cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,862 Documents
 354   355   356   357   358 
Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum VS Pelindungan Hak Asasi Manusia : Petani Kalasey Mempertahankan Kebun Terakhir Ashley Juniare Maria Rengkung; Suparjo, Suparjo
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2033

Abstract

Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest is the core of the Implementation of Land Acquisition which is basically not free from impacts which should also be regulated in this Law. As land plays an important role in everyday life, it is necessary to pay attention to rights and protection regarding its procurement. Law Number 2 of 2012 is too broad to protect the state's power so that it intersects with human rights provisions such as protecting people's rights. This research uses a statutory research approach and a conceptual approach. This research uses secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, namely statutory regulations and secondary legal materials in the form of books and scientific journals. The results of this research reveal (a) Appropriate land acquisition procedures (b) Public interests are the basis for land acquisition (c) The process of applying for PTUN is related to land acquisition (d) Compensation for losses (e) protection of community rights in land acquisition.
Analisis Tindak Pidana Aborsi Dalam Perkara Nomor 482/PID.SUS/2021/PN CKR Nadya Salsha Tanjung; Hery Firmansyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2034

Abstract

Abortion is a public health problem because it has an impact on maternal morbidity and mortality. As is known, the main causes of death for pregnant women and giving birth are bleeding, infection and eclampsia. However, abortion is actually also a cause of maternal death, only in the form of bleeding complications and sepsis. Abortion, which we often know as the act of aborting a pregnancy, is basically an act that is iprohibited in indonesia. In ithe Criminal Code, regulations regarding abortion are included in the chapter on crimes against life. Criminal responsibility is based on if there is a iviolation of norms and there are sanctions, then there will be responsibility. The iudge in determining criminal responsibility is based on the indictment and the facts in the trial and the fulfillment of the "intentional" element. The basis for the judge's consideration in handing down a decision in the crime of abortion is based on many things, including the evidence presented, the statements of witnesses and the defendant, and the indictment submitted by the public prosecutor.
Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Yang Memiliki Hak Atas Tanah Gabriel Nugeraha Silalahi; Gunawan Djajaputra
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2035

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the form of legal protection for parties who own land rights and analyse the legal certainty of land rights certificate holders through a case study of Banjarbaru District Court Decision Number 62/Pdt.G/2022/PN Bjb. This research uses normative juridical research by analysing secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the court decision provided legal protection for Sudjar Wadi as a party with land rights through recognition of the validity of the land sale and purchase transaction, the right to appear before the Land Deed Official (PPAT), to transfer the name of the land certificate, and to take care of the lost certificate. This decision also emphasises the importance of legal certainty in protecting the rights of land certificate holders by ensuring Sudjar Wadi has legal rights to the disputed land. Law enforcement in this case achieved the goals of legal certainty, social benefit, and justice by determining the defendant to bear the costs of the case, providing incentives for effective law enforcement, and is expected to increase public confidence in judicial institutions and compliance with the rule of law.
Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Perpanjangan Hak BOT Terhadap Skema Build Operate Transfer antara PT Hotel Indonesia Natour (Persero) dan PT Cipta Karya Bumi Indah (PT CKBI) Nazihatul Muna; Bambang Kuswito
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2036

Abstract

Perjanjian BOT antara PT Hotel Indonesia Natour (Persero) dan PT Cipta Karya Bumi Indah (PT CKBI) merupakan sebuah skema kerjasama yang melibatkan pihak swasta dan pemerintah. Dalam perjanjian ini, PT CKBI bertindak sebagai pihak swasta yang membangun, mengelola, dan mengoperasikan aset milik PT Hotel Indonesia Natour (Persero) selama jangka waktu tertentu, sebelum akhirnya mengembalikan aset tersebut kepada pihak pemerintah. Perjanjian BOT antara PT Hotel Indonesia Natour (Persero) dan PT Cipta Karya Bumi Indah (PT CKBI) telah menimbulkan dugaan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam proses perpanjangan hak BOT. Hal ini disebabkan oleh adanya ketidaksesuaian antara Surat Menteri BUMN No. 5-136/MBU/2004 dengan waktu pelaksanaan perpanjangan yang dilakukan, serta dugaan penyimpangan dalam pengelolaan aset milik negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal yaitu menganalisis hukum secara normatif, berfokus pada peraturan, prinsip, dan doktrin hukum yang bersumber pada peraturan perundang-undangan, yurisprudensi, dan literatur hukum. Sumber data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah sumber data primer yaitu peraturan perundang-undangan, yurisprudensi, dan kontrak, sumber data sekunder yaitu buku, jurnal ilmiah, laporan sumber referensi lainnya dan sumber data tersier yaitu kamus hukum, ensiklopedia, dan indeks. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan. Analisis data penelitian ini dihubungkan dengan permasalahan yang kemudian diteliti dan diuraikan dalam bentuk narasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu berusaha untuk menginterpretasikan dan menganalisis dugaan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam perpanjangan hak BOT terhadap skema Build Operate Transfer antara PT Hotel Indonesia Natour (Persero) dan PT Cipta Karya Bumi Indah (PT CKBI) berdasarkan surat persetujuan Menteri BUMN nomor S-247/MBU/2004 tanggal 11 Mei 2004.
Kepastian Hukum Terkait Pembagian Harta Waris Bagi Ahli Waris Perempuan dalam Masyarakat Hukum Adat Batak Toba melalui Surat Keterangan Waris Jessica, Graciella Ratna; Meliyana Yustikarini
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2037

Abstract

In the provisions of Batak Toba Customary Law, especially Batak Toba Customary Inheritance Law, women are relatively weak legal subjects. As a result of the patrilineal kinship system adopted by the Batak Toba indigenous community, women have limited rights, inversely proportional to men. As subjects who are often considered 'passengers' in a family, women in the Batak Toba indigenous community face direct discriminatory treatment in the eyes of the Batak Toba customary law itself. However, along with the pace of development of the times, gender-based discrimination in various aspects is no longer considered relevant. Referring to Article 17 of Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights and the Jurisprudence of the Indonesian Supreme Court No. 179K/Sip/1961, women's inheritance rights are equal to men. Where customary laws that are no longer able to adjust to the development of community life, such as not recognizing the position of women as equal to men, cannot be maintained. Departing from this, women in the Batak Toba indigenous community have a legal protection to be able to defend their rights and position in the eyes of the law to be equal to men. Regarding the issue of inheritance rights, women in the Batak Toba traditional community can take care of making a Certificate of Inheritance.
Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menangani Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum 2024 Christine S.T Kansil; Namira Diffany Nuzan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2038

Abstract

The writing of this research is based on the aim that an assessment will be carried out regarding the extent of the authority of the constitutional court in handling the 2024 election dispute case submitted by the presidential candidate pair and also the vice presidential candidate in serial number 3 and serial number 1. The basis for submitting the petition to the constitutional court by of the candidate pair that there are indications that there was a massive structured and systematic act of fraud in the 2024 election carried out by presidential and vice presidential candidate number 2 where in the implementation of this year's election the principles of fairness and overflow were not implemented properly. Therefore, a problem that can be studied is whether the constitutional court has the authority to handle this case, as in accordance with Law Number 24 of 2003 which regulates the authority of the constitutional court in Article 10 paragraph 1 letter a. Therefore, in the implementation or results of this research, the author really hopes that it will be useful for the constitutional court and the parties involved in this matter. Apart from that, readers will also be able to find out about the extent of authority that the constitutional court has in handling disputes over election results.
Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Dinamika Politik dan Kepercayaan Publik di Indonesia: Analisis Implikasi Hukum dan Etika Kansil, Christine S.T; Putri Meilika Nadilatasya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2039

Abstract

The Constitutional Court is one of the judicial power institutions appointed to carry out judicial functions to uphold the law and justice as fair as possible. According to Law Number 24 of 2003, the Constitutional Court has the duty and function to handle constitutional cases relating to certain constitutional issues. To ensure that the constitution is implemented responsibly in accordance with the will of the people and the principles of democracy, constitutional judges must have knowledge and skills in state administration as well as a commitment to implement and oversee public life. The Constitutional Court's decision on the age limit of presidential and vice-presidential candidates in Law No. 7/2017 on General Elections (Election Law) is considered a measure of the qualifications of a leader, and this decision has caused much debate in society. The purpose of this research is to identify how the Constitutional Court's decision impacts Indonesian politics as well as the ethical standards violated by the judges when making the decision.
Dinamika Permasalahan Ahli Waris dalam Penyerahan Protokol Notaris Meninggal Dunia Yulian, Fransisca Chatharina; Rasji, Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2042

Abstract

Notaris secara yuridis dilandasii berdasarkan UU RI No. 2 Tahun 2014 yang mengubah UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Salah satu ketentuan penting adalah Pasal 35 ayat (1) yang mengharuskan keluarga notaris yang meninggal untuk memberitahukan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD). Namun, prosedur penyerahan protokol notaris tidak diatur rinci, menyebabkan kekosongan hukum dan potensi masalah seperti kerusakan atau penyalahgunaan dokumen. Ahli waris seringkali kurang memahami kewajiban mereka, sehingga dapat mengakibatkan kerugian hukum dan administrasi. Ketentuan ini perlu diperjelas untuk memastikan keamanan dan kelancaran penyerahan protokol notaris. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan mengacu kepada aspek hukum positif yang berlaku di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Tanggungjawab ahli waris menurut Pasal 35 ayat (1) UUJN wajib memberitahukan MPD tentang meninggalnya notaris, sehingga ahli waris mengambil alih tanggung jawab notaris. Ini berarti ahli waris tidak hanya mewarisi harta benda tetapi juga tanggung jawab dan kewajiban profesi notaris. Pasal 63 ayat (2) UUJN mengatur penyerahan Protokol Notaris oleh ahli waris kepada notaris lain yang ditunjuk MPD. Ahli waris bertanggung jawab menjaga kelangsungan praktek notaris, memastikan aksesibilitas dokumen, dan menjamin keamanan dokumen Protokol Notaris. Penyerahan protokol harus dilakukan sesuai ketentuan hukum. Ahli waris bekerja sama dengan MPD dan notaris baru untuk menjaga keutuhan dan aksesibilitas dokumen penting ini, memberikan kepastian hukum dan melindungi hak-hak pihak yang terlibat dalam perbuatan hukum. Protokol Notaris harus disimpan dengan baik meskipun notaris pensiun atau meninggal dunia, sesuai Pasal 65 UUJN. Notaris bertanggung jawab atas setiap akta yang dibuatnya seumur hidup, bahkan setelah protokol diserahkan ke penerima protokol. Penyerahan protokol oleh ahli waris wajib dilaporkan ke Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) dalam 7 hari kerja. Protokol harus diserahkan ke notaris penerima dalam 30 hari dengan berita acara. Jika notaris meninggal saat cuti, Pejabat Sementara Notaris menyerahkan protokol dalam 60 hari. Prosedur ini memastikan tanggung jawab beralih ke notaris penerima protokol, melibatkan ahli waris, MPD, dan pejabat sementara notaris, serta menghindari masalah hukum dan administrasi terkait dokumen notaris.
Analisis Viktimisasi Struktural Terhadap Eksploitasi Anak Sebagai Pedagang Asongan di Ruang Publik Kreatif Jakarta Tiara Rainpina Putri Hutasoit; Nadia Utami Larasati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2043

Abstract

Anak sebagai pedagang asongan menjadi salah satu fenomena yang paling sering ditemui di beberapa lokasi Ruang Publik Kreatif (RPK) di Jakarta. Mayoritas mereka memilih untuk bekerja sebagai pedagang asongan dilatar belakangi oleh kondisi ekonomi yang mencapai tahap kemiskinan, sehingga bekerja dengan berdagang diharapkan dapat membantu mereka untuk memenuhi kehidupan diri sendiri dan keluarga. Meskipun dilatar belakangi kondisi ekonomi, namun perilaku anak sebagai pedagang asongan merupakan hal yang melanggar hukum dan peraturan, terutama peraturan daerah DKI Jakarta karena dianggap tidak memenuhi kriteria kesejahteraan anak. Anak menjadi pedagang asongan dapat dikategorikan dalam viktimisasi struktural jika mengalami penyalahgunaan kekuasaan seperti eksploitasi, diskriminasi, dan penindasan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif dan pendekatan kualitatif. Dalam melakukan analisis, peneliti menggunakan konsep viktimisasi struktural oleh Ezzat Fattah yang berasa dari teori viktimologi. Pengumpulan data penelitian dilakukan dengan cara studi pustaka, wawancara serta observasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, keempat subjek dalam penelitian ini mengalami viktimisasi struktural sebagai anak yang menjadi pedagang asongan di RPK Jakarta dengan analisis menggunakan empat faktor struktural yang diidentifikasi oleh Cameron dan Newmann yaitu, faktor ekonomi, faktor sosial, faktor ideologi, dan faktor geopolitik. Faktor-faktor ini turut menjadikan anak sebagai posisi rentan untuk dapat dieksploitasi oleh orang dewasa sebagai pekerja, salah satunya dengan menjadi pedagang asongan.
Antisipasi Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Berkaitan Dengan Profesi Notaris dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) Elrika, Elrika; Djaja, Benny
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2044

Abstract

The mode of Money Laundering Crime (TPPU) that often occurs in Indonesia is by utilizing the role of Notary and PPAT in performing their duties. Notaries and Land Deed Officials ("PPAT") become co-suspects in criminal cases, because they are suspected of assisting in the implementation of money laundering crimes, or other criminal acts involving deeds made. The research method used in writing this article is normative juridical research with a research approach using statutory regulations and using a theoretical or conceptual approach. The results of the analysis of the Notary and PPAT in carrying out their duties to anticipate money laundering apply the principle of Recognizing Service Users, if the Notary or PPAT finds suspicious transactions, they can report it to the Financial Transaction Reporting and Analysis Center (PPATK). In addition, Notary and PPAT are not responsible for the criminal act of money laundering committed by the parties or their clients who use the services of Notary or PPAT who require their services based on their authority. The position of the Notary and PPAT in exercising their authority to make authentic deeds is only as a recorder that is poured into a deed that gives rise to legal acts and has perfect evidentiary power. Notaries and PPAT are only obliged to report to PPATK if there are indications of money laundering committed by the parties or their clients through their services as Notaries or PPAT.

Page 356 of 387 | Total Record : 3862

 354   355   356   357   358 

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue