cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Novianita Rulandari
Contact Email
journal@ilomata.org
Phone
+6281289935858
Journal Mail Official
ilomatajournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Pangkalan Asem raya No. 55 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science
Published by Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda
ISSN : 2714898X     EISSN : 27148998     DOI : 10.52728/ijss
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other
FOCUS Ilomata International Journal of Social Science aims to provide information on both theoretical and empirical articles and case studies relating to sociology, political science, history, law in society and related disciplines. Published articles use scientific research methods, including statistical analysis, case studies, field research and historical analysis. SCOPE Ilomata International Journal of Social Science concerns on sociology, political science, history, law in society and related domains. through publication of research based articles and critical analysis articles. It describes, compares, interprets, and explains the whole aspects of multi discipline perspectives including anthropology, sociology, psychology, philosophy, education, philology and history of religion. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science acordially welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 449 Documents
 41   42   43   44   45 
The Role of a Pragmatic Approach in the Habituation of Spoken Standard Indonesian to Enhance Elementary School Students’ Public Speaking Skills: a Systematic Literature Review Elma Nur Hafizah; Aninditya Sri Nugraheni; Abroto
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2242

Abstract

Public speaking competence among elementary school students remains constrained by psychological barriers, including anxiety, low self-confidence, and limited mastery of standard oral Indonesian. In classroom interaction, standard Indonesian is often perceived as overly formal and disconnected from students’ everyday communication practices, which reduces its functional use in authentic researchs. From the perspective of communicative competence and pragmatic theory, this condition reflects a gap between linguistic knowledge and the ability to apply language appropriately in research-sensitive oral communication. This study aims to synthesize the contribution of pragmatic aspects to the habituation of standard oral Indonesian and to examine their pedagogical implications for students’ public speaking development. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) design was employed, analyzing 12 peer-reviewed studies indexed in Scopus and ProQuest published between 2016 and 2026. The selection process followed explicit inclusion criteria, prioritizing elementary-level studies while incorporating a limited number of comparative studies from other educational levels to strengthen conceptual generalization. A thematic synthesis approach was applied to identify recurring instructional strategies, pragmatic components, and reported learning outcomes. The findings suggest that teacher modeling, researchualized dialogue practice, and simulation-based learning are consistently associated with increased student engagement in using standard oral Indonesian. Pragmatic elements, such as politeness strategies, deixis, speech acts, and prosodic features, are also linked to improved communicative appropriateness and reduced speaking anxiety. However, these results indicate patterns of association rather than causal relationships due to the heterogeneity of the included studies.
The Effect of the Team Game Tournament Model on Negotiation Text Writing Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Grade X Students at SMAN 6 Tangerang Regency Rosa Aulia Fitri Siregar; Goziyah; Ariyana
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2245

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of the Teams Games Tournament (TGT) learning model in improving the negotiation text writing skills of Grade X students at SMAN 6 Tangerang Regency. Writing negotiation texts is an important component of Indonesian language learning, requiring students to develop structured arguments, coherent ideas, and persuasive language. However, students often experience difficulties in organizing ideas and expressing arguments effectively in written form. This quantitative quasi-experimental study employed a nonequivalent control group design involving 66 Grade X students from intact classes. The experimental group was taught using the TGT learning model for several instructional meetings, while the control group received conventional instruction. Pre- and post-test writing tasks on negotiation texts were assessed using a rubric covering content relevance, text organization, argument development, language use, and writing mechanics. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann–Whitney U test with IBM SPSS Statistics version 27. The results showed a statistically significant difference in post-test writing scores, with higher average scores in the experimental group. These findings suggest that the Teams Games Tournament learning model is associated with improved negotiation text writing skills in this school context. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to limitations such as the single-school sample, relatively small sample size, intact class assignment without full randomization, and the absence of long-term observation. Further research involving broader samples and different educational contexts is recommended to strengthen the generalizability of these findings.
Human, Social, and Digital Capital in Educational Development: Evidence from Pasirmae Village Muhammad Afrizal; Kiki Syarifudin; Robert Markus Zaka Lawang
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2246

Abstract

Persistent disparities in educational quality between rural and urban areas frequently stem from limited infrastructure, financial capacity, and access to educational facilities, yet Pasirmae Village exemplifies how community resources are mobilized to support educational continuity. This study aims to interpret how human capital and social capital operate and interact in shaping community-based educational practices in Pasirmae Village, framing digital capital as a contextual supporting factor that facilitates access rather than as a primary analytical construct equal to the others, rather than constructing generalized theoretical models. Employing a qualitative case study design, data were collected through participant observation, document analysis, and in-depth interviews with teachers, school administrators, community leaders, and parents as key informants, with the data analyzed thematically to identify patterns in the roles and interrelations of these capitals. The findings reveal that human capital, reflected in parental educational awareness and educators’ pedagogical competence, functions as the primary driver of learning quality, while social capital manifested in trust, dense social networks, active participation, and the cultural practice of mutual cooperation operates as a reinforcing mechanism that sustains collective educational initiatives, with their relational interaction allowing social cohesion to amplify the effectiveness of individual capacities in addressing local educational constraints while digital capital provides contextual support; this study contributes by providing a context-bound interpretation of how community-derived resources function as an adaptive mechanism in rural education, offering an empirically grounded insight into the micro-level dynamics of educational development in resource-limited settings.
Mapping Ten Years of Digital Burnout Research (2015–2024): a Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis Rima Febrianti; Pieter Andrian; Reni Januarti; Sri Astuti Handayani; Tatan Mayandripan
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2313

Abstract

This study investigates the evolution of research on digital burnout and digital stress by applying a systematic bibliometric approach to publications indexed in Scopus between 2015 and 2024. The objective is to identify publication trends, intellectual structures, and emerging thematic patterns within this domain. A structured search strategy was implemented using predefined keywords, followed by a screening process based on relevance, document type, and duplication removal, resulting in a final sample of 162 peer-reviewed articles. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix to perform co-authorship, co-occurrence, and citation network analyses. The findings indicate a marked increase in publication output after 2020, reflecting intensified scholarly attention during the global digital transition period. Network visualization reveals that research is concentrated around three dominant clusters: (1) psychological impacts of digital overload, (2) organizational and occupational stressors linked to constant connectivity, and (3) coping mechanisms including digital detox and boundary management. Germany emerges as a central contributor in terms of institutional productivity and collaboration networks. Additionally, keyword co-occurrence analysis highlights a recent shift toward hybrid work environments and techno-stress mitigation strategies. This study contributes by providing a structured mapping of the intellectual and thematic evolution of digital burnout research, emphasizing the transition from individual-level analysis to organizational and systemic perspectives. The results offer an evidence-based foundation for future research directions, particularly in refining conceptual frameworks and identifying underexplored areas such as long-term adaptation to digital work ecosystems.
The Use of Storybird to Improve Students’ Narrative Writing Skills: A Classroom Action Research in Grade VIII at SMP N 3 Sleman, Yogyakarta Linda Nur Ainah; Jamilah
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2320

Abstract

This study investigates the use of the Storybird platform to enhance the writing skills of grade VIII students at SMP N 3 Sleman in the 2024/2025 academic year. Although digital storytelling tools are increasingly integrated into EFL pedagogy, empirical evidence regarding their classroom implementation for improving multiple dimensions of writing remains limited. Addressing this gap, the research examines how Storybird supports students’ writing development in a real classroom context. Employing a classroom action research design conducted in two cycles, the researcher collaborated with an English teacher. Participants comprised 32 students from class VIII B. Data were gathered through writing tests, observation sheets, field notes, and semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data underwent thematic analysis, while quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Validity was established through democratic, dialogic, catalytic, and outcome criteria. Findings indicate that Storybird’s picture book feature facilitated improved idea generation and more coherent organization of narrative texts. Qualitative evidence revealed heightened engagement, better vocabulary selection, and gradual gains in grammatical accuracy. Quantitatively, mean writing scores rose from 57.61 in the pre-test to 71.50 in Cycle 1 and 80.03 in Cycle 2. These results suggest that Storybird was associated with enhanced writing performance among the students. Given the classroom action research design, causal inferences must be drawn cautiously. Nevertheless, the study contributes contextual evidence on the pedagogical value of digital storytelling tools for supporting writing development in resource-constrained EFL settings.
Leadership Training Policy Implementation at Inap Timor-Leste: Diagnosing Ineffectiveness and Strengthening Bureaucratic Capacity Belarmino da Costa; Edy Sutrisno
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2333

Abstract

Leadership training policy is a strategic instrument for developing the competency and professionalism of the civil service apparatus. In Timor-Leste, this mandate is institutionally assigned to the Instituto Nacional da Administração Pública (INAP) under Decree-Law No. 38/2012 and Decreto-Lei n.º 25/2016. Despite a legally sound normative foundation, implementation remains critically ineffective  evidenced by only 150 participants trained out of 3,527 officials holding structural positions over three years (2022–2024). This study investigates why legal clarity has not translated into effective implementation, employing a qualitative case study design with data drawn from semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and field observation involving ten purposively selected informants. Analysis is framed through the Van Meter and Van Horn model, which reveals that the implementation gap stems from six interconnected failures: unoperationalized policy standards in the curriculum, insufficient human and material resources, unsystematic inter-organizational communication, weak characteristics of implementing agents, volatile socio-political conditions, and inconsistent implementor disposition. The study's specific contribution lies in empirically diagnosing these causal linkages within a nascent post-independence state context, where bureaucratic capacity-building remains structurally constrained. Findings suggest that normative adequacy alone is insufficient; effective implementation requires operationalized standards, strengthened resource capacity, coordinated inter-agency mechanisms, and institutionalized commitment among implementing actors.
The Implementation of Social Issue-Based Social Studies Learning: A Qualitative Case Study at SMP Negeri 2 Sungai Melayu Rayak Siswati; Siswandi; Karel Juniardi
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2343

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of social issue-based Social Studies learning at SMP Negeri 2 Sungai Melayu Rayak in response to the limited contextualization of Social Studies instruction, which remains predominantly content-oriented despite curriculum reforms promoting student-centered learning. Previous studies have largely emphasized the theoretical importance of social issue-based learning, while empirical evidence regarding its classroom implementation in Indonesian junior secondary schools remains limited. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected through in-depth interviews with teachers, school leaders, and students, alongside classroom observations and document analysis of lesson plans and instructional materials. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and thematic conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that the integration of local social issues, including agrarian conflicts and environmental problems, was associated with enhanced instructional relevance and encouraged active student participation. Learning activities based on group discussion, case analysis, and reflective presentation were perceived to support students’ critical thinking, argumentation, and collaborative abilities. The study also found that the Kurikulum Merdeka framework provided pedagogical flexibility that enabled teachers to adapt learning materials to students’ social realities. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating how social issue-based Social Studies learning can be operationalized in a local Indonesian school context to foster contextual critical awareness and civic responsibility among junior secondary students.
A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes in Laparoscopic versus Robotic Donor Nephrectomy Muhammad Rizki Fadil; Fabian Gamal Sutrisno; Jeremia Yusak Lestari; Archie Fontana Iskandar
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2344

Abstract

Living donor kidney transplantation remains the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease because it provides superior long-term outcomes compared with dialysis. The increasing use of minimally invasive techniques, particularly Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy (LDN) and Robotic Donor Nephrectomy (RDN), has prompted comparisons of their perioperative performance and donor outcomes. This study systematically reviewed evidence comparing postoperative renal function, hospital length of stay, perioperative parameters, and postoperative complications between LDN and RDN. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar for comparative studies published between 2010 and 2025. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were synthesized qualitatively. The evidence indicates that RDN and LDN produce comparable postoperative renal function, including stable estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine levels. Several studies reported shorter hospital stays, lower early postoperative pain scores, and faster recovery with RDN, although robotic procedures required longer operative times during early implementation. Complication rates were generally low and similar between techniques. Overall, both LDN and RDN are feasible and safe minimally invasive approaches for living donor nephrectomy. However, variations in study design, institutional experience, and outcome reporting limit definitive conclusions regarding the superiority of either technique, highlighting the need for standardized high-quality comparative studies.
Stakeholder Participation Analysis in the Development of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS): A Qualitative Analysis of Health Project Management Practices Arief Rahman
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2516

Abstract

Hospital construction projects involve complex coordination among multiple actors, yet previous studies have paid limited attention to how stakeholder participation shapes the development of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) within specific healthcare construction settings. This study aimed to examine the forms and levels of stakeholder participation in WBS development and to identify factors influencing stakeholder involvement during project planning. A qualitative case study was conducted in the Dharmais Cancer Hospital construction project. Data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews with nine key informants representing strategic project organization functions, which includes senior management, project operations, engineering, administration, quantity surveying, building information modeling, and contract management, alongside the project owner representative. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and validated through triangulation techniques. The findings indicate that stakeholder participation varied across groups. Project owners and key technical actors were actively involved in defining work packages and making planning decisions, whereas some supporting stakeholders participated only at the consultation stage. In several instances, participation tended to become formalistic because decision-making authority remained concentrated among a limited number of actors, while communication and institutional procedures constrained broader involvement. Organizational structure, leadership commitment, communication mechanisms, and information technology support were identified as important factors shaping participation patterns. The study suggests that effective WBS development depends not only on the presence of stakeholders but also on the quality and distribution of their participation. These findings provide practical insights for improving collaborative planning in healthcare construction projects.

Page 45 of 45 | Total Record : 449

 41   42   43   44   45 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April 2026 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): January 2026 Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): October 2025 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July 2025 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): April 2025 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): January 2025 Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024): October 2024 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): July 2024 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): April 2024 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): January Vol 4 No 4 (2023): October 2023 Vol. 4 No. 4 (2023): October 2023 Vol 4 No 3 (2023): July 2023 Vol 4 No 2 (2023): April 2023 Vol 4 No 1 (2023): January 2023 Vol 3 No 4 (2022): October 2022 Vol 3 No 3 (2022): July 2022 Vol 3 No 2 (2022): April 2022 Vol 3 No 1 (2022): January 2022 Vol 2 No 4 (2021): October 2021 Vol 2 No 3 (2021): July 2021 Vol 2 No 2 (2021): April 2021 Vol 2 No 1 (2021): January 2021 Vol 1 No 4 (2020): October 2020 Vol 1 No 3 (2020): July 2020 Vol 1 No 2 (2020): April 2020 Vol 1 No 1 (2019): October 2019 More Issue