Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education)

project
Website

Published by STKIP Siliwangi Bandung

ISSN : 26146320 EISSN : 26146320 DOI : -

Core Subject : Education,

Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Focus PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) is a media for diseminating the result of research about language and education in English Education. Scope PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) publishes the research article in language, and education in English Education.

Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum

Articles 1,135 Documents

8 9 10 11 12

AN ANALYSIS OF LEXICAL COHESION FOUND IN “NEVER SAY NEVER” SONG LYRICS Pratiwi, Vivi Yulia; Jayanti, Yeni Dwi; Syathroh, Isry Laila
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 2, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3, MAY 2019
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

The purpose of this study is to describe kinds of lexical cohesion and to know frequent lexical cohesion used to support the cohesiveness of discourse in Justin Bieber and Jaden Smith’s song entitled “Never Say Never”. The subject of this study is “Never Say Never” song lyrics. This study uses descriptive qualitative that focuses on lexical cohesion in particular synonym, repetition (anaphora and epistrophe repetition) and antonym. The instrument that the researchers used are books, earphone, youtube and other supporting tools. From this study, the result shows that the lyrics of “Never Say Never” song contains eleven forms of lexical cohesion, consisting of two synonyms, seven repetitions, and two antonyms. So the most frequent occurrence in the data is repetition. The function of lexical cohesion is to make the lyrics have harmonization that makes the lyrics more meaningful

ANALYZING FACE THREATENING ACT IN WHATSAPP GROUP Nuraeni, Wulan; Wibowo, Noer Aripin
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 1, No 4 (2018): Volume 1 Number 4, July 2018
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

As human being people will always interact each other every day, in every situation there are probability where someone can be threatened. Every interaction contains utterance where threatened can be happened in order to threaten both of speakers and hearer which is called Face Threatening Act or known as FTA. This research purpose was to found out the kind function of FTA in politeness that might be applied on the group chat between student with another student and student with the lecturer. The research took the places in WhatsApp group of college student of IKIP Siliwangi Bandung, Cimahi, Indonesia which consist 38 respondents. This research used a descriptive qualitative and the data taken from the results of questionnaire as an instrument. Based on the data from finding section that founded most of college students used a positive politeness when communicated with other students even though there was small percentage showed some of student used negative politeness as well.

IMPROVING STUDENTS LISTENING SKIL USING ENGLISH STORIES WITH AUDIO APPLICATION Putri, Fadhila Bestary; Widia, Wida; Santoso, Iman
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 2, No 4 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 4, July 2019
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

This research is a classroom action research that doing in one of SMK Kesehatan in Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Classroom action research is a research that did by teacher in the class to improve students ability in a learning teaching process, in this case their score. This research is done for maintain or solving the teaching English problems in the class. Listening skill is the one of the skill in language that important for our life. Every person starts their capability in language with great listening training. With this skill we can processing some informations and messages that tells by other person into our own understanding. Innovation in learning method such as using application in mobile phone surely can catch students attention in learning English, this teaching media can help them to improve their listening skill. And also can reduce some boredome in teaching leaning process. This research was done by using Listen English Audio Book smartphone application. This application contain the sound of narrators that telling the stories. It also contain the written text of the story which narrators tells about. The writer did a pretest before she start the treatment, the treatment itself and post test after the treatment to measure students ability in listening skill. At the pretest, the student’s average score are 4.56 move to the first post test the student’s average score increase to 6.68 and continued increase up to 7.55 at second posttest.

THE USE OF INDONESIAN ENGLISH CODE MIXING ON INSTAGRAM CAPTIONS Nuraeni, Bani Lisa; Farid, Mochammad Zhafran; Cahyati, Sri Supiah
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 1, No 4 (2018): Volume 1 Number 4, July 2018
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/project.v1i4.p448-453

Recent studies on intrasentential code-switching or code mixing (CM) show the functional separation of two languages to be a legitimate, highly structured bilingual communicative device with its own syntactic and sociolinguistic constraints.This research investigates the use of code mixing on instagram.The study aims to find out kind of code mixing used on Instagram users in their caption and to find out how many code mixing code used by instagram users in their caption. This research applies descriptive qualitative method. The data of this research are Indonesian – English code mixing on Indonesian Instagram users posting and the information of the reasons of using code mixing. The data are taken from the Indonesian Instagram users posting. The data are analyzed based on the linguistic form of code mixing by Suwito’s theory and the reasons of code mixing by Hockett’s theory.Keyword: Code Mixing, Instagram, Linguistic form

IMPROVING STUDENTS' READING SKILL THROUGH COLLABORATIVE LEARNING Arliani Gunawan Putri; Arrin Nur Octavialis; Irma Savitri Sadikin
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 2, No 6 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 6, November 2019
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Abstract This research aims is to find out how effective students’ reading skill after they were instructed by using Collaborative Learning. Sample of the research was 36 students in 7th grade of SMPN 5 Cimahi. The researcher administered reading test in collecting the data. The result of the data analysis showed that there was a significant improvement in students’ reading skill after learning through Collaborative Learning. It could be seen from students’ average score in pretest was 64,81 and students’ average score in posttest was 75,56. In short, Collaborative Learning could enhance students’ reading skill.Keywords: Collaborative Learning, Improving, Reading Skills

ANALYSIS OF INTERROGATIVE SENTENCES TRANSLATION IN ENGLISH INTO INDONESIAN ON THE SUBTITLE OF “ANT-MAN” MOVIE Eris, Eris; Arifin, Fauji Imamul
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 2, No 4 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 4, July 2019
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

This study is qualitative descriptive research. This study had been using data of document that is the subtitle of Ant-Man movie either in English or Indonesian which was translated by Horonis. The purpose of this research, to know the translation of interrogative sentences on the subtitle of this movie either interrogative sentences of Wh Question or Yes no Question. Technique of data collecting like watching the movie of Ant-Man, comparing the subtitle uses Aegisub software, and giving a code. Technique of data analyzing uses the method of document analyzing with domain analysis (to know data or not), and analisis taxonomy analysis (classifying the data into the kind of interrogative sentences). Had been found 188 data, Wh Question is 88 data (46.80 %) and Yes-no Question is 100 data (53.19 %). From type of Wh Question had been found type of what is 43 data (22.87%), where is 6 data (3.19%), who is 9 data (4.78%), why is 11 data (5.85%), when is 1 data (0.53%), and how is 18 data (9.57%). Then, from type of Yes-no Question had been found type of to be 27 data (14.36%), modal 15 data (7.97%), declarative 52 data (27.65%), and tag question 6 data (3.19%).

THE ANALYSIS SPEECH ACTS OF THE MAIN CHARACTER IN FREEDOM WRITERS MOVIE SCRIPT Mulyani, Upit; Latifah, Dewi
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 1, No 5 (2018): Volume 1 Number 5, September 2018
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Abstract In the study of language, what people do by saying something is called speech acts. Speech acts are not only found in everyday life but also in the film. This research concerns with speech acts produced by the main character in Freedom Writers movie script. The aims of this research are to describe the types of speech acts and to analyze the most dominant speech acts produced by the main character. Besides, the aims of this research are also to know and describe the purposes of Erin Gruwell as the main character to use speech acts. Austin’s (1962) theory of speech acts is applied in this research as the major theory. This research is qualitative research. The subject of this research is texts in the form of movie script and document analysis is used to gather the data. Qualitative research is applied to analyze the data in the form of the text. There are 100 utterances to be analyzed. The result of this research shows that the five types of speech acts produced by Gruwell are representatives, directives, expressives, commissives and declarative. This study shows that the dominant speech acts used is representatives and it reaches 58%. It indicates that Gruwell uses representative because she wants to express what she really knows.

LINGUISTICS VARIETIES : REGISTER IN ENGLISH FANFICTION KPOP “Miss Perfect Idol” Reni Mulyani; Lilis Suryani
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 2, No 5 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 5, September 2019
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

English fanfiction kpop was the stories who created by fans’ to their idol by their imagination and used English in created the stories the reason was because kpopers / readers whole the world can read the stoeries and benefit for the author can improved their English skill especially in writing and vocabulary. The objectives of this study were to describe the linguistics form and the meaning of register used in English fanfiction kpop “Miss Perfect Idol” at www.asianfanfics.com website. The method used in this study was descriptive qualitative method. The data obtained from www.asianfanfics.com on 24th February 2018 . The researchers found out the linguistic forms in English fanfiction kpop “Miss Perfect Idol” there were noun (twenty five data of noun), adjective (six data of adjective) , verb (five data of verb), interjection (two data of interjection), adverb of place (one data of adverb of place). In the meaning of register the reseachers found the high frequency data of register meaning that was contextual meaning, the data consist of 20 contextual meaning (51.3%) and 19 lexical meaning (48.7%). The contextual meaning more frequently appeared because there were a lot of new vocabularies created by kpopers and the author of fanfic and the vocabularies used in fanfiction.

AN ANALYSIS OF FLOUTING MAXIM IN “THE B.F.G” MOVIE Nur Ulfah, Rena Al Asyifa; Afrilia, Resti
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 1, No 5 (2018): Volume 1 Number 5, September 2018
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

This research studies about flouting maxim in The B.F.G movie. The research concerns on finding the flouting maxims in The B.F.G movie. This research employed mainly descriptive qualitative method to support in interpreting and analysing the data. The data of this research were utterances produced by Sophie and BFG as main characters in The B.F.G movie. The context of the research was the dialogues of the movie. The data sources of this research were The B.F.G and its script. Meanwhile, the primary instrument of this research was the researcher ourselves. The data were collected by downloading the movie and the script, watching the movie, and then collecting the data which reflects the phenomena of maxim flouting. The paper examines the use of flouts in different situations and explores in what situations the different characters flout the maxims for any conversation. The results show that there were 10 flouting maxims of quantity (42%); 10 flouting maxims of relevance (42%); 2 flouting maxims of quality (8%); and 2 flouting maxims of manner (8%). Hence the total number of flouting maxims is 24. These results suggest that the use of flouts has to do with their different personalities and communities.Keywords: Cooperative Principle, Grice’s Maxim, Flouting MaximHow to Cite: Ulfah-1, R.A.A.N.U.-1., Afrilia, R-2. (2018). An Analysis of Fluting Maxim in BFG Movie. Project, X (X), XX-XX. INTRODUCTIONCommunication is a medium to convey meaning from one to another. As stated by Yule (2006) that communication involves word recognition and meaning recognition. There could be hidden intention in some utterances. Failing to recognize those intentions may lead to misunderstanding and even a dispute. Nevertheless, listener is not always to be in guilt. Sometimes in communication, the speaker may provide incomplete or unclear utterance hence the listener found difficulties to comprehend. Thus it is claimed that language as a tool for communication serves as an instrument to maintain a good relationship between the speaker and the hearer. Dealing with language and communication, cooperative principle proposed by Grice serves as means to achieve effective communication. It is described that speakers and listeners must give contribution as required by each other so that both of them may come to the same understanding of the meaning they are trying to convey. Grice elaborates four conversational maxims: maxim of relevance, maxim of quantity, maxim of quality, and maxim of manner. During conversation, speakers may break the rule of the maxims. The flouting of the maxims may occur in daily life or in movies. Movies as one of literary works mostly functions to entertain the audience. The flouting maxims in movies may be intentionally created to achieve the purpose of entertaining. The BFG is one fantasy adventure film released in 2016 by Walt Disney. It tells about the journey of two different species, a human (Sophie) and a giant (that Sophie called Big Friendly Giant). Since they are from different group of communities, their communication may run ineffective. This study aims at analyzing the flouting maxims occurred in The BFG movie.The Cooperative Principle Cooperative Principle is the basic principle in pragmatics. The Cooperative Principle is principle of conversation that was proposed by Grice. He called The Cooperative Principle as when we try to talk to be cooperative by elevating. He says, “make your conversational contribution such as is required, at the stage at which it occurs, by the accepted purpose or direction of talk exchange in which you are engaged.” Within this principle, he intended four maxims.(Grundy, 1998) (in Ginarsih, 2014)Grice’s MaximMaxim of RelevanceMaxim of relation: This maxim may seem clear in the first look but as Grice himself mentioned it is very difficult to define it exactly: "Though the maxim itself is terse, its formulation conceals a number of problems that exercise me a good deal: questions about what different kinds and focuses of relevance there may be, how these shift in the course of a talk exchange, how to allow for the fact that subjects of conversations are legitimately changed, and so on. I find the treatment of such questions exceedingly difficult, and I hope to revert to them in later work." Grice ( in Kheirabadi, 2012).Maxim of Quantity Maxim of quantity requires that participants of a conversation give their contribution as is required in terms of the quantity of information. To say beyond the quantity of information needed in the conversation is to break the maxim. In making their contribution to the conventional talk, participants should gauge the amount information that is really sought for and give it as much as is necessary. They should not make their contribution either more informative or less informative. (Seken, n.d.2015)Maxim of QualityMaxim of quality requires conventional participants to say things that are true or things that they believe to be true. That is, they do not say anything than they believe to be false or anything of which they do not have any evidence. In other words, to comply with this maxim, a speaker in a conventional exchange must speak on the basis of facts, or he/she must have factual evidence by which to sufficiently support what he/she says as truth. (Seken, n.d.2015)Maxim of Manner Utterances may conform to the maxims or may disobey them by infringing, opting out, and flouting or violating. The infringement of the maxims is because of the speaker‟s imperfect knowledge of linguistic. When speakers decided to be uncooperative, they opt out of observing the maxims. ( Thomas 1995 in Jafari, 2013) Maxim Flouting Flouting a maxim is the case when a speaker purposefully disobeys a maxim at the level of what is said with the deliberate intention of generating an implicature. In this case, the speaker’s choice not to observe the maxim by the words he/she utters may be related to the some motive (such as politeness, style of speaking, etc.) (Seken, n.d.2015).According to Thomas (1995:64 in Mohammed & Alduais, 2012) flouting a maxim occurs where a participant in a conversation chooses to ignore one or more of the maxims by using a conversational implicature. Ignoring maxims by using conversational implicatures means that the participant adds meaning to the literal meaning of the utterance. He further explains the conversational implicature that is added when flouting is not intended to deceive the recipient of the conversation, but the purpose is to make the recipient look for other meaning. Moreover Black (2006:25 in Mohammed & Alduais, 2012) explains that a speaker who flouts maxims is actually aware of the Cooperative Principles and the maxims. In other words, it is not only about the maxims that are broken down but that the speaker chooses an indirect way to achieve the cooperation of the communication.Types of Flouting Maxim In ( Grice’s theory in Nur & Fatmawati, 2015) there are four types of maxim flouting. They are quantity maxim flouting, quality maxim flouting, relevance maxim flouting, and manner maxim flouting. Quantity Maxim FloutingWhen a speaker flouts the maxims under the category of Quantity, she/he blatantly gives either more or less information than the situation demands.For example: A : The other giants. Are they nice, like you a nice?B : No, I regret to say that the guys would eat you alive bite. My twenty four foot, but not in Giant country, and that's where you are. In Giants country now.In the example above, it is not appropriate, because when A asks the B about another giant, B does not answer according to the question. He give more information that not needed by A.Quality Maxim Flouting Thomas (in Fami 2015:15) said that flout maxim of quality occur when the speaker say something which is blatantly untrue or for which he/she lack adequate evidence.For example:A : Not as it happens to me, it is most terrible speakB : Well, I think you speak beautifullyIn the example above, B say untrue or lie. She do this, because she doesn’t want B sad with his speaking.Relevance Maxim FloutingFlouting of maxim relevance, (Ginarsih 2014, n.d.) said that by changing the subject or by failing the address the topic directly is encountered very frequently. For example:A : You mean of my life. For the rest of my life?B : Hey, do not you cold?In this case B did not answer according to the question, B changes the topic of conversation. Manner Maxim FloutingAccording to (Ginarsih 2014, n.d.) The maxim under the category of manner is exploited by giving ambiguity and obscure expressions, failure to be brief and orderly. It is often trying to exclude a third party, as in this sort of exchange between husband and wife.A : Where are you off to?B : I was thinking of going out to get some of that funny white stuff for somebody.A : OK, but don’t be long – dinner is nearly readyB speaks in an ambiguous way, saying “that funny white stuff” and“somebody”, because he is avoiding saying “ice cream” and “her/his Daugther”, so that his little daughter does not become excited and ask for the ice cream before her meal. Sometimes the speakers play with words to heighten the ambiguity, in order to make a point.Movie(Chandra Yuliasman 2014) Movie is happen based on script, but it reflect to our daily life activity mostly. That is why the researcher interested to use movie as media to increase the researcher understanding about flouting maxim. Movie also affect masses in childhood and youth. Movie is also called a film or motion picture, is a series of still or moving images. Based on the theories above, the researcher chose “The BFG (Big Friendly Giant)” as the object of the research.The B.F.GThe B.F.G is a 2016 American fantasy adventure film directed and produced by Steven Spielberg, written by Melissa Mathison and based on the 1982 novel of the same name by Roald Dahl. In the film, an orphan human girl be friends a benevolent giant, dubbed the "Big Friendly Giant", who takes her to Giant Country, where they attempt to stop the man-eating giants that are invading the human world. The writers chose The B.F.G, because in the film contain about friendship and courage, in that movie also have morality and ethics quotes. Steven Spielberg is known for his quality films, such as Jurrasic Park. He has also received three Oscars, and received a Life Achievement Award from the American Film Institute (AFI). Steven hooked some Hollywood actresses to play in the movie B.F.G, such as: Mark Rylance (B.F.G), Ruby Barnhill (Sophie), Penelope Wilton, Jemani Clement, Rebecca Hall, Rafe Spall, and Bill Hader. Steven Spielberg films this In the premiere of premiere The BFG managed to triumph in the Top 10 Box Office by collecting revenues of USD 31 million. Although not a chance to taste the top of the Box Office but The BFG still loved by his fans, especially for lovers of fantasy and adventure movies.METHODThis research uses a descriptive qualitative method to analyse the flouting maxim in The B.F.G movie directed by Steven Spielberg. According to Holloway (in Nur & Fatmawati, n.d.) qualitative research is a form of social inquiry focusing on the interpretation of experience and the world by people.” Therefore, this research is conducted systematically through the technique of data collecting and data analysis. The data are taken from the script, the writers analysed of flouting maxim of quantity, maxim of quality, maxim of relation, and maxim of manner based on Grice’s theories, being used to choose the most frequently method among them, the writer used percentage category based on Multihajz’s formula, in Selvia (2014) as follows: P = Percentage F = Frequency n = Number of Maxims RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONResultsThere are 24 conversations from 100 conversations that found in The B.F.G Movie between the main characters, Sophie and B.F.G that flouted the Grice’s cooperative principle. They flouted the maxim of quantity, the maxim of quality, the maxim of relation, and the maxim of manner. In the calculation the writers employed percentage technique as described below:Table 1The Classification of Maxim:NoTypes of MaximQuantityPercentage1.The Maxim of Quantity1042 %2. The Maxim of Quality28 %3The Maxim of Relevance1042 %4The Maxim of Manner28 %Total24100 %From the classification above, it could be seen clearly that among four types of maxim in conversation between the main characters, Sophie and B.F.G in “The B.F.G” Movie, the maxim of Quantity and Relevance were the most identifiable types. First is Quantity. There are 10 conversations or cover 42 %. The second was the maxim of Relevance; there are 10 conversations or cover 42 %. The third was maxim of Quality; there are 2 conversations or cover 8 %. The fourth was the maxim of Manner; there are 2 conversations or cover 8 %. Based on the table above, here are the explanations of each maxim that the main character, Sophie and B.F.G flouted in The B.F.G Movie. The maxim of quantitySophie : The other giants. Are they nice, like you a nice?B.F.G : No, I regret to say that the guys would eat you alive bite. My twenty four foot, but not in Giant country, and that's where you are. In Giants country now.Analysis: It is not appropriate, because when Sophie asks the BFG about another giant, the BFG does not answer according to the question. He give more information that not needed by Sophie.Sophie : We can’t have secrets. I'll tell you mine. I sneak around at night too, and that still sometimes theft and lying. So I’m alone at the time. I've never had a best friend, I told you all thatB.F.G : We got over.Analysis: The BFG did not give the right reasons to reply to a statement from Sophie.Sophie : You should not let them treat you like that. You should notB.F.G : Live with nine giant eats beans. They take so I return. Murmur good dreams. It's what I can do, I do something. I do something.Analysis: The BFG ignored Sophie’s suggestion of another giant treating the BFG badly and he changed the subject.Sophie : No I’m not.B.F.G : Yes you here. If you are a human being and human being is a strawberry cream for giants. They are the prey of those giants out there, so you stay in a nice safe place right here. Analysis: BFG answer does not fit with the context of the conversation at that time.B.F.G : Someone called me a big, friendly giant. How should I call you? Sophie : My name is SophieAnalysis: Sophie does not understand about a nickname, so she just answers with her name only "Sophie".B.F.G: So you're an orphan?Sophie: Yes. You took me to an orphanage. You did not know?Analysis: Sophie did not give the right reasons to reply to a statement from B.F.G.B.F.G: I did not know that. Are you happy there?Sophie: No! I hate that. The lady who runs it is incompetent and she’s crazy rules and you get punish a lot.Analysis: In this conversation, Sophie should answer yes or no , because the question is are you happy there ?.Sophie : Being is not be ing .What is that green thing ?B.F.G : Frobscuttel. All giant drink frobscottel.Analysis: BFG answer does not fit with the context of the conversation at that time.Sophie : Where are you going now ?B.F.G : A dreams blow .It's what I do next.Analysis: BFG answer does not fit with the context of the conversation at that time. In this conversation Sophie asks where, it means that ask about place.Sophie : But why did you bring me here? Why did you take me?B.F.G : I had did to take you, because the first thing you, you would do spread the news you actually saw a giant and then there would be a big fuss and all human beans would be looking for the giant dresses all excited, and then I would be locked up in a cage to look at me with all the noisy hypo-fat and crocodiles and giraffes. And then there would be a huge hunt for all the boy giantsAnalysis: The BFG gives too much give reason to Sophie, should the BFG give Sophie a simple and precise reason for the question.The maxim of RelevanceSophie : Then, who are you? What kind of monster are you?B.F.G : You as me wrongAnalysis: BFG does not honestly reply to Shopie that he is a giant kind.Sophie : You mean of my life. For the rest of my life. B.F.G : Hey, do not you cold?Analysis: BFG did not answer according to the questionSophie : What did you work? B.F.G : And now she asks me to tell you very big secrets.Analysis: BFG did not answer according to the questionSophie : Flesh head ,he comes to eat me, my blood will be on your hands. B.F.G : Everything about you going against my better judgment.Analysis: BFG tries to make Shopie calm by diverting the conversationSophie : Look at all the stars! B.F.G : Often when it is clear I hear distant music living of the stars in the skyAnalysis: When Shopie wants to show something, BFG answer it with things that are not appropriate.Sophie: Really? B.F.G : You think I'm kidding, right? Analysis: BFG should simply answer "yes" or "no".Sophie : Are there bad dreams here too? B.F.G : It will a TrogglehumperAnalysis: BFG did not answer the question correctly.Sophie : Make them all happy. BFG, your father and your mother taught you about dreams? B.F.G : The Giants do not have mothers or fathers. Analysis: BFG should simply answer “has” or “has not”.Sophie : What is the Sophie’s dream? B.F.G : A golden Phizzwizard. I had not seen in a while. Analysis: BFG does not explain what dreams Sophie will experience.Sophie : You snapped me.B..F.G : Well, you are right. After all, you're just a little thing. I can’t help thinking what your poor mother and father must be …Analysis: BFG should simply answer "yes" and "no", and not discuss the unnecessaryThe maxim of QualityB.F.G : You do, you really do?Sophie : Simply beautifully.Analysis: In this situation of conversation, Sophie gives untrue respond to B.F.G or she lies, because she didn’t want make B.F.G sad with B.F.G’s sentence.B.F.G : Not as it happens to me, it is most terrible speak.Sophie : Well, I think you speak beautifully.Analysis: In this conversation, Sophie say untrue or lie. She did it, because she didn’t want B.F.G sad with his statement.The maxim of mannerSophie : Blood bottler ? B.F.G : Yes and butcherSophie : The butcher. Please don’t eat me.Analysis: BFG does not explain in detail about Bottler.Sophie : But then I wake up.B.F.G : And you wake up.Sophie : But not here.Analysis: There is no alignment in the conversationDiscussionThe writer found total numbers of flouting maxim that produce by main character in “The B.F.G” movie those were 24 utterances. Then divided into four types of flouting, they were quality which had 10 data or 42%, quantity had 2 data or 8%, relevance had 10 data or 42% and manner had 2 data or 8%. Thus the most frequent category of flouting maxim produce is the main character was maxim of quality and maxim of relevance. It means that in this movie, The BFG tended to conduct his flouted utterance for move the conversations. CONCLUSIONThe aim of this research is to find out the flouting maxim by the main characters in “The B.F.G” movie. The result show the most frequent category of flouting maxim by the main character was quality and relevance. It indicates that based on the maxim of quantity, there are some conversations that giving more or less information. Based on the semantics theory it is wrong, because giving more information than the need is flouting the maxim of quantity. For the maxim of relevance, there are some conversations that are not relevance, it is related with Ginarsih statement relevance maxim flouting by changing the subject or by failing the address the topic directly is encountered very frequently. There are only two flouting maxims of quality and manner was less frequent. It indicates mostly the conversation in The B.F.G movie is cooperative. It is different with the previous study, from Iniyanti, A et.al (2014) they found two flouting maxims, there are: maxim of relation and maxim of manner. And from Al-Qaderi (2015) he found that the maxim of quantity was most frequently flouted.After the research, the researcher took a conclusion that even the famous movie, the flouting maxims are can’t be avoid. ACKNOWLEDGMENTSPlace Acknowledgments, including information on the source of any financial support received for the work being published. Place Acknowledgments, including information on the source of any financial support received for the work being published.

USING DEONTIC MODALITY IN MAZE RUNNER (THE DEATH CURE) MOVIE Faisal, Muhammad; Syahri, Chaidir
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 2, No 6 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 6, November 2019 (Accepted Papers)
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (471.384 KB)

The objectives of this research are to identify the types of deontic modality and the meaning of utterances that found in The Maze Runner (The Death Cure) movie. This research used script only from the movie entitled The Maze Runner (The Death Cure) that had been analyzed by the researcher. The research used descriptive as a research design and qualitative method as a research methodology. Therefore, the data of this research was in the form of utterances that was performed by the cast in The Maze Runner (The Death Cure) movie. The research data were collected by taking the movie script from the internet. The collected data were analyzed by Saeed’s theory. The finding revealed that there are two types of deontic modality found in utterances performed by the cast of The Maze Runner (The Death Cure) movie namely; Obligation and permission. The meaning of utterances that belongs to obligation means that someone have to do what the speaker said. While the meaning of utterances that belongs to permission means that someone’s incumbency to authorized somebody else to do something. Keywords: Deontic modality, The Maze Runner (The Death Cure), Semantics

Page 10 of 114 | Total Record : 1135

8 9 10 11 12

Filter by Year

2018 2025

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol. 8 No. 5 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2025 Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 4, JULY 2025 Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 3, MAY 2025 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2025 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2025 Vol. 7 No. 6 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 6, NOVEMBER 2024 Vol. 7 No. 5 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 4, JULY 2024 Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 3, MAY 2024 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2024 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2024 Vol. 6 No. 6 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 6, NOVEMBER 2023 Vol. 6 No. 5 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2023 Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 4, JULY 2023 Vol 6, No 3 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 3, MAY 2023 Vol 6, No 2 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2023 Vol 6, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2023 Vol 5, No 6 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 6, NOVEMBER 2022 Vol 5, No 5 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2022 Vol 5, No 4 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 4, JULY 2022 Vol 5, No 3 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 3, MAY 2022 Vol 5, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2022 Vol 5, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2022 Vol 4, No 6 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 6, NOVEMBER 2021 Vol 4, No 5 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2021 Vol 4, No 4 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 4, JULY 2021 Vol 4, No 3 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 3, MAY 2021 Vol 4, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2021 Vol 4, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2021 Vol 3, No 6 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 6, NOVEMBER 2020 Vol 3, No 5 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2020 Vol 3, No 4 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 4, JULY 2020 Vol 3, No 3 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 3, MAY 2020 Vol 3, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2020 Vol 3, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2020 Vol 2, No 6 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 6, November 2019 (Accepted Papers) Vol 2, No 6 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 6, November 2019 Vol 2, No 5 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 5, September 2019 Vol 2, No 5 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 5, September 2019 Vol 2, No 4 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 4, July 2019 Vol 2, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3, MAY 2019 Vol 2, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3, MAY 2019 Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Volume 2 Number 2, March 2019 Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Volume 2 Number 2, March 2019 Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Volume 2 Number 1, January 2019 Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Volume 2 Number 1, January 2019 Vol 1, No 6 (2018): Volume 1 Number 6, November 2018 Vol 1, No 6 (2018): Volume 1 Number 6, November 2018 Vol 1, No 5 (2018): Volume 1 Number 5, September 2018 Vol 1, No 5 (2018): Volume 1 Number 5, September 2018 Vol 1, No 4 (2018): Volume 1 Number 4, July 2018 Vol 1, No 3 (2018): Volume 1 Number 3, May 2018 Vol 1, No 3 (2018): Volume 1 Number 3, May 2018 Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Volume 1 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2018 Vol 1, No 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2018 More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Aseptiana Parmawati

Contact Email
aseptianaparmawati@gmail.com

Phone
+6285351391000

Journal Mail Official
project@journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Terusan Jendral Sudirman, Cimahi 40526

Location
Kota cimahi,

Jawa barat

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Aseptiana Parmawati

Contact Email aseptianaparmawati@gmail.com

Phone +6285351391000

Journal Mail Official project@journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id

Editorial Address Jl. Terusan Jendral Sudirman, Cimahi 40526

Location Kota cimahi, Jawa barat INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Aseptiana Parmawati

Contact Email
aseptianaparmawati@gmail.com

Phone
+6285351391000

Journal Mail Official
project@journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Terusan Jendral Sudirman, Cimahi 40526

Location
Kota cimahi,

Jawa barat

INDONESIA