cover
Contact Name
Ja'far Baehaqi
Contact Email
jafarbaehaqi@walisongo.ac.id
Phone
+6285225300659
Journal Mail Official
walrev.journal@walisongo.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sharia Faculty Office Building and Law 2nd Floor Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang Jl. Prof. Hamka Km. 02 Ngaliyan, Semarang 50185. Telp (024) 7601291 Fax (024) 7601291
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev)
ISSN : 27153347     EISSN : 7220400     DOI : 10.21580/walrev
Core Subject : Social,
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) is a scientific journal published in April and October each year by the Law Studies Program at the Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, Semarang. This journal has specifications as a medium of publication and communication of legal science ideas derived from theoretical and analytical studies, as well as research results in the field of legal science. The editor hopes that writers, researchers and legal experts will contribute in this journal.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 169 Documents
Analysis of the Causes of Narcotics Recidivities in Class IIa Prisons in Bogor Septiawan, Yudha Nugraha
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2020.2.1.5321

Abstract

The risk can cause harm to someone, including people who have used narcotics. Drug abuse is a concern for many people today. Misuse of narcotics is a deviation of behavior or deeds that violate the law, and it is unfortunate if prisoners who are free to repeat the narcotics crime again. The problem that became the reference in this research is whether the factors that cause the repetition of narcotics crime, how the risk of repetition of narcotics crime, and how to overcome the narcotics crime repetition. The purpose of this study is to determine the factors, risks, and efforts in overcoming repetition of narcotics crime. This research was conducted using a qualitative approach by collecting data using interview, observation, and documentation methods. Data analysis is described in the form of sentence descriptions and analyzed qualitatively, then a conclusion is drawn. Based on the results of research and discussion, it is concluded: (1) Factors that influence the repetition of narcotics crime are internal factors and external factors. (2) The risk of repetition of narcotics crime is carried out in the level of risk classification. (3) Efforts to overcome the repetition of narcotics crime shall be carried out in a preventive and repressive manner. The advice given is maximizing rehabilitation activities carried out in Corrections Institutions and maximizing coaching programs in Corrections Institutions
Implementation of the Methadone Maintenance Therapy Program for Highrisk Drug Prisoners Zakaria, Moch Subhan
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2020.2.1.5338

Abstract

The harm reduction program is a program that aims to assist inmates who use syringes (IDU's) in overcoming dependence on narcotics medically and to prevent the adverse effects caused by narcotics abuse. Where in general the use of heroin is done by injecting using a syringe alternately, or known as "For Wet" This can cause a new problem that is greater that the outbreak of the HIV/AIDS virus. Most prisoners use injecting narcotics before entering prison and have been infected with the HIV virus, so the risk of transmitting HIV/AIDS to other prisoners is very high. The tendency of the number of relapses (reuse) by prisoners who are in the period of coaching is quite high despite the efforts of strict supervision in the security sector, but in fact in several prisons/detention there is narcotics smuggling in various modes. For this reason, the Indonesian Ministry of Law and Human Rights through the Directorate General of Corrections organizes the P4GN program (Prevention of Eradication of Narcotics Abuse and Circulation) in prisons and detention environments by promoting the principle of "Total Abstinence" meaning that no use of any type of narcotics during coaching in prisons and prisons. But for the type of metadone, which is a type II narcotics can be tolerated because it is used for the purpose of treatment/healing of narcotics dependence and is also a government program implemented by the Ministry of Health as the leading sector.
Presumption of Innocence Against Criminal Offenders in the Police: A Critical Study Wulandari, Oktavia; Imron, Ali; Ernawati, Briliyan; Nurdin, Nazar
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2020.2.1.5506

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to conduct a critical study of the application of the presumption of innocence to the perpetrators of criminal acts (suspects) investigated by the police. Implementation of the principle is important to study because the suspect must not be considered guilty before the criminal act is proven. A review of this case was carried out at the Kendal Police Department in mid-2019-2020. Writing texts are written with a normative-empirical approach. The non-doctrinal approach was chosen because it can clearly examine the application of the principle of presumption of innocence in more depth. Therefore, the author considers it necessary to carefully examine the application of these principles in the process of law enforcement at the police level. The results showed that the application of the principle of presumption of innocence in the Kendal Police Department was not optimal, because some of its applications were colored by threats and acts of violence. The suboptimal application of this principle is influenced by various factors, including the lack of legal knowledge of suspects and threats and acts of violence that are not reported. As we know the presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle in the criminal justice system, where a person must be positioned innocent before his guilt is proven in an honest and open trial.
Annual Leave Entitlement of Labor (A Comparison between Egypt Law with Indonesia) Jaedin, Jaedin
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2020.2.1.5530

Abstract

Wages are unimportant in work ties then leave pay is a worker's right that must be provided in accordance with the principle of no work no pay. Leave is a goal to restore labor to a physically stable and able to rest the human body. However, the regulations in Indonesia do not apply the law as in the State of Egypt, the employer revokes the wages of leave if the worker is provided with other services while on leave. Regulations in Egypt are in accordance with the Egyptian Law Number 12 of 2003 concerning relevance to the purpose of the leave itself, namely leave to rest the physical or body of the worker, not to utilize work leave at another employer. However, the regulations in Indonesia in Law Number 13 of 2003 have not been regulated as in Egypt. In Egypt, it is more comprehensive in expressing the principle of no work, no pay.
Legal Protection for Disability Workers in Semarang: Case Study at PT. Samwon Busana Indonesia Indarti, Retno; Masyithoh, Novita Dewi; Nurhayati, Tri
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2020.2.1.5555

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to measure legal protection and employment opportunities for persons with disabilities who work in various companies in the city of Semarang, Central Java. As is known, the right to work for citizens is regulated in Article 27 Paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution, which mandates the right of citizens to get a decent job and life. Every citizen has the same rights and the state (government) has regulated these rights in terms of obtaining employment without exception, including persons with disabilities. This study uses a juridical-empirical (non-doctrinal) approach, which examines how employment opportunities and legal protection of persons with disabilities in the city of Semarang, especially in PT. Samwon Clothing Indonesia. Primary data sources were obtained from PT. Samwon Busana Indonesia through interviews, secondary data in the form of legal material. Data Collection Method with Interview and Documentation methods, Data Analysis is done by a descriptive method. The results showed that employment opportunities for workers with disabilities in the city of Semarang, especially in PT Samwon Busana Indonesia had fulfilled one percent of the total employees. The total disability workers at the company are 14 out of a total of 1317 employees. In terms of legal protection, all employees both with disabilities and do not get the same rights and opportunities to be treated fairly. In addition, fulfillment of the rights of workers with disabilities is also fulfilled without discrimination.
Criminal Policy to Treat Delices Against Religion and Beliefs Harmony Royani, Yayan Muhammad
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2021.3.2.8369

Abstract

The protection of the rights to freedom of religion and belief in the constitution aims to create a community life based on morals based on divinity. As a country with a high level of plurality from the aspects of religion and belief, protection of religious harmony and belief is necessary to achieve this goal. Based on the above points of thought, several problems can be formulated, namely how is the current criminal policy in overcoming offenses against religious and belief harmony. And what will the future criminal policy be in overcoming offenses against religious harmony and belief. The method used in this research is a normative juridical approach, where the data used are secondary sources in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials.This research is a descriptive analytical study, namely research to describe the problem, analyze the problem and classify the problem for research purposes which are presented descriptively. The results of this study indicate that the criminal acts formulated in the Criminal Code are very limited, including not protecting beliefs protected by the constitution and there is still a divergence by including religious offenses in the Chapter on Public Order. In the non-penal policy, the regulations governing religious harmony are still ineffective and the current government is not serious about creating harmony between religious and believers. Future penal efforts can be made by updating the Criminal Code. As an effort to improve, the concept of the Criminal Code can formulate the provisions of offenses by looking at the provisions of offenses contained in the Draft Law on Religious Harmony. In non-penal efforts, the approach is through the formulation and implementation of government programs. Among them are approaches to understanding theology, education, dialogue and conflict resolution.Perlindungan atas hak kebebasan beragama dan berkepercayaan dalam konstitusi bertujuan supaya tercipta kehidupan masyarakat yang berlandaskan moral atas dasar ketuhanan. Sebagai negara dengan tingkat pluralitas yang tinggi dari aspek agama dan kepercayaan, maka perlindungan terhadap kerukunan umat beragama dan berkepercayaan mutlak dibutuhkan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut. Berdasarkan pokok pemikiran di atas, maka dapat dirumuskan beberapa permasalahan, yaitu bagaimanakah kebijakan kriminal saat ini dalam menanggulangi delik-delik terhadap kerukunan umat beragama dan berkepercayaan. Dan bagaimanakah kebijakan kriminal yang akan datang dalam menanggulangi delik-delik terhadap kerukunan umat beragama dan berkepercayaan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif, dimana data yang digunakan adalah sumber sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder maupun bahan hukum tersier. Adapun penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif analitis, yaitu penelitian untuk mendeskripsikan masalah, menganalisis masalah dan mengklasifikasi masalah untuk kepentingan penelitian yang disajikan secara deskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa tindak pidana yang dirumuskan dalam KUHP sangatlah terbatas, diantaranya belum melindungi kepercayaan yang dilindungi konstitusi serta masih terdapat divergensi dengan memasukan delik agama dalam Bab Ketertiban Umum. Dalam kebijakan non penal, regulasi yang mengatur tentang kerukunan umat beragama masih kurang efektif serta pemerintah saat ini tidak serius menciptakan harmonisasi antar umat beragama dan berkepercayaan. Upaya penal yang akan datang dapat dilakukan dengan pembaharuan KUHP. Sebagai upaya penyempurnaan, Konsep KUHP dapat memformulasikan ketentuan delik dengan melihat ketentuan delik yang terdapat dalam RUU Kerukunan Umat Beragama. Dalam upaya non penal, pendekatan melalui penyusunan dan pelaksanaan program pemerintah. Diantaranya dengan pendekatan pemahaman teologi, pendidikan, dialog dan resolusi konflik.
Implementation of the Erga Omnes Principle on the Decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) concerning the Supreme Court's SE (MA) regarding Judicial Review Ceprudin, Ceprudin
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2021.3.2.9423

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the decisions of the Constitutional Court (MK) and Circular Letters (SE) of the Supreme Court (MA) regarding Judicial Review (PK) in criminal cases. In March 2014, through decision No. 34/PUU-XI/2013, the Constitutional Court stated that in a criminal case, a PK may be conducted more than once. The verdict states that Article 268 paragraph (3) of Law no. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Interestingly, the Supreme Court issued SE No. 7 of 2014 which stipulates that PK is only allowed once. SEMA was signed on December 31, 2014, Chairman of the Supreme Court, Hatta Ali. The existence of the Constitutional Court and SEMA decisions has implications for the dualism of legal practice between only one time and maybe more than once in a PK application. Until now, the SEMA has not been revoked. The existence of the dualism of these rules seems to create uncertainty in the practice of PK law enforcement in Indonesia. Analysing the two legal products from two conflicting state institutions is very important to clarify the procedure for review. The review, which is also often called an extraordinary legal effort, is essential to maintain legal justice and safeguard the basic rights of citizens. In reviewing this fact, we will refer to the principle of Erga Omnes and its correlation with the protection of the basic rights of citizens. The principle of Erga Omnes (applies to everyone in the same case) must be heeded by all state institutions including the Supreme Court. In addition, regulation and its implementation must still pay attention to human rights. So this study uses the normative legal method. Based on the provisional facts presented, the authors hypothesise that SEMA should support the Constitutional Court's decision on PK as an implementation of the principle Erga Omnes and protect the basic rights of citizens. The principle of Erga Omnes and the framework for protecting basic human rights are two things that must be signed in the practice of review.[]Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dan Surat Edaran (SE) Mahkamah Agung (MA) tentang Peninjauan Kembali (PK) dalam perkara pidana. Pada Maret 2014, melalui putusan No. 34/PUU-XI/2013, MK menyatakan bahwa perkara pidana, PK boleh lebih dari satu kali. Putusan itu menyatakan Pasal 268 ayat (3) Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) bertentangan dengan UUD NRI 1945. Menariknya, MA menerbitkan SE No. 7 Tahun 2014 yang menentukan bahwa PK hanya dibolehkan satu kali. SEMA ditandatangani pada 31 Desember 2014 Ketua MA, Hatta Ali. Adanya putusan MK dan SEMA itu berimplikasi pada dualisme praktik hukum antara hanya satu kali dan boleh lebih dari satu kali dalam permohonan PK. Hingga kini, SEMA tersebut belum dicabut. Adanya dualisme aturan tersebut seakan menimbulkan ketidakpastian praktik penegakkan hukum PK di Indonesia. Menganalisis dua produk hukum dari dua lembaga negara yang bertentangan itu sangat penting untuk menjernihkan tata cara peninjauan kembali. Peninjauan kembali yang juga kerap disebut upaya hukum luar biasa pada hakikatnya untuk menjaga keadilan hukum dan menjaga hak-hak dasar warga negara. Dalam mengkaji fakta ini, akan merujuk asas erga omnes dan korelasinya dengan perlindungan hak dasar warga negara. Asas erga omnes (berlaku bagi semua orang dalam perkara yang sama) harus diindahkan oleh semua lembaga negara termasuk MA. Selain itu, dalam sebuah aturan dan pelaksanaannya harus tetap memperhatikan hak asasi manusia. Sehingga kajian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif. Atas fakta sementara yang tesaji, penulis berhipotesa bahwa SEMA seharusnya mendukung putusan MK tentang PK sebagai implementasi asas erga omnes dan melindungi hak-hak dasar warga negara. Asas erga omnes dan kerangka perlindungan hak dasar manusia merupakan dua hal yang harus menjadi rambu-rambu dalam praktik peninjauan kembali.
Covid-19 Lockdown and The Plights of People Remanded in Security Detention Centres: A Socio Legal Analysis Maigari, Abdullahi Muhammad; Dauran, Faruk Usman; Qadir, Uthman Abdullahi Abdul-
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2022.4.1.9888

Abstract

The researchers analyzed from sociological and legal perspectives the COVID-19 lockdown and the plights of people remanded in security detention centers in Nigeria. The objective of the study is to identify the loopholes in the Constitution of the Federal Republic 1999 as amended and other relevant legal provisions in Nigeria. The study is an exploratory type of research whose goal is to explore the phenomenon under investigation. This research design is considered appropriate for this paper because the COVID-19 lockdown has explored the weaknesses of the extant legal provisions in Nigeria in a situation like the Lockdown. Data were from secondary sources and were subjected to content analysis. The result revealed that during the COVID-19 lockdown in Nigeria, accused persons, awaiting trial persons and prisoners in different detention centers were detained beyond the legal requirements whereas there is no legal provision that clearly stated remedies.Tulisan ini mengkaji hak-hak orang yang ditahan oleh aparat keamanan atau dijebloskan ke dalam lembaga pemasyarakatan oleh Pengadilan sebelum lockdown COVID-19 dan menjalani masa karantina COVID-19 dalam tahanan. Para peneliti mengidentifikasi ketentuan hukum yang terkandung dalam Konstitusi Republik Federal Nigeria 1999 & celah di dalamnya yang gagal membuat ketentuan untuk keadaan darurat seperti penguncian. Konsekuensi yang tidak diinginkan dari tindakan purposive oleh Robert Merton diadopsi sebagai penjelasan teoretis. Makalah ini mengadopsi desain penelitian eksplorasi untuk mengeksplorasi kekosongan dalam Hukum Nigeria di mana data bersumber dari sumber sekunder dalam teks terdokumentasi. Makalah ini menemukan bahwa semua Undang-undang dan Undang-undang di Nigeria tidak memiliki ketentuan tentang bagaimana memberi kompensasi kepada orang-orang yang mengalami masalah emosional, keuangan sosial, dan psikologis sebagai akibat dari waktu yang mereka habiskan di sel tahanan di luar waktu yang diharapkan karena penguncian.
Position and Functions of Judges in Enforcing the Supreme of the Law: Case Study of Code of Ethics Violation by Judge Tutik, Titik Triwulan
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2021.3.2.9996

Abstract

This research is a rational-empirical research that aims; First, examine the existence of Judicial Power in a constitutional state based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Second, examine the position of Supreme Court Justices as law enforcement actors in Judicial Power according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Third, analyze whether the function of judges is Agung as a law enforcer in the Judicial Power as regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia reflects the principles of independence. There are two main functions of judicial power as the main characteristics of the rule of law and the principle of the rule of law: First, judicial power, both in terms of substance and administration, has been determined to be independent and integrated under the guidance of the Supreme Court, but at the same time its role The DPR to control the Supreme Court's powers is enhanced through determining the appointment and dismissal of Supreme Court justices, and by establishing a Judicial Commission to oversee the administrative aspects of judicial power. Second, taking into account the considerations of the Supreme Court, the President is given the right to grant clemency, abolition and amnesty. The enforcement of the rule of law is a necessity in a state of law and an independent, neutral (impartial) and competent judiciary is one element. The position and function of the Supreme Court judge holds a very important position and role, in enforcing the rule of law. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian rasional-empiris yang  bertujuan; Pertama, mengkaji eksistensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam negara Hukum berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Kedua, menelaah kedudukan Hakim Agung sebagai pelaku penegak hukum dalam Kekuasaan Kehakiman menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Ketiga, menganalisis apakah fungsi Hakim Agung sebagai pelaku penegak hukum dalam Kekuasaan Kehakiman sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 mencerminkan prinsip-prinsip independensi. Terdapat dua fungsi utama dari kekuasaan kehakiman sebagai ciri pokok negara hukum dan prinsip negara hukum: Pertama, kekuasaan kehakiman, baik dari segi subtansinya maupun administrasinya, telah ditetapkan bersifat mandiri dan terpadu di bawah pembinaan MA, tetapi pada saat yang bersamaan peran DPR untuk mengontrol kekuasaan MA ditingkatkan melalui penentuan pengangkatan dan pemberhentian hakim agung, dan dengan pembentukan KY untuk mengawasi segi-segi administrasi kekuasaan kehakiman. Kedua, dengan memperhatikan pertimbangan MA Presiden diberi hak untuk memberikan grasi, abolisi dan amnesti. Penegakkan supremasi hukum merupakan sebuah keniscayaan dalam negara hukum dan peradilan yang mandiri (independen), netral (tidak memihak) dan kompeten merupakan salah satu unsur. Kedudukan dan fungsi hakim agung memegang posisi dan peran yang sangat penting, dalam penegakkan sumpremasi hukum tersebut.
The Victimological Context on Child Sexual Violence Chasanah, Anissaa Nuril; Arifin, Ridwan
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2022.4.1.10574

Abstract

Sexual violence against children is a crime that needs serious attention. In this crime, children as victims often do not get adequate legal protection and fulfill their rights as victims. This study aims to analyze child sexual crimes in the context of victimology and victim protection. This study uses a normative legal study approach by analyzing the applicable laws and regulations as well as literature review related to the protection of children as victims of sexual crimes. This study proves and confirms that the protection of children in cases of sexual crimes has been legally guaranteed through the Law on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims, the Law on Child Protection, and the Law on Human Rights. However, the process of fulfilling the rights of children as victims in these crimes does not yet have adequate aspects of justice for children. The existing criminal law instruments are only oriented towards punishment and deterrence of perpetrators of sexual crimes. Kekerasan seksual terhadap anak menjadi salah satu tindak pidana yang perlu mendapatkan perhatian serius. Pada tindak pidana ini, anak sebagai korban seringkali tidak mendapatkan perlindungan hukum dan pemenuhan hak-haknya sebagai korban secara memadai. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kejahatan seksual anak dalam konteks viktimologi dan perlindungan korban. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan studi hukum normatif dengan menganalisis aturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta kajian kepustakaan berkaitan dengan perlindungan anak sebagai korban kejahatan seksual. Studi ini membuktikan dan menegaskan bahwa perlindungan anak dalam kasus kejahatan seksual telah dijamin secara yuridis melalui Undang-Undang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak, dan Undang-Undang Hak Asasi Manusia. Namun demikian proses pemenuhan hak-hak anak sebagai korban dalam tindak pidana tersebut belum memiliki aspek keadilan yang memadai bagi anak. Instrumen hukum pidana yang ada hanya berorientasi terhadap pemidanaan dan penjeraan terhadap pelaku kejahatan seksual.