cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
 296   297   298   299   300 
Kompetensi Notaris Pengganti dalam Menggantikan Notaris yang Cuti Sebagai Pejabat Negara Kurniadi, Maxwell
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1316

Abstract

Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang memiliki wewenang untuk membuat akta otentik dan kewenangan lainnya sebagaimana dimaksud dalam pasal 1 angka (1) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Sedangkan Notaris Pengganti adalah seseorang yang untuk sementara waktu diangkat sebagai Notaris untuk menggantikan tugas Notaris yang sedang cuti, sakit atau untuk sementara berhalangan menjalankan jabatannya sebagai seorang Notaris. Syarat menjadi Notaris Pengganti yakni seorang warga negara Indonesia yang berijazah sarjana hukum dan telah bekerja sebagai karyawan kantor Notaris paling sedikit 2 (dua) tahun berturut-turut. Notaris Pengganti sendiri memiliki kewajiban dan wewenang yang sama dengan Notaris biasa. Hal menimbulkan suatu kondisi yang timpang dimana syarat menjadi Notaris Pengganti tidak sebanding dengan syarat menjadi Notaris biasa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang bersifat preskriptif yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, diperlukan adanya revisi Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris dan revisi Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pengangkatan, Cuti, Perpindahan, Pemberhentian dan Perpanjangan Masa Jabatan Notaris mengenai syarat Notaris Pengganti.
Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen atas Barang yang Tidak Sesuai dengan Gambar pada Transaksi di Marketplace Pratama Arief, Rifky
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1317

Abstract

Marketplace is a place for online sellers; Despite having a good security system, there are still loopholes for fraud, one of which is by selling items that do not match the photo. This shows how difficult it is to be a buyer in buying and selling online. This research will discuss consumer legal protection against goods that do not match the image in transactions in the marketplace and the responsibility of business actors. This study used a normative juridical approach. Furthermore, the results of this study show that consumers have the right to get products according to the image, and sellers in the marketplace will be responsible for such errors according to the Consumer Protection Act. The marketplace can provide suggestions to sellers so that images of traded products can be depicted clearly.
Penggunaan Vie Structure untuk Praktik Nominee dalam Praktik Penanaman Modal di Indonesia Reditha Saras, Anak Agung Ayu
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1318

Abstract

Indonesia is a popular place for foreign investors to carry out investment activities. The government as the host state can also then provide and determine restrictions to certain actions regarding this investment, among others by issuing Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment and Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation. The existence of these restrictions and prohibitions then causes certain parties to smuggle the law in order to make investment easier, including the practice of nominees. What will be discussed in this article is the validity of the nominee practice by looking at the VIE structure practice in the People's Republic of China and looking at it from a civil and corporate perspective. This research method uses normative legal research. The research results show that VIE Structure is a nominee practice which is prohibited in Indonesia. In addition, all agreements for nominee practice will be null and void by law.
Penerapan Pidana Terhadap Terdakwa Tindak Pidana Menambang Terumbu Karang di Kawasan Konservasi Putra Feli, Aidil; Fitriati, Fitriati; A. Kana, Philips
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1319

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 27 of 2007 concerning Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands, explicitly explains criminal sanctions for perpetrators of mining coral reefs. This research is Normative Juridical legal research. Criminal Application Against Defendant Mining Coral Reefs in Conservation Areas In Decision Number 73/Pid.B/2017/PN Sit the defendant was charged under Article 73 paragraph (1) letter a of Republic of Indonesia Law No. 27 of 2007 concerning Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands. Decision Number 592/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Pdg defendant Risal Bin Olleng was proven to have jointly committed the criminal act of destroying coral reef ecosystems in a conservation area as well as defendant I. Usmanto PGL. Brother and defendant II. Muhammad Nur PGL. The act mentioned above has been legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing the criminal act of "participating in committing acts which result in pollution and/or damage to fish resources and/or the environment in the fisheries management area of the Republic of Indonesia." The judge's consideration in imposing a crime on the defendant in Decision Number 73/Pid.B/2017/PN Sit and Number 592/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Pdg is that it has the same elements of consideration, namely each person, and the element of deliberately mining coral reefs, taking coral reefs in Conservation Areas, using explosives and toxic materials, and/or other methods that result in damage to the coral reef ecosystem.
Kebijakan Kriminal dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia Rozaq, Mubdiul; Fahmiron, Fahmiron
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1320

Abstract

Law Number 5 of 2018 has regulated the Eradication of Indonesian Terrorism Crimes. However, the number of acts of terrorism in Indonesia has not decreased even though the laws and regulations in Indonesia have provided strict sanctions against the perpetrators of terrorism. Crime prevention policies or efforts are urgently needed to reduce the number of acts of terrorism in Indonesia. The problems examined in this thesis are First, how is the criminal policy in handling criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia? Second, how can the handling of criminal acts of terrorism be better in the future in Indonesia? This research is a legal research with descriptive analytical specifications. The approach used is a normative juridical approach. The data used are secondary data and primary data collected through library research. The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and presented in an analytical descriptive form. The results of this study are first, criminal policy in handling criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia is the formation or renewal of legal substance with the issuance of RI Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning Amendments to RI Law Number 15 of 2003 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism. Second, better handling of Terrorism Crimes in the Future is to change Article 14 by adding 1 (one) new paragraph, namely paragraph (2) concerning mitigating crimes against perpetrators if the crime referred to in paragraph (1) does not occur. Furthermore, amending Article 17 paragraph (2) regarding criminal liability for corporations that commit acts of terrorism.
Penerapan Strict Liability dalam Hukum Pelindungan Konsumen di Indonesia: Perbandingan Negara Lain Sinduningrum, Aryani; Marlyna, Henny
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1321

Abstract

Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen mengatur terkait pertanggungjawaban produk terhadap adanya tuntutan ganti kerugian yang terjadi terhadap konsumen. Dalam pelindungan konsumen di Indonesia perlu adanya penerapan konsep strict liability yang lebih kuat lagi dalam konteks pertanggungjawaban produk. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal yang menggunaan pendekatan analitis dengan mengumpulkan, mengidentifikasi, serta menganalisis data secara kualitatif. Dari hasil dari penelitian diperoleh: 1. Indonesia belum menerapkan strict liability secara murni sebab masih harus dilakukan pembuktian terbalik serta unsur kesalahan masih harus dibuktikan terlebih dahulu 2. Strict liability tidak murni juga diterapkan di negara Belanda sebagai negara yang memiliki tradisi hukum civil law sebab produsen atau pelaku usaha harus membuktikan bahwa adanya unsur kesalahan. Berbeda dengan negara yang memiliki tradisi hukum common law seperti di Inggris dan Amerika bahwa dalam penerapan strict liability tidak melihat pada unsur kesalahan, melainkan melihat pada unsur risiko yang menimbulkan kerugian. Perbandingan konsep penerapan strict liability di berbagai negara ini diharapkan dapat diadopsi dalam rangka menentukan konsep strict liability yang ideal di Indonesia serta meningkatkan upaya pelindungan hukum terhadap konsumen.
Implementasi Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dalam Kasus Investasi Di Plaftorm Binomo untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Bagi Korban Nugroho, Dryan; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1322

Abstract

This research analyzes the implementation of the Anti-Money Laundering Law in the case of illegal investment on the Binomo platform. The investigation involves alleged violations of the ITE Law, the Money Laundering Law, the Indonesian Criminal Code, and futures trading regulations related to illegal investments causing financial losses to victims. Reports from the public have led to legal actions involving the Indonesian National Police's Criminal Investigation Department (Bareskrim Polri) concerning these investment-related legal violations. Following their identification as suspects, victims of illegal investment have filed claims for compensation, while institutions such as the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) have provided information on restitution or compensation available under Law No. 31 of 2014. This case also highlights the role of applications like Binomo in money laundering, resulting in significant losses for the victims. Discussions encompass the modus operandi of perpetrators, government efforts in blocking related websites, and the crucial conclusion regarding the importance of robust law implementation to safeguard the public and prevent detrimental illegal practices.
Impact and Legal Protection for Concurrent Creditors Due to the Rejection of Homologation of Peace Agreement by Commercial Court Andinda, Chica Octa; Adam, Richard C.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1323

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications and obstacles that arise in the context of bankruptcy and the postponement of debt payment obligations, particularly concerning the settlement agreement between debtors and creditors. The primary focus is on the consequences of the rejection of the homologation of a settlement agreement, wherein the debtor is subsequently declared bankrupt and prohibited from seeking further attempts at reconciliation, in accordance with Article 175 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law (UUK-PKPU).The research delves into the practical implications of bankruptcy, where the curator is responsible for managing the debtor's assets and distributing them to creditors. Concurrent creditors, despite having priority in the distribution of assets, may face the risk of losses if the assets are insufficient to cover the entire debt.Furthermore, obstacles to legal protection for concurrent creditors are also discussed, including bad faith in settlement agreements, such as collusion between debtors and creditors. The condition where the debtor's assets exceed the agreed-upon value in the settlement agreement is also a concern, with the court playing a role in ensuring a fair distribution of assets.By exploring these various aspects, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of the complex dynamics involved in situations of bankruptcy and the postponement of debt payment obligations. It offers insights into the key roles played by the court, creditors, and debtors in the relevant legal context.
Legal Protection of Company Data and Confidential Documents with Confidentiality Clauses in Employment Agreements and Code of Conduct (Case Study of PT Metindo Perkasa Decision Number 459/Pdt/2019/Pt.Bdg) Martheo, Felicia; Gunadi, Ariawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1324

Abstract

Protection of company secrets is an important part of ensuring healthy business and business activities. To ensure development activities with fair economic principles, the Indonesian state also strives to protect every business actor who can innovatively create systems and business activities that are mutually beneficial. However, the problem is that monopolistic actions and unhealthy competition often occur and end up with the teacher being one of the parties in a collaboration. For this reason, in order to protect every party in business activities, especially company activities, the state has legal provisions that regulate company secrets. This research aims to find out about legal protection for confidential company data and documents in Indonesia, as well as recognizing the role of work agreements and codes of conduct in the protection of confidential company data and documents. The research method used is descriptive analysis using a statutory approach, a case approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this research indicate that legal protection regarding confidential company documents and data is carried out based on Law no. 8 of 1997 concerning Company Documents and Law no. 30 of 20000 Concerning Trade Secrets, Meanwhile, the role of agreements and codes of conduct is very important in ensuring a healthy relationship between the workforce and the company, and is regulated in Law no. 13 of 2003 concerning Employment.
Sengketa Merek Strong dan Penggunaan Kata Umum pada Merek Dagang (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung 332 K/ Pdt.Sus-Hki/2021) Sihombing, Silvia; Aminah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1325

Abstract

Trademark becomes a valuable asset owned by a company, especially if the brand has become a well-known mark. The well-known of a trademark creates a greater opportunity for deviations in the use of the brand which will eventually lead to the trademark disputes. Trademark disputes are still common in Indonesia with various problems, especially imitation of famous trademarks. The purpose of this study was to determine the decision process of the judiciary regarding the "STRONG" trademark dispute from the first level and an appeal and to see its conformity with the applicable laws and regulations and justice for the disputing parties.The approach method used in this thesis is normative juridical, namely research that uses existing legal norms and the application of these legal norms with research specifications is descriptive-analytical. The results showed that the Supreme Court in Decision Number 332 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021 which stated that the considerations at the Central Jakarta Commercial Court were wrong in applying the law, had given correct considerations and decisions in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The Defendant/Applicant for Cassation has not violated the rights to the “STRONG” trademark belonging to the Plaintiff/Respondent of Cassation. In order to be able to use a trademark in the form of a general descriptive word, it must build a secondary meaning on the trademark so that it can become a stand-alone trademark and has a strong distinguishing power. The need for additional criteria and use of trademark in the form of descriptive general words in the laws and regulations concerning trademarks in Indonesia.

Page 298 of 391 | Total Record : 3910

 296   297   298   299   300 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue