cover
Contact Name
Anita Susilawati
Contact Email
anitasusilawati@lecturer.unri.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jomase@isomase.org
Editorial Address
Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Riau Kampus Bina Widya, Jl. HR. Soebrantas Km. 12,5 Panam, Pekanbaru 28293, Riau, INDONESIA
Location
Kota pekanbaru,
Riau
INDONESIA
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Published by Universitas Riau
ISSN : 23547065     EISSN : 25276085     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.36842/jomase
The mission of the JOMAse is to foster free and extremely rapid scientific communication across the world wide community. The JOMAse is an original and peer review article that advance the understanding of both science and engineering and its application to the solution of challenges and complex problems in naval architecture, offshore and subsea, machines and control system, aeronautics, satellite and aerospace. The JOMAse is particularly concerned with the demonstration of applied science and innovative engineering solutions to solve specific industrial problems. Articles preferably should focus on the following aspects: new methods or theory or philosophy innovative practices, critical survey or analysis of a subject or topic, new or latest research findings and critical review or evaluation of new discoveries. Scope The JOMAse welcomes manuscript submissions from academicians, scholars, and practitioners for possible publication from all over the world that meets the general criteria of significance and educational excellence. The scope of the journal is as follows: Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering Computational fluid dynamic and Experimental Mechanics Hydrodynamic and Aerodynamics Noise and Vibration Aeronautics and Satellite Engineering Materials and Corrosion Fluids Mechanics Engineering Stress and Structural Modeling Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering Robotics and Control Heat Transfer and Thermal Power Plant Engineering Risk and Reliability Case studies and Critical reviews
Articles 329 Documents
Analysis of Oil Dielectric Strength Insulation on Oil Circuit Breakers Based on Service Life and Operating Frequency Engla Harda Arya; Benriwati Maharmi; Mohammad Lutfi
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 66 No 2 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (573.141 KB) | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v66i2.300

Abstract

The electricity distribution breakdown can be caused the service life and operating frequency of Oil Dielectric Strength (ODS). Hence, it requires a study due to the spare part is difficult to find. This paper aims to test the ODS on Oil Circuit Breaker (OCB) of 13.8 kV aged between 29 to 43 years. The test used the ASTM D1816 standard to analyze the effect of oil life and circuit breaker operating frequency on the physical, color and strength of ODS. For the visual test used the ASTM D1524 standard. The color test based on the ASTM D1500 standard. From the test results, it can be seen that 6DN F1 was yellow-black in colors. The color level was from 0.5 to 6, which was a striking color difference. This happens because it had been operating for 3 years with a frequency of 2 manual open times and 11 trips with a large normal load of 206A. In the 8D F7 feeder, there was also a decrease in breakdown voltage, which was far from 45.6 kV to 9.7 kV. Therefore, the oil was declared failed due to below the minimum standard of 27 kV. Based the validity test, the six samples were still within the allowable limits based on ASTM D1816 with the range value being below 92%. This means that the six samples were valid.
Effect of Rotational Speed on Hardness Value and Area of Vertical Bar-Plate Rotary Friction Weld Joint Yohanes Yohanes; Meipen Meipen
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 66 No 3 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v66i3.327

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of rotational speed on the weld joint area and the hardness value of vertical bar-plate friction welding on dissimilar materials. Several testing methods were carried out, namely liquid penetrant, macro-observations, micro-observations and hardness test to investigation the welding results. The results of the liquid penetrant test have no effect on the welding specimens. Based on macro-observations was revealed a large enough cavity at a speed of 2.484 rpm with a cavity length of 4.76 mm, then getting smaller at a speed of 2.613 rpm with a cavity length of 2.63 mm. Then, at a speed of 4.335 rpm, no cavities were found. The micro-observation was a change in the microstructure, where in the weld metal area produces fine grains that affect the hardness value. The hardness value increases as it approaches the weld area. The highest hardness value at a speed of 4.335 rpm with a hardness value of 148.10 VHN, while the lowest hardness at a rotational speed of 2.484 rpm has a hardness value of 140.44 VHN.
Energy and Exergy Analysis of 6 MW Gas Power Plant at BOB PT. Bumi Siak Pusako - Pertamina Hulu Mohammad Barbarosa; Awaludin Martin; Yogie Rinaldy Ginting
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 66 No 3 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v66i3.287

Abstract

BOB PT. Bumi Siak Pusako – Pertamina Hulu is Indonesian Operator Company that uses gas power plant for Pekanbaru Coastal Plan (CPP) block. The 4x6 MW energy capacities must follow energy, exergy, economics analysis and environmental impacts due to CO² emission and exhaust gas temperature. From the analysis, the gas power plant thermal efficiency is 42.85%, exegetic efficiency is 33.22% with the largest exergy loss of 18.7 kW in combustion chamber, 7.1 kW in compressor, and 2.69 kW in gas turbine with total cost loss due to exergy destruction of 2,537.52 $/hour. The cost loss value is 1362.45 $/hour for compressor, 1,962.28 $/hour for combustion chamber, and 212.79 $/hour for gas turbine. The exhaust emission is 0.21 kg/s, forest area required to absorb pollution is 11.63 ha, exhaust heat released is 1913.51 kW. This study indicates that the analytical method carried out can be developed and applied comprehensively to generating facilities in Indonesia.
Identification of Signature Images with Edge Detection Canny Yanti Desnita Tasri
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 66 No 3 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v66i3.316

Abstract

In authenticating and verifying important documents, one of them is in the form of identifying the authenticity of a signature. In addition, the signature is also a form of ratification and a sign of approval in important documents is mandatory. Along with current technological developments, the signing process can be carried out in digital media such as cellphones and other media. The ability of the system to identify a person's signature becomes important because of the many forgeries that occur. This study aims to implement the Canny edge detection method to identify a person's signature. The number of signature images used is 10 signatures. The results of this study indicate that the Canny edge detection method has a similarity percentage of 70% to 100%, and the similarity values below 70% and above 100% are grouped into signature images that are not original.
The Effect of Short and Long Fiber on Impact Strength in High Density Polyethylene-Fiberglass Composite Elgi Oki Andeska; M Dalil; Dodi Sofyan Arief
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 66 No 3 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v66i3.315

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the HDPE (High Density Polyethylene) reinforced with fiberglass to increase strength and toughness into a composite that has the potential to replace ABS (Acronitrile Butadiene Styrene). The composites were made with variations in composition based on volume fraction. The HDPE as matrix and fiberglass as reinforcement through the mixing method, molded in a heating machine (T=140°C), pressed with a pressing time of ±45 minutes. Then, the specimens were cut according to ASTM D6110 standard, and the Charpy impact test was performed. The impact of long fiber for the HDPE composition of 70%vol and fiberglass 30%vol, the average impact strength was 176.838 Joule/mm². The long fiber for the HDPE composition of 80%vol and fiberglass of 20%vol, the average impact strength was 208.08 Joule/mm². The impact of short fiber for HDPE composition of 70%vol and fiberglass of 30%vol, the average impact strength was 72.858 Joule/mm². The short fiber for HDPE composition 80%vol and fiberglass of 20%vol, the average impact strength was 33.394 Joule/mm². Based on research of ABS mixture at 40%/60%vol mixture variation, the average impact strength was 24.8 Joule/mm2 and the 20%/80%vol mixture variation, the impact strength was 18 Joule/mm². In conclusion, the impact strength of the ABS was lower than the HDPE-Fiberglass composite. Therefore, the HDPE-Fiberglass composite can be used as a substitute for ABS for car bumpers.
Study Experimental of Diesel Engines Performance by Using Variations of Mesh Filter and Biodiesel B40, B50 as Fuel Romy Romy; Zuchra Helwani; Asal Felix Mandrofa
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 66 No 3 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v66i3.291

Abstract

Biodiesel is an alternative fuel, which can be used as a substitute for fossil fuels. Biodiesel has different characteristics than fossil fuels, so need study to improve engine performance. One way to improve engine performance by vary the fuel filter mesh. In this study by varied the size of the filter mesh with sizes of 2, 10, and 30 microns. This study used B40 (a ratio 60% diesel and 40% biodiesel) and B50 (a ratio 50% diesel and 50% biodiesel) as fuel. Then, an engine rpm was varied by brake pressure load of 2500 kg/m2, 5000 kg/m2, 7500 kg/m2, 10000 kg/m2, and 12500 kg/m2. As results, the optimal mesh size used for B40 was 2 microns and 30 microns for B50 fuel. From the comparison of engine performance results, the fuel filter mesh used in B40 fuel has better engine performance results compared to B50.
Analysis of Current and Electrode Types on Welding Defects in ASTM A36 Mild Steel Herisiswanto Herisiswanto; Yohanes Yohanes; Khoirul Hafisuddin
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 66 No 3 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v66i3.303

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the welding defects that occurring in the SMAW (Shielded Metal Arc Welding) process. This study used experimental method to investigate the various types of electrodes and welding current. The welding process in this study used ASTM A36 low carbon steel with specimen dimensions of 8 mm thick, 80 mm wide, and 100 mm long. The welding process was carried out in an underhand position (1G) using a V-seam layer with a SMAW welding machine, which a sliding adaptive two axis system with speed control. The types of electrodes used were E6013 and E7018 electrodes with a diameter of 3.2 mm. The current variations used 90 A, 105 A and 120 A. The test methods used the Penetrant Test, Visual Test (Non Destructive Test) and Tensile Test (Destructive Test). The results of this study were: 1) the welding defects that often occurring at the E6013 electrode due to undercut and at the E7018 electrode caused by the porosity, 2) at a current of 120 A the occurrence of welding defects was minimal, and 3) the tensile strength of E7018 was greater than E6013.
Design of Betel Nut Peeler Machine Based on Quality Function Deployment and Value Engineering Yunus Pardosi; Anita Susilawati
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 67 No 1 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v67i1.324

Abstract

The goal of this study is to design a betel nut peeler machine based the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Value Engineering methods to optimize the stripping of betel nut process. A case study was carried out in the Keritang District of the Tembilahan Regency of Riau Province, Indonesia. Previously, the Keritang District community used the manual processes stripping technique, thus the final production cannot be in huge amounts. The method was implemented through several steps that began with gathering data and information about the machines desired by the community using QFD and Value Engineering. The machine was designed with the goals of being simple to use, efficient, and responsive to the needs of the community in mind. Each of these characteristics is discussed in the House of Quality. As a result, the Value Engineering approach was developed to uncover effective costs to deliver good quality, appearance, or features, and it may be used to improve product quality, lower costs, boost efficiency, and reduce risk. Finally, an appropriate and optimal design for the betel nut peeler was developed. The benefit of betel nut peeler machine design is supposed to be simple to use and to provide big amounts of stripping results quickly. As a result, the production of betel nut peeling rises.
Design of Biomass Stove Using the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Method Yohanes Yohanes; Helmi Afianda Azhar
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 67 No 1 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v67i1.304

Abstract

The design of the furnace used by the community is still very simple so that the combustion efficiency is still low. This study aims to design and test the performance of a wood stove based on the wishes and needs of the community. This study uses a descriptive design. The sample of this research is 50 respondents. The measuring instruments of this research are questionnaires and field observations. The method in this study uses the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method in analyzing the wood stove production design and the House of Quality matrix is ​​used in making the design to determine the characteristics of the community. The wood stove design used is two wood stoves. In the manufacture of this biomass furnace using mild steel material. The results showed that two wood stoves and one wood stove produced a faster boiling time than one wood stove, namely 4 minutes 52 seconds for two wood stoves, while for one wood stove it took 5 minutes 31 seconds. The difference in time obtained from these two tools is 39 seconds. The results of this study indicate that two wood stoves are more effective than one stove. This study recommends that people can use wood fuel when cooking, so it is easier than one biomass stove.
Effect of Spindle Speed of Bar-Plate Rotary Friction Welding Machine on Joint Interface Area and Hardness Value Michael Simorangkir; Yohanes Yohanes; Muftil Badri
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 67 No 1 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v67i1.322

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the rotational speed parameter on the joint interface weld area and the value of hardness on similar materials. Welding parameters used the rotational speed of 2,484 rpm, 2,613 rpm and 4,335 rpm. Test method used in this research was liquid penetrant, macro and micro-observation and hardness test. The results of the liquid penetrant test showed no defects on the surface of the connection. In macro-observation, where there is a fairly large void at rotational speed of 2,484 rpm, which has length is 2,69 mm, then shrinks at 2,613 rpm to 1,52 mm, then at 4,335 rpm there is no visible void. In micro-observations showed that the weld metal area had a finer grain structure than the HAZ (Heat Affected Zone) and base metal areas this affect hardness value. The results of the hardness test are that the higher the rotational speed the higher the hardness value produced.

Filter by Year

2013 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 69 No 3 (2025): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 69 No 2 (2025): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 69 No 1 (2025): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 68 No 3 (2024): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 68 No 2 (2024): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 68 No 1 (2024): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 67 No 3 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 67 No 2 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 67 No 1 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 66 No 3 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 66 No 2 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 66 No 1 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 65 No 3 (2021): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 65 No 2 (2021): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 65 No 1 (2021): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 64 No 3 (2020): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 64 No 2 (2020): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 64 No 1 (2020): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 63 No 3 (2019): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 63 No 2 (2019): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 63 No 1 (2019): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 62 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 61 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 60 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 59 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 58 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 57 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 56 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 55 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 54 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 53 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 52 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 51 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 50 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 49 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 48 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 47 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 46 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 45 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 44 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 43 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 42 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 41 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 40 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 39 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 38 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 37 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 36 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 35 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 34 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 33 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 32 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 31 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 30 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 29 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 28 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 27 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 26 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 25 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 24 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 23 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 22 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 21 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 20 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 19 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 18 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 17 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 16 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 15 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 14 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 13 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 12 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 11 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 10 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 9 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 8 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 7 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 6 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 5 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 4 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 3 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 1 No 1 (2013): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) More Issue