cover
Contact Name
AGUS PURWANTO
Contact Email
aguspurwanto.prof@gmail.com
Phone
+62811700111
Journal Mail Official
journal.jiemar@gmail.com
Editorial Address
IEMAR ( Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research) ISSN : 2722-8878 Address: Griya Catania Blok F.08/80 Citra Raya . Kab. Tangerang Publisher: JIEMAR
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research (JIEMAR)
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27228878     DOI : https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar
The aim of JIEMAR ( Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research is to publish theoretical and empirical articles that are aimed to contrast and extend existing theories, and build new theories that contribute to advance our understanding of phenomena related with industrial engineering and industrial management in organizations, from the perspectives of Production Planning/Scheduling/Inventory, Logistics/Supply Chain, Quality Management, Operations Management and Operational Research. The contributions can adopt confirmatory (quantitative) or explanatory (mainly qualitative) methodological approaches. Theoretical essays that enhance the building or extension of theoretical approaches are also welcome. JIEMAR selects the articles to be published with a double bind, peer review system, following the practices of good scholarly journals. JIEMAR is published monthly (on-line versions), following an open access policy. On-line publication allows to reduce publishing costs, and to make more agile the process of reviewing and edition. JIEMAR defends that open access publishing fosters the advance of scientific knowledge, making it available to everyone. List Scope Jpurnal JIEMAR: • Supply chain • Lean manufacturing • Operations improvement • Innovation management in operations • Operations in service industry • Operational Research • Total Quality Management • Total Productive Maintenance • How to manage workforce in operations • Logistic in general • Operational Management • Finance Management • Strategic Management • Marketing Management • Learning & Human Development Management
Articles 466 Documents
Layered CNS Interface Framework for Civil–Military Airspace Integration: A PRISMA-Based Systematic Review of Airspace Security Effectiveness Budi Santoso; Asep Adang Supriyadi; Afen Sena
Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : AGUSPATI Research Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.7777/jiemar.v7i2.699

Abstract

Airspace has evolved into a contested socio-technical domain in which civil aviation, military operations, and cyber infrastructures interact under increasing complexity yet remain structurally fragmented. Existing scholarship is dispersed across aviation safety, defense doctrine, and cybersecurity, limiting the development of integrative frameworks capable of explaining system-level security outcomes. While systems-of-systems (SoS) research predominantly emphasizes technical interoperability, the role of governance in structuring cross-domain integration remains insufficiently theorized.This study addresses this gap through a PRISMA-based Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of 35 high-relevance sources indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. Adopting a SoS perspective, it develops the Layered CNS Interface Framework (LCIF) as a governance-driven, multi-layer integration architecture linking policy, operational, technological, and cyber dimensions.The synthesis suggests that airspace security effectiveness is shaped by three interdependent constructs—integration quality, interoperability, and adaptive capacity—within which civil–military air traffic management operates as a mediating mechanism translating structural integration into coordinated operational outcomes. These relationships are theoretically derived from cross-domain synthesis rather than empirically established.The study contributes by extending SoS theory into the domain of security governance and by reconceptualizing interoperability as a multi-dimensional construct encompassing technical, institutional, and decision-making alignment. The LCIF model provides a theoretically grounded and empirically testable foundation, enabling future examination of multi-layer causal relationships through Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) in complex airspace systems.
OPTIMIZATION OF NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRY CAPACITY TO ENSURE THE FULFILLMENT OF INDONESIAN NAVY DEFENSE EQUIPMENT IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL MARITIME DEFENSE Pandu Briantisno; Achmad Faisol; Mohamad Rachmad
Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : AGUSPATI Research Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.7777/jiemar.v7i2.700

Abstract

The dynamics of the global strategic environment, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region, require Indonesia to continuously strengthen its maritime defense through the independent and sustainable fulfillment of the Indonesian Navy’s primary weapon systems. This study aims to analyze the current capacity of the national defense industry, identify the main obstacles in meeting the Indonesian Navy’s defense equipment needs, and formulate relevant optimization strategies. The study employs a qualitative method, grounded in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2002 concerning National Defense and Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2025 concerning the Indonesian National Armed Forces, and is supported by Defense Industry Theory and Self-Reliance Theory. The findings show that the national defense industry has made progress, particularly in the construction of several types of warships; however, it still faces limitations in mastering high-end technology, importing strategic components, research and development, and institutional synergy. SWOT analysis places the strategy in Quadrant III (turn-around), emphasizing the reduction of import dependence, strengthening mastery of strategic technology, increasing research investment, and optimizing collaboration among the government, industry, research institutions, and the Indonesian Navy. This strategy is important to strengthen the self-reliance of the national defense industry and support national defense readiness at sea.
AN ANALYSIS OF LEADERSHIP AND STRUGGLE IN THE 2026 UNITED STATES–VENEZUELA CONFLICT TO ENHANCE THE CAPABILITIES OF THE INDONESIAN NAVY IN DEVELOPING OPERATIONAL STRATEGIES AGUS PURWANTO; Sabono Wantoro; Muh. Ilham
Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : AGUSPATI Research Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.7777/jiemar.v7i2.701

Abstract

— This study examines the 2026 conflict between the United States and Venezuela through the lenses of transformational leadership, realism in international relations, crisis decision-making, and asymmetric warfare. Using a qualitative method, the research analyzes the chronology of the conflict from the pre-crisis phase, the outbreak of military confrontation, and its post-conflict regional and global repercussions. The findings show that the conflict was driven by the intersection of geopolitical rivalry, energy security, military pressure, and ideological contestation. From a leadership perspective, Donald Trump and Nicolás Maduro demonstrated contrasting but equally decisive leadership styles in responding to crisis conditions. From a realist perspective, the conflict reflected the pursuit of national interests, power projection, and the struggle to preserve regional influence. The study also finds that crisis decision-making under time pressure and uncertainty shaped rapid strategic choices on both sides, while Venezuela’s response illustrated the relevance of asymmetric warfare in confronting a militarily superior adversary. Furthermore, the conflict generated humanitarian, diplomatic, and energy-related consequences that extended beyond the two states. For Indonesia, particularly the Navy, the case offers important lessons on maritime readiness, joint operations, defense diplomacy, and post-conflict stabilization.
DETERMINING PRIORITIES FOR DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TO SUPPORT THE PROTECTION OF STRATEGIC VITAL AREAS OF THE INDONESIAN NAVY IN ORDER TO COUNTER MILITARY AND NON-MILITARY THREATS WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA AGUS PURWANTO; Hendrik Kurniawan; Sri Depranoto
Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : AGUSPATI Research Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.7777/jiemar.v7i2.702

Abstract

— The development of modern defense technology has become a critical component of national security strategy in responding to increasingly complex and multidomain threats. This study examines the prioritization of defense technology development to support the protection of Strategic Vital Areas of the Indonesian Navy against both military and non-military threats. Using an integrated methodological approach, the study combines the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and SWOT analysis to generate objective and strategic recommendations. The AHP results indicate that cyber resilience is the highest priority, surpassing C-ISR and UAV technologies, highlighting its fundamental role in ensuring the effectiveness of modern network-centric defense systems. Without robust cyber capabilities, other defense technologies are vulnerable to disruption and degradation. Furthermore, the SWOT analysis positions the strategy within the W–O (turnaround) quadrant, emphasizing the need to leverage external opportunities to overcome internal limitations. The recommended strategies include developing an integrated cyber defense architecture, enhancing interoperability through international cooperation, strengthening domestic defense industry capabilities, and implementing layered cyber defense systems. Overall, this study underscores the importance of cyber resilience as the backbone of adaptive, integrated, and sustainable defense capabilities to safeguard national sovereignty in the era of asymmetric and hybrid threats.
OPTIMIZATION OF HUMAN RESOURCE PLANNING TO SUPPORT THE FREE NUTRITIOUS MEAL PROGRAM IN ORDER TO REALIZE A RESILIENT NATIONAL DEFENSE AGUS PURWANTO; Widarta Kusuma; Hendro Wijiantoro
Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : AGUSPATI Research Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.7777/jiemar.v7i2.703

Abstract

The free nutritious meal program introduced by the Indonesian government under the Prabowo–Gibran administration represents a strategic policy aimed at improving children’s nutritional status, enhancing educational outcomes, and strengthening national resilience. This study examines the challenges and strategic role of human resource planning in supporting the implementation of the program. Using a qualitative approach, the research identifies three major issues: limited human resource competencies, inefficient logistics management, and suboptimal supervision and monitoring systems. The findings reveal that inadequate skilled personnel and weak coordination across the supply chain hinder the effectiveness of food distribution, particularly in remote areas. Furthermore, the absence of an integrated monitoring system reduces the program’s impact on improving children's nutrition. The study highlights the strategic contribution of the Indonesian Navy in addressing these challenges through comprehensive human resource planning, including capacity building, structured training, cross-sectoral logistics coordination, and technology-based monitoring systems. Strengthening these aspects is essential to ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of the program, which ultimately contributes to the development of a healthy, productive generation and supports a resilient national defense system.
THE 2023 UNITED STATES–IRAQ CONFLICT REVIEWED FROM THE PERSPECTIVES OF LEADERSHIP AND STRUGGLE, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INDONESIAN NAVY Yusuf Muchram Pribadi; Widarta Kusuma; Hendro Wijiantoro
Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : AGUSPATI Research Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.7777/jiemar.v7i2.704

Abstract

The 2003 United States invasion of Iraq stands as one of the most controversial military interventions of the early twenty-first century. This study examines the conflict from the perspectives of leadership, fighting spirit, international humanitarian law, and its strategic lessons for the Indonesian Navy. Using a qualitative method, the research analyzes the historical background of the war, the legal and political justifications advanced by the United States, the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime, and the prolonged instability that followed the invasion. The findings show that the conflict reflected a sharp contrast between George W. Bush’s preemptive and decisive leadership style and Saddam Hussein’s authoritarian-personalistic rule, both of which revealed critical weaknesses in long-term strategic governance. The study also highlights that military superiority and rapid tactical victory did not guarantee strategic success, particularly in the absence of effective post-conflict planning, institutional reconstruction, and public legitimacy. Furthermore, the conflict demonstrated serious humanitarian consequences, including civilian casualties, torture, sectarian violence, and mass displacement. For the Indonesian Navy, the Iraq War offers important lessons regarding comprehensive strategic planning, operational adaptability, technological readiness, intelligence accuracy, and the necessity of upholding humanitarian values in modern military operations.