cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Ishar Helmi
Contact Email
jlruinjkt@gmail.com
Phone
+6281291179663
Journal Mail Official
jlruinjkt@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 95 Ciputat Tangsel
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
ISSN : 27157172     EISSN : 27157164     DOI : 10.15408
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other
Journal of Legal Research is a peer-reviewed journal on legal research published quarterly (February, May, August, November) since 2019 by Departemen Legal Studies Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta in cooperation with Center for the Study of Constitution and National Legislation (POSKO-LEGNAS). Journal of Legal Research aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws. The Review, hence, welcomes contributions from international legal scholars and professionals as well as from representatives of courts, executive authorities, and agencies of development cooperation. The Review basically contains any topics concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Published exclusively in English, the Review seeks to expand the boundaries of Indonesian legal discourses to access English-speaking contributors and readers all over the world. The Review, hence, welcomes contributions from international legal scholars and professionals as well as from representatives of courts, executive authorities, and agencies of development cooperation. The Review basically contains any topics concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. The range of contents covered by the Review spans from established legal scholarships and fields of law such as privacy laws and public laws which include constitutional and administrative law as well as criminal law, international laws concerning Indonesia, to various approaches to legal studies such as comparative law, law and economics, sociology of law and legal anthropology, and many others. Specialized legal studies concerning various aspects of life such as commercial and business laws, technology law, natural resources law and the like are also welcomed.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 306 Documents
 27   28   29   30   31 
Analisis Diversi Dalam Perkara Pidana Anak: Studi Putusan Nomor 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Jkt.Brt Khairunnisa, Indah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 6, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.28925

Abstract

Prosedur dan proses diversi dalam kasus pencurian dengan pemberatan oleh anak serta penerapan hukum dan pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Jkt.Brt tidak sepenuhnya sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku. Studi ini menggunakan penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, mengacu pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014, serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 65 Tahun 2015. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa dalam perkara ini, Jaksa Penuntut Umum menerapkan dakwaan subsidiar dengan Pasal 365 ayat (2) butir 1 dan 2 KUHP atau Pasal 363 ayat (1) butir 4 KUHP, dan hakim menjatuhkan putusan pidana penjara 1 bulan 15 hari kepada anak pelaku. Meskipun diversi telah dilakukan dan mencapai kesepakatan damai, hakim tetap melanjutkan proses peradilan hingga vonis dijatuhkan, yang bertentangan dengan prinsip keadilan restoratif dalam sistem peradilan anak. Rekomendasi yang diusulkan mencakup penguatan regulasi terkait diversi, termasuk ketentuan tempat pelaksanaannya serta sanksi bagi aparat hukum yang tidak menerapkannya dengan baik. Sistem peradilan pidana anak perlu lebih mengedepankan prinsip perlindungan anak dan restorative justice agar tidak ada lagi pemidanaan yang tidak diperlukan bagi anak yang telah berhasil mencapai kesepakatan damai melalui mekanisme diversi.
Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Agama Terhadap Legal Standing LPKSM Sebagai Penggugat Dalam Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Alifia, Putri; Rohman, Muhammad Mujibur
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 6, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.34500

Abstract

The inconsistency of decisions regarding the legal standing of the Community-Based Consumer Protection Institution (LPKSM) in the Sharia economic court case at the Religious Court has created legal defenders. There are differences of opinion between judges regarding the legal standing of LPKSM as the Plaintiff in this settlement. This study aims to examine the position of LPKSM in the trial at the Religious Court and analyze various decisions that show this disparity. Through a qualitative literature approach, the study concludes that the law grants LPKSM the right to sue with specific requirements. LPKSM cannot act as an advocate representing consumers directly because it contradicts Law Number 18 of 2013. The differences in court decisions regarding the legal standing of LPKSM mainly depend on considerations regarding the interests fought for by the institution. To overcome the disparity in decisions and create legal certainty, a special formulation is needed to be used as a guideline in reconstructing the sharia economy. LPKSM who wish to become a party in a Sharia economic case must meet formal and material requirements, namely being a legal entity or foundation, having Articles of Association, being registered with the Consumer Protection Agency Registration Certificate (TDLP), and fighting for public interests, not individual interests. With clear standards, it is hoped that legal certainty can be created in handling Sharia economic settlements involving LPKSM in the Religious Court.
Problematika Perizinan Penyadapan Oleh KPK Pasca Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Rachman, Andi Nur; Syarif, Mujar Ibnu
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 6, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.22068

Abstract

The revision process of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law resulted in structural changes with the formation of the KPK Supervisory Board. This change impacts the work procedures of KPK investigators, especially in conducting wiretapping of corruption suspects. This article analyzes the problematic issues of wiretapping permits by the KPK after the revision of Law Number 19 of 2019, which introduced a multi-layered bureaucracy. This study uses a normative legal method with statutory regulations. The results of the study indicate that the revision of the law requires the KPK to obtain permission from the Supervisory Board before conducting wiretapping, which has the potential to hinder the effectiveness and speed of investigations. However, after a judicial review was conducted at the Constitutional Court, it was decided that wiretapping could be carried out without permission from the Supervisory Board but must still be notified within a specific period. This decision is measured as a positive step in maintaining a balance between the effectiveness of corruption eradication and the accountability of the KPK institution.
Pembuktian Tidak Langsung Dalam Praktik Kartel Pada Industri Minyak Goreng (Studi Putusan Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. Nomor 03/KPPU/2010/PN.Jkt.Pst Jo. Nomor 582k/Pdt.Sus/2011.) Ulya, Rafa'any Darajatanti; Selian, Muhammad Ali Hanafiah; Rahmatullah, Indra
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.17788

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of indirect evidence in handling cartel practices in the cooking oil industry, focusing on a case study of Decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. No.03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST Jo. Number 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. The research method used is the juridical-normative approach, which relies on legal sources such as laws and regulations, legal principles, norms, principles, and expert opinions to analyze the issues studied. In the KPPU decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) stated that 21 cooking oil producers were proven to have practiced cartels. However, business actors applied with the Central Jakarta District Court, which then overturned the decision through Decision No. 03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST. The cancellation was based on the consideration that KPPU only relied on analysis, theories, and definitions considered speculative and not supported by substantial evidence. KPPU then filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court rejected the appeal and upheld the settlement of the first-level court through Decision No. 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. This study also highlights that challenges in indirect evidence can be overcome by implementing a leniency program, as has been implemented in various countries. This program incentivizes parties involved in the cartel to disclose information to the competition authority.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Tokopedia Terhadap Konsumen Atas Ketidaksesuaian Barang Dalam Jual Beli Online Rahmawati, Zahra
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.22618

Abstract

This study discusses Tokopedia's legal responsibility towards consumers for non-conformity of goods in online sales transactions. Although regulations regarding electronic commerce have been established, there are still weaknesses in consumer legal protection. Consumers often experience losses due to goods received that do not match the description without receiving proper compensation. This study uses a normative-empirical method with a regulatory-statutory approach and case studies to analyze Tokopedia's responsibility and legal protection for consumers in electronic transactions. The study results indicate that the available settlement mechanisms, such as online dispute resolution, have not fully provided justice for consumers. Tokopedia, as a platform provider, is responsible for ensuring that consumer rights are protected and providing more effective settlement solutions. In addition, consumer legal awareness of their rights in electronic transactions is still low, so they are willing to take their position in dealing with sales with sellers. This study highlights the need to strengthen regulations and implement more effective consumer legal protection in the e-commerce ecosystem. An active role is needed from the government and e-commerce platforms to ensure a transparent complaint mechanism supporting consumer protection to create a safer and fairer digital trade ecosystem.
Analisis Diversi Dalam Perkara Pidana Anak: Studi Putusan Nomor 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Jkt.Brt Khairunnisa, Indah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.28925

Abstract

Prosedur dan proses diversi dalam kasus pencurian dengan pemberatan oleh anak serta penerapan hukum dan pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Jkt.Brt tidak sepenuhnya sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku. Studi ini menggunakan penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, mengacu pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014, serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 65 Tahun 2015. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa dalam perkara ini, Jaksa Penuntut Umum menerapkan dakwaan subsidiar dengan Pasal 365 ayat (2) butir 1 dan 2 KUHP atau Pasal 363 ayat (1) butir 4 KUHP, dan hakim menjatuhkan putusan pidana penjara 1 bulan 15 hari kepada anak pelaku. Meskipun diversi telah dilakukan dan mencapai kesepakatan damai, hakim tetap melanjutkan proses peradilan hingga vonis dijatuhkan, yang bertentangan dengan prinsip keadilan restoratif dalam sistem peradilan anak. Rekomendasi yang diusulkan mencakup penguatan regulasi terkait diversi, termasuk ketentuan tempat pelaksanaannya serta sanksi bagi aparat hukum yang tidak menerapkannya dengan baik. Sistem peradilan pidana anak perlu lebih mengedepankan prinsip perlindungan anak dan restorative justice agar tidak ada lagi pemidanaan yang tidak diperlukan bagi anak yang telah berhasil mencapai kesepakatan damai melalui mekanisme diversi.
Efektivitas Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Dalam Menanggulangi Penyebaran Spoiler Film Di Media Sosial Tiktok: Studi Kasus Film Mencuri Raden Saleh Yaumil, Syahrul; Nahrowi, Nahrowi
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.33541

Abstract

The effectiveness of the Copyright Law in dealing with the practice of spreading movie spoilers on TikTok social media, with a case study of the film Mencuri Raden Saleh. The phenomenon of movie spoilers on social media is a problem that impacts the economic and moral rights of creators of cinematographic works. This study uses a sociological, legal approach to understand the interaction of society with applicable legal norms. The study results indicate that TikTok's policies are not yet in line with copyright protection regulations in Indonesia, so copyright infringement in the form of spoilers and film piracy is still difficult to control. Although Law Number 28 of 2014 has provided legal protection for copyright holders, its implementation is still hampered by the nature of the complaint offense, which requires copyright owners to file a report first so that the legal process can run. In addition, the low public legal awareness of copyright is also a significant factor in the rampant practice of movie piracy on social media. Therefore, a more comprehensive regulatory update is needed, as increased supervision of digital platforms and wider socialization to raise public awareness of the importance of copyright protection in the digital era.
Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Agama Terhadap Legal Standing LPKSM Sebagai Penggugat Dalam Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Alifia, Putri; Rohman, Muhammad Mujibur
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.34500

Abstract

The inconsistency of decisions regarding the legal standing of the Community-Based Consumer Protection Institution (LPKSM) in the Sharia economic court case at the Religious Court has created legal defenders. There are differences of opinion between judges regarding the legal standing of LPKSM as the Plaintiff in this settlement. This study aims to examine the position of LPKSM in the trial at the Religious Court and analyze various decisions that show this disparity. Through a qualitative literature approach, the study concludes that the law grants LPKSM the right to sue with specific requirements. LPKSM cannot act as an advocate representing consumers directly because it contradicts Law Number 18 of 2013. The differences in court decisions regarding the legal standing of LPKSM mainly depend on considerations regarding the interests fought for by the institution. To overcome the disparity in decisions and create legal certainty, a special formulation is needed to be used as a guideline in reconstructing the sharia economy. LPKSM who wish to become a party in a Sharia economic case must meet formal and material requirements, namely being a legal entity or foundation, having Articles of Association, being registered with the Consumer Protection Agency Registration Certificate (TDLP), and fighting for public interests, not individual interests. With clear standards, it is hoped that legal certainty can be created in handling Sharia economic settlements involving LPKSM in the Religious Court.
Menyoal Efektivitas Asas Erga Omnes Dalam Konsep Eksekutorial Dan Hukum Islam (Studi Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVII/2020) Armanda, Rizki; Abdurrofiq, Atep
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.38573

Abstract

The validity of the erga omnes principle is reflected in the provision stating that the Constitutional Court's decision can be implemented directly without any consideration of the decision of the relevant authorized official unless other regulations and laws regulate it. This provision reflects the binding legal force and comprehensive nature (between parties), which generally applies to the parties to the case. Problems arise when the Constitutional Court's decision is not implemented by the parties to the case, state institutions, state administrators, and related parties for various reasons. This research is a normative legal research with secondary data. The results of the study show that the logistical consequences of the erga omnes principle, which requires all levels of citizens to implement the decision, impact parties with various interests so that they feel disadvantaged. In a situation like this, the parties can no longer take other legal measures except to obey and comply with the punishment.
Disparitas Putusan Peninjauan Kembali(Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 109 Pk/Pid/2007 Dan No. 133 Pk/Pid/2011)dalam Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana Munir Said Thalib Dan Penggunaan Surat Palsu Oleh Terpidana Pollycarpus Budihari Priyanto Nuha, Muhammad Ulin; Burhanudin; Rambe, Mara Sutan
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v7i1.16540

Abstract

This research analyzes the implementation of judicial review applications filed by both public prosecutors and defendants, focusing on the applicants’ legal grounds and the judges’ considerations in Supreme Court Decisions No. 109 PK/Pid/2007 and No. 133 PK/Pid/2011. The study employs a normative juridical approach, which examines relevant laws, legal principles, and scholarly doctrines to address the research questions systematically. The findings reveal that the right to file a judicial review is not limited to convicted persons but may also be exercised by public prosecutors. A judicial review may be accepted when judicial error occurs during the trial or when new evidence (novum) emerges that could significantly alter the verdict. The research further emphasizes that judges must act independently, free from external influence, and base their rulings solely on legal facts and judicial conviction.

Page 29 of 31 | Total Record : 306

 27   28   29   30   31 

Filter by Year

2019 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024) Vol 6, No 2 (2024) Vol 6, No 1 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023) Vol 5, No 2 (2023) Vol 5, No 1 (2023): ARTICLES IN PRESS Vol 5, No 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023) Vol 4, No 6 (2022) Vol 4, No 5 (2022) Vol 4, No 4 (2022) Vol 4, No 3 (2022) Vol 4, No 2 (2022) Vol 4, No 1 (2022) Vol 3, No 6 (2021) Vol 3, No 5 (2021) Vol 3, No 4 (2021) Vol 3, No 3 (2021) Vol 3, No 2 (2021) Vol 3, No 1 (2021) Vol 2, No 5 (2020) Vol 2, No 4 (2020) Vol 2, No 3 (2020) Vol 2, No 2 (2020) Vol 2, No 1 (2020) Vol 1, No 6 (2019) Vol 1, No 5 (2019) Vol 1, No 4 (2019) Vol 1, No 3 (2019) Vol 1, No 2 (2019) Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Journal of Legal Research Vol 1, No 1 (2019) More Issue