cover
Contact Name
Ilham Zitri
Contact Email
jgop.fisip@ummat.ac.id
Phone
+6287863988310
Journal Mail Official
jgop.fisip@ummat.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. KH. Ahmad Dahlan No.1, Pagesangan, Kota Mataram
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP)
Core Subject : Social,
Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP) ISSN: 2686-3391 adalah salah satu jurnal yang dikelola oleh Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik (FISIP) Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram. JGOP diterbitkan untuk menjadi wahana pendorong perkembangan ilmu pemerintahan melalui penelitian serta kajian kritis terhadap berbagai konsep baru, fenomena dan peristiwa dalam kehidupan pemerintahan. Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP) merupakan jurnal yang fokus dan skup kajiannya dibidang pemerintahan dan politik. untuk itu kami membuka bagi peneliti yang ingin mempublikasikan pemikirannya atau hasil penelitian.
Articles 104 Documents
Financial Effectiveness and Efficiency Analysis of Magelang Regency After the Central Government’s Budget Efficiency Policy Natta Sanjaya; Sigid Widyantoro; Anton Purwadi; Naufal Ridho; Raytanza Iswadinata
Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP) Vol 8, No 1 (2026): July
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MATARAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jgop.v8i1.35955

Abstract

This study analyzes the financial effectiveness and efficiency of Magelang Regency following the implementation of the 2025 central government budget efficiency policy. Using a mixed-method approach with sequential exploratory design, data were collected through interviews and budget reports. Quantitative analysis employed descriptive ratio methods to assess effectiveness and efficiency, while qualitative data explained the implementation dynamics. Results show that budget planning remained highly effective (99.56%) and efficient (27.76%), though capital expenditure absorption was only 4.02%. Internal audit, program prioritization, and disciplined reallocation supported fiscal stability despite reduced transfer funds. The study concludes that while the efficiency policy fostered fiscal prudence, it also slowed capital project execution. Findings suggest the need for balanced fiscal discipline and development acceleration. 
Implementation of State-Owned Assets Management Policy: An Analysis of Asset Management, Disposal, and Write-Off Based on the Edward III Model at the Palembang Religious Training Center Rahmawati Rahmawati; Lili Erina; Nurmah Semil; Raniasa Putra
Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP) Vol 8, No 1 (2026): July
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MATARAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jgop.v8i1.37973

Abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 28 of 2020 regarding the management of State-Owned Assets (BMN), specifically in terms of the administration, destruction, and write-off of state-owned assets at the Palembang Religious Training Center. A qualitative approach with a case study design was employed. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, and were analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña interactive model within the framework of George Edward III’s policy implementation theory. The results indicate that the implementation of the BMN management policy has not yet reached an optimal state. The primary issues lie in weak organizational communication, limited resource capacity, low commitment among implementers, and the lack of integration within the bureaucratic structure. These conditions result in discrepancies in BMN data, delays in administrative processes, and the ineffective execution of BMN disposal and write-off procedures. This study contributes to strengthening the application of Edward III’s theory within the context of state-owned asset management at the work unit level, while also expanding the analysis to include aspects of BMN disposal and write-off. The research implications emphasize the need to strengthen internal coordination, enhance human resource capacity, provide proportional incentives, and improve the bureaucratic system to make it more integrated.
Indonesia’s Climate Diplomacy: Criticisms and Challenges of Biomass Co-firing Under JETP Ade Arya Yunissa; Ali Maksum
Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP) Vol 8, No 1 (2026): July
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MATARAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jgop.v8i1.40158

Abstract

This study analyzes Indonesia’s climate diplomacy in developing biomass through coal co-firing policies as a strategy to achieve Net Zero Emissions (NZE) within the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) framework. The research focus is directed at how Indonesia constructs its domestic energy transition narrative amid rising international criticism regarding the sustainability and effectiveness of biomass. Utilizing a qualitative method with a case study approach, data collection was conducted through a comprehensive literature review, analysis of government policy documents, international organization reports, and publications from global environmental institutions. Theoretically, this study applies the concepts of climate diplomacy and the just energy transition framework. The findings reveal a structural policy misalignment. Indonesia utilizes biomass co-firing as a diplomatic instrument to demonstrate its decarbonization commitment while maintaining national energy stability. However, this policy has drawn sharp global criticism for being perceived as a "false solution" that extends the lifespan of coal plants, risks driving deforestation through Energy Plantation Forest expansion, and weakens Indonesia's bargaining position, thereby stalling the disbursement of JETP grants. The novelty and research gap of this study lie in its shift from the technical-economic aspects of biomass to the political dimensions of international relations. This study fills a literature gap by mapping how the friction between domestic regulations and global green norms creates a deadlock in climate finance. The policy implications urge the Indonesian government to reconfigure its diplomatic strategy by tightening biomass sustainability standards and redirecting international funding toward pure renewable energy infrastructure.
Evaluating the Implementation of Green Economy Policies in Addressing Deforestation to Support the Achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Indonesia Meisya Tantri Girsang; Ali Maksum
Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP) Vol 8, No 1 (2026): July
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MATARAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jgop.v8i1.40234

Abstract

The green economy has emerged as a strategic policy framework for promoting sustainable development and accelerating the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Indonesia. Despite the adoption of various green economy initiatives, deforestation remains a persistent environmental challenge, indicating a discrepancy between policy objectives and implementation outcomes. This study evaluates the effectiveness of green economy policies in addressing deforestation and examines their contribution to achieving the SDGs in Indonesia. A qualitative research design was employed using a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed journal articles, government publications, reports from international organizations, and official statistical data. The collected data were analyzed through thematic content analysis, guided by Ecological Modernization Theory (EMT) to examine the relationships among environmental governance, institutional reform, and forest conservation. The findings indicate that Indonesia has made measurable progress in reducing net deforestation through forest rehabilitation and restoration programmes. However, independent satellite-based monitoring by Global Forest Watch shows that forest cover loss continues in several regions, suggesting that current green economy policies have been more effective in mitigating the impacts of deforestation than in addressing its underlying drivers. The study identifies institutional fragmentation, inconsistent law enforcement, competing land-use interests, and limited governance capacity as the principal barriers to effective policy implementation. By integrating Ecological Modernization Theory with policy implementation analysis and complementary deforestation datasets from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (KLHK) and Global Forest Watch, this study provides a more comprehensive framework for evaluating green economy policies and demonstrates that strengthening institutional coordination, governance effectiveness, and stakeholder collaboration is essential for advancing SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 15 (Life on Land) in Indonesia

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 104