cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi
Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Phone
+6281215312967
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstitusi
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 18297706     EISSN : 25481657     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 11 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "vol. 23 no. 2 (2026)" : 11 Documents clear
Dissenting Opinion sebagai Manifestasi Hukum Progresif dalam Menjaga Integritas Pemilu: Dissenting Opinions as a Manifestation of Progressive Law in Safeguarding Electoral Integrity Aditya Andela Pratama; Kholifatul Muna
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2328

Abstract

The Constitutional Court’s decisions in disputes over the results of the 2024 presidential election, which contained dissenting opinions, highlight the need to reconcile substantive justice with electoral integrity. This study analyzes whether the decisions reflect progressive legal principles and progressive interpretation, as well as their constitutional implications for democracy. This research uses a normative juridical method, with Constitutional Court Decision No. 1/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024 and No. 2/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024 as primary legal materials. The findings show that elements of progressive law appear in the dissenting opinions of three constitutional justices, who emphasized substantive justice and constitutional morality in resolving electoral disputes. Although the decisions did not alter the election results and the dissenting opinions are not legally binding, they strengthen discourse on electoral integrity. The decisions also indicate the need for electoral law reform and reaffirm the Constitutional Court’s role in safeguarding substantive democracy.
Menjaga Independensi Hakim Konstitusi: Studi Komparasi Mekanisme Pengisian Jabatan dan Masa Jabatan : Safeguarding the Independence of Constitutional Court Justice: A Comparative Study of the Mechanisms for Appointment and Term of Office Satrio Febriyanto; Qurrata Ayuni
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk23210

Abstract

Kasus penggantian Hakim Konstitusi Aswanto dari jabatannya oleh DPR selaku lembaga pengusulnya adalah bentuk politisasi yudisial yang mengancam independensi personal hakim konstitusi. DPR memanfaatkan celah hukum ketiadaan pengaturan masa jabatan dan teknis mekanisme pengisian jabatan hakim konstitusi dalam UUD NRI 1945. Ketiadaan pengaturan menghasilkan praktik ketatanegaraan yang tidak terstandarisasi, bahkan suatu lembaga pengusul dapat memakai mekanisme pemilihan Hakim Konstitusi berbeda-beda yang memicu hubungan ketergantungan antara Hakim Konstitusi dan lembaga pengusulnya. Situasi ini memicu pertanyaan mendasar, bagaimana kejelasan pengaturan konstitusi menentukan praktik ketatanegaraan dalam pengisian jabatan Hakim Konstitusi dan independensi lembaga peradilan? Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal dan pendekatan studi komparasi, temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa mengubah konstitusi menjadi lebih detail tak cukup. Praktik ketatanegaraan juga perlu diperbaiki dengan menekankan penerapan nilai demokrasi dalam pemilihan Hakim Konstitusi seperti Pemilihan Hakim Konstitusi berbasis voting di parlemen dan mekanisme korektif terhadap pemilihan Hakim Konstitusi untuk menjaga imparsialitasnya dari lembaga pengusulnya.
Keheningan Administratif di Indonesia: Fiktif Negatif atau Fiktif Positif? Administrative Silence in Indonesia: Negative or Positive Legal Fiction? Aan Efendi; Dyah Ochtorina Susanti; Ahmad Suhaimi; Suwardi Suwardi; Lucky Dafira Nugroho
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2323

Abstract

The Government Administration Act introduced the positive legal-fiction model, apparently to replace the negative legal-fiction model under the State Administrative Courts Act. However, this regulatory choice has generated legal controversy because it did not fully achieve that objective. As a result, the positive and negative legal-fiction models now coexist without a clear hierarchy or priority of application. This article examines the legal controversy arising from the adoption of these two models in different statutes. The issue is broader than a mere conflict between statutes because it concerns the legal consequences of administrative silence in administrative decision-making generally. This research employs a doctrinal legal method. It finds that the Government Administration Act and the State Administrative Courts Act regulate distinct subject matters; therefore, the positive legal-fiction model does not automatically revoke or supersede the negative legal-fiction model. Consequently, administrative silence in Indonesia may be treated under either the negative or the positive legal-fiction model, meaning that it may be deemed either a rejection or an approval of an application. A future General Administrative Law Act or General Administrative Procedure Act should adopt either the negative or the positive legal-fiction model as the general rule, with any exceptions expressly stipulated by law.
Tindakan Ekstra Konstitusional Presiden di Indonesia: Legitimasi dan Rekonstruksi Pembatasan: Extra-Constitutional Actions of the Indonesian President: Legitimacy and Reconstruction of Restrictions Muhammad RM Fayasy Failaq
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk23211

Abstract

Extra-constitutional actions arise from constitutional deadlock and states of emergency. In practice, these actions are accepted despite deviating from constitutional rules and carrying authoritarian tendencies. In Indonesia, although the Constitution has been refined through four amendments, extra-constitutional action remains a threat because of its rigid character, a weak democratic background, and the uncertainty of future emergencies. This legal research, based on a literature review, aims to examine the role of legal, social, and ethical legitimacy in justifying extra-constitutional actions and to formulate an ideal concept for limiting them; the discussion begins with a proper understanding of extra-constitutional actions. The approaches used are statutory and conceptual, with qualitative-prescriptive analysis. The results show that legal legitimacy (constitutional legality) cannot justify extra-constitutional actions because they are inherently deviant and serve merely as a formality for legalizing emergencies. Therefore, the primary role lies in social legitimacy (societal acceptance) and ethical legitimacy (the value of limiting power). Finally, to optimize the role of legitimacy, ideal limitation measures should begin with the determination of a constitutional emergency, implement measures that are closest to constitutional legal action, immediately end the emergency, and, after it ends, immediately evaluate the post-emergency constitution.
Penguatan Partisipasi Rakyat dalam Proses Perubahan Konstitusi di Indonesia: Strengthening People's Participation in the Constitutional Change Process in Indonesia Rino Irlandi; Fitra Arsil
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2322

Abstract

The rules governing constitutional amendment in Indonesia still leave one crucial issue unresolved: the absence of regulations on mechanisms for public participation. Although previous studies have attempted to address this issue, the proposed ideas have not yet covered public participation at every stage of the amendment process. This article seeks to fill that literature gap by proposing mechanisms for public participation at each stage of the constitutional amendment. This doctrinal study employs comparative, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The findings lead to two conclusions. First, countries such as Chile, Ireland, and Romania have clear rules on public participation that positively affect constitutional amendment processes, making them suitable references for Indonesia. Second, Indonesia can strengthen public participation by adopting constitutional initiative mechanisms at the proposal stage, establishing a constitutional convention at the deliberation stage, and holding a referendum at the ratification stage.
Kritik terhadap Sistem Pendaftaran Tanah Berbasis Publikasi Negatif Berunsur Positif di Indonesia: Critique of the Land Registration System Based on a Negative Publication System with Positive Elements in Indonesia Abdul Wahid; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Lego Karjoko
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2325

Abstract

This study analyzes the philosophical, theoretical, and constitutional rationality of Indonesia’s land registration system, which adopts a negative publication system with positive elements to ensure legal certainty over land rights. Normatively, the system is based on Article 19 of the Basic Agrarian Law and implemented through Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 and Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021, under which certificates function as strong but non-absolute evidence and may still be annulled through judicial mechanisms. This indicates that the resulting legal certainty remains limited. Philosophically, referring to Gustav Radbruch’s theory of legal values, law must balance legal certainty, justice, and utility; however, this balance has not been fully achieved because of the absence of the indefeasibility of title principle. Constitutionally, Constitutional Court Decision No. 001-021-022/PUU-I/2003 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012 affirm the state’s obligation to ensure public welfare and protect rights. The absence of title finality reveals a gap between norms and practice, qualifying the system as a systemic failure that requires reconstruction toward a positive publication system based on limited indefeasibility of title, alongside institutional reform and land data digitalization.
Krisis Representasi Konstitusional: Urgensi Menghidupkan Kembali dan Mereposisi Utusan Golongan dalam MPR: The Crisis of Constitutional Representation: The Urgency of Reviving and Repositioning Functional Group Delegates within the MPR Abdy Yuhana
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2327

Abstract

The removal of the Functional Group Delegates (Utusan Golongan) from the institutional structure of the People’s Consultative Assembly (Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, hereinafter “MPR”) following Indonesia’s constitutional amendments of 1999–2002 warrants reconsideration regarding its consistency with the founding ideals of independence. While many studies have examined changes to the MPR’s constitutional status and authority, limited attention has been given to the abolition of Utusan Golongan as a matter of constitutional and functional representation. This study aims to analyze the constitutional significance of UG and the urgency of reintroducing and repositioning it within the MPR. Using normative juridical research methods, the study concludes that Utusan Golongan in the original 1945 Constitution reflected the ideals of inclusivity, pluralism, and comprehensive representation of the Indonesian people, which were diminished after its removal. Therefore, reintroducing and repositioning Utusan Golongan are necessary to strengthen constitutional democracy and functional representation in the manifestation of popular sovereignty.
Finalitas Bersyarat dan Pemeriksaan Kembali Konstitusional: Rekalibrasi Integritas Yudisial di Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia: Conditional Finality and Constitutional Rehearing: Recalibrating Judicial Integrity in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Siti Nurhayati; Fenolia Intan Saputri
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2321

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 memperlihatkan krisis legitimasi kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia karena pelanggaran etik serius tidak memengaruhi keberlakuan putusan yang final dan mengikat. Penelitian ini penting karena pemisahan kaku antara validitas hukum dan pertanggungjawaban etik memungkinkan produk yudisial yang tercemar konflik kepentingan tetap berlaku secara hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, kasus, dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa integritas yudisial merupakan syarat konstitusional objektif bagi validitas ajudikasi konstitusional. Penelitian ini menawarkan doktrin finalitas bersyarat, yaitu finalitas putusan dapat dibuka kembali apabila cacat integritas terbukti secara otoritatif oleh lembaga etik. Doktrin tersebut dioperasionalkan melalui mekanisme Pemeriksaan Kembali Konstitusional sebagai bentuk koreksi diri peradilan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Indonesia perlu mengadopsi ajudikasi berbasis integritas melalui reformasi legislasi dan hukum acara untuk menyelaraskan hukum, etika, kepastian hukum, dan keadilan substantif.
Kemandirian dan Profesionalitas Penyelenggara Pemilu: Analisis Putusan DKPP Terhadap Penyelenggara Pemilu di Sumatera Barat Tahun 2013-2024: Independence and Professionalism of Election Organizers: Analysis of DKPP Decisions on Election Organizers in West Sumatra 2013-2024 Khairul Fahmi; Desip Triananda; Ilhamdi Putra
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2324

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas tentang pemaknaan prinsip kemandirian dan profesionalitas penyelenggara pemilu dalam putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum (DKPP) terhadap dugaan pelanggaran kode etik penyelenggara pemilu di Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Masalah kajian difokuskan pada dua hal, yaitu bagaimana pemaknaan prinsip kemandirian dan profesionalitas penyelenggara pemilu dalam putusan-putusan DKPP, dan bagaimana koherensi pemaknaan tersebut terhadap norma kode etik dan tujuan penegakan kode etik penyelenggara pemilu. Kajian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif berbasis pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Kajian ini menemukan, secara umum proses penegakan kode etik penyelenggara pemilu oleh DKPP telah berjalan dengan baik, namun pemaknaan terhadap prinsip kemandirian dan profesionalitas penyelenggara pemilu cenderung meluas dibanding rumusan normatif kode etik dan konsep kemandirian dan profesionalitas yang dikonstruksikan dalam literatur-literatur integritas pemilu. Pemaknaan tersebut belum sepenuhnya koheren dengan norma dan tujuan penegakan kode etik penyelenggara pemilu. Kajian ini merekomendasikan perbaikan terhadap kode etik penyelenggara pemilu, khususnya terkait indikator prinsip kemandirian dan profesionalitas penyelenggara pemilu.
Menjaga Hak Milik, Memulihkan Aset: Perspektif Mahkamah Konstitusi atas Perampasan Aset tanpa Pemidanaan di Indonesia: Guarding Property, Recovering Assets: A Constitutional Court Perspective on Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture in Indonesia Hanifah Azizah; Mahmud Mulyadi; Alvi Syahrin; Marlina Marlina
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2326

Abstract

Perampasan aset tanpa pemidanaan (NCBAF) memungkinkan pemulihan aset hasil kejahatan tanpa putusan pidana, namun berpotensi membatasi hak milik pribadi tanpa penetapan bersalah. Ketegangan ini bersinggungan dengan asas due process of law dan pembatasan hak secara proporsional berdasarkan Pasal 28D ayat (1), Pasal 28H ayat (4), dan Pasal 28J ayat (2) UUD 1945. Karena hukum Indonesia saat ini belum mengatur NCBAF secara eksplisit maupun menjamin perlindungan prosedural yang memadai, sementara pemulihan aset hasil korupsi masih lemah, perumusan parameter konstitusionalnya menjadi mendesak. Dengan metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, kajian ini menelaah NCBAF dari perspektif due process dan proporsionalitas. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa NCBAF konstitusional sepanjang pembatasannya ditetapkan oleh undang-undang, memiliki tujuan yang sah, ditempuh melalui proses yang adil, dan bersifat proporsional, selaras dengan pandangan Mahkamah Konstitusi bahwa hak milik bukan hak absolut. Kajian menyimpulkan bahwa RUU Perampasan Aset perlu memuat pengawasan yudisial dan perlindungan pihak ketiga beriktikad baik.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 11

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 23 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 22 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 22 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 22 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 20 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol. 15 No. 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) More Issue