Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV)
ALAUDDIN LAW DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL (ALDEV) IS A PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL PUBLISHED BY FACULTY OF SYARIAH AND LAW, ALAUDDIN STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY. ALDEV PUBLISHED THREE TIMES A YEAR IN MARCH, AUGUST, AND NOVEMBER. THIS JOURNAL PROVIDES IMMEDIATE OPEN ACCESS TO ITS CONTENT ON THE PRINCIPLE THAT MAKING RESEARCH FREELY AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC SUPPORTS A GREATER GLOBAL EXCHANGE OF KNOWLEDGE. THE AIMS OF THIS JOURNAL IS TO PROVIDE A VENUE FOR ACADEMICIANS, RESEARCHERS, AND PRACTITIONERS FOR PUBLISHING THE ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES OR REVIEW ARTICLES. THE SCOPE OF THE ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN THIS JOURNAL DEALS WITH A BROAD RANGE OF TOPICS IN THE FIELDS OF CRIMINAL LAW, CIVIL LAW, INTERNATIONAL LAW, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, ISLAMIC LAW, ECONOMIC LAW, MEDICAL LAW, ADAT LAW, ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND ANOTHER SECTION RELATED CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN LAW.
Articles
20 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 5 No 2 (2023): ALDEV"
:
20 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Kejahatan Penguntitan Berbasis Elektronik untuk Tujuan Seksual ]]>
<![CDATA[Agung Liawi, Aldias]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Sofyan, Andi]]>;
<![CDATA[Adhyanti Mirzana, Hijrah]]>
<![CDATA[ Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): ALDEV ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i2.35504
<![CDATA[Problems regarding the regulation of electronic-based sexual violence crimes are unclear and require more detailed elaboration, especially in the case of stalking crimes. The research method is normative legal research and applies two approaches, namely, the Comparative and Conceptual approaches. The results showed that understanding the law itself, especially comparisons that aim to assume equality (there are similarities in various legal systems), has a definite goal that is of course related to the formal way of building the system (reviewing); moreover, it aims to unite one law because it is related to cyberstalking; it is universal and can be reached from various regions, not only in Indonesia. Law enforcement for cyberstalking cases in Indonesia can be linked to provisions in the Criminal Code, the ITE Law, and the Pornography Law. So that the provisions in the TPKS Law that regulate electronic-based stalking for sexual purposes have not yet been implemented.]]>
<![CDATA[Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Menangani Perkara Pengaduan Konstitusional Melalui Penafsiran Konstitusi ]]>
<![CDATA[Idris, Munawara]]>;
<![CDATA[Bachri, Syamsul]]>;
<![CDATA[Naswar]]>
<![CDATA[ Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): ALDEV ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i2.35592
<![CDATA[Constitutional complaints aim to improve checks and build a good and clean government. The Constitutional Court often rejects constitutional complaints that come in on the basis of a lack of authority. However, the Constitutional Court sometimes accepts constitutional lawsuits and even grants these requests using interpretation according to the power of The Sole Interpreter of the Constitution. Therefore, the problem raised is how the interpretation is carried out by the Constitutional Court so that it can accept a constitutional lawsuit without making changes to the constitution. This study uses normative research methods with statutory, conceptual, historical, and comparative approaches. The results of this research show that through the Judicial Review window, the Constitutional Court can resolve cases of constitutional complaints using the interpretation of indicator analogies. Because the Constitutional Court may not reject a case submitted to it on the basis of the Ius Curia Novit principle.]]>
<![CDATA[Efektivitas Hukum Pemenuhan Hak Restitusi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang di Kota Makassar ]]>
<![CDATA[Saodana, Shafira]]>;
<![CDATA[Muchtar, Syamsuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Azisa, Nur]]>
<![CDATA[ Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): ALDEV ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i2.35622
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the law on the fulfillment of the right of restitution Against Trafficking in Persons in Makassar. This study uses empirical legal methods, using a qualitative approach. The results of this study are (1) the fulfillment of the right of restitution to victims of trafficking in Persons is regulated in Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the eradication of trafficking in Persons. The public prosecutor informs the victim of the right to request restitution which then the public prosecutor informs the amount of losses suffered by the victim due to the crime of trafficking in persons. (2) the effectiveness of the fulfillment of the right to restitution of victims of trafficking in Persons has not been effective because the law enforcement officers, especially investigators and prosecutors lack understanding related to restitution submission]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Hukum terhadap Pelaku dan Korban Tindak pidana Obstruction of Justice ]]>
<![CDATA[Tangko, Lidwina Aprilliana Allo]]>;
<![CDATA[Agung, Dirga]]>;
<![CDATA[Andi Dewi Pratiwi]]>
<![CDATA[ Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): ALDEV ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i2.35685
<![CDATA[Obstruction of Justice is an act classified as a criminal offense because it obstructs or hinders the legal process in a case. Lawyers in carrying out their professional duties are often associated with allegations of obstructing the legal process in cases involving their clients. The purpose of this writing is to understand the legal regulations regarding obstruction of justice in Indonesia and the characteristics of lawyer's conduct that can be classified as obstructing the legal process or obstruction of justice. The method used in this article is juridical normative. The research findings indicate that obstruction of justice is generally regulated in Article 221 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and specific legislation. A lawyer can lose their immunity and be considered to have committed obstruction of justice if such conduct is not based on good faith and unrelated to their professional duties.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Kewenangan Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) dalam Upaya Penjaminan Dana Nasabah ]]>
<![CDATA[Al-Amanah, Tuhfatul Abrar]]>;
<![CDATA[Sumardi, Juajir]]>;
<![CDATA[Famauri, Andi Tenri]]>
<![CDATA[ Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): ALDEV ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i2.36614
<![CDATA[This study aims to implement the Authority and Role of the IDIC in Efforts to Guarantee Customer Funds to provide a sense of security for public savings funds in banks. The method of research is qualitative, using interviews and documentation as data collection methods. The results of this study indicate that (1) The authority and role of LPS in guaranteeing public savings in the banking world is to provide a sense of security for customer deposit funds; (2) the occurrence of cases of bank failures, break-ins, and slips of funds that occurred in the banking world. This is a form of violation that is detrimental to the customer, and LPS, in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, has the authority to guarantee customer deposits at the bank.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Tahap Pemanfaatan Pengelolaan Pulau Kecil (Studi Kasus Putusan PTUN Jakarta mengenai Reklamasi Pulau K) ]]>
<![CDATA[Jati Pamungkas, Tegar]]>;
<![CDATA[Vanisrooy, Gabriel Sanno]]>;
<![CDATA[Meylani, Nur Anissa]]>;
<![CDATA[Wibowo, Sulistyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): ALDEV ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i2.37273
<![CDATA[This article examines natural resources under the control of a country. Indonesia adheres to state property where natural resources are controlled by the state In accordance with Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. State control aims to create justice for citizens Indonesia. This article uses a qualitative method as a research method using a normative juridical approach. In compiling articles, the authors collect data using literature studies. This study aims to discuss the concept of the state in managing coastal areas and small islands along with an analysis of K Island reclamation decisions in Jakarta. This research resulted that the management of coastal areas and small islands is divided into three stages wherein the stages of planning, utilizing and supervising and controlling and the decision on the reclamation of K Island that the reclamation of K Island was canceled because it was not in the public interest.]]>
<![CDATA[Keberlakuan dan Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Hukum Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintahan Daerah sebagai Upaya Perwujudan Pemerataan Kesejahteraan Rakyat ]]>
<![CDATA[Angelina, Noviyanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Puji Simatupang, Dian]]>
<![CDATA[ Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): ALDEV ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i2.37440
<![CDATA[Since Law Number 1 of 2022 has existed in society, it has provided a number of implications including in the implementation of regional autonomy and decentralization. The scope of law reform which covers taxes and levies, management of transfers to the regions, management of regional expenditures, granting authority to carry out regional financing, and implementation of national fiscal policy synergies are considered as a step forward in carrying out reforms regarding central and regional financial relations. However, the enactment of this law is considered by several parties to be able to narrow the space for Regional Governments in implementing regional autonomy and decentralization. This article will see whether its existence has an impact and influence on the implementation of regional autonomy.]]>
<![CDATA[Mekanisme Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Presiden pada Pasal 14 Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 ]]>
<![CDATA[Farlyanda, Dimas]]>;
<![CDATA[Sujatnika, Ghunarsa]]>
<![CDATA[ Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): ALDEV ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i2.37496
<![CDATA[The authority to grant clemency, amnesty, abolition, and rehabilitation is stated in Article 14 of the 1945 Constitution as the power entrusted to the President. Below is explained in the presidential system why there is power in article 14 of the 1945 Constitution owned by the president? Why then why in exercising the prerogative of his power in article 14 of the 1945 Constitution should the President ask for the consideration of the House of Representatives and the Supreme Court? Can be briefly explained based on the conclusion that is because the President holds the power of the head of state, and prerogative rights do not mean deviating judicial or humanitarian and social rights owned by the 2 institutions of the Supreme Court and the House of Representatives, the research method used by the author is a normative juridical research method]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Keterangan Sahnya Hasil Hutan Kayu (Studi Putusan No. 58/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Sdr) ]]>
<![CDATA[Esa, Ambo]]>
<![CDATA[ Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): ALDEV ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i2.38788
<![CDATA[The aim of the research is to find out the application of material law to decisions no. 58/Pid.B/2022/PN.Sdr and to find out what the judges' considerations are in making a decision against the perpetrators of the crime of forging letters. This type of research is normative. The results of this study indicate that: (1) In the application of Law Number 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction in its decision, the public prosecutor used a combination of charges, and this practice is appropriated with the existing regulations; (2) Based on the judge's consideration referring to Article 88 paragraph (1) letter "b" of Article 14 of the Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction rule, indirectly, the judge's legal considerations for the first indictment are not appropriate where there are differences in the considerations and indictments submitted by the public prosecutor.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaturan Prinsip Hardship pada Kontrak Bisnis dalam Hal Debitur Wanprestasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Anggraeny Arief]]>;
<![CDATA[Hambali, Azwad Rachmat]]>
<![CDATA[ Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): ALDEV ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i2.38849
<![CDATA[This research aims to find out the legality of the principle of difficulty in business contracts in Indonesia and the liability of the debtor if it has defaulted on a business contract related to difficulties. This study used normative legal research. Basically, difficult situations are events that fundamentally change the balance of contract execution due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The responsibility of the Debtor in executing the contract due to non-fulfillment of performance (default) is to remain subject to and follow the rules as stipulated in the Difficulties Provisions Article 6.2.1 and Article 6.2.3 UPICC. The government needs to make regulations regarding the application of the principle of hardship to provide legal certainty and justice for parties whose contract implementation is under difficult conditions or is experiencing difficulties due to the COVID-19 pandemic.]]>
