cover
Contact Name
Rustamaji
Contact Email
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6285865999842
Journal Mail Official
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Gedung 3, Departemen Hukum Acara Alamat: Ir. Sutami No. 36A,Kentingan, Surakarta
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Verstek
ISSN : -     EISSN : 23550406     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i3.55027
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 453 Documents
TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN BEBAS PERKARA PENCABULAN ANAK (Studi Putusan Nomor 104/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tli.) Nabila, Elnajj Keysha; Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.95944

Abstract

This article analyses criminal procedure law related to the suitability of the judge's consideration of rendering a judgment of acquittal of case of obscene act against a child in Verdict Number 104/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tli. with the provision of Article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The purpose of this article is to determine whether the judge's consideration of rendering a judgment of acquittal of case of obscene act against a child in Verdict Number 104/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tli. is in accordance with the provision of Article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is a normative or doctrinal legal research that is prescriptive and applied. Types of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique used in collecting legal materials is literature study or document study. The finding proves that the judge's consideration of rendering a judgment of acquittal of case of obscene act against a child in Verdict Number 104/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tli. has been in accordance with the provision of Article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PADA PERKARA MEMPERTONTONKAN KETELANJANGAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 264/PID.B/2021/PN SGT) Andika, Reinaldy Bagus; Aldyan, Arsyad
Verstek Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i1.79518

Abstract

Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan dan mengkaji permasalahan mengenai hakim yang memutuskan putusan pidana berupa penjara selama 2 tahun terhadap pelaku pelecehan seksual dalam hal ini, pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana apakah sudah sesuai dengan Pasal 183 KUHAP jo Pasal 36 Undang Undang no. 44 tahun 2008 tentang Pornografi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitianhukum normatif bersifat perspektif dan terapan. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, dengan cara studi pustaka, teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode deduktif yang berpangkal pada premis mayor dan premis minor. Dari hasil penelitian dan pembahasan yang telah dilakukan Penulis, Penulis menemukan bahwa pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap Terdakwa telah sesuai dengan Pasal 183 jo Pasal 36 Undang Undang no. 44 tahun 2008 studi putusan nomor: 264/PID.B/2021/Pn Sgt dengan memperhatikan alat-alat bukti yang sah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP dengan setidaknya berdasarkan minimal adanya 2 (dua) alat bukti, sehingga Terdakwa terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan menurut hukum melakukan tindak pidana.
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KEFARMASIAN DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR: 29/PID.SUS/2024/PN SLT Nurlatifah, Istizanah; Sukma, Dara Pustika
Verstek Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i1.98345

Abstract

This study aims to analyze whether the judge's considerations in rendering a criminal sentencing decision in the pharmaceutical crime case, Verdict Number: 29/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Slt, comply with the provisions of Article 183 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This study was normative legal research with a prescriptive and applied nature. The approach used in this study was a case study. Primary and secondary legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed using deductive syllogism techniques. Based on the results of research and discussion, it is concluded that the judge's considerations in ruling on the pharmaceutical criminal case in Verdict Number 29/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Slt are in accordance with Article 183 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), as there are four (4) valid pieces of evidence in the case that convinced the judge that the defendant was indeed guilty of distributing pharmaceutical products that did not meet the required standards and must be held accountable for his action.