cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin
Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id
Phone
+6282242226898
Journal Mail Official
usmlawreview@usm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Soekarno - Hatta
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26214105     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i2.2266
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Journal USM LAW REVIEW (JULR) is an academic journal for Legal Studies published by Master of Law, Semarang University. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. The focus and scope of this journal are legal problems in the fields of Criminal Law; Civil Law; Constitutional Law; International Law; Administrative Law; Islamic Law; Business Law; Medical Law; Environmental Law; Adat Law; Agrarian Law; Legal Philosophy.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 62 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER" : 62 Documents clear
The Urgency Regulation Prohibition of Social Commerce in Indonesia From The Perspective Maslahah Mursalah Oktavia, Dian Novyta; Batubara, Chuzaimah
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10341

Abstract

This research aims to determine the importance of social commerce regulations, explore the development and implementation of these regulations in Indonesia, and understand Maslahah Mursalah's views on these regulations. The current rapid growth of digital technology has driven great progress in various scientific disciplines, particularly in the economic sector, where business actors, especially MSMEs, are starting to participate in the e-commerce space. With the emergence of online trading trends that use social media as the main platform (social commerce), government awareness of the growth potential of e-commerce has encouraged the government to adopt strict and enforceable regulations. This scientific study uses normative juridical research methodology, specifically focussing on secondary data sources. These sources include primary legal materials, such as statutory regulations (legislative approach), and secondary legal sources accessed through library sources. The study revealed that the Minister of Trade, Zulkifli Hasan, has issued new regulations, namely Minister of Home Affairs Regulation (Permendagri) Number 31 of 2023 concerning Licensing, Advertising, Development, and Supervision of Trading Business Entities via Electronic Systems. This law aims to help Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), clarify social commerce operations, and foster a strong e-commerce ecosystem. However, some view the government's issuance of this regulation as lacking substance and haste. Mursalah's problem is that government regulations, specifically Minister of Trade Regulation Number 31 of 2023, only address a few aspects of enhancing human welfare, particularly for commercial actors.
RETRACTION NOTICE: Model Kolaborasi Antar-lembaga dan Reformasi Tata Kelola Keamanan Maritim Dalam Menjaga Kedaulatan Indonesia Pasca Reformasi Sudarto, Sudarto
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.8912

Abstract

RETRACTION TO: Sudarto Sudarto (2024). Model Kolaborasi Antar-lembaga dan Reformasi Tata Kelola Keamanan Maritim Dalam Menjaga Kedaulatan Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jurnal USM Law Review Vol 7, No 3, pp. 1260-1271, December 2024, DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.8912. Following a rigorous, carefully concerned, and considered review of the article published in Jurnal USM Law Review to article entitled “Model Kolaborasi Antar-lembaga dan Reformasi Tata Kelola Keamanan Maritim Dalam Menjaga Kedaulatan Indonesia Pasca Reformasi” Jurnal USM Law Review Vol 7, No 3, pp. 1260-1271, December 2024, DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.8912. Sudarto Sudarto. The article contains redundant material and copyright infringement. Following a report from the original author and an investigation conducted by the editor, it was found that the article bears similarities to a previously published article in the NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol. 8 No. 5 (2021) DOI: 10.31604/jips.v8i6.2021.1406-1428, Ministrate Jurnal Birokrasi & Pemerintahan Vol 3. No. 1 (2021) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jbpd.v3i3, Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan Vol. 13 No. 2 Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan Vol. 13 No 2 (2023) http://ejournal-balitbang.kkp.go.id/index.php/jkse/article/view/12542
Membongkar Permainan-Kebenaran (Truth-Games) Penuntut Umum Dalam Kasus Korupsi Tata Niaga PT. Timah Marbun, Rocky
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.11099

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membongkar model permainan-kebenaran (truth-games) dari Penuntut Umum melalui komunikasi instrumental berbasis logika monolog guna mencapai kepentingannya dalam mempersalahkan Terdakwa—sebagai tujuan utama, dalam proses penegakan hukum pidana pada perkara Korupsi Tata Niaga PT. Timah. Diskursus validitas terhadap Surat Dakwaan—sebagai bagian dari tindakan Penuntutan, dalam proses pembuktian di depan persidangan, selalu dikonstruksikan berdasarkan keterpenuhan akan asas jelas, cermat, dan lengkap melalui Pasal 143 ayat (2) huruf b KUHAP, dengan ancaman Surat Dakwaan dinyatakan batal demi hukum. Asas Jelas, Cermat, dan Lengkap dipandang sebagai suatu parameter untuk mengukur bahwa telah muncul pemahaman dan keyakinan Penuntut Umum akan adanya suatu peristiwa pidana yang terjadi. Namun demikian, dalam kajian Ilmu Hukum yang bersifat normatif tersebut, tidak mampu melakukan teoretisasi terhadap strategi bahasa kekuasaan sebagai kapital simbolik yang bersifat subyektif dari kesadaran diri Penuntut Umum. Oleh karena itu, adalah penting untuk mengungkapkan tehnik komunikasi yang dikembangkan oleh Penuntut Umum dalam merasionalisasikan dakwaannya, dalam proses jawab menjawab guna mempertahankan pendapatnya melalui dialektika pada pemeriksaan Ahli Hukum Pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan partisipatoris. Data yang digunakan dikumpulkan melalui studi literatur dan rekaman persidangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) komunikasi Penuntut Umum bersifat instrumental; (2) perilaku generalisasi fakta; (3) menghindari kajian hubungan hukum dan subyek hukum; (4) terjadinya sesat pikir dalam penggunaan bahasa normatif sebagai strategi bahasa kekuasaan; dan (5) konstruksi strategi bahasa kekuasaan melalui dominasi penafsiran guna pemenuhan unsur kerugian keuangan negara sebagai representasi tindak pidana korupsi.
Epistemologi Filsafat Pancasila dalam Pembangunan Politik dan Hukum di Indonesia Leduq, Anselmus; Cipto Handoyo, Benediktus Hestu
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10344

Abstract

This study aims to build a healthy political and legal life and democratization based on the elements and sources of truth of the epistemological values of Pancasila. This study needs to be studied because the development of political and legal life in Indonesia today is increasingly unstable in political dynamics. The law which is considered as the commander of the state, is now weakened in order to perpetuate or smooth the power of individuals or groups of people in politics, there is a lot of corruption, collusion, and nepotism (KKN). The increasingly complex political and legal dynamics are increasingly moving away from the values of Pancasila. The research method used is a qualitative descriptive method with a historical and philosophical approach. The results of the study show that the dynamics of politics and law in Indonesia are not running healthily and democratically because they are not built on the values of Pancasila as the basis of the State. Politics and law are now built on the ambition of group and individual power so there is a lot of corruption, collusion, and nepotism (KKN). The conclusion of this study is to try to uncover the ideas, sources, origins, and essence of knowledge from the values of Pancasila as the nation's ideology and apply them to the dynamics of political and legal life in Indonesia. These values are divinity, humanity, unity, democracy, human rights, justice, certainty, and the benefits of law. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membangun kehidupan politik dan hukum yang sehat dan demokratisasi yang berdasarkan pada unsur dan sumber kebenaran dari nilai-nilai epistemology Pancasila. Penelitian ini perlu dikaji karena perkembangan kehidupan politik dan hukum di Indonesia dewasa ini semakin labil dalam dinamika politik. Hukum yang dianggap sebagai panglima negara, kini dilemahkan demi melanggengkan atau memuluskan kekuasaan individu atau sekelompok orang dalam berpolitik, banyak terjadi korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme (KKN). Dinamika politik dan hukum yang semakin kompleks ini semakin menjauh dari nilai-nilai Pancasila. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode deksriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan historis dan filosofis. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dinamika politik dan hukum di Indonesia tidak berjalan dengan sehat dan demokratis karena tidak dibagun berdasarkan nilai-nilai Pancasila sebagai dasar Negara. Politik dan hukum sekarang dibagun atas ambisi kekuasaan kelompok dan Individu, sehingga banyak terjadi korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme (KKN). Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah berusaha membongkar ide-ide, sumber, asal, dan esensi pengetahuan dari nilai-nilai Pancasila sebagai ideologi hidup bangsa dan diaplikasikan ke dalam dinamika kehidupan politik dan hukum di Indonesia. Nilai-nilai tersebut adalah ke-Tuhanan, kemanusian, persatuan, demokrasi, hak asasi manusia, keadilan, kepastian dan kemanfaatan hukum.
Quo Vadis Status Kondominium Hotel Berdasarkan Perspektif Regulasi Rumah Susun di Indonesia Puspitasari, Syalaisha Amani; Taupiqqurrahman, Taupiqqurrahman
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10874

Abstract

This research aims to identify the status of condominium hotels and to determine the legal implications of any deviation from the intended function of flats, both for the unit condotel’s owner and developer. In a condominium hotel, the unit owner is unable to control their unit, as their role is as an investor. Consequently, the unit owner is not permitted to occupy their unit for residential purposes because it is intended to be rented out as a hotel. Furthermore, the unit owner is not included in the PPPSRS, as all activities within the condominium hotel are carried out by the hotel operator. The lack of definitive regulations in Indonesia has given legal uncertainty due to the position between flats and hotel regulations. Hence, there has been a non-conformity between the main purpose of the building as stated in the Building Construction Permit (IMB), the role of the developer which has the potential to cause a conflict of interest with unit owners, as well as the reduction in interest in property investment in Indonesia. This research is normative-juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. This research uses library research data collection techniques with descriptive and prescriptive data analysis techniques. The result of this research is that condominium hotels can be classified as flats through the adaptation of residential and business functions and involving owners such as PPPSRS to appoint and supervise the hotel operator. This research presents an implementation solution that can enhance legal certainty for owners and operators of hotels. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi status kondominium hotel dan untuk mengetahui implikasi hukum atas penyimpangan fungsi rumah susun terhadap pemilik unit dan developer kondominium hotel berdasarkan perspektif regulasi rumah susun di Indonesia. Dalam konsep kondominium hotel, pemilik unit tidak dapat menguasai unit miliknya secara absolut karena kedudukannya hanya sebagai investor, sehingga unit tersebut tidak dapat digunakan sebagai tempat tinggal, melainkan akan disewakan kembali sebagai hotel. Selain itu, pemilik unit tidak tergabung dalam PPPSRS karena seluruh kepentingan bersama diurus dan dikelola oleh operator hotel sebagai perpanjangan tangan developer yang kerap dipersamakan dengan PPPSRS. Tidak adanya regulasi yang dapat digunakan sebagai landasan hukum seluruh aktivitas di kondominium hotel menyebabkan adanya ketidakpastian hukum karena kondominium hotel berdiri di antara regulasi rumah susun dan perhotelan. Akibatnya adalah terdapat celah untuk melakukan penyeludupan dan penyimpangan hukum, seperti ketidaksesuaian fungsi bangunan sebagaimana yang tertera dalam Izin Mendirikan Bangunan (IMB), peran developer yang terlalu mendominasi melalui operator hotel yang berpotensi menimbulkan konflik dengan para pemilik, serta potensi menurunnya minat investasi properti di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data secara kepustakaan, serta teknik analisis data deskriptif dan preskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kondominium hotel dapat dikategorikan sebagai rumah susun melalui penyesuaian fungsi hunian dan usaha, serta melibatkan para pemilik sebagai PPPSRS untuk melakukan penunjukan dan pengawasan operator hotel sebagai pengelola. Penelitian ini menawarkan solusi implementatif yang dapat memperkuat kepastian hukum bagi pemilik dan pengelola.
Legal Protection for Buyers of Inherited Land Who Have Not Been Certified In Islamic Law Masriani, Yulies Tiena
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.9524

Abstract

The urgent need for legal protection for buyers of uncertified inherited land under Islamic law is critical. This study employs a normative juridical approach, supported by an extensive literature review, to examine the complexities of buying and selling inherited land within the framework of Islamic inheritance law, known as farāid. This system delineates specific shares for each heir as guided by syara'. The process of purchasing inherited land mirrors that of individual land transactions, with significant distinctions concerning certification status. Key findings reveal that all heirs listed on the Heir Certificate, issued by the District Head or Notary, must consent to any sale. If the seller is later found to lack rightful ownership or if the documentation is fraudulent, a buyer acting in good faith is entitled to legal protection. This framework safeguards buyers from potential legal repercussions stemming from the seller's misrepresentation or lack of ownership. The study underscores the necessity for robust legal frameworks to protect buyers and uphold justice in land transactions, particularly in situations where certification is absent. This research analyzes the legal protections available to buyers of uncertified inherited land, emphasizing the importance of awareness and due diligence in transactions to mitigate risks associated with unclear legal aspects.
The Use of Magic in the Village Head Election in Tidore Islands City Indonesia Rosyidi, Irham; Faisal, Fatma; Umar, Mahmud Hi; Sybelle, Jan Alizea; Junaidi, M
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10519

Abstract

In Indonesia, the Village Head Election is the implementation of people’s sovereignty to choose village heads in a direct, public, free, confidential, honest, and just manner as stated in Regulation of the Minister of Internal Affairs No. 27 of 2020. This paper aims to analyze deviant behavior in the Village Head Elections that may bring harm to other people that involve the role of supernatural beings committed by Village Head Election participants. The importance of learning magic for the Village Head Election includes: (1) to influence the opinion of society who have suffrage rights; (2) to manipulate the obtainment of votes; (3) to make other Village Head Election participants die and/or sick; and (4) to influence the opinion of Village Head Election organizers. This paper employed the juridical empirical research method in the field of the legal anthropology scientific discipline. It used the behavioral approach. This paper aims to understand how mystical practices may influence election results that should ideally be carried out in a just and honest manner as well as to increase awareness of the risk of unethical behavior in the election process. Results showed that mystical things are always closely related to the culture of the Indonesian nation from era to era, including in its political culture. It can be seen that in every leadership of national figures, mystical activities are practiced. Contestants will visit shamans by sending voodoo to their political opponents so that they can win the political contestation. Apart from that, there are those who carry out rituals that are believed to be effective as a way to win the contestation in the political realm. The novelty of this research is that authors not only analyze the magical aspect of the Village Head Elections but also how magic is believed and implemented at the national level. The implication of this case is that it is rather difficult to prove magical cases. Thus, it leads to the occurrence of widespread suspicion among all parties.
Quo Vadis Authority to Manage Public Agency Credits by The State Credits Affairs Committee (PUPN) Indrawati, Yuli
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10573

Abstract

This study aims to examine the authority of the State Credits Affairs Committee (PUPN) to settle public agency credit. The Constitutional Court (MK) Decision Nr. 77/PUU-IX/2011 which abolished the phrase settlement of credits from bodies that are either directly or indirectly controlled by the State by PUPN. Otherwise, Government Regulation No. 28 of 2022 concerning Pengurusan Piutang Negara oleh PUPN regulated that PUPN can handle creditors in bad faith from special bodies/institutions/public legal entities. The research questions how public agency credits are managed by PUPN? This study differs from previous studies because it uses a public financial law perspective on the characteristics of public bodies as sui generis institutions and PUPN’s special authority in managing receivables. This research is important because it provides a legal study on legal certainty in the practice of managing public agency receivables by PUPN and eliminates concerns about lawsuits over the management of said receivables by PUPN. The research results show that processing public agency receivables by PUPN is only an alternative determined by the public agency - it does not have to be submitted. This concept is based on the application of the sui generis nature and legal subject status of public bodies and is used to optimize the management of public bodies' credits because PUPN has extraordinary coercive authority. This kind of mechanism has a positive value for public bodies in maintaining their financial health and also in efforts to maintain optimal service to the public which is the task of public bodies.
Optimalisasi Fungsi Pengawasan DPRD Terhadap Pembangunan Infrastruktur Nugroho, Wahyu; Sudarmanto, Kukuh; Soegianto, Soegianto; Arifin, Zaenal
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.8371

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the use of the right of inquiry by the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) in Indonesia's state governance, particularly in overseeing infrastructure development in Sleman Regency. The urgency of this research lies in the need to strengthen the supervisory function of the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) to ensure the effectiveness and transparency of regional development. The novelty of this research focuses on optimizing the role of the DPRD through a normative juridical approach and an in-depth analysis of the implementation of oversight functions involving the right of inquiry. This research uses a normative juridical method by examining legislation, literature, and empirical data related to the implementation of the DPRD's supervisory function. The research results show that the DPRD's oversight of infrastructure development in Sleman Regency has been effective, supported by adequate regulations, the commitment of DPRD members, as well as budgetary support, and the enhancement of human resource capacity through training. In addition, the harmonious relationship between the DPRD and the executive, as well as community participation, also strengthens the oversight. This research concludes that the optimization of the DPRD's supervisory function can be achieved through preventive and repressive oversight, both directly and indirectly, as well as across sectors. With effective oversight, it is hoped that development in Sleman Regency can proceed more transparently, accountably, and in accordance with the needs of the community without deviations that harm the state. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penggunaan hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) dalam tata kelola negara Indonesia, khususnya dalam pengawasan pembangunan infrastruktur di Kabupaten Sleman. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada perlunya memperkuat fungsi pengawasan DPRD untuk memastikan efektivitas dan transparansi pembangunan daerah. Kebaruan penelitian ini terfokus pada optimalisasi peran DPRD melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dan analisis mendalam terhadap implementasi fungsi pengawasan yang melibatkan hak angket. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur, dan data empiris terkait pelaksanaan fungsi pengawasan DPRD. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengawasan DPRD terhadap pembangunan infrastruktur di Kabupaten Sleman telah berjalan baik, didukung oleh regulasi yang memadai, komitmen anggota DPRD, serta dukungan anggaran dan peningkatan kapasitas sumber daya manusia melalui pelatihan. Selain itu, hubungan harmonis antara DPRD dan eksekutif serta partisipasi masyarakat turut memperkuat pengawasan.Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa optimalisasi fungsi pengawasan DPRD dapat dicapai melalui pengawasan preventif dan represif, baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung, serta lintas sektor. Dengan pengawasan yang efektif, diharapkan pembangunan di Kabupaten Sleman dapat berjalan lebih transparan, akuntabel, dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan masyarakat tanpa penyimpangan yang merugikan negara.
Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim Mahkamah Agung Perspektif Hukum Progresif: Wasiat Wajibah Terhadap Anak Sebagai Ahli Waris Beda Agama Jafar, Abdul; Qosim, Sarah; Syamsul, Syamsul
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.9281

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the progressive legal perspective on the considerations of judges in granting obligatory wills to non-Muslim heirs, uncover how this decision embodies legal discovery, and identify challenges and criticisms that arise both from Islamic law and positive law perspectives in Indonesia.In the progressive legal analysis, this decision demonstrates the courage of the Supreme Court judges in prioritizing substantive justice by considering the social context and pluralism of Indonesian society. The judges employed the method of ijtihad and Islamic jurisprudence principles to justify the granting of obligatory wills to non-Muslim children as a form of protecting human rights. However, this decision is not without criticism, with some arguing that the judges may have overstepped their authority and created legal uncertainty, particularly from the standpoint of conservative scholars who emphasize strict adherence to the texts of the Qur'an and Hadith. Additionally, challenges also arise from the perspective of positive law in Indonesia, concerning the judges' authority in creating precedents outside formal legislative mechanisms. These findings reinforce the urgency of developing more dynamic and responsive methods of legal interpretation to meet the needs of substantive justice. The impact of this decision shows that progressive legal discovery can set a precedent in Indonesia's legal practice, which, when applied prudently, can balance legal certainty and substantive justice. The study’s recommendations emphasize the importance of further discussions on the role of judges in harmonizing principles of justice with written law, as well as the application of legal discovery methods that support inclusivity and justice within a pluralistic society. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perspektif hukum progresif terhadap pertimbangan hakim dalam memberikan wasiat wajibah kepada ahli waris non-Muslim, mengungkap bagaimana putusan ini mencerminkan penemuan hukum, serta mengidentifikasi tantangan dan kritik yang muncul baik dari perspektif hukum Islam maupun hukum positif di Indonesia. Dalam analisis hukum progresif, putusan ini menunjukkan keberanian hakim Mahkamah Agung dalam mengedepankan keadilan substantif dengan mempertimbangkan konteks sosial dan pluralitas masyarakat Indonesia. Hakim menggunakan metode ijtihad dan kaidah fiqih hukum Islam untuk menjustifikasi pemberian wasiat wajibah kepada anak non-Muslim sebagai bentuk perlindungan hak-hak kemanusiaan. Namun, putusan ini tidak luput dari kritik yang menyatakan bahwa hakim berpotensi melampaui kewenangan dan menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum, terutama dari sudut pandang ulama konservatif yang menekankan pentingnya kepatuhan pada teks Al-Qur'an dan Hadits. Selain itu, tantangan dari perspektif hukum positif di Indonesia juga muncul terkait otoritas hakim dalam menciptakan preseden di luar mekanisme formal legislasi. Temuan ini memperkuat urgensi untuk mengembangkan metode interpretasi hukum yang lebih dinamis dan responsif terhadap kebutuhan keadilan substantif. Dampak putusan ini menunjukkan bahwa penemuan hukum progresif dapat menjadi preseden dalam praktik hukum di Indonesia, yang jika diterapkan dengan bijak, mampu menyeimbangkan kepastian hukum dan keadilan substantif. Rekomendasi dari penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya diskusi lebih lanjut mengenai peran hakim dalam mengharmonisasikan prinsip-prinsip keadilan dengan hukum tertulis, serta penerapan metode penemuan hukum yang mendukung inklusivitas dan keadilan di tengah masyarakat plural.

Page 2 of 7 | Total Record : 62

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): - Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): AUGUST Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): APRIL Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): DECEMBER Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): AUGUST Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): APRIL Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): NOVEMBER Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): MAY Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): NOVEMBER Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): MAY Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): NOVEMBER Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): MAY Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): NOVEMBER Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): MAY Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): NOVEMBER Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): MAY More Issue