Abstract

Fetishism is often hidden and difficult to prove as a criminal offense in Indonesia due to the lack of specific regulations in the Criminal Code. This disorder involves sexual arousal towards non-genital objects and may interfere with social functioning, requiring behavioral therapy. Evidence challenges include difficulty obtaining evidence and social stigma. The solution is clearer laws, specialized law enforcement training, a multi-disciplinary approach, and public education to reduce stigma and increase reporting. The aim of this research is to find out the challenges and solutions in proving criminal acts related to fetishism. The research method used in this article is normative legal research. Normative legal research focuses on the analysis of statutory regulations, legal doctrine, and relevant legal concepts to find solutions to the legal issues raised in this paper. The results of this research are that Fetishistic disorder is a condition where a person has sexual urges towards non-genital objects, which can be a criminal act. In Indonesia, the law does not specifically regulate fetishism, creating a gap in protection for victims. Challenges in evidence include difficulty gathering evidence, social stigma, and lack of understanding. The solution is more comprehensive laws, specialized training for law enforcement, a multi-disciplinary approach, public education, and the use of advanced forensic technology.
Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum VS Pelindungan Hak Asasi Manusia : Petani Kalasey Mempertahankan Kebun Terakhir Ashley Juniare Maria Rengkung; Suparjo, Suparjo
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2033

Abstract

Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest is the core of the Implementation of Land Acquisition which is basically not free from impacts which should also be regulated in this Law. As land plays an important role in everyday life, it is necessary to pay attention to rights and protection regarding its procurement. Law Number 2 of 2012 is too broad to protect the state's power so that it intersects with human rights provisions such as protecting people's rights. This research uses a statutory research approach and a conceptual approach. This research uses secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, namely statutory regulations and secondary legal materials in the form of books and scientific journals. The results of this research reveal (a) Appropriate land acquisition procedures (b) Public interests are the basis for land acquisition (c) The process of applying for PTUN is related to land acquisition (d) Compensation for losses (e) protection of community rights in land acquisition.
Analisis Tindak Pidana Aborsi Dalam Perkara Nomor 482/PID.SUS/2021/PN CKR Nadya Salsha Tanjung; Hery Firmansyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2034

Abstract

Abortion is a public health problem because it has an impact on maternal morbidity and mortality. As is known, the main causes of death for pregnant women and giving birth are bleeding, infection and eclampsia. However, abortion is actually also a cause of maternal death, only in the form of bleeding complications and sepsis. Abortion, which we often know as the act of aborting a pregnancy, is basically an act that is iprohibited in indonesia. In ithe Criminal Code, regulations regarding abortion are included in the chapter on crimes against life. Criminal responsibility is based on if there is a iviolation of norms and there are sanctions, then there will be responsibility. The iudge in determining criminal responsibility is based on the indictment and the facts in the trial and the fulfillment of the "intentional" element. The basis for the judge's consideration in handing down a decision in the crime of abortion is based on many things, including the evidence presented, the statements of witnesses and the defendant, and the indictment submitted by the public prosecutor.
Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Yang Memiliki Hak Atas Tanah Gabriel Nugeraha Silalahi; Gunawan Djajaputra
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2035

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the form of legal protection for parties who own land rights and analyse the legal certainty of land rights certificate holders through a case study of Banjarbaru District Court Decision Number 62/Pdt.G/2022/PN Bjb. This research uses normative juridical research by analysing secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the court decision provided legal protection for Sudjar Wadi as a party with land rights through recognition of the validity of the land sale and purchase transaction, the right to appear before the Land Deed Official (PPAT), to transfer the name of the land certificate, and to take care of the lost certificate. This decision also emphasises the importance of legal certainty in protecting the rights of land certificate holders by ensuring Sudjar Wadi has legal rights to the disputed land. Law enforcement in this case achieved the goals of legal certainty, social benefit, and justice by determining the defendant to bear the costs of the case, providing incentives for effective law enforcement, and is expected to increase public confidence in judicial institutions and compliance with the rule of law.
Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Perpanjangan Hak BOT Terhadap Skema Build Operate Transfer antara PT Hotel Indonesia Natour (Persero) dan PT Cipta Karya Bumi Indah (PT CKBI) Nazihatul Muna; Bambang Kuswito
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2036

Abstract

Perjanjian BOT antara PT Hotel Indonesia Natour (Persero) dan PT Cipta Karya Bumi Indah (PT CKBI) merupakan sebuah skema kerjasama yang melibatkan pihak swasta dan pemerintah. Dalam perjanjian ini, PT CKBI bertindak sebagai pihak swasta yang membangun, mengelola, dan mengoperasikan aset milik PT Hotel Indonesia Natour (Persero) selama jangka waktu tertentu, sebelum akhirnya mengembalikan aset tersebut kepada pihak pemerintah. Perjanjian BOT antara PT Hotel Indonesia Natour (Persero) dan PT Cipta Karya Bumi Indah (PT CKBI) telah menimbulkan dugaan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam proses perpanjangan hak BOT. Hal ini disebabkan oleh adanya ketidaksesuaian antara Surat Menteri BUMN No. 5-136/MBU/2004 dengan waktu pelaksanaan perpanjangan yang dilakukan, serta dugaan penyimpangan dalam pengelolaan aset milik negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal yaitu menganalisis hukum secara normatif, berfokus pada peraturan, prinsip, dan doktrin hukum yang bersumber pada peraturan perundang-undangan, yurisprudensi, dan literatur hukum. Sumber data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah sumber data primer yaitu peraturan perundang-undangan, yurisprudensi, dan kontrak, sumber data sekunder yaitu buku, jurnal ilmiah, laporan sumber referensi lainnya dan sumber data tersier yaitu kamus hukum, ensiklopedia, dan indeks. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan. Analisis data penelitian ini dihubungkan dengan permasalahan yang kemudian diteliti dan diuraikan dalam bentuk narasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu berusaha untuk menginterpretasikan dan menganalisis dugaan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam perpanjangan hak BOT terhadap skema Build Operate Transfer antara PT Hotel Indonesia Natour (Persero) dan PT Cipta Karya Bumi Indah (PT CKBI) berdasarkan surat persetujuan Menteri BUMN nomor S-247/MBU/2004 tanggal 11 Mei 2004.
Kepastian Hukum Terkait Pembagian Harta Waris Bagi Ahli Waris Perempuan dalam Masyarakat Hukum Adat Batak Toba melalui Surat Keterangan Waris Jessica, Graciella Ratna; Meliyana Yustikarini
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2037

Abstract

In the provisions of Batak Toba Customary Law, especially Batak Toba Customary Inheritance Law, women are relatively weak legal subjects. As a result of the patrilineal kinship system adopted by the Batak Toba indigenous community, women have limited rights, inversely proportional to men. As subjects who are often considered 'passengers' in a family, women in the Batak Toba indigenous community face direct discriminatory treatment in the eyes of the Batak Toba customary law itself. However, along with the pace of development of the times, gender-based discrimination in various aspects is no longer considered relevant. Referring to Article 17 of Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights and the Jurisprudence of the Indonesian Supreme Court No. 179K/Sip/1961, women's inheritance rights are equal to men. Where customary laws that are no longer able to adjust to the development of community life, such as not recognizing the position of women as equal to men, cannot be maintained. Departing from this, women in the Batak Toba indigenous community have a legal protection to be able to defend their rights and position in the eyes of the law to be equal to men. Regarding the issue of inheritance rights, women in the Batak Toba traditional community can take care of making a Certificate of Inheritance.
Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menangani Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum 2024 Christine S.T Kansil; Namira Diffany Nuzan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2038

Abstract

The writing of this research is based on the aim that an assessment will be carried out regarding the extent of the authority of the constitutional court in handling the 2024 election dispute case submitted by the presidential candidate pair and also the vice presidential candidate in serial number 3 and serial number 1. The basis for submitting the petition to the constitutional court by of the candidate pair that there are indications that there was a massive structured and systematic act of fraud in the 2024 election carried out by presidential and vice presidential candidate number 2 where in the implementation of this year's election the principles of fairness and overflow were not implemented properly. Therefore, a problem that can be studied is whether the constitutional court has the authority to handle this case, as in accordance with Law Number 24 of 2003 which regulates the authority of the constitutional court in Article 10 paragraph 1 letter a. Therefore, in the implementation or results of this research, the author really hopes that it will be useful for the constitutional court and the parties involved in this matter. Apart from that, readers will also be able to find out about the extent of authority that the constitutional court has in handling disputes over election results.
Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Dinamika Politik dan Kepercayaan Publik di Indonesia: Analisis Implikasi Hukum dan Etika Kansil, Christine S.T; Putri Meilika Nadilatasya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2039

Abstract

The Constitutional Court is one of the judicial power institutions appointed to carry out judicial functions to uphold the law and justice as fair as possible. According to Law Number 24 of 2003, the Constitutional Court has the duty and function to handle constitutional cases relating to certain constitutional issues. To ensure that the constitution is implemented responsibly in accordance with the will of the people and the principles of democracy, constitutional judges must have knowledge and skills in state administration as well as a commitment to implement and oversee public life. The Constitutional Court's decision on the age limit of presidential and vice-presidential candidates in Law No. 7/2017 on General Elections (Election Law) is considered a measure of the qualifications of a leader, and this decision has caused much debate in society. The purpose of this research is to identify how the Constitutional Court's decision impacts Indonesian politics as well as the ethical standards violated by the judges when making the decision.

Page 162 of 391 | Total Record : 3910

 160   161   162   163   164 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue