Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

All

Jurnal Konstitusi

jk
Website

Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

ISSN : 18297706 EISSN : 25481657 DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841

Core Subject : Humanities, Social,

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.

Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum

Articles 584 Documents

32 33 34 35 36

Legalitas Hukum Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah dalam Menyelenggarakan Pilkada Ansori Ansori
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Penelitian ini membahas legalitas hukum Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah (KPUD) dalam menyelenggarakan pemilihan kepala daerah pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan memahami legalisasi pengaturan kedudukan hukum KPUD dalam penyelenggaraan Pilkada pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif, dengan teori lembaga negara, hierarki, kewenangan, keabsahan hukum, dan tujuan hukum. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh adalah bahwa legalitas kedudukan hukum KPUD dalam penyelenggaraan Pilkada pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 yaitu bahwa KPUD tidak dapat menyelenggarakan Pilkada karena KPUD bagian dari KPU yang bersifat hierarki, sedangkan KPU berwenang secara konstitusional menyelenggarakan Pemilu, sedangkan Pilkada bukan bagian dari Pemilu pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 dan KPUD bukan lembaga daerah yang diberikan tugas khusus oleh undang-undang untuk menyelenggarakan pilkada, tugas menyelenggarakan Pilkada tersebut diberikan oleh undang-undang kepada KPU dan dilaksanakan oleh KPUD.The study addressed the legality of Regional Election Commission (KPUD) to hold local elections after the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 97/PUU-XI /2013. It aims to give analysis and to better understand the law that provides legal status of KPUD for organizing the elections after the court decision. The type of research is a juridical-normative research by employing the theory of state organs, hierarchy, powers, legal validity, and legal objectives. The obtained results showed that based on its legal status in organizing regional head elections, after the judgment of the Court decision No. 97/PUU-XI/2013, KPUD cannot hold regional head elections due to its position as subordinate of KPU as a hierarchical organization. KPU has the constitutional power to hold elections while regional head elections are not parts of the Election after the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 97/PUU-XI/2013. KPUD is not a regional organ given a special duty by the law to hold a local election. The task of organizing the local election is given by law to KPU and implemented by KPUD.

Kewajiban Pemenuhan Hak Konstitusional Teman Tuli dalam Mengakses Informasi di Mahkamah Konstitusi Rima Yuwana Yustikaningrum
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

As one of the judiciary bodies in Indonesia, which plays a role as the human right protector, the Constitutional Court have a significant part to ensure the fulfilment of the Indonesians’ human right. Moreover, before signing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2007 in New York and ratifying it in 2011, Indonesia had recognized human rights under its constitution, namely UUD 1945. Furthermore, the government of Republic Indonesia has been approving Act number 8 the Year 2016 about Persons with Disabilities in 2016. Under this act, the deaf has its recognized rights, especially to access information, to choose the preferable kind communication forms as it needs, and the affirmation of the state’s obligations to fulfil their human rights equally. However, the Constitutional Court has yet to have a standard operating procedure yet which specifically regulates the mechanism of accessible information for the deaf. Accordingly, in disseminating information to the public, not all people can access the information. In other words, the deaf find difficulties to comprehend the content of the message conveyed by the Court to the public as the Court do not consistently provide any tools, such as sign language interpreter and written texts. Thus, it is safe to submit that accessible information is yet to be provided by the Court in terms of publishing the information to the public. This article discusses the obligation of the Constitutional Court to ensure the fulfillment of the deaf right to access information. The aim of elaborating some related cases law and an applied standard operational procedure in Georgia’s Court in this article is that to remind the Constitutional Court to be consistent in ensuring the enjoyment and fulfillment of the deaf right to access information as the constitution recognize equality for all.

Fenomena Two in One Pengujian Perppu Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Dua lembaga negara sama-sama berwenang menguji Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu); Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) “berwenang” berdasarkan Pasal 22 ayat (2) dan ayat (3) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945, sedangkan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) berdasarkan putusannya No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 menyatakan “berwenang pula.” Dengan adanya dua lembaga negara yang mempunyai kewenangan yang sama tersebut maka (dapat) terjadi fenomena. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada tiga bentuk fenomena Two in One Pengujian Perppu yang (dapat) terjadi. Pertama, “judicial examination for constitutionality to Perppu pre-legislative review.” Kedua, “judicial examination for constitutionality to Perppu post-legislative review.” Ketiga, jika terjadi judicial review Perppu di MK baik dalam keadaan bentuk fenomena pertama atau fenomena kedua tetapi dalam waktu yang berlarut-larut DPR tidak memberikan keputusan tidak menyetujui atau menyetujui Perppu menjadi undang-undang. Prosedur hukum untuk bentuk fenomena kedua tidak jauh berbeda dengan prosedur hukum fenomena bentuk pertama; prosedur hukum serta yang dijadikan dasar pertimbangannya mempunyai kesamaan. Sedangkan prosedur hukum untuk bentuk fenomena ketiga perlu pula dikaji lebih lanjut secara mendalam untuk mencapai titik temu oleh dua pihak (DPR dan MK) yang berwenang menguji Perppu. Bentuk fenomena dan prosedur hukum pertama dan kedua bisa dikatakan sebagai jenis kewenangan yang bersifat pasif. Sedangkan bentuk fenomena dan prosedur hukum yang ketiga bisa dikatakan sebagai jenis kewenangan yang bersifat aktif.Two state institutions are equally authorized to test the Government Regulation in Lieu of Laws (Perppu); The House of Representatives (DPR) is “authorized” based on Article 22 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, while the Constitutional Court (MK) based on its verdict No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 declared “authorized as well.” With the existence of two state institutions that have the same authority, then the phenomena (can) happen. This research is a legal research using normative approach. The results of the study showed that there are three forms of phenomena of Two in One Perppu review which (can) happened. First, “judicial examination for the constitutionality to Perppu pre-legislative review.” Second, “judicial examination for the constitutionality to Perppu post-legislative review.” Third, in the case of Perppu judicial review in the Constitutional Court, either in the form of the first phenomenon or the second phenomenon, yet in the long period the DPR does not give a decision whether to approve the Perppu or not into the law. The legal procedure for the form of the second phenomenon is not much different from the legal procedure of the first form phenomenon; legal procedures and the basis of their considerations are merely the same. While the legal procedure for the third form of the phenomenon should also be studied further in depth to reach the final point by two parties (DPR and MK) authorized to review the Perppu. The first and the second forms of the phenomena and legal procedures can be regarded as a kind of passive authority. While the third form of the phenomena and legal procedures can be regarded as a type of active authority.

Kebijakan Pengelolaan Tambang dan Masyarakat Hukum Adat yang Berkeadilan Ekologis Muchamad Ali Safaat; Aan Eko Widiarto; Fajar Laksono Suroso
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 4 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah: pertama, bagaimana kebijakan pengelolaan sumber daya pertambangan berdasarkan undang-undang pertambangan mineral dan batubara? Kedua, bagaimana kebijakan pengelolaan sumber daya pertambangan perspektif masyarakat hukum adat yang berkeadilan ekologis? Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, pertama, kebijakan pengelolaan sumber daya pertambangan berdasarkan undang-undang pertambangan mineral dan batubara saat ini hendaknya disesuaikan dengan putusan-putusan mahkamah konstitusi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dalam konteks perizinan. Pemerintah daerah provinsi sekarang ini mengambil alih kewenangan pemerintah kabupaten/kota untuk mengeluarkan izin tambang berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 tahun 2014 yang sebenarnya masih bersifat semi sentralistik dan secara kewilayahannya dalam konteks tambang masih berada di kabupaten, sementara pemerintah provinsi sebagai wakil dari pemerintah pusat; kedua, Kebijakan pengelolaan sumber daya pertambangan perspektif masyarakat hukum adat yang berkeadilan ekologis terletak pada konsep kearifan masyarakat hukum adat dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam, dalam hal ini tambang yang menjadi hak penguasaan negara. Terdapat hubungan timbal balik antara manusia dengan alam, dimana masyarakat hukum adat selalu menempatkan keseimbangan alam dalam pengelolaan lingkungan (participerend cosmisch), sehingga keadilan ekologis dapat dirasakan semua unsur alam, selain manusia.The problems in this paper are: first, what are the mining resource management policies based on mineral and coal mining laws? and second, how is the mining resource management perspective of the ecological justice community indigenous people? This research method uses normative legal research with the classification of secondary data including primary legal materials including legislation in the fields of mineral and coal mining, environmental protection and management, and regional government. Secondary legal material in the form of books and journals, while secondary legal material in the form of online news. Data analysis using qualitative juridical analysis. The results of this study are first, current mining resource management policies based on mineral and coal mining laws should be adjusted to the decisions of the constitutional court and Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government in the context of licensing. The provincial government is currently taking over the authority of the district / city government to issue mining permits under Law No. 23 of 2014 which are actually still semi-centralistic and in the territory in the context of mines still in the district, while the provincial government is the representative of the central government; secondly, the policy of managing mining resources from the perspective of indigenous peoples with ecological justice lies in the concept of indigenous peoples’ wisdom in managing natural resources, in this case mining which is the state’s right of control. There is a reciprocal relationship between humans and nature, where customary law communities always place natural balance in environmental management (participerend cosmisch), so that ecological justice can be felt by all elements of nature, other than humans.

Anomali Penerapan Klausul Bersyarat dalam Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Anang Sulistyono; Abdul Wahid; Mirin Primudyastutie
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

In the implementation of constitutional review by the Constitutional Court, one of the dynamics occur is the emergence of conditionally constitutional unconstitutional decisions. Furthermore, the utilization of these types of decisions also has its dynamics, especially concerning the interpretation of conditional decisions. It can be indicated by the existence of anomalies decisions, which in the legal consideration, states that the norms reviewed are conditionally constitutional, but in its verdict, the norms are declared conditionally unconstitutional. Therefore, this paper aimed to comprehend the utilization of conditional decisions in constitutional review and to understand how is the anomaly in conditional clause implementation, as well as what Constitutional Court can do to prevent the anomalies to occur. Based on the analysis of conditional decision’s anomalies, there are at least three points that need to be pointed out. First, the anomalies increasingly show that conditionally constitutional and conditionally unconstitutional are substantially the same. Second, the use of conditionally constitutional clause as a ratio decidendi is considered to have no impact on the implementation of decisions. Third, the seven decisions analyzed further emphasized the Constitutional Court views that conditionally constitutional clause is deemed to be more effective in the implementation.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 Titon Slamet Kurnia
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This article expresses the author’s view to disagree with the existence of the KPK and its supporting Constitutional Theory. This article is based on classical model of the trias politica theory and suggests that the existence of executive bodies should conform with the prescription of unitary executive theory. According to the unitary executive theory, the president should have the power to appoint and remove any executive official exclusively. This norm is based on the status of the president as the Chief Executive. According to this notion, the KPK, as independent agency, is unconstitutional. In line with the Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-XV/2017, qualifying the KPK as executive, our abnormal constitutional order, with the existence of the KPK, should be normalized in accordance with the unitary executive theory.

Politik Hukum Pendidikan Nasional: Analisis Politik Hukum dalam Masa Reformasi Jayus Jayus
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Sistem pendidikan nasional yang diatur dalam UU Sisdiknas harus mampu meningkatkan keimanan dan ketakwaan, mencerdaskan kehidupan bangsa, dan memajukan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi yang berorientasi 4 (empat) hal, yaitu menjunjung tinggi nilai-nilai agama, memelihara persatuan bangsa, memajukan peradaban, dan memajukan kesejahteraan umat manusia. Salah satu tujuan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia ialah mencerdaskan kehidupan bangsa. Hal ini berdampak bahwa kewajiban negara terhadap warga negara dalam bidang pendidikan mempunyai dasar yang fundamental. Hal ini sebagaimana tertuang dalam Pembukaan UUD 1945. Adanya tujuan nasional tersebut mengakibatkan bahwa kewajiban mencerdaskan bangsa melekat pada eksistensi negara, sehingga negara memprioritaskan anggaran pendidikan minimal 20% dari APBN dan APBD. Bahkan seharusnya untuk pendidikan dasar, baik negeri maupun swasta, harus cuma-cuma, karena menjadi tanggung jawab negara yang telah mewajibkan setiap warga negara mengikuti pendidikan dasar. Era reformasi telah memberikan ruang yang cukup besar bagi perumusan kebijakan-kebijakan pendidikan baru yang bersifat reformatif dan revolusioner. Bentuk kurikulum menjadi berbasis kompetensi. Begitu pula bentuk pelaksanaan pendidikan berubah dari sentralistik (orde lama) menjadi desentralistik. Anggaran pendidikan ditetapkan sesuai dengan UUD 1945 yaitu 20% (dua puluh Persen) dari APBN dan APBD, sehingga banyak terjadi reformasi di dunia pendidikan.

Putusan Nomor 74/PUU-XII/2014 dan Standar Konstitusional Dispensasi Perkawinan Faiq Tobroni
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 74/PUU-XII/2014 meninggalkan harapan yang belum terpenuhi, yakni rumusan standar konstitusional sebagai pertimbangan dalam pemberian dispensasi umur perkawinan. Makalah ini akan menjawab alasan mengapa MK menolak merumuskannya? dan bagaimana standar konstitusional yang bisa dirumuskan? MK menolak permohonan pemohon judicial review untuk menjadikan kehamilan di luar perkawinan sebagai satu-satunya standar pemberian dispensasi umur perkawinan. Penolakan ini mengisyaratkan MK menganggap bahwa hal itu merupakan open legal policy; suatu saat bisa berubah sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan konteks masyarakat. MK juga tidak menggunakan UUD 1945 untuk merumuskan rumusan standar konstitusional dispensasi perkawinan karena hal itu harus ditempuh melalui legislative review. Sebagai tawaran dari penulis dalam legislative review, standar konstitusionalnya bisa dirumuskan melalui pendekatan hukum non sistematik dan pembacaan maqashid syari’ah. Pertimbangannya harus memperhatikan perlindungan kepentingan agama (Pasal 28E ayat (1) UUD 1945), kepentingan kepastian hukum bagi pelaku (Pasal 28D ayat (1) UUD 1945), kebebasan kehendak dan keyakinan (Pasal 28E ayat (2) UUD 1945), kepentingan kesejahteraan hidup (Pasal 28H ayat (1) UUD 1945), dan hak asasi yang dimiliki keturunan (Pasal 28B ayat (1) UUD 1945).The decision of Constitutional Court Number 74/PUU-XII/2014 leaves the unmet expectations, which is the standard for an exemption in marital age. The paper will provide the answer to the reason why the Court refused to set the standard? And how the Court should formulate it as the constitutional standards? The Court rejected the petitioner arguments in the judicial review case to make pre-marital pregnancy as the only standard to set an exemption of marital age. It suggests that the Court considers it is an “open legal policy”; where the policy may change according to the needs of society. The Court also did not use the Constitution to give the interpretation on the constitutional standard in marital exemption because it must be pursued by way of review by the parliament. The author offers, in term of legislative review, that the standards can be formulated through a non-systematic legal approach and the interpretation of maqashid syari’ah. The arguments should pay attention to the protection of religious interests (Article 28E (1) of the Constitution), the interests of legal certainty of the citizens (Article 28D (1) of the Constitution), free will and belief (Article 28E (2) of the Constitution), the welfare (Article 28H (1) of the Constitution), and the rights of descendants (Article 28B (1) of the 1945 Constitution).

Tenggang Waktu Konstitusionalitas dan Kebersesuaian Undang-Undang dengan UUD 1945 dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Joko Tri Haryanto; Luhur Fajar Martha
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 4 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi seringkali menimbulkan perdebatan di masyarakat. Salah satunya terkait penundaan keberlakuan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang telah melahirkan doktrin baru mengenai kekuatan hukum mengikatnya putusan MK. Penelitian ini mengangkat permasalahan, pertama: karakter putusan MK yang memuat tenggang waktu konstitusionalitas dan konsep kebersesuaian undang-undang dengan UUD 1945. Kedua, pengaruh putusan tersebut terhadap pembangunan hukum di Indonesia. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa, pertama, putusan-putusan yang menjadi objek penelitian ditemukan karakteristik yang beragam terkait dengan tenggang waktu konstitusionalitas dan kebersesuaian antara Undang-Undang dan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, sebagai berikut; (i) Putusan yang menentukan tenggang waktu secara tegas dan perintah untuk penyesuaian dengan UUD 1945, yaitu putusan Nomor 012-016-019/PUU-IV/2006 (UU KPK) dan Putusan Nomor 32/PUU-XI/2013 (UU Asuransi) dan Putusan Nomor 026/PUU-III/2005 dan 026/PUU-IV/2006 (UU APBN); (ii) Putusan yang menentukan tenggang waktu secara tidak tegas (fleksibel) dan perintah untuk penyesuaian dengan UUD 1945, yaitu Putusan Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 (UU Pemda dan UU Kekuasaan Kehakiman) dan Putusan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 (UU Pilpres); (iii) Putusan yang tidak menyebutkan tenggang waktu namun hanya perintah untuk penyesuaian dengan UUD 1945 (secara tidak langsung), yaitu Putusan Nomor 28/PUU-XI/2013 (UU Koperasi) dan Putusan Nomor 85/PUUXI/2013 (UU SDA). Kedua, Putusan MK menjadi salah satu faktor determinan dalam fungsi legislasi, dan hal ini dapat dipahami karena inilah bentuk diskresi yang dimiliki oleh MK selaku pelaku kekuasaan kehakiman.The constitutional court often make their headlines or controversy with their ruling. One of them is relative with the postpone enforcement of a decision which has raised a new doctrine about legal force's binding of the Constitutional Court's decision. This study raised the issue, first, about the character of the constitutional court's ruling which contained the limitation of time in constitutionality and the concept of conformity of the law with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Second, the influence of the court decision on legal development in Indonesia. This study used normative legal research. The results of the study concluded that, first, it is founded that the various characteristics related to the limitation of time in constitutionality in the court's decision which become the object of this study and also it is founded that the compability between the law and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia as follows : (i) The court's decision that set the limited of time in constitutionality explicitly and orders to adjust to the 1945 Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia, namely decisions number 012-016-019/PUU-IV/2006 (Corruption Eradication Commission Act) and decision number 32/PUU-XI/2013 (Insurance Related Business Act) and decision number 026/PUU-III/2005 and 026/PUU-IV/2006 (State Budget Act); (ii) Court's decision that determine the limited of constitutionality flexibly and orders to adjust to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia namely decision number 97/PUU-XI/2013 (Regional Government Act and Judicial Power Act) and decision number 14/PUU-XI/2013 (Presidential Election Act); (iii) Court's decision that do not mention the limitation of time in constitutionality but only orders to adjust to the 1945 Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia, namely decision number 28/PUU-XI/2013 (Cooperatives Act) and decision number 85/PUU-XI/2013 (Water Resources Act). Secondly, the constitutional court decision is one of the determinant factors in the function of legislation, and this can be understood because this is the form of discretion that the constitutional court has as the perpetrator of judicial power.

Implementasi Green Constitution di Indonesia: Jaminan Hak Konstitusional Pembangunan Lingkungan Hidup Berkelanjutan I Gede Yusa; Bagus Hermanto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Konsep Green Constitution yang telah diadopsi dalam beberapa konstitusi di dunia seperti Konstitusi Ekuador 2008 dan Konstitusi Perancis 2005, selaras dengan UUD NRI Tahun 1945 pasca amandemen yang memuat konsep Green Constitution sebagaimana dirumuskan pada Pasal 28H Ayat (1) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 yang mencerminkan generasi hak asasi manusia ketiga yakni hak kolektif dan hak pembangunan, berupa hak atas lingkungan hidup, serta Pasal 33 ayat (4) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 yang mencerminkan pembangunan lingkungan hidup yang berkelanjutan di Indonesia secara konstitusional. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk menganalisis konsep Green Constitution di dalam Konstitusi Indonesia (UUD NRI Tahun 1945). Di sisi lain, juga secara intensif mengkritisi implementasi dari konsep Green Constitution yang berkaitan dengan pembangunan lingkungan hidup yang berkelanjutan. Tulisan ini berfokus pada dua permasalahan hukum yakni : bagaimanakah konsep Green Constitution dalam konteks UUD NRI Tahun 1945 dan pengaturannya di Indonesia serta bagaimanakah implementasi konsep Green Constitution dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945 dalam konteks menjamin hak asasi manusia atas lingkungan hidup berkelanjutan. Adapun tulisan ini dibuat dengan menggunakan metode penulisan socio-legal dengan pendekatan studi konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Melalui tulisan ini diharapkan dapat menegaskan bahwa konsep Green Constitution di Indonesia dimaknai sebagai konstitutionalisasi norma hukum lingkungan sebagaimana diatur dan terimplementasi dalam ketentuan Pasal 28H ayat (1) dan Pasal 33 ayat (4) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 serta konsiderans menimbang huruf a, b, f, Pasal 1 angka (2), Pasal 44, Penjelasan Bagian I. Umum angka (1) dan (5) Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009. Namun demikian, Green Constitution belum tercermin secara holistik, terbatas pada indikator masyarakat, namun belum didukung indikator hukum dan indikator pelaksana praktik hukum.Green Constitution concept which has been adopted by several constitution in the world such as The Constitution of Ecuador 2008 and The Constitution of France 2005, inline with 1945 Indonesian Constitution after Amendment that contains Green Constitution concept in the Article 28H paragraph (1) 1945 Indonesian Constitution which shows the third human rights generation such as collective rights and development rights especially the rights of environmental, and in Article 33 paragraph (4) 1945 Indonesian Constitution that contains sustainable environmental development in Indonesia constitutionally. The main purpose of this journal is to analyze the concept of Green Constitution in the 1945 Indonesian Constitution. Besides, it also intends to criticize the implementation of the Green Constitution concept that relates to sustainable environmental development. This paper focuses on two law problems: how the concept of green constitution in 1945 Indonesian Constitution with other regulations is and how the implementation of green constitution concept in the 1945 Indonesian Constitution in the context guarantee human right for sustainable environmental development is. This paper is set as a socio-legal Research with conceptual study and statutory approach. This paper is expected to affirm that the Green Constitution in Indonesia is valued as environmental norm constitution as arranged and implemented in Article 28H paragraph (1) and Article 33 paragraph (4) 1945 Indonesian Constitution and Considering part a, b, f, Article 1 Sub-article (2), Article 44, Elucidation I. General part (1) and (5) The Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 32 Year 2009 about Protection and Management of Environment. However, the Green Constitution has not been reflected holistically. It is still limited on society indicators and has not been supported by legal indicators and indicators of legal practice.

Page 34 of 59 | Total Record : 584

32 33 34 35 36

Filter by Year

2015 2024

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 20 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol. 15 No. 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone
+6281215312967

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone +6281215312967

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone
+6281215312967

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA