cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Aseptiana Parmawati
Contact Email
aseptianaparmawati@gmail.com
Phone
+6285351391000
Journal Mail Official
project@journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Terusan Jendral Sudirman, Cimahi 40526
Location
Kota cimahi,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education)
Published by STKIP Siliwangi Bandung
ISSN : 26146320     EISSN : 26146320     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media
Focus PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) is a media for diseminating the result of research about language and education in English Education. Scope PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) publishes the research article in language, and education in English Education.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 1,165 Documents
 23   24   25   26   27 
AN ANALYSIS OF ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS PERFORMED IN DONALD TRUMP’S VICTORY SPEECH IN THE UNITED STATES ELECTION 2016 Anisa Nur Azizah; Dinar Alpiah
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 1, No 3 (2018): Volume 1 Number 3, May 2018
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (605.842 KB) | DOI: 10.22460/project.v1i3.p241-248

Abstract

This study deals with an analysis of illocutionary act in Donald Trump’s utterances in his Victory Speech in the United States election 2016. The objectives of this study are to identify types of illocutionary act used by Donald Trump and to identify the most dominant type of illocutionary act. The data was taken from www.youtube.com.In this study, the researchers applieddocumentation technique in collecting the dataand the descriptive qualitative method was used to analyze the data. The researchers used Yule’s theory forthe types of illocutionary acts.The findings showed that there are five types of illocutionary acts found in this study including declarative (DC) occurs (2), representative (RP) occurs (46), expressive (EV) occurs (38), directive (DR) occurs (7), and commissive (CM) occurs (24).The researchers also find mostly performs in Donald Trump’s utterances in Victory Speech is, and informing his victory and his plan as the new representative act which is refers tostating, asserting, predicting, retelling president of United States to the audience. Keywords:speech acts, illocutionary acts, victory speech.
IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY THROUGH PROJECT BASED-LEARNING USING VISUAL MEDIA Iis Harisma; Ghina Ilmiah; Yana Yana
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 2, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3, MAY 2019
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (759.947 KB) | DOI: 10.22460/project.v2i3.p364-370

Abstract

The aim of this study is to know the improvement of students’ writing ability through Project based-learning using visual media in recount text at X Grades of students’ Vocational High School in Cimahi. This study was Quantitative design, the sample of research consisted of 30 students. The instrument used in this research was written test. The written test was applied in pretest and posttest. The writing test was administrated as the instrument of the research. The result shown that the students’ total score of pretest was 176, and then total score of posttest was 2222. It means that students’ score increased. Then the data were analyzed using statistical formula of t-test computation The data were analyzed by using t-test as the significant level of p<0.05 through SPSS version 15.0. Based on t-measure analysis show that T-score (9,589) ˃ T-table 5% (2, 045).  It means that was significant so the Null Hypothesis (Ho) was rejected. It means that Project based- Learning using Visual Media has significant effect in improving students’ writing ability.
THE INFLUENCE OF TANGIBLE REWARDS TO STUDENT’S MOTIVATION IN 4TH GRADE SDN SINARGALIH 1 CIRANJANG STUDENTS Tedi Cahya; Anggraeni Novianti Kusnadi; Anita Anggraeni
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 1, No 4 (2018): Volume 1 Number 4, July 2018
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/project.v1i4.p350-356

Abstract

This study focused on the influence of tangible rewards to students’ motivation on the learning process. The objective of this research is to describe how tangible reward can improve students’ motivation. This research used descriptive qualitative as a research design. The data of this research were obtained from interview to the teacher who teaches in 4th-grade students’ of SDN Sinargalih 1 Ciranjang. The interview was conducted twice. The result of the research would be described in the form of words. The result of the interview, the teacher had tried to apply tangible reward to improve students’ motivation. The teacher was quite good when used the tangible reward to improve the students’ motivation. Meanwhile, the result from teacher interview also showed that the students’ had better motivation from the first meeting to the next meeting. They tried to more active in the process of learning, although some of the students’ are still passive and had less of motivation. Then the result of an interview given to the teacher showed a positive effect. Tangible reward made the students participate actively. It is viewed by the students when the teacher gives some tests to get the reward. The students try to answer teacher question and had no fear to make mistakes.
COMPARISON BETWEEN COOPERATIVE LEARNING METHODS AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING USING PERSONAL LETTER IN TEACHING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING AT SMA SEBELAS MARET BANDUNG Verawati Verawati; Wawan Kuswandi
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 3, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/project.v3i2.p290-298

Abstract

The paper explains about the comparison between cooperative learning methods and problem based learning using personal letter in teaching students’ ability in writing skill. Experiment study at SMA Sebelas Maret Bandung. The method of this research is experiment quasi concerning experiment class was given learning treatment by using cocoperative learning methods meanwhile control class was given learning by using problem based learning. Student ability in writing sklill is measure by questionnaire or test. Result of the research peove that student ability in writing who teach by cooperative learning methods same as the student who teach problem based learning. The T’test means that the null hypothesis accepted, there is no difference in the ability of the initial writing of the experimental class and the control class. Some difficulties of students; lack of vocabulary, can’t write content is well, hard to understand the topic, hard to answer the question, and still nervous during discussion. To solve the problems like that the teacher can be a solution. Keywords:  Cooperative Learning Methods, Problem Based Learning, Writing  
TEACHING READING NARRATIVE TEXT USING THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) TECHNIQUE IN CLASS VIII SMPN 03 CIMAHI Yuniarti, Witri; Yulianti, Yulianti; Syathroh, Isry Laila
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/project.v3i1.p73-77

Abstract

Reading is something important and necessary for students because the achievement of their study depends on the greater part of their ability to read. The aims of the researchers is to investigate the application of Think Pair Share (TPS) technique to improve students reading comprehension. The population were 140 students of class VIII in SMPN 03 Cimahi. The researchers used quantitative method. The instrument that the researchers used are observation, field note, pretest and posttest. The result of this study proved that the Think Pair Share (TPS) technique is effective to be used in learning reading narrative text. The result showed that statistic calculation the mean scores of pretest is 63.43 and the mean scores of posttest is 83.57. So it can be concluded that after students learned reading narrative text using Think Pair Share (TPS) technique, their reading abilities are improved.                                                      
THE EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN DISCOVERY LEARNING AND WORD WALL METHODS IN IMPROVING VOCABULARY AT SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS Junizar, Fahmi; Sudiyono, Sudiyono
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 3, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/project.v3i2.p180-186

Abstract

Some of the teacher is having a problem when using discovery learning as a method to improve the vocabulary of a student. Based on the objective of this research, the writer conduct wordwall method on SMP mutiara 1 Bandung that will help on improving student vocabulary, and hopefully it can be applied simultaneously to increase interest in learning especially in English course in SMP Mutiara 1 Bandung. Based on the results of research that has been done by the writer, there are very helpful results in developing the method of Word Wall as a teaching material capable of improving the quality of learning and also can improve students vocabulary. From the test results of normality and homogeneity that the data used is homogeneous and distributed normally, so that the process of the research can be continued as it should be. Keywords:  Vocabulary, Discovery Learning, Wordwall
IMPROVING ENGLISH SPEAKING ABILITY USING THE SNOWBALL THROWING GAMES TECHNIQUE Dedy Williana; Wibbie Putra Anugrah; Evie Kareviati
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/project.v3i1.p43-48

Abstract

Abstract In this study, the researcher used method Classroom Action Research (CAR) to improve the quality of the learning and teaching processes as well as to detect and solving the problems that found in the teaching and learning process. The subjects of this research were the 34 students in SMK Budi Bhakti Utama Padalarang. The researcher used collaborative action research with some English teachers in the school. In this study, the researcher using the instruments interview and questionnaire test to collecting the data. The test that given to students is pre test and also post test in the and of the class or after the students has a treatment. In this result of the study showed the mean score of pretest is 62.02 to 64.00 and post test’s score reached up to 79.00. It is important to describe that there is a significant improvement of the test. Therefore, the criteria of success had been determined. It is crucial to remember that communicative games have contributed and positive impact on teaching and learning process. The communicative games like snowball throwing game expected to enhance students’ motivation and enthusiasm in learning English. Clearly, It gives positive improvement on students’ confidence and their fluency in speaking skill. In short, communivative games can be describing that the strategy of teaching-learning creates good, enjoyable circumstances and reduces the stress level and boredom in learning process. Keywords:  Snowball Throwing, Speaking ,Car  How to Cite: Last name-1, Initial First and Middle name-1., Last name-2, Initial First and Middle name-2., & Last name-3, Initial First and Middle name-3. (2017). Title Title Title Title. Infinity, X (X), XX-XX.
PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITION CONSTRAINTS OF LEARNING PARTICIPANTS IN STUDYING ENGLISH (Study at Learning Group of Package “C” in Community Learning Center / Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat (PKBM) Nugraha Mandiri Cimahi City – West Java Province) Sudiyono Sudiyono
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/project.v3i1.p149-156

Abstract

This study reviewed the condition of learning participants’ at the study group of package “C” equivalent to SMA / SMK in the Community Learning Center (PKBM) Nugraha Mandiri which is located at Jalan Sawah Lega number 70 A, Cipageran Village, North Cimahi District, Cimahi City - West Java Province. The condition of learning participants in this research  were psychological constraints.  Psychological constraints in this paper were limited only to : (a) interest in learning; (b) learning motivation; (c) intelligence; and (d) learning activities of the learning participants population. The writing of this study is entitled Psychological Condition Constraints of Learning Participants in Studying English (Study at Learning Group of Package “C” in Community Learning Center/PKBM Nugraha Mandiri Kota Cimahi. The sample taken for this study was all the learning participants totaling 32 people, so this study was also called population research. The study was conducted using observation techniques, document studies, and interviews. While the research approach is a qualitative descriptive approach, which is a study whose purpose is to describe how the activities and conditions of the object under study. The steps for collecting and processing data are as follows: (1) conducting a preliminary study; (2) conduct document studies, observations and interviews; (3) do data processing; data is processed by doing simple calculations such as finding the sum and average amount. The results of the research show that more than 50% of the learning participants face psychological factor constraints, and further this condition affects their learning behavior.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MAKE A MATCH METHOD TO IMPROVE WRITING DESRIPTIVE TEXT AT TENTH GRADE STUDENTS IN SMK JABIR AL-HAYYAN Mahmud Yusuf; Hasanudin Hasanudin
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 3, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/project.v3i2.p259-265

Abstract

Based on the phenomena that students have difficulties in writing descriptive text, the students could not write because do not have any ideas when they are asked to write. So, they need some ways which could help them in writing. The problems in writing can be solved by implementing some strategies in teaching writing. One of approach that teacher can use to help students write a good text is MAM. The main objective of this study is find out if MAM can improve students’ ability in writing descriptive text. The research method used is quantitative research, specifically quantitative with one group pretest-posttest design. The sample take two class at tenth grade students of SMK Jabir Al-Hayyan in academic year 2019/2020. The data had been obtained in post-test of experimental class were: the highest score was 96, the lowest score was 62, and the mean score was 80.50. Post-test of control class were: the highest score was 89, the lower score was 60, and the mean score was 71.54. It can be seen from the data showed that students’ score in experimental class was highest than control class. It means that using make a match method was effective, easier, and more understable to be applied in teaching and learning process, especially in writing descriptive text. Keywords:  Improve, Make A Match Method, Writing Descriptive Text
THE USE OF CLUSTERING TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT Della Hanafiawi; Harry Muharam; Aseptiana Parmawati
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/project.v3i1.p5-10

Abstract

Students have to learn the four basic language skill, they are listening, reading, writing, speaking. One of the most important skill that is Writing. It can make students to share the ideas into written form in the text or paragraph with the right order of generic structure. The purpose of this research was to find out the improving of students writing skill  of descriptive text using clustering technique at seventh grade students of SMPN 11 Cimahi in the Academic Year of 2018 – 2019. This research used Classroom Action Research. The research was carried out in  two cycles and each cycle consisted of four steps, they are Planning, Action, Observation, and Reflection. Most of the students gradually gained good scores at the end of each  cycles. The students responses showed that they interested to learn writing.The score of Minimum Mastery Criterion of English lesson was 75. The Students mean score of pretest 45,7. The mean score in postest 1 was 53,7. The mean score of posttest 2 was 79,3. From this result, the researcher concludes that teaching descriptive text using clustering technique can improve their writing ability and the atmosphere of the class was more alive. Keywords:  CAR, Writing Skill

Page 25 of 117 | Total Record : 1165

 23   24   25   26   27 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2026 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): VOLUME 9 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2026 Vol. 8 No. 5 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2025 Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 4, JULY 2025 Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 3, MAY 2025 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2025 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2025 Vol. 7 No. 6 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 6, NOVEMBER 2024 Vol. 7 No. 5 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 4, JULY 2024 Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 3, MAY 2024 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2024 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2024 Vol. 6 No. 6 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 6, NOVEMBER 2023 Vol. 6 No. 5 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2023 Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 4, JULY 2023 Vol 6, No 3 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 3, MAY 2023 Vol 6, No 2 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2023 Vol 6, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2023 Vol 5, No 6 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 6, NOVEMBER 2022 Vol 5, No 5 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2022 Vol 5, No 4 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 4, JULY 2022 Vol 5, No 3 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 3, MAY 2022 Vol 5, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2022 Vol 5, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2022 Vol 4, No 6 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 6, NOVEMBER 2021 Vol 4, No 5 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2021 Vol 4, No 4 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 4, JULY 2021 Vol 4, No 3 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 3, MAY 2021 Vol 4, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2021 Vol 4, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2021 Vol 3, No 6 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 6, NOVEMBER 2020 Vol 3, No 5 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2020 Vol 3, No 4 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 4, JULY 2020 Vol 3, No 3 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 3, MAY 2020 Vol 3, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2020 Vol 3, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2020 Vol 2, No 6 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 6, November 2019 (Accepted Papers) Vol 2, No 6 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 6, November 2019 Vol 2, No 5 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 5, September 2019 Vol 2, No 5 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 5, September 2019 Vol 2, No 4 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 4, July 2019 Vol 2, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3, MAY 2019 Vol 2, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3, MAY 2019 Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Volume 2 Number 2, March 2019 Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Volume 2 Number 2, March 2019 Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Volume 2 Number 1, January 2019 Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Volume 2 Number 1, January 2019 Vol 1, No 6 (2018): Volume 1 Number 6, November 2018 Vol 1, No 6 (2018): Volume 1 Number 6, November 2018 Vol 1, No 5 (2018): Volume 1 Number 5, September 2018 Vol 1, No 5 (2018): Volume 1 Number 5, September 2018 Vol 1, No 4 (2018): Volume 1 Number 4, July 2018 Vol 1, No 3 (2018): Volume 1 Number 3, May 2018 Vol 1, No 3 (2018): Volume 1 Number 3, May 2018 Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Volume 1 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2018 Vol 1, No 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2018 More Issue