cover
Contact Name
Rico Nur Ilham
Contact Email
radjapublika@gmail.com
Phone
+6281238426727
Journal Mail Official
radjapublika@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl.Pulo Baroh No.12 Lancang Garam Kecamatan Banda Sakti Kota Lhokseumawe, Aceh
Location
Kota lhokseumawe,
Aceh
INDONESIA
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)
Published by CV. RADJA PUBLIKA
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2808487X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas
This journal accepts articles on results of the research in fields of Education, Cross Culture, Law, Environmental Empowerment which are the latest issues from the results of activities or practical implementations that are problem solving, comprehensive, meaningful, latest and sustainable findings with clear goals and visionary in various activities that have innovation and creativity. So that they do not just replicate the same activities in different places but must have to measurable results and impacts for society and support the achievement of the goals set in modern human development.
Articles 80 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)" : 80 Documents clear
THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA USE ON LEARNING MOTIVATION AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT OF GRADE XII D OF AL AZHAR COLLEGE MEDAN Keyfun Akbar Kaban; Khairin Hafiz; Khalisah Aprillia Damanik; Rangga Ananda Siregar; Eko Wishnu Wahyudi
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4361

Abstract

Social media has become an important part of adolescents' lives and influences various aspects, including learning motivation and academic achievement. This study aims to analyze the impact of social media use on the learning motivation and academic achievement of class XII D students at Al Azhar Medan's flagship high school. The research method used a quantitative approach with a survey design, involving 28 students as a sample. The research instruments were a social media usage questionnaire, a learning motivation scale, and student academic grade data. The results showed a significant negative relationship between the intensity of social media use and learning motivation, while its effect on academic achievement tended to be moderate. This confirms that excessive social media use has the potential to reduce learning concentration and academic results, although on the other hand, social media can also be used positively as a learning resource. These findings provide important implications for educators, parents, and school policymakers to direct social media use in a more productive direction.
CONTINUOUS DISPUTES AND FIGHTS ARE THE MOST POPULAR REASONS FOR DIVORCE Nadia Romadhon; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.3950

Abstract

Marriage is a spiritual and physical bond between a man and a woman to form a family that is peaceful, loving, and merciful. However, not all marriages are harmonious and lasting. Data from the Religious Courts shows that the most common reason for divorce in Indonesia is persistent disputes and quarrels. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions related to these reasons, as stipulated in Article 116 letter (f) of the Compilation of Islamic Law and Article 19 letter (f) of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975, as well as the implementation and development of their formulation through SEMA Number 3 of 2023. In practice, judges have the freedom to assess whether a household conflict has met the requirements of "continuous" and "no hope of reconciliation" to be the basis for a divorce decision. This study shows that economic factors, poor communication, and the presence of a third party contribute to these dominant reasons for divorce. Therefore, strengthening regulations and understanding judges is important to maintain a sense of justice for the parties.
THE EFFECT OF INFLATION, INTEREST RATE AND EXCHANGE RATE ON INDONESIA'S BALANCE OF PAYMENTS Nyimas Adheana Darnita; Weri; Asri Diana; Fitriyani; Diana Sapha A.H
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.3995

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the effect of inflation, interest rate and exchange rate on Indonesia's balance of payments by using annual data for the period 1993-2024. The method used is Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) which is able to identify short-term and long-term effects simultaneously, and accommodate the characteristics of non-stationary time series data with different levels of integration. The results show that in the short term, inflation has a positive effect, while exchange rates and interest rates have a negative effect on the balance of payments. Meanwhile, in the long run, exchange rates and interest rates have a positive effect, and inflation has a negative but insignificant effect. The novelty of this study lies in the use of ARDL model with long data coverage and explicit separation between short-run and long-run dynamics, which has rarely been comprehensively discussed in previous studies related to the balance of payments in Indonesia. The government's role is required to maintain price and interest rate stability through adaptive exchange rate management in order to maintain Indonesia's balance of payments.
THE URGENCY OF FORCED MONEY REGULATION IN THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: NORMATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISMS Ferio Wabarca Hutabarat; Shinta Hadiyantina; Sudarsono
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4320

Abstract

The regulation of forced money (dwangsom) within the State Administrative Court is an important instrument to ensure compliance of state administrative officials with court decisions that have permanent legal force. However, until now the regulations governing the mechanism for the implementation of forced money in the PTUN are still unclear, so it often causes obstacles in the practice of execution. This study aims to analyze the urgency of the regulation of forced money in the State Administrative Court by focusing on the implementation mechanism so that it can be implemented effectively. The research method used is a prescriptive method with a normative approach, namely examining applicable laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant court decisions. The results of the study show that the absence of strict regulations regarding the implementation of forced money creates legal uncertainty and has the potential to weaken the function of the PTUN as judicial control over government administrative actions. Therefore, a more comprehensive regulation is needed regarding the mechanisms, procedures, and parameters of the implementation of forced money in order to provide legal certainty, ensure the effectiveness of the execution of decisions, and strengthen the principle of the rule of law in the administration of government.
LEGAL RECONSTRUCTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY VALUATION INSTITUTIONS AS FIDUCIARY SECURITY TO REALIZE LEGAL CERTAINTY I. Irfan Ibrahiem; Elfrida Ratnawati; Simona Bustani
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4358

Abstract

The utilization of Intellectual Property (IP) as an economic asset in Indonesia is significantly hampered when applied as fiduciary security due to profound legal uncertainty, particularly surrounding valuation mechanisms. A primary obstacle is the dearth of a standardized, legally recognized IP valuation institution, which inhibits the acceptance of IP as collateral by financial institutions. This study aims to analyze and reconstruct the legal framework governing these valuation institutions to establish legal certainty. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research identifies key issues: inadequate existing regulations, and the rejection of IP by banks owing to valuation difficulties, value fluctuation risks, and execution uncertainties. The findings conclude that a legal reconstruction of the IP valuation institution is essential. This reconstruction must establish standardized valuation criteria and fortify the legal framework, thereby enabling IP to function as an effective financing instrument and realizing legal certainty in Indonesia.
THE INFLUENCE OF PEER ENVIRONMENT ON LEARNING MOTIVATION OF CLASS XI STUDENTS OF AL-AZHAR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MEDAN Hany Ataqiya Afan; Mohammad Fadel Hakeem; Ijlal Habibie; M. Ihza Al Amin
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4377

Abstract

This study aims to determine the influence of the friendship environment on the learning motivation of grade XI students of Al Azhar Superior High School Medan. The research uses a quantitative approach with an associative descriptive method. The population in the study was determined through random sampling techniques. Data collection was carried out using a Likert scale questionnaire which included two main variables, namely the friendship environment and learning motivation. The results of the study show that the friendship environment has a positive influence on students' learning motivation. Most respondents stated that their friends supported learning activities (68.9%) and did not influence them not to study (53.3% disagreed). In addition, 82.2% of students admitted to studying earnestly and 100% trying to understand the lessons given. These findings show that a positive friendship environment contributes to increased student learning motivation in excellent schools.
ANALYSIS OF IMPORTANT, CAREFUL, CERTAIN AND MUTUALLY AGREEABLE CRITERIA IN THE REGULATION OF ARTICLE 173 OF THE HERZIEN INLANDSCH REGLEMENT REGARDING EVIDENCE OF JUDGES' SUSPECTS Naufal Anfasa Firdaus; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Rachmi Sulistyarini
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4413

Abstract

The sentence in Article 173 HIR which states "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" is a regulation that is still abstract and can be interpreted in many ways, where this is like what category of important or very important circumstances are, then what is thorough or precise, how to assess certain conditions, and whether they correspond to each other whether they should be applied to 2 (two) types of evidence or what. The purpose of this study is to analyze the criteria contained in the sentence important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable in the regulation of Article 173 HIR. The research method used is legal research with a statutory regulatory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Based on the research that has been carried out, it is known that normatively the criteria "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" in Article 173 HIR are not explained completely, then after a theoretical analysis through the doctrines of legal experts and linguistically, namely Indonesian and legal language, the meaning contained therein is obtained. The "important" criterion contains relevant and logical boundaries directly related to the subject matter of the case, the "thorough" criterion contains methodological boundaries for the application of caution, the "certain" criterion contains specific boundaries and the strength of the evidence is not questioned, and the "mutually agreed" criterion contains for consistency and mutually corroborating evidence.
THE ROLE OF AMICUS CURIAE IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES IN INDONESIA Yessika Florencia; Milda Istiqomah; Faizin Sulistio
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4417

Abstract

The criminal justice system in Indonesia has not explicitly regulated the requirements, procedures for submitting, and the position of amicus curiae in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. There are judges who reject the submission of Amicus curiae because there is no procedural law governing it, judges argue that procedural law in the judicial process is very important in realizing legal certainty in Indonesia. Meanwhile, judges who accept amicus curiae applications use Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power as the basis for accepting amicus curiae in trials. Progressive judges use Amicus curiae in their consideration of their decisions both from a philosophical, juridical and sociological perspective, where the hope is that the judge's decision will not only provide legal certainty but also truly provide a sense of justice and benefit to the parties. This study aims to determine the role of amicus curiae or friends of the judiciary in improving the quality of judges' decisions in the criminal justice system process in Indonesia. This research uses normative juridical method by using statutory approach and comparative approach. The results showed that the existence of amicus curiae can make a positive contribution to the decision of criminal cases in Indonesia. It is time for a regulation regarding the role and position of amicus curiae in the criminal justice system in Indonesia, so that there is an increase in the quality of decisions by accommodating the values of life and development in society.
LEGAL CERTAINTY OF MARRIAGE BETWEEN CHRISTIANS AND CATHOLICS IN THE DECISION OF THE NORTH JAKARTA DISTRICT COURT NUMBER 423/PDT.P/2023/PN JKT.UTR Samuel Fajar Hotmangara Tua Siahaan; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Djumikasih
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4422

Abstract

Interfaith marriages can be registered by the state as long as there is a court decree declaring the validity of the marriage and registerable, as regulated in the act of marriage and act of population administration. This also applies to interchurch marriages between Catholics and Christians in Indonesia. Regarding this matter, The North Jakarta District Court issued Decree Number 423/Pdt.P/2023/PN Jkt.Utr, which granted the petitioners' request for registration of their interchurch marriages. However, in its legal reasoning, the Judge stated that the petitioners' interchurch marriage was not considered an interfaith marriage. Furthermore, the Judge did not obtain evidence of the Christian Church's approval of their interchurch marriage. Through this study of this decree, the author conducted legal research using a statutory, a conceptual, and a systematic approach, thus concluding that the decree order does not fulfill the principle of legal certainty.
CONSTITUTIONALITY ISSUES OF PARATE EXECUTION IN SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTES (CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 950/PDT.G/2019/PA.JP) Muhamad Dadi Dwiono; A. Rachmad Budiono; Siti Rohmah
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i1.4449

Abstract

Parate execution is a mechanism of direct enforcement without prior judicial proceedings, as regulated under Article 6 of Law No. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights. However, this mechanism often conflicts with Article 224 HIR/258 R.Bg, which requires execution through court execution by court fiat. This study examines the constitutionality of Article 6 in relation to Article 224 HIR/258 R.Bg, using Central Jakarta Religious Court Decision No. 950/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JP as the primary case study. It also analyses the concept of justice in Islamic law and Jeremy Bentham’s theory of legal utility. The findings reveal a normative conflict that creates legal uncertainty and undermines substantive justice, particularly in Sharia-based financing. Harmonisation between statutory law and Islamic legal principles is therefore necessary to achieve legal certainty and substantive justice.