cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rustamaji
Contact Email
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6285865999842
Journal Mail Official
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Gedung 3, Departemen Hukum Acara Alamat: Ir. Sutami No. 36A,Kentingan, Surakarta
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Verstek
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : 23550406     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i3.55027
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 666 Documents
 43   44   45   46   47 
IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 138 KUHAP BAB XV PENUNTUTAN TENTANG PEMBERKASAN PERKARA ATAS PENYIDIKAN DAN PENUNTUTAN SEBUAH PERKARA (STUDI DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI JAKARTA TIMUR) Rahardhan Gaza Sumantri; Novita Alfian
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73081

Abstract

This legal research aims to find out and examine problems regarding the implementation of Article 138 of the Criminal Code CHAPTER XV prosecution regarding the filing of cases for the investigation and prosecution of a case with study at (East Jakarta District Attorney), the entire process of which is included in the pre-prosecution process. This research is an empirical legal research that is descriptive in nature. Secondary data types include primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Primary data is the main data of this study. While secondary data is used to support primary data. Data collection techniques used were interviews and literature studies with qualitative analysis techniques. The research instrument was in the form of the provisions of Article 110 and Article 138 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code, then the analytical technique used was the deductive method. From the results of the study, a conclusion can be drawn that in the case of a narcotics crime case of the methamphetamine type with the case register number: BP/57/V/2022/Res.Narcotics at the East Jakarta District Attorney's Office, then the Public Prosecutor has applied the legal provisions of Article 138 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Where the process of transferring the file by the investigator to the Public Prosecutor has been carried out and according to the provisions of Article 110 and Article 138 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Public Prosecutor after examining the case file and stating that the file is incomplete.Keywords: Pre-prosecution, Implementation, investigating officer, East Jakarta District Attorney, Independence, Public Prosecutor, investigation, prosecution
PENGGUNAAN POLIGRAF (LIE DETECTOR) DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PERSETUBUHAN ANAK Melati, Agnada Risma; Septiningsih, Ismawati
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.71922

Abstract

This article analyses the use of a polygraph (lie detector) in proving cases of child intercourse in decision number: 111/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Wno. The purpose of this article is to determine the suitability of using a polygraph (lie detector) in the crime of sexual intercourse with a child under the provisions of Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This writing uses normative legal research methods that are prescriptive and applied. The approach used in this research is a case approach. Types and sources of legal materials through library research. The results of the study show that the use of a polygraph (lie detector) in the evidence carried out by the Public Prosecutor regarding the crime of sexual intercourse with a child in the decision number: 111/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Wno is in accordance with Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely as letter evidence. However, in this case its position is only limited as complementary evidence, not as the main evidence at trial, so it must be paired with other evidence to strengthen the evidentiary process in court. Keywords: Proof; Polygraph; Letter
URGENSI PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERSIDANGAN TINDAK PIDANA ELEKTRONIK Hizkia Andhitya Wijaya; Muhammad Rustamaji
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73615

Abstract

This article analyzes the urgency of the evidentiary process in electronic criminal trials. This study aims to determine the importance of the evidentiary process in an electronic crime trial where in an electronic crime the evidence submitted is not only tangible but intangible evidence. This research is a normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. The legal material collection technique used in this study is the document study technique or library study technique. The collection of legal materials is carried out through document studies and literature studies. Based on the results of the research, it shows that proof in electronic crime is the main thing, because in the proof what is sought is material truth, that a crime has occurred and it is the defendant who is guilty of committing it. The court is bound by a rule or methods or provisions of evidence as stipulated in the law. Legitimate evidence must be carried out in court in accordance with the procedures or methods that apply in the law of evidence.Keywords: Evidence, Electronic Crime, Criminal Procedure law
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENILAI SAKSI MAHKOTA PADA TINDAK PIDANA MEMBANTU MELAKUKAN PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA Icha Hanifah Razzak; Putri Maha Dewi
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73296

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether the crown witness was considered by the judge in proving the crime of assisting premeditated murder in Decision Number 41/Pid.B/2021/PN Bil. This research is a normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. This research uses a case approach. The legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used in this legal research is literature study. The results of this study indicate that in Decision Number 41/Pid.B/2021/PN Bil, the crown witness was considered by the judge. The use of crown witnesses is allowed while still observing the provisions in submitting crown witnesses. These provisions are the separation of case files, lack of evidence, and criminal acts in the form of participation. The judge's consideration in Decision Number 41/Pid.B/2021/PN Bil which uses a crown witness is in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Based on the evidence submitted by the public prosecutor which was strengthened by the testimony of the crown witness, the judge was convinced that the criminal act had actually occurred and the defendant was the one guilty of committing it. The use of crown witnesses in this case was able to facilitate the judge in imposing punishment on the defendant who helped commit premeditated murder.Keywords: Crown Witness; Evidence; Judge's Consideration
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KESEHATAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 14/PID.SUS/2021/PN PTI) Ana Pristiwijayani; Itok Dwi Kurniawan
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73101

Abstract

Abstract: The research conducted by the author aims to determine the consider of judges in a rule deciding criminal cases by deliberately producing or distributing pharmaceutical preparations without a marketing license and the consider (verdict study Number: 14/Pid.Sus/2022 / PN Pti). This type of legal research is normative legal research and prescriptive and applied. The research approach uses a case approach. Legal materials used include primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used is the study of literature. The analysis used is syllogism deduction. Based on the results of the study showed that, first, the position of pharmacologists compared to other evidence is the same as long as the conditions as valid evidence are met. Second, the consideration of the District Court judge in examining and deciding the criminal case by the defendant Ahmad Nur Muchlisin is following Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code because it has met at least two valid pieces of evidence, and the pharmacologist's statement does not have a binding evidentiary force value. Keywords: Health Crimes; Trihexyphenidyl; Evidence; Judge’s Consideration
PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN SANKSI PIDANA PENJARA KEPADA ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN (Putusan Nomor: 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN-Enr) Charista Eforina Waruwu; Itok Dwi Kurniawan
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.60237

Abstract

This article aims to determine the suitability of the judge's decision in imposing prison sentences on children who are perpetrators of abuse based on the provisions of Article 354 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code and the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The type of research used is normative legal research which is prescriptive and applied. This legal research approach is a case approach. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used is literature study. The technique of analyzing legal materials used in writing this law is the syllogism method using deductive thinking patterns. The results of this study indicate that the judge's decision in the Enrekang District Court Decision Number 3/Pid.sus-Anak/2020/PN-Enr has given a decision that is not in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 79 Paragraph (2) of the Child Criminal Protection System Act. because the Judge did not give consideration that refers to Article 354 of the Criminal Code.Keywords: Judge's Decision, Persecution, Child Defendant
KESESUAIAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP TERDAKWA ANAK DENGAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN YANG BERLAKU Ulinda Sekar Wulandari; Kristiyadi Kristiyadi
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.72255

Abstract

This study aims to determine the suitability of the judge's consideration in the Decision of the Klaten District Court Number 3/Pid.Sus-Child/PN.Kln with the provisions of the applicable laws, especially Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System of Children. This study uses prescriptive normative legal research methods. This study uses a case study. The types of legal materials used include primary and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used by the authors in this study is a document study technique or library research. The legal material analysis technique in this study uses the syllogism method with the mindset of deduction. The results showed that the judge's consideration was based on the indictment of the Public Prosecutor and Juridical and Non-juridical considerations in imposing a criminal supervision to children in the form of placing children under the supervision of the public prosecutor for 3 (three) months in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. In its consideration, the judge had considered at least two pieces of evidence, namely witness statements and the defendant's statement where the beliefs obtained from the two evidences the judge was able to state that the defendant had been guilty of committing the criminal acts of theft by weighting. Keywords: Judge's consideration, Child, Theft of Crimes, Criminal Imposition
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGKABULKAN KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP KESALAHAN JUDEX FACTIE Bagas Prasetya Faliquzzaman; Muthia Sakti
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73789

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to analyze the consideration of the supreme court regarding the judex factie error in deciding that corruption was acquitted (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 2407/K/Pid.Sus/2020). This type of normative research is prescriptive with a case approach. The research legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials with library research collection techniques. This research shows that the consideration of the Supreme Court in decision Number 2407K/Pid.Sus/2020 is in accordance with Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code because judex factie in this case the Decision of the Makassar High Court does not apply the law as it should. Keywords: Supreme Court, Judex Factie, Free Verdic
ANALISIS PENGGUNAAN DAKWAAN ALTERNATIF SUBSIDAIR OLEH PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PERKARA PERLINDUNGAN ANAK afina akmalia; Arsyad Aldyan
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73335

Abstract

This study aims to determine the suitability of the use of alternative subsidiary forms of indictment by public prosecutors in proving child protection cases with the provisions of the KUHAP based on decision Number 13/Pid.Sus.Anak/2020/PN.Kln. This research is included in normative legal research with a case study. Techniques for collecting primary and secondary legal materials are obtained from document studies or literature. Based on this research, it was found that the use of an alternative subsidiary form of indictment by the public prosecutor in proving child protection cases in Decision Number 13/Pid.Sus.Anak/2020/PN.Kln is by the KUHAP. The Public Prosecutor in preparing the indictment has complied with the provisions stipulated in the Attorney General’s Circular Letter Number SE004/J.A/11/1993 concerning Making Indictments. The preparation of this subsidiary alternative indictment has met the formal and material requirements for an indictment as regulated in the provisions of Article 143 Paragraph (2) of the KUHAP. The Public Prosecutor used an alternative subsidiary form of indictment because the Public Prosecutor was unsure which article was most appropriate to apply to the actions he was charged with against the defendant.Keywords: Indictment, Alternative Subsidiary, Public Prosecutor, Child Protection
KESESUAIAN PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA ANAK SEBAGAI PERANTARA JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA DENGAN UU SPPA Laksmidari Khansa Bella Wisnu Wardani; Kristiyadi Kristiyadi
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73106

Abstract

This article aims to find out the legal considerations used by Judges in deciding a narcotics case with a child who acts as an intermediary for buying and selling narcotics in the study of verdict Number 4/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PNWng. The method used in this research is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. The research approach uses a case approach. The types of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials with library research/ document studies. Based on the research, the results obtained were that the judge's considerations in deciding criminal cases with children as defendants were in accordance with the Law on Juvenile Justice System. Children Against the Law have fulfilled the elements of the article charged by the Public Prosecutor through evidence that is in accordance with Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In addition, the trial is also in accordance with the provisions of the Law on Juvenile Justice System where children are tried based on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. However, in sentencing, the judge felt that he had not been optimal in his considerations where the judge still ruled out several articles and principles in the Law on Juvenile Justice System which affected the outcome of the decision in sentencing.Keywords: Children Against the Law; Narcotics Sale and Purchase Intermediary; The Law on Juvenile Justice System

Page 45 of 67 | Total Record : 666

 43   44   45   46   47 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14, No 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI-MARET Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER Vol 13, No 2 (2025): APRIL-JUNI Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-MARET Vol 12, No 4 (2024): OKTOBER-DESEMBER Vol 12, No 3 (2024): JULI-SEPTEMBER Vol 12, No 2 (2024): APRIL-JUNI Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-MARET Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER Vol 11, No 2 (2023): APRIL-JUNI Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-MARET Vol 10, No 4 (2022): OKTOBER-DESEMBER Vol 10, No 3 (2022): JULI-SEPTEMBER Vol 10, No 2 (2022): APRIL-JUNI Vol 10, No 2 (2022): APRIL-JUNI Vol 10, No 1 (2022): JANUARI-MARET Vol 9, No 4 (2021): OKTOBER-DESEMBER Vol 9, No 3 (2021): JULI-SEPTEMBER Vol 9, No 2 (2021): APRIL-JUNI Vol 9, No 1 (2021): JANUARI-MARET Vol 8 No 3 (2020): SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER Vol 8, No 2 (2020): MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 8, No 1 (2020): JANUARI-APRIL Vol 6, No 3 (2018): SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER Vol 6, No 2 (2018): MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 6, No 1 (2018): JANUARI-APRIL Vol 7, No 3 (2019): SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER Vol 7, No 2 (2019): MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 7, No 1 (2019): JANUARI-APRIL More Issue