cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Maria Indira Aryani
Contact Email
maria_indira.hi@upnjatim.ac.id
Phone
+6231-8706369
Journal Mail Official
jgp@upnjatim.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Raya Rungkut Madya Gunung Anyar Surabaya 60294
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Global and Policy Journal of International Relations
Published by Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
ISSN : 23379960     EISSN : 27454274     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Education, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
Global & Policy adalah jurnal ilmiah yang dikelola oleh Program Studi Hubungan Internasional Universitas Pembangunan "Veteran" Jawa Timur. Global & Policy menerima artikel baik hasil pemikiran maupun hasil penelitian dalam bidang terkait kajian Hubungan Internasional kontemporer. Jurnal Global & Policy diterbitkan dua kali dalam setahun, yaitu setiap bulan Juni dan Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 264 Documents
 23   24   25   26   27 
Modeling Non-State Actor Interactions in Inclusive Urban Ecology: The Role of Community Gardens in Sustainable City Development Wiranata, Indra Jaya; Simbolon, Khairunnisa
Global and Policy Journal of International Relations Vol 14, No 01 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33005/jgp.v14i01.5641

Abstract

Urban areas are increasingly dealing with connected issues like environmental damage, food insecurity, and the loss of inclusive public spaces, especially in fast-growing cities like Bandar Lampung. These problems require responses that involve the community and go beyond government-led initiatives. This research looks at how community gardens, supported by groups other than the government, like local communities, regional governments, and international networks such as UCLG-ASPAC, that supports local governments in Asia-Pasific through advocacy, capacity building, and promoting inclusive sustainable development. Using examples from around the world, the study examines the urban agriculture program in Singapore, Rosario, Seoul, Seville and Yogyakarta. These cases show how community gardens can boost biodiversity, improve air quality, support food sovereignty, and create inclusive public spaces. Tropical cities, unlike those in temperate climates, can take advantage of year-round growing seasons, which opens up new possibilities for ecological innovation and local food systems. This research emphasizes that community gardens are not just green spaces; they are socio-ecological infrastructures that help strengthen urban resilience and promote justice. The involvement of groups outside the government is key to starting and expanding these initiatives. In line with Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 11, SDG 2, and SDG 13), the study concludes with practical suggestions for integrating community gardening into inclusive urban planning, particularly in tropical areas. This research provides valuable insights for policy-makers, practitioners, and international networks on creating ecologically fair and community-driven urban futures.
Trump’s Second Term and the Return of ‘America First’: Continuity, Institutions, and Global Impact in 2025 Widyantoro, Sigid Widyantoro
Global and Policy Journal of International Relations Vol 14, No 01 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33005/jgp.v14i01.5706

Abstract

This study examines the continuity and transformation of United States foreign policy under Donald Trump’s second administration in 2025, focusing on three dimensions—policy continuity, institutional response, and global impact. Using a qualitative, library-based approach and applying neorealist, liberal, and constructivist frameworks, the research analyzes decisions such as the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, disengagement from the World Health Organization, and the “Liberation Day” tariff initiative. Findings reveal that Trump’s policies demonstrate ideological persistence rather than strategic innovation, reaffirming the primacy of sovereignty and unilateralism in American foreign policy. While domestic and international institutions voiced opposition, their material constraints limited any effective resistance, confirming the neorealist logic of state dominance. However, partial liberal and constructivist resilience remains evident in adaptive institutional behaviors and evolving global norms. The study concludes that Trump’s 2025 foreign policy contributes to the transition from a liberal international order toward a pluralist, ideologically contested system, where cooperation endures amid renewed great-power competition.
Masyarakat Sipil Global dan Aktivisme Transnasional: Studi Kasus “The Dalit Women’s Movement” di India Ayu, Galuh Anissa Sekar
Global and Policy Journal of International Relations Vol 14, No 01 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33005/jgp.v14i01.5471

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study aims to analyze the efforts of The Dalit Women’s Movement initiated by feminist movements and Dalit communities in India. The author will examine the transnational advocacy process in response to the Indian government's failure to accommodate the basic rights of Dalit women. The article will also outline several achievements successfully accomplished by The Dalit Women’s Movement as a manifestation of global civil society discourse. In this study, the author employs the Transnational Advocacy Network (TAN) theory introduced by Keck and Sikkink. The method used in this research is a qualitative descriptive method. The research findings indicate that the strategies of the Dalit women's movement meet the criteria of TAN outlined by Keck and Sikkink, including information politics, symbolic politics, leverage politics, and accountability politics. Thus, transnational advocacy by activists carried out over the years ultimately yielded results, as evidenced by behavioral changes by the target actor, namely the Government of India.Kata Kunci: Advokasi, Diskriminasi, India, Perempuan Dalit, TransnasionalStudi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis upaya The Dalit Women’s Movement yang digagas oleh gerakan feminsis dan komunitas Dalit di India. Penulis akan mengkaji proses advokasi transnasional dalam merespons kegagalan pemerintah India untuk mengakomodasi hak-hak dasar perempuan Dalit. Artikel ini juga akan menjabarkan sejumlah pencapaian yang berhasil dilakukan oleh The Dalit Women’s Movement sebagai manifestasi dari wacana masyarakat sipil global. Dalam studi ini, penulis menggunakan teori Transnational Advocacy Network (TAN)  yang diperkenalkan oleh Keck dan Sikkink. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi gerakan perempuan Dalit memenuhi kriteria TAN yang dikemukakan Keck dan Sikkink, di antaranya information politics, symbolic politics, leverage politics, dan accountability politics. Dengan demikian, advokasi transnasional oleh para aktivis yang dilakukan selama bertahun-tahun pada akhirnya membuahkan hasil dibuktikan dengan perubahan perilaku oleh target aktor, yakni Pemerintah India. Keywords: Advocacy, Discrimination, India, Dalit Women, Transnational
Kritik atas Interdependensi Kompleks: Studi Kasus Perang Dagang AS–Tiongkok di Era Kepemimpinan Donald Trump Wicaksana, Fauzan Akbar; Hidayatullah, Nur Luthfi
Global and Policy Journal of International Relations Vol 14, No 01 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33005/jgp.v14i01.5215

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas paradoks dalam hubungan interdependensi ekonomi antara Amerika Serikat dan Tiongkok, khususnya dalam konteks perang dagang sejak 2018. Meskipun kedua negara adidaya memiliki tingkat ketergantungan ekonomi yang sangat tinggi, konflik tetap terjadi dalam bentuk tarif balasan, pembatasan ekspor teknologi, dan sanksi terhadap perusahaan strategis. Kondisi ini menunjukkan adanya kegagalan teori interdependensi kompleks dalam menjelaskan realitas kontemporer, karena teori tersebut mengasumsikan bahwa saling ketergantungan akan menurunkan potensi konflik antar negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan studi kasus dan analisis konseptual terhadap teori complex interdependence Keohane dan Nye, dan weaponized interdependence Farrell dan Newman. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa ketimpangan dalam struktur jaringan global telah memberikan negara dominan, seperti Amerika Serikat, kemampuan untuk menggunakan ketergantungan sebagai alat koersif. Konsep panopticon effect dan chokepoint effect menjelaskan bagaimana Amerika Serikat memanfaatkan posisi sentralnya dalam sistem keuangan dan teknologi global untuk membatasi akses dan mengawasi lawan strategisnya. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, penelitian ini mengusulkan pembaruan konseptual melalui kerangka complex coercive interdependence, yaitu pemahaman bahwa interdependensi yang kompleks juga dapat dimanfaatkan secara koersif oleh negara yang memiliki kontrol atas simpul-simpul penting dalam jaringan global. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi teoritis dalam memperkaya kajian hubungan internasional, khususnya dalam memahami dinamika kekuasaan di era globalisasi dan rivalitas antara kekuatan besar.

Page 27 of 27 | Total Record : 264

 23   24   25   26   27 

Filter by Year

2013 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14, No 01 (2026) Vol 13, No 02 (2025) Vol 13, No 01 (2025) Vol 12, No 02 (2024) Vol 12, No 01 (2024) Vol 11, No 02 (2023) Vol 11, No 01 (2023) Vol 10, No 02 (2022) Vol 10, No 01 (2022) Vol 9, No 02 (2021) Vol 9, No 2 (2021) Vol 9, No 1 (2021) Vol 8, No 03 (2020) Vol 8, No 02 (2020) Vol 8, No 01 (2020) Vol 7, No 02 (2019) Vol 7, No 01 (2019) Vol 6, No 02 (2018) Vol 6, No 01 (2018) Vol 5, No 02 (2017) Vol 5, No 01 (2017) Vol 4, No 02 (2016) Vol 4, No 01 (2016) Vol 3, No 02 (2015) Vol 3, No 01 (2015) Vol 2, No 02 (2014) Vol 2, No 01 (2014) Vol 1, No 02 (2013) Vol 1, No 01 (2013) More Issue