cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Anita Susilawati
Contact Email
anitasusilawati@lecturer.unri.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jomase@isomase.org
Editorial Address
Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Riau Kampus Bina Widya, Jl. HR. Soebrantas Km. 12,5 Panam, Pekanbaru 28293, Riau, INDONESIA
Location
Kota pekanbaru,
Riau
INDONESIA
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Published by Universitas Riau
ISSN : 23547065     EISSN : 25276085     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.36842/jomase
Core Subject : Science, Engineering,
Aerospace Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Mechanical Engineering
The mission of the JOMAse is to foster free and extremely rapid scientific communication across the world wide community. The JOMAse is an original and peer review article that advance the understanding of both science and engineering and its application to the solution of challenges and complex problems in naval architecture, offshore and subsea, machines and control system, aeronautics, satellite and aerospace. The JOMAse is particularly concerned with the demonstration of applied science and innovative engineering solutions to solve specific industrial problems. Articles preferably should focus on the following aspects: new methods or theory or philosophy innovative practices, critical survey or analysis of a subject or topic, new or latest research findings and critical review or evaluation of new discoveries. Scope The JOMAse welcomes manuscript submissions from academicians, scholars, and practitioners for possible publication from all over the world that meets the general criteria of significance and educational excellence. The scope of the journal is as follows: Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering Computational fluid dynamic and Experimental Mechanics Hydrodynamic and Aerodynamics Noise and Vibration Aeronautics and Satellite Engineering Materials and Corrosion Fluids Mechanics Engineering Stress and Structural Modeling Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering Robotics and Control Heat Transfer and Thermal Power Plant Engineering Risk and Reliability Case studies and Critical reviews
Arjuna Subject : Teknik (semua kategori) - Teknik (Lain-Lain)
Articles 329 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
The Effect of Variation of Bar Surface Chamfer Angle on Rotary Friction Welding Connections Yohanes, Yohanes; Badri, Muftil; Pramija, Syafirman
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 67 No 3 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v67i3.320

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of chamfer angle variations on flash, welding time, interface and hardness values at welded joints of similar materials. The method was used, with parameters of the rotational speed of 4.335 rpm, friction pressure of 0.5 MPa, forging pressure of 0.7 MPa, forging time of 10 seconds and chamfer angle variations of 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°. Then, the specimen result was tested using the projector profile, Non-Destructive Test (NDT), macro-observation, and Vicker test. The result showed that the greater the chamfer angle variation on the given bar surface, the smaller the size of the resulting flash. The smallest flash dimension was produced at a chamfer angle variation of 45°, with an average flash height of 1.03 mm, successfully reducing the flash height by 62% from variations without chamfer angles. Moreover, an average flash width of 0.26 mm reduced the flash width by 77% of the variation without a chamfer angle. Therefore, the greater the variation of the chamfer angle, the smaller the flash size and the more significant the variation of the chamfer angle, the longer the welding time. In the interface area, chamfer angle variations do not affect cracks and voids. The chamfer angle affects the average hardness value, where the more significant the chamfer angle, the more the hardness value is increased.
Finite Element-Based Optimization of Cross-Section Area on 2D Truss Structure with 10-members and 12-members Using Nonlinear Programming Method Nazaruddin - Nazaruddin; Feblil Huda; Hafizah Hafizah; Fatiya Fatiya
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 67 No 3 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v67i3.350

Abstract

Designing a structure requires good planning to obtain optimal results. Some things that need to be considered in designing structures are the materials used, the dimensions of the structure, and others. By optimizing the dimensions of the structure, the use of materials can be minimized so that production costs can be reduced. The experiment requires additional cost and time. Therefore, finite element software can be used to design the structure optimally in compliance with the constraints set according to the requirements. Previous studies have carried out cross-section area optimization of structures with maximum allowable stress limits. In this research, the optimization of 2D truss cross-section area with maximum volume constraint is developed using MATLAB software with fmincon function. The structure is modelled in 2 shapes: a 2D truss with ten members and a 2D truss with twelve members. The optimum area is obtained from the simulation results, which are almost the same in both structures, while the lower stress value is obtained in the ten-member 2D truss structure. The maximum stress (tensile stress) on the 12-member 2D truss occurs on element 12 at 3484.28 psi, and then the minimum stress (compressive stress) occurs on elements 3, 4, 8, and 9 at -3472.10 psi. The maximum stress (tensile stress) on the 10-member 2D truss structure occurs in elements 1 and 9 at 3472.10 psi, and the minimum stress (compressive stress) occurs in element four at -3479.77 psi.
Analysis of Components Selection of Oil Draining Machine for Spinner System Based Analytical Hierarchy Process Evander Simanjuntak; Anita Susilawati; Herisiswanto Herisiswanto; Dedi Rosa Putra Cupu
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 67 No 3 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v67i3.310

Abstract

The function of the oil draining machine is to effectively reduce the oil content in the food from frying. This study aims to analyse the spinner system's components for the oil draining machine using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The AHP makes broad and unstructured problems into a flexible and easy-to-understand model. This research begins with a study of the initial design of the spinner system for the oil-draining machine components. Then, the characteristics and process parameters (spinner) of the oil-draining machine's parts were analysed using the AHP method. From the analysis results, the new designs were developed by eliminating or combining components that did not add value. The priority of consumer needs for function, performance, ergonomics, durability, serviceability and aesthetics were referenced to make a new design. Then, the new components of the spinner system oil draining machine were developed. Customers' needs for design priority include functionality to drain the cooking oil and crackers, capacity exceeding 3kg, ease of assembly, lightweight, easy to use, stainless steel material, easy to repair and dark colour selection.
Development of Rotary Fatigue Test Equipment Based on the Joseph Marin Approach Prasetyo, Anang; Afrizal, Efi; Nazaruddin, Nazaruddin
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 67 No 3 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v67i3.344

Abstract

This paper proposed the development of rotary fatigue test equipment. This equipment was used to test the JIS S45C steel, validated using the Joseph Marin approach. Analyzing the fatigue strength of JIS S45C steel using the Joseph Marin approach was compared to experimental testing. The dimension of the test specimens was based on the ASTM E 466. The test data was displayed in the form of an S-N curve. The test results showed the fatigue strength of JIS S45C steel on the whole that was close to each other, experimentally and using the Joseph Marin approach. In the infinite life region, it is known that the fatigue strength based on the Joseph Marin approach was lower than experimental tests. Therefore, if JIS S45C steel had received a hefty load repeatedly, it would fail more quickly.
Analysis of Workbench Flatness Measurement and Product Result of 3 Axis CNC Router Machine Junaidi, Abdul Khair; Mendofa, Dyon Shaputra; Arief, Dodi Sofyan
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 67 No 3 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v67i3.349

Abstract

The development of technology in the industrial sector is increasing rapidly, especially the application of computers in the field of machinery. Demands from consumers who want good quality workpieces, precision, completed in a short time and in large quantities, will be easier to work with a CNC Router machine. Surface flatness is an absolute thing that must be considered in the machining process, especially the 3 Axis CNC Router machine. This type of research is an experimental research, using Dutch teak wood as a workpiece with a height of 15 mm, a length of 100 mm and a width of 80 mm, the machining process uses a 3 Axis CNC Router Machine. The flatness of the workbench is first measured, then the product is prepared with a depth of 2 mm in the product area. The research uses a variation of the spindle speed of 600 rpm, 800 rpm and 1000 rpm. After that, measurements are taken to obtain the flatness value. Measuring flatness using a Dial indicator measuring instrument with accuracy (1 µm). The best product flatness test or the lowest value is (32.00 µm) obtained from the spindle speed of 1000 rpm and the most uneven product evenness is (56.00 µm) obtained from the spindle speed of 600 rpm, knowing the effect of the flatness value of the workbench on the product flatness value 3 Axis CNC Router Machine, that the flatter the workbench, the flatter the product results. The results of the research can be used to refine machining strategies to achieve optimal machining.
Investigation of Tensile and Impact Properties of Pineapple Leaf Fiber-Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Hybrid Composites Badri, Muftil; Sari, Azzaharah Isyari Nuraini; Dalil, M; Saputra, Sukemi Indra
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 68 No 2 (2024): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v68i2.369

Abstract

Kontes Kapal Cepat Tak Berawak Nasional (KKCTBN) held by Pusat Prestasi Nasional (Puspresnas) Kemendikbudristek RI aims to encourage innovation in the design and performance of shipping-maritime technology prototypes. The selection of the right material for the catamaran hull is very important because it affects the strength and weight of the ship. Materials such as fiber reinforced polymer, which uses glass fiber, are often used due to their good mechanical strength. However, natural fibers such as pineapple leaf fiber also have potential as composite reinforcement. The combination of natural and synthetic fibers, such as pineapple leaf fiber and glass fiber, in hybrid composites can improve the mechanical properties of the material. The purpose of this study was to investigate tensile and impact properties of pineapple leaf fiber-glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) hybrid composites. Fiber preparation was carried out by separating pineapple leaf to produce fibers, alkaline treatment using 10% NaOH with a soaking time of 24 hours, and oven drying at 100?C for 60 minutes. Polymer as the matrix used was 50% while the percentage variations of pineapple leaf fiber and glass fiber were sequentially as follows 5%:45%, 10%:40% and 15%:35%. It was found that the tensile strength of the 10% pineapple leaf fiber composite was about 114 MPa and impact strength 49.96 J/mm², density 1.19 g/cm3. The results of this study indicate that the resulting composite can be used as an alternative material in the prototype hull of a catamaran type unmanned speedboat.
Enhancing ASTM B424 UNS N08825 Long Seam Weld Liner Material with Annealing Quenching Techniques in the Cladding Process on the Surface of Steel Pipes Yunasri, Yunasri; Hasibuan, Fardin; Hakim, Arif Rahman; Ariyanto, Nugroho Pratomo
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 68 No 2 (2024): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v68i2.370

Abstract

The use of cladding methods in manufacturing corrosion-resistant pipes is crucial for industries such as oil and gas, chemical plants, and pressure vessel manufacturing. This study focuses on ASTM B424 UNS N08825, a corrosion-resistant alloy (CRA) to be used as the surface layer for steel pipes. The cladding method involves forming CRA sheets into longitudinal pipes, followed by welding the joints, annealing, and rapid cooling before high process expansion to surface layer the steel pipes. At a temperature of 930-990°C, the annealing process aims to reduce stress and improve material properties, followed by rapid cooling to stabilize the microstructure. Various tests were conducted on the CRA liner pipes with or without annealing and quenching, including tensile testing, hardness testing, chemical composition analysis, and microstructure examination. The results showed that the material's ultimate tensile strength and hardness significantly increased after the treatment, with better uniformity in the microstructure. This study concludes that annealing and rapid cooling enhance the mechanical properties and stability of ASTM B424 UNS N08825, allowing the cladding process on steel pipe surfaces to be performed flawlessly and making it suitable for high-performance applications in corrosive environments.
Analysis of Cut Size Paper Cutting Machine Performance Using Total Productive Maintenance Concept (Case Study: PT. RST) Mustafa, Rolandi; Susilawati, Anita; Mulyadi, Ismet Hari
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 68 No 2 (2024): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v68i2.365

Abstract

PT. RST, a leading paper factory in Indonesia, prioritizes timely production by optimizing productivity, efficiency, and paper quality. This study assesses the reliability of the Cut Size (CS) paper cutting machine, which is enhanced through the implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) as a management philosophy to ensure high-efficiency operations. To evaluate machine performance, Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) measurement is used. From data collected from January to September 2023, an analysis is conducted to improve the performance of the CS machine, which has not met its set target. The average OEE value of 70.9% falls short of the target of 72%. This research aims to improve the performance of the CS machine through the TPM approach, focusing on the Focused Maintenance pillar. Using tools such as Pareto diagram, why-why analysis, fishbone diagram, and the 5W1H method, several sources of problems causing the decrease in OEE value will be identified and addressed.
Numerical Analysis of Sedimentation in Open Channels Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Putra, Yoga Satria; Noviani, Evi; Hasanuddin, Hasanuddin; Kurnia, Elsa; Christy, Maria Citra Puella
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 68 No 2 (2024): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v68i2.366

Abstract

This study investigates sedimentation in open channels utilizing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The validation indicates a strong agreement between the simulation and the reference data. Flow velocity substantially decreases in the branched channel post-bifurcation. Similarly, at a 90o bend, there is a notable drop in flow velocity after the curve. A vortex forms in areas where the velocity decreases. Sedimentation prediction can be achieved by observing these velocity reductions in specific channel sections. In the branched channel, low velocities and localized water eddies are found after the bifurcation point. In a channel with a 90o bend, the velocity diminishes on the inner side of the curve, with vortices forming, acting as potential sediment traps. This study highlights the utility of CFD as an effective method for enhancing the understanding of sedimentation processes in river systems.
Potential Optimization of Industrial Waste as an Alternative Material for Composite Filler in Brake Pad Manufacturing – A Review Sativa, Oriza; Nawangsari, Putri
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- Vol 68 No 1 (2024): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
Publisher : International Society of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -scientists and engineers- (ISOMAse)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36842/jomase.v68i1.356

Abstract

This study investigates the sustainable utilization of fly ash, palm slag and Cement By-Pass Dust (CBPD) waste as alternative materials for environmentally friendly brake pad development. These waste materials, with compositions similar to Asbestos, historically used in brake pad composites, present an eco-conscious solution. Integrating industrial waste in brake pad production offers substantial environmental benefits, technological progress, and commercial advantages. The compaction value and particle size distribution significantly impact brake pad mechanical properties. Adjusting these factors is crucial for meeting desired mechanical property requirements. A large particle size distribution enhances material density and hardness poses challenges in maintaining performance stability at high temperatures despite good recovery values. This paper highlights the potential of waste materials for sustainable brake pad development and underscores the need for careful optimization for high-temperature stability.

Page 14 of 33 | Total Record : 329

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2013 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 69 No 3 (2025): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 69 No 2 (2025): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 69 No 1 (2025): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 68 No 3 (2024): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 68 No 2 (2024): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 68 No 1 (2024): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 67 No 3 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 67 No 2 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 67 No 1 (2023): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 66 No 3 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 66 No 2 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 66 No 1 (2022): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 65 No 3 (2021): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 65 No 2 (2021): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 65 No 1 (2021): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 64 No 3 (2020): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 64 No 2 (2020): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 64 No 1 (2020): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 63 No 3 (2019): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 63 No 2 (2019): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 63 No 1 (2019): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 62 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 61 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 60 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 59 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 58 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 57 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 56 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 55 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 54 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 53 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 52 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 51 No 1 (2018): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 50 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 49 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 48 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 47 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 46 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 45 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 44 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 43 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 42 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 41 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 40 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 39 No 1 (2017): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 38 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 37 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 36 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 35 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 34 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 33 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 32 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 31 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 30 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 29 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 28 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 27 No 1 (2016): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 26 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 25 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 24 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 23 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 22 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 21 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 20 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 19 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 18 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 17 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 16 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 15 No 1 (2015): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 14 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 13 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 12 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 11 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 10 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 9 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 8 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 7 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 6 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 5 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 4 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 3 No 1 (2014): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) Vol 1 No 1 (2013): Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse) More Issue