cover
Contact Name
Sukendar
Contact Email
spsilmuhukum@uninus.ac.id
Phone
+628122416324
Journal Mail Official
sukendarsps@uninus.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Soekarno - Hatta No. 530, Bandung
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA
ISSN : 20858884     EISSN : 28295889     DOI : https//doi.org/10.30999
Core Subject : Social,
Media Justitia Nusantara (MJN) is a journal that intends to publish most quality research papers in the fields of law or criminology and social justice studies. The journal is keen to present relative overview of law, system-wide trends and problems on law, crime and justice throughout the world. Journal provides a medium for social scientists to report research findings with respect to crime and justice through innovative and advanced methodologies. The Journal encourages in submission of articles, research notes, and commentaries and also invites papers based on empirical research, theoretical analysis and debate, and policy analysis and critique that centre on crime and broadly defined justice-related topics in an international perspective.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 169 Documents
Analysis of Court Decisions Regarding In Persona Claims in Credit Agreement Cases: Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Mengenai Gugatan Kurang Pihak (In Persona) pada Perkara Perjanjian Kredit Adelya, Eka; Elviandri; Arif Pratama, Rio
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i2.3726

Abstract

This study examines the legal reasoning employed by judges in resolving civil cases involving insufficient parties (in persona) within credit agreement disputes, and evaluates the consistency of judicial considerations across three levels of the court system: District Court, High Court, and the Supreme Court. The issue arises due to the absence of clear standards regarding which parties must be included in civil lawsuits, particularly in credit agreements that often involve more than two parties. Using a normative juridical method with a statutory and case approach, this research analyzes three decisions: No. 30/Pdt.G/2022/PN WNG, No. 133/PDT/2023/PT SMG, and No. 469 K/Pdt/2024. The findings reveal differing judicial orientations: the District Court prioritizes the substance of default, the High Court emphasizes formal completeness of parties, and the Supreme Court seeks a balance between both. The study concludes that there is no uniformity in judicial assessment concerning party sufficiency in credit agreement disputes, indicating the need for the Supreme Court to issue clear guidelines to ensure legal certainty and the protection of all parties involved.
Analisisis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Kreditur Atas Pembatalan Sepihak Pembayaran Debitur: Studi Putusan Tingkat Pertama, Banding, Dan Kasasi: Analisisis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Kreditur Atas Pembatalan Sepihak Pembayaran Debitur: Studi Putusan Tingkat Pertama, Banding, Dan Kasasi Yasmin, Putri Nabila Yasmin; Arif Pratama, Rio
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i2.3727

Abstract

This research is motivated by a legal dispute between a debtor and a creditor due to unilateral cancellation in a credit agreement, which resulted in different rulings at the District Court, High Court, and Supreme Court levels. The study aims to analyze the judges’ considerations and the legal consequences arising from these three decisions. The method used is normative juridical research with a case approach, by analyzing relevant legislation and court decisions. The results indicate that the District Court and High Court considered the creditor’s actions as unlawful due to the absence of good faith, thus ordering the return of collateral and the payment of compensation. Conversely, the Supreme Court annulled those decisions and affirmed that the credit agreement remains binding as long as the debt has not been fully paid, thereby ruling out any unlawful act. In conclusion, there is a contrast between the substantive justice approach adopted by the lower courts and the legal formalism approach applied by the Supreme Court. The implication of this research highlights the importance of harmonizing legal interpretations to ensure legal certainty and protect the rights of parties in credit agreements.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim mengenai Wanprestasi dalam Perkara Perjanjian Kredit di Tiga Tingkatan Peradilan: Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim mengenai Wanprestasi dalam Perkara Perjanjian Kredit di Tiga Tingkatan Peradilan Suleng, Suleng Belista; Pratama, Rio Arif
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i2.3728

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal considerations of judges in cases of default in credit agreements and their impact on legal protection for parties who suffer losses. This study focuses on three decisions: Surabaya District Court Decision No. 714/Pdt.G/2021/PN Sby, Surabaya High Court Decision No. 695/Pdt/2022/PT Sby, and Supreme Court Decision No. 2149 K/Pdt/2024. The method applied is normative juridical research using a case approach. The research findings indicate differences in considerations between the first instance and cassation courts, which stated that the defendant was in default, while the appellate court held the opposite opinion. The Supreme Court corrected the considerations at the appellate level and provided legal protection to the plaintiff as the party who had fulfilled the contractual obligations. The decision also confirmed that liability for default can be imposed on creditors who are negligent in carrying out their obligations. The implications of this decision underscore the importance of protecting parties in good faith and affirming the role of judges in correcting injustices in contracts.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMBATALAN KEPUTUSAN KPU KABUPATEN MAHAKAM ULU BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 224/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025: Analisis Yuridis Pembatalan Keputusan Kpu Kabupaten Mahakam Ulu Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 224/Phpu.Bup-Xxiii/2025 Miftah, Muhammad; Prasetyo, Bayu; Elviandri
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i2.3729

Abstract

This study examines Constitutional Court Decision No. 224/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025, which annulled the results of the 2024 Mahakam Ulu Regency Regional Head Election due to proven serious violations of the principle of neutrality of the State Civil Apparatus (ASN) and abuse of authority by the incumbent regent in supporting his biological child’s candidacy for regional head. Employing a normative juridical method and a case study approach, the research focuses on analyzing the Constitutional Court’s legal reasoning and the juridical implications of annulling the decision of the Mahakam Ulu General Election Commission (KPU). The findings indicate that the actions of the public official in question met the criteria for structured, systematic, and massive (TSM) violations, significantly undermining electoral integrity and fairness. The Constitutional Court’s ruling is regarded as a form of constitutional protection of voters’ rights as well as a reinforcement of the rule of law and substantive democracy. This study underscores the urgency of reforming the electoral oversight system and strictly enforcing the principle of bureaucratic neutrality in the conduct of regional elections in Indonesia.
Peran Pemerintah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Dalam Mengatasi Penambangan Batubara Tanpa Izin : Kalimantan Timur Dalam Mengatasi Penambangan Batubara Tanpa Izin Riantori Panandito, Muhammad Rizky
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i2.3730

Abstract

This study aims to examine the role of the East Kalimantan provincial government in addressing illegal coal mining activities and analyze the supporting and inhibiting factors, as well as its impact on the environment. This study uses an empirical legal approach, with data collection techniques through field studies, observations, and interviews with officials from the Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM) Agency and affected communities. The results indicate that despite various monitoring and development efforts, the role of the East Kalimantan provincial government in addressing illegal mining remains suboptimal, particularly in terms of legal enforcement and social control. Supporting factors such as regulations and cross-agency coordination are in place, but are hampered by weak law enforcement, limited resources, and low public awareness. This study recommends strengthening synergy between agencies, optimizing integrated supervision, and empowering communities through education and sustainable economic alternatives. These efforts are crucial to preventing broader environmental damage and maintaining the well-being of communities surrounding mining sites.
Tinjauan Kriminologis Pidana Hukuman Mati Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkoba Dalam Perspektif Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia: Tinjauan Kriminologis Pidana Hukuman Mati Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkoba Dalam Perspektif Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia ANNISA SUSINTA
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i2.3738

Abstract

Permasalahan narkotika di Indonesia terus menjadi tantangan serius, baik dari segi hukum, kesehatan, maupun sosial. Pendekatan hukum yang selama ini diterapkan cenderung menyeragamkan semua pelaku baik pengguna, korban ketergantungan, maupun pengedar ke dalam satu kategori: kriminal dan bukan tidak mungkin mengakibatkan penjatuhan hukuman mati. Metode penelitian yang digunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris, yaitu suatu metode yang menggabungkan antara aspek hukum normatif (peraturan perundang-undangan) dan kenyataan di lapangan. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa, Penanganan kasus narkotika di Indonesia memerlukan reformasi kebijakan yang berorientasi pada kesehatan masyarakat dan hak asasi manusia. Dengan menerapkan pendekatan berbasis asesmen medis dan sosial, negara dapat lebih bijak dalam membedakan mana pelaku kejahatan dan mana korban penyalahgunaan, serta memberi respons yang tepat: hukuman bagi pelaku, pertolongan dan rehabilitasi bagi korban.
PENEGAKAN PENGAWASAN DALAM MELINDUNGI KONSUMEN TERHADAP TRANSPORTASI ONLINE DI INDONESIA: A. PENDAHULUAN Virgy, Rery Lasinta; SETIAWAN, ANDRY
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i2.3521

Abstract

Online transportation is growing rapidly due to technological advances, this makes it easier for consumers to use it and can be quickly and easily accessed to meet the needs desired by consumers. There are positive and negative impacts that require supervision to minimize negative impacts. This study aims to find out and also analyze the enforcement of supervision given to consumer protection regarding the online transportation sector. For this purpose, the legal research method is used with a discussion that is in line with consumer protection for online transportation. The results of the study were able to determine the form of legal protection and supporting factors in order to improve the enforcement of supervision in protecting consumers in the online transportation sector in Indonesia.
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN BERUPA GANTI KERUGIAN SEBAGAI PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIHAK PENGELOLA TAMAN WISATA Maliki, Achmad Ichsan; Fitriyah, Mas Anienda Tien
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 13 No 1 (2023): Februari 2023
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v13i1.2578

Abstract

Adanya permasalahan di taman wisata hingga merugikan pengunjung dengan ini perlu dipertanyakan mengenai perlindungan konsumen dan pertanggungjawaban hukumnya. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk menggali pelaksanaan perlindungan konsumen berupa ganti kerugian sebagai pertanggungjawaban pihak pengelola taman wisata. Tipe penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris, dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Studi lapangan dilakukan di taman wisata Kenjeran Park & Atlantis Land Surabaya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan konsumen terhadap pengunjung taman wisata secara preventif belum dapat diwujudkan dengan baik, terbukti adanya fasilitas yang roboh hingga merugikan konsumen. Namun perlindungan secara represif telah diwujudkan dengan baik. Pertanggungjawaban hukum dengan ini telah dilaksanakan dengan baik oleh pihak pengelola taman wisata.
UPAYA PREVENTIF OLEH BANK DALAM MENCEGAH NASABAH WANPRESTASI ATAS KREDIT RUMAH Pandini, Evelyn Novi; Maharani, Sri
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 13 No 1 (2023): Februari 2023
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v13i1.2581

Abstract

Produk layanan bank salah satunya ialah Kredit Pemilikan Rumah (KPR). Produk tersebut dimaksudkan untuk memberi kemudahan bagi nasabahnya dalam memenuhi kebutuhan tempat tinggal. Dalam realitanya ditemukan bahwa nasabah produk Kredit Pemilikan Rumah (KPR) mengalami wanprestasi dalam pelaksanaanya. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk menggali mengenai perwujuda upaya preventif oleh pihak bank dalam mencegah nasabah wanprestasi atas kredit rumah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan berjenis penelitian hukum empiris, dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Studi lapangan dilakukan di Bank Central Asia (BCA) Cabang Surabaya. Hasil penelitian didapati bahwa upaya preventif oleh Bank BCA Surabaya sebagai pencegahan terjadinya waprestasi telah dilakukan dengan menegakkan prinsip 5C, yang meliputi modal, watak, jaminan, dan perekonomian debitur. Selain itu pihak bank juga menegakkan prinsip kehati-hatian. Wanprestasi yang tetap terjadi menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas hukum dengan ini belum terwujud dengan maksimal
PERWUJUDAN KEMANFAATAN HUKUM DALAM PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP KORUPSI SEBAGAI KEJAHATAN LUAR BIASA Nugroho, Hafidz Amrullah Dzaky; Mahanani, Anajeng Esri Edhi
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 13 No 1 (2023): Februari 2023
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v13i1.2590

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hakim didalam Putusan Nomor 10/pid.sus-tpk/2021/PT.DKI. ditinjau dari teori kemanfaaatan hukum. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan tersebut belum sesuai dengan teori kemanfaatan hukum, mengingat penegakan hukumnya yang tidak tegas terhadap korupsi yang merupakan suatu kejahatan luar biasa (extra ordinary crime), terlebih terdakwanya merupakan aparat penegak hukum yang seharusnya dapat dihukum lebih berat. Seharusnya diutamakannya upaya pemberantasan masalah korupsi di Indonesia, mengingat dampak korupsi sangat menyeluruh dalam kehidupan masyaraakat bernegara.