cover
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,862 Documents
Implementasi Peraturan Gubernur Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 10 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penataan dan Pemberdayaan Pedagang Kaki Lima di Lokasi Sementara (LOKSEM) & Lokasi Binaan (LOKBIN) Kecamatan Tanah Abang Qilan Nurfarhan, Luthfi; Djajaputra, Gunawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1518

Abstract

Street vendors are categorized as urban informal sectors that have not been accommodated in the official city plan, so it is not surprising that street vendors in the city or always become the main target of the city government to be put in order. But the fact is that various forms of policies in order to bring order to traders The street vendors that have been carried out by the city government have not run well in handling street vendors, it must be admitted that at this time there are regulations that will actually have an impact that is feared to decrease the income level of street vendors when compared to the location of origin because it is far from consumers or the target market of these street vendors. Based on the research background described above, I as a researcher decided to conduct research on the implementation of the Regulation of the Governor of the Special Capital Region of Jakarta Number 10 of 2015 concerning the Arrangement and Empowerment of Street Vendors in Temporary Locations & Assisted Locations Tanah Abang District.
Analisis Obstruction Of Justice dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Lubis, Fauziah; PC.Sinaga, Juliana
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1519

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze obstruction of justice from a criminal law perspective. The type of legal research method used in this research is a normative research method. The approach methods that will be applied are the Statute Approach and the Case Approach. The data collection technique uses library research (normative legal research) which focuses on secondary data, so the author conducted research on laws and government regulations relating to this research. Data collection tools in normative juridical research come from secondary data with the aim of obtaining concepts, theories and information as well as conceptual thoughts from previous researchers in the form of statutory regulations, scientific works, journals and others. The data analysis technique begins with examining the collected data, then conducting direct and directed interviews, then conducting qualitative data analysis, that is, the data obtained is arranged systematically and then analyzed qualitatively in the form of rules. The results of this research found that the criminal act of obstruction of justice as regulated in the provisions of Article 21 Article 21 of Law no.31 of 1999 Jo Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes and Article 22 of Law no. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Human Trafficking is a crime in which the perpetrator commits acts by obstructing the justice process against laws that are actually clear and against law enforcement such as giving false information, committing violence, destroying evidence, premeditated crimes and make threats. As stated in Article 221 paragraph (1), the Criminal Code threatens with criminal penalties for anyone who hides or helps someone who commits a crime so that the person avoids investigation or detention. In the criminal act of obstructing the legal process (obstruction of justice) apart from being viewed from the act which contains a mistake on the part of the perpetrator which must be considered as intentional as intended, and the act is clearly in conflict with the applicable laws and regulations then the act can be is said to be a criminal act/criminal act.
Penerapan Prinsip Non Diskriminasi dan Kesetaraan dalam Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta M.P. Ekon, Yanto
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1520

Abstract

Prinsip non diskriminasi wajib diterapkan oleh Perguruan Tinggi Swasta, tanpa memandang siapa pendiri atau pemiliknya atau agama, budaya dan/atau ras yang dianut atau dimiliki oleh pendiri Perguruan Tinggi Swasta itu. Penerapan prinsip non diskriminasi dan kesetaraan dalam pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta dapat dilakukan melalui 2 (dua) hal, yakni kurikulum harus memuat pendidikan agama menurut keyakinan peserta didik, bukan keyakinan pendiri dan persyaratan seleksi, pemilihan dan pengangkatan pejabat di lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta tidak bersifat diskriminatif. Perguruan Tinggi Swasta yang tidak menerapkan prinsip non diskriminasi dan kesetaraan dapat mengakibatkan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta itu dikenakan sanksi administrasi dan perseorangan, organisasi dan penyelenggara Perguruan Tinggi Swasta dikenakan sanksi pidana
Implementation of Restorative Justice, The Intent of Punishment, and Legal Clarity In Indonesia Lubis, Fauziah; Zahara, Fatimah; Hamidah, Wanda
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1521

Abstract

This study looks at the fairness of restorative justice, the goal of punishment, and the need of legal certainty. According to the study's findings, restorative justice is still only being applied theoretically. In this instance, it emphasizes that the formalistic, long-established ideas of justice that have arisen in society and are applied in Indonesian customary law assemblies serve as the foundation for the genuine aim of sentencing. In contrast, the notions of individual deterrence and general deterrence call for actions to be absolute in order to produce a deterrent impact. Afterward, the idea of reform or rehabilitation was further developed. The use of restorative justice emphasizes the recovery of victims' material losses as a result of the perpetrators' unlawful acts, both physically and psychologically. This is done through a consensus-building process involving the perpetrator, the victim, the perpetrator's family, and the victim's family, as well as, if necessary, the community and the appropriate authorities. With relation to legal norms and values, this research methodology is normative juridical along with theories, legal doctrine, jurisprudence, applicable rules and regulations, as well as pubiications pertinent to the research topic. According to the study's findings, restorative justice is a noble form of justice when instances of illegal behavior have happened. Therefore, repair or restoration is crucial if the victim is to be rehabilitated or healed from the suffering he has endured on a material, physical, or psychic level. To be clear, restorative justice does not apply to all crimes; rather, it only does so in circumstances involving crimes against children, minor offenses, women in conflict with the law, and drug-related offenses. In order to provide clarity, there should be a firmness if the offender does not want to make restitution even though it is deemed capable of doing so in terms of material capabilities. There also needs to be concrete sanctions so that restorative justice is not only limited to other options; the legal framework for it should be expanded to the Constitution.
Perlindungan Hak Individu Melalui Pendekatan Lex Favor Reo Di Sistem Hukum Pidana Nadhir, Khibran; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1523

Abstract

Individual rights are the personal rights of Indonesian citizens in the eyes of the law, including within the criminal law system. The criminal law system in Indonesia recognizes "lex favor reo" as one of the principles in the imposition of criminal punishment. However, Indonesia has undergone a transition from the old Criminal Code (resulting from concordance) to the new Criminal Code as the national Criminal Code. The purpose of this research is to analyze the protection of individual rights with a lex favor reo approach in the criminal law system. The research method used is normative research with a legal approach and the collection of legal materials through library research for descriptive analysis. The results of this research show that Indonesia has protected individual rights in the national Criminal Code as human rights. Furthermore, with the implementation of the new Criminal Code, the principle of lex favor reo, namely the lex favor reo principle, will be resolved based on corrective justice, where criminal sanctions contained in the old Criminal Code are designed to be oriented towards the recovery or compensation for victims of criminal acts. Although there are criminal sanctions, the criminal sanctions in the new Criminal Code also constructively embody the "spirit" of corrective justice.
Analisis Yuridis Pemberatan Pidana Terhadap Terpidana Residivis Terorisme Apricia, Nadira; Hutabarat, Rugun Romaida
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1524

Abstract

Sentencing does not always have a deterrent effect on the perpetrator. The large number of perpetrators who repeat their crimes is proof that the punishment imposed on them does not have a deterrent effect. There needs to be regulation regarding the repetition of criminal acts, especially regarding serious crimes such as criminal acts of terrorism. Improving criminal penalties for repeat criminals or recidivists can be used as a step to reduce and prevent repeated crimes. This research uses the Muhammad Basri case as an example of a repeat case of criminal acts of terrorism. This research aims to find out how criminal penalties are imposed on terrorist recidivists.
Analisis Keabsahan Akta Di Bawah Tangan Atas Jual Beli Tanah yang Mengandung Cacat Kehendak Serta Penerapan Kriteria Pembeli Beritikad Baik (Studi Putusan Nomor 18/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Wtp) Ajo, Fransiska Litania Ea Tawa; Djajaputra, Gunawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1525

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to find out the validity of buying and selling land under the hands and also to understand the criteria for buyers in good faith. The basis of this research is Decision Number 18/Pdt.G/2021/PN Wtp. This writing uses normative juridical research methods. Based on the analysis and looking at the court decision, it is known that the sale and purchase carried out is invalid because the land is inherited land that has not been divided, but the seller who is the heir sells the land without the knowledge of the other heirs so that the sale and purchase contains a defect in the will because it is not based on an agreement. together. However, the sale and purchase was also based on deception carried out by the seller against the buyer (Defendant) where the buyer was not aware of any defects in the sale and purchase. Based on this, the buyer should be said to be a buyer in good faith, but even so, the buyer is obliged to objectively examine the ownership of the land.
Kekuatan Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Terhadap Kesusilaan (Tinjauan Putusan Perkara Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 1361/Pid.B/2022/PN. Sby) Kristanto, Respati Bayu; Puspitosari, Hervina
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1526

Abstract

This research aims to determine the evidentiary strength of testimonium de auditu and its position as a witness in trials of crimes against morality. This research uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach, a case approach using Surabaya District Court Decision Number 1361/Pid.B/2022/PN Sby. The data collection instrument was carried out through secondary data obtained from literature. The data obtained is in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The data is then arranged systematically through an emphasis on understanding using qualitative descriptive methods. The results of this research indicate that the position and strength of a testimonium de auditu witness in a court trial is valid in accordance with the Constitutional Court decision No. 65/PUU-VIII/2010 and its strength depends on the conformity between the facts in the field and the witness' testimony in the trial. Then, further regulation is needed in the future regarding the meaning of witness testimonium de auditu in the upcoming revision of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the differences in meaning with Constitutional Court Decision No. 65/PUU-VIII/2010 for the sake of implementing justice as well as legal certainty in a criminal justice process.
Bagaimana Keberlakuan Hak Waris di Indonesia Immanuel Rich, Johannes; Djaja, Benny
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1527

Abstract

This research investigates the implementation of inheritance rights in Indonesia with a focus on the role of customary law, religious law, and positive law in the distribution of inheritance. The research findings illustrate the complexity of the property inheritance system which is influenced by local norms, traditional traditions and religious values. Although Indonesia has national regulations governing inheritance rights, customary law often dominates the division of property in various regions, creating significant variations. Religious law, especially Islamic law, also plays a key role, although implementation varies across different Muslim communities. This research highlights the problem of gender inequality in the inheritance of property and the complexity of modern family structures as the main factors influencing the implementation of inheritance rights. In addition, the economic impact of inheritance rights is highlighted, with particular attention to property management, fair distribution, and protection of heirs' rights. Policy recommendations include legal reform, increasing public awareness, and empowering women to create a more inclusive and fair inheritance rights system in Indonesia.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Jual Beli Tanah yang Dilakukan dengan Itikad Baik Firman, Handy; Gunawan, Gunawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1528

Abstract

Land transactions play a crucial role in social and financial aspects, particularly concerning property ownership. The integrity and good faith of involved parties in these transactions are pivotal in legal protection, especially in safeguarding well-intentioned buyers. This study aims to explore the legal framework, challenges, and outcomes regarding land transactions involving buyers with good intentions, focusing on Indonesian law. The objective is to examine the existing legal framework, challenges, and outcomes associated with such transactions to ensure fair and proper practices. This research adopts a normative approach, emphasizing an in-depth analysis of existing legal texts, court decisions related to cases involving buyers acting in good faith during land transactions, and relevant legal documents. The primary focus is on "written law," exploring statutes, government regulations, and court decisions related to these transactions. Key findings highlight the significance of good faith in contractual agreements, regulated in the Indonesian Civil Code. Buyers acting in good faith during land transactions are entitled to legal protection according to Article 1338 of the Civil Code. This principle, reinforced by Circular Letter No. 7/2012, safeguards honest buyers even when the seller lacks valid property rights. However, complexities in law enforcement arise due to conditions for valid agreements, land registration, and the pivotal role of a notary or Land Deed Official (PPAT) in the transaction process.

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue