cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,862 Documents
 323   324   325   326   327 
Analisis Yuridis Ahli Waris yang Wanprestasi atas Perjanjian yang dibuat Pewaris (Putusan Perkara Perdata Nomor 443/Pdt.G/2021/PN Smg) Tandian, Jennifer; Roisah, Kholis
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1664

Abstract

Dalam perjanjian kredit modal kerja dapat menimbulkan sengketa berupa wanprestasi. Dalam kasus perjanjian kredit modal kerja antara PT Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Jateng selaku kreditur dengan Alm. Hasyim Mustofa selaku debitur terjadi wanprestasi karena debitur meninggal dunia dan ahli waris tidak ada itikad baik untuk menyelesaikan seluruh kewajiban yang ditinggalkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kewajiban ahli waris terhadap hutang debitur (pewaris) dalam perjanjian kredit modal kerja dengan PT Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Jateng dan apabila ahli waris tidak bersedia membayar hutang debitur (pewaris) dalam perjanjian kredit modal kerja tersebut dapat dinyatakan wanprestasi atau tidak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan hukum ini yaitu yuridis empiris. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, ahli waris memiliki kewajiban untuk menyelesaikan seluruh hutang yang ditinggalkan oleh pewaris. Hal tersebut dikarenakan tidak adanya keterangan atas penolakan harta warisan dari ahli waris yang dapat dibuktikan dengan adanya putusan pengadilan agama yang berisi penetapan ahli waris. Dengan diterimanya warisan, maka seluruh hak dan kewajiban akan beralih kepada ahli waris. Dengan demikian, bagi ahli waris yang tidak memiliki itikad baik untuk membayar hutang dari pewaris dapat digugat wanprestasi oleh kreditur yang dalam hal ini adalah pihak PT Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Jateng.
Perlindungan Hukum PT Pegadaian (Persero) Selaku Kreditur Aras Barang Curian Dijadikan Jaminan Gadai (Studi Putusan Nomor 517/Pid.B/2023/PN SMG) Purwanto, Windy Hanifah; Silviana, Ana
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1665

Abstract

An economy that continues to develop in line with society's current needs. Loans using a pawn system are one of the alternatives chosen for distributing financing funds. However, in practice, there is still the practice of pawning credit systems with goods obtained from criminal acts, which is detrimental to PT Pegadaian (Persero) as the creditor of the pawnbroker. The method used in this research is Normative-Empirical with a qualitative descriptive approach. The results of the research show that, the position of PT Pegadaian (Persero) in this case as a creditor who gave the pawn, even though the collateral originates from a crime, namely, theft, does not necessarily make the company's position as a custodian. This is strengthened by the applicable laws and regulations and based on the considerations of the property judge. the guarantee is returned to PT Pegadaian (Persero). The anticipatory solution for PT Pegadaian (Persero) is that the company can reaffirm the regulations regarding the inclusion of collateral documents such as receipts for purchasing gold jewelry. Or it can be confirmed through a third party regarding ownership of the collateral. Next, the customer needs to make a statement as well as a power of attorney and approval for the goods to be guaranteed from the actual owner of the goods.
Penegakan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Incest Terhadap Anak di Bawah Umur dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam Marluga Tambunan, Unjur; Mahfudz Harahap, Mar'ie
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1666

Abstract

This research discusses law enforcement for perpetrators of sexual relations between individuals who still have familial relationships based on consanguinity in the perspective of positive criminal law and Islamic criminal law. By using a comparative approach method, the researcher found differences between positive criminal law and Islamic criminal law in the process of consanguineous sexual relations, especially in the complaint process, and also in the withdrawal of reports. The researcher categorizes consanguineous sexual relations as adultery, which can be legally processed after a complaint from the victim based on Article 284 paragraph (2) of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), while in Islamic law, with just one of the three existing pieces of evidence, punishment can be imposed immediately without a complaint. Furthermore, in Article 284 paragraph (4) of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), it is also stated that the complainant is allowed to withdraw their report before a judge's decision. This is different from Islamic law, where once consensual sexual relations are known to have occurred, the punishment cannot be revoked. Since consensual sexual relations are categorized as adultery, punishment is already stipulated in Islamic law as the absolute right of Allah and has been determined in the Quran. Article 294 of the Indonesian Criminal Code should be amended promptly to prevent weakness and be more effective and precise in preventing and punishing perpetrators of consanguineous sexual relations. Furthermore, society should avoid this act, as it not only constitutes a major sin but also severely damages morals and mental well-being.
Hukum Penetapan Mahar Oleh Sultan Selangor di Tinjau dari Hukum Islam Hatim Bin Shaharuddin, Muhammad; Fatimah, Fatimah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1667

Abstract

Islam has established lofty and noble goals for marriage. Islam also establishes dowry as an exclusive right for women. The dowry is a financial right that is obligatory by the prospective husband to the prospective wife. Although the dowry is an obligation of the prospective husband to the prospective wife, Islam never burdens the dowry beyond the ability of the prospective husband himself. However, what happened in Malaysia, especially in the State of Selangor, the Sultanate of Selangor issued a regulation regarding the minimum limitation of the amount of dowry in the state of Selangor, where Islam itself never gave a minimum or maximum limit to the amount of dowry. Because of this, this research aims to find out how Islamic law views the determination of the minimum amount of dowry set by the Sultanate of Selangor. With the formulation of the problem of how the implications of the Selangor Islamic Religious Office's decision on the minimum amount, how Islam views the determination of the minimum amount of dowry set by the Sultanate of Selangor. This research uses qualitative research with a juridical sociological empirical legal approach where the author focuses on research on the implementation or operation of a rule of Islamic law in society, whether it is related to the effectiveness of implementation, to the impact of its implementation on Islamic law in the structure of society. The results of the research show that the fuqaha agree that there is no maximum limit in the amount of dowry, but in the minimum limit the fuqaha differ in their opinion regarding this matter.
Titik Singgung Penggabungan Gugatan dengan Gugatan Kelompok Achmad Rizaldi, Fahim; Tobing, PL
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1668

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of finding out how to file a civil lawsuit, because the form and aspects of the lawsuit have the same characteristics. Aspects of the same form of lawsuit are cumulative lawsuits and group lawsuits. In this research method the author uses normative legal research, namely research carried out by analyzing applicable laws and regulations. Regarding the sources of legal materials used, they are divided into primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, where the primary legal materials are the main legal materials that are the basis for the study of this writing, namely statutory regulations. That there are differences in the forms of lawsuits even though they have some of the same characteristics, what makes them different is the accumulation of lawsuits / Combination of lawsuits regarding several legal issues that are both subjective and objective in nature, their use in civil courts which usually deal with issues of breach of contract, unlawful acts and divorce, etc. Meanwhile, group lawsuits are used for civil matters regarding consumer protection, the environment and forestry.
Analisis Implementasi Undang-Undang Wakaf Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 Terhadap Peran Nazhir dalam Pengelolaan Wakaf: Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor 20/Pdt.G/2023/PN Msb Nuridin, Nuridin; Hidayat, Yusup
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1669

Abstract

This research analyzes the application of the Waqf Law Number 41 of 2004 to the role of nazhir in waqf administration, taking the case study of Case Decision Number 20/Pdt.G/2023/PN Msb as a basis. The focus is on evaluating the role and performance of the nazhir in the legal context, as well as its impact on the continuity of the waqf and the integrity of the nazhir. Through a normative legal approach, this research identifies the nazir's responsibilities and duties in maintaining and managing waqf assets following Sharia principles. Analysis of Decision Number 20/Pdt.G/2023/PN Msb reveals the judge's consideration of the nazir's role in managing waqf land, especially in the context of the conflict over ownership of land intended for the Baitul Makmur Mosque. This research explores the relationship between the nazhir's role and the implementation of the Waqf Law, as well as the impact of the judge's considerations on the decision in the case. As a result, protection of waqf ownership, especially in the context of waqf land, emerged as crucial. Emphasis is also placed on the important role of nazhir in safeguarding and managing religious assets for the public interest.
Esensi Delik Obstruction of Justice Dalam Konstruksi Hukum Pidana Keysha, Saradiba; Abduh, Rachmad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1670

Abstract

Obstruction of justice is a criminal offense formulated in the Criminal Code to protect the judicial process so that it runs fairly and prevents manipulation. However, law enforcement against obstruction of justice in Indonesia is considered to be still weak due to several obstacles such as unclear article formulations, weak cooperation between related institutions, minimal internal supervision and lack of public understanding. Therefore, various comprehensive improvement efforts are needed both in terms of regulations, coordination between institutions, internal supervision, and public education so that enforcement of obstruction of justice laws can run effectively and optimally in Indonesia.
Analisis Perbuatan Mengalihkan dan Merusak Cagar Budaya (Studi Kasus Cagar Budaya Benteng Putri Hijau Di Delitua) Stepya, Chorry; Ginting, Lilawati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1671

Abstract

Protection of cultural heritage in Indonesia is regulated in Law no. 11 of 2010 concerning Cultural Heritage. Violations in the form of destroying cultural heritage can be subject to serious criminal sanctions. One example of a protected cultural heritage is Fort Putri Hijau, with various protection efforts by the government such as restoration, monitoring and outreach, in order to preserve this historic site as the nation's cultural heritage.
Timbulnya Keyakinan Hakim dalam Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Pidana di Peradilan Indonesia Gulo, Nimerodi; Cornelius Dikae Zolohefona Gulo
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1672

Abstract

Legal proof in a criminal case is the process of convincing a judge of the truth of an event that is the basis of a claim or defence in a case. Legal proof has various aspects, methods, and systems that are governed by the rules of the law in force. Legal proof also relates to the concepts of justice, certainty, and validity of the law. The purpose of legal proof is to a fair, true, and in accordance with the facts and law. Law proof faces a variety of challenges and problems, such as the limitation of the means of proof, the difficulty of testing the validity and authenticity of evidence, and the influence of non-law factors on proof. Therefore, legal proof requires improved quality, professionalism, and integrity of the perpetrators, whether judges, prosecutors, lawyers, or witnesses. The methods used are the Legislative approach, the Case approach, and the Conceptual approach. By looking at whether the law of our events is still relevant to the existing case, then how to solve the problem with the emerging views and doctrines in criminal law. The legal proof in criminal cases is also very close to the emergence of judges' beliefs, so the judge is obliged to apply the theory relevant to the conditions that exist at the time of the decision of a case. Thus, theory used must follow the case and the development of the doctrine in the law of criminal cases.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Marketplace di Indonesia terkait Pelanggaran Hak Cipta: Tantangan, Regulasi, dan Upaya Pencegahan dalam Era E-Commerce Djamaludin, Samsul; Fuad, Fokky
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1674

Abstract

Marketplace legal liability in Indonesia regarding copyright infringement in the E-Commerce era faces increasing complexity and a rise in copyright infringement cases. The formulation of the problem in this research is the complexity of the problem of copyright infringement in the market, as well as obstacles in demanding market accountability, the role of the market, and what preventive measures need to be strengthened to overcome this problem. This research combines normative and empirical perspectives to understand the crucial aspects of market legal accountability. The research results show the need for revisions in the legal framework regarding market legal responsibility for copyright infringement in Indonesia. The inconsistency between Article 15 of the ITE Law and Article 10 of the Copyright Law creates obstacles in implementing the rules. Therefore, concrete measures are needed to harmonize regulations and improve copyright protection in the market.

Page 325 of 387 | Total Record : 3862

 323   324   325   326   327 

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue